Lockheed Tristar Case Analysis

  • Uploaded by: karthikk09101990
  • 0
  • 0
  • February 2021
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Lockheed Tristar Case Analysis as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 816
  • Pages: 9
Loading documents preview...
Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar Rainbow Products Part A Cash Flow -35000

5000

Payback period IRR NPV Decision

5000

5000

5000

5000

5000

11.49% (Rs.945.68) NO

WACC

12%

WACC

12%

-35000 4500

Payback period IRR NPV Decision

Payback period IRR NPV Decision

5000

7 years

Part B Cash Flow Initial Yr 1 to infinity

Part C Cash Flow -35000

5000

7.78 years 12.86 % 2500 Yes

4000

4160

4326.4 4499.456 4679.434 4866.612 5061.276 5263.727

7.65 years 15.43 % 15000 Yes

5000

5000

5000

5000

5000

5474.276 5693.247 5920.977 6157.816 till infinity

5000

5000

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar

Add a new window Update existing equipment Build a new stand Rent a larger stand

Inv. -75000 -50000 -125000 -1000

CF yr 1 44000 23000 70000 12000

CF yr 2 44000 23000 70000 13000

a) IRR rule is misleading due to difference in size of investment. b) Using NPV rule, we recommend "Build a new stand". c) The difference in ranking is explained by the size of investment.

CF yr 3 44000 23000 70000 14000

IRR 34.6% 18.0% 31.2% 1207.6%

NPV@15% $25,462 $2,514 $34,826 $28,470

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar

Cash flows w/o subsidy A) IRR 25% Cost to city PV of Cost to city @20% B) 2-year Payback Cost to city PV of Cost to city @20% C) NPV 75000 @20% Cost to city PV of Cost to city @20% D) ARR 40% Cost to city PV of Cost to city @20%

CF 0 -1000000

CF1 371739

CF 2 371739

CF 3 371739

CF 4 371739

-877899

371739

371739

371739

371739

371739

628261

371739

371739

122101 122,101 -1000000

256522 178140 -887334

371739

371739

371739

371739

371739

371739

371739

684783

112666 112,666 -1000000

313044 150966

NPV subsidy option (C) is least costly to the city.

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar a) NPV of project = 210,000 - 110,000 = 100,000

Amount of new equity to be raised = 110,000 Suppose, N = no. of new shares to be issued P = final share price

and So, or,

N*P = 110,000 (10,000+N)*P = 1210,000 = total value of assets after the project (10,000+N)/N = 11 N = 1,000 P = $ 110

b) 1000 new shares to be issued @$110 c) The project increases the value of the stock of the existing shareholders by $10 (from $100 to $110)

Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tristar a) Prodn. Level = 210 units = 35 units per year for 6 years Prod. Cost = $14 mn per unit Sale price = $16 mn per unit Prodn Year t Inv Costs Rev 1967 0 -100 1968 1 -200 1969 2 -200 1970 3 -200 1971 4 -200 -490 1972 5 -490 1973 6 -490 1974 7 -490 1975 8 -490 1976 9 -490 1977 10 -490 Total -900 -3430 Accounting profit NPV @10% b) Prodn. Level = 300 units = 50 units per year for 6 years Prod. Cost = $12.5 mn per unit Sale price = $16 mn per unit Prodn Year t Inv Costs Rev 1967 0 -100 1968 1 -200 1969 2 -200 1970 3 -200 1971 4 -200 -625 1972 5 -625 1973 6 -625 1974 7 -625 1975 8 -625 1976 9 -625 1977 10 Total -900 -3750 Accounting profit NPV @10%

Cash Flow -100 -200 -200 -60 -550 70 70 70 70 -70 420 -480

140 140 560 560 560 560 420 420 3360 -480 (Rs.584)

Cash Flow

200 200 800 800 800 800 600 600 4800

-100 -200 -200 0 -625 175 175 175 175 -25 600 150

150 (Rs.274)

c) Prodn. Level = 400 units = 67 units per year for 5 years and 65 units in year 6 Prod. Cost = $11.75 mn per unit Sale price = $16 mn per unit Prodn Year t Inv Costs Rev Cash Flow 1967 0 -100 -100 1968 1 -200 -200 1969 2 -200 -200

1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977

3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Total

-200 -200

-900

-787 -787 -787 -787 -787 -764 -4700

Accounting profit NPV @10%

268 268 1072 1072 1072 1064 804 780 6400

68 -719.25 284.75 284.75 284.75 276.75 40.25 780 800

800 Rs.43

d) The decision to pursue the program was not sound. It affected the shareholder value adversely. e) Prodn. Level = 210 units = 35 units per year for 6 years Prod. Cost = $14 mn per unit Sale price = $16 mn per unit Govt. to bear the sunk cost of $700 mn till 1970. Prodn Year t Inv Costs Rev 1967 0 1968 1 1969 2 1970 3 1971 4 -200 -490 1972 5 -490 1973 6 -490 1974 7 -490 1975 8 -490 1976 9 -490 1977 10 -490 Total -200 -3430 Accounting profit NPV @10%

Cash Flow

140 140 560 560 560 560 420 420 3360 220 Rs.16

140 -550 70 70 70 70 -70 420 220

11.74627

Related Documents

Tristar Case Sol.
January 2021 1
Case Analysis
January 2021 1
Case Analysis
January 2021 1
Case Analysis
February 2021 1

More Documents from "Tony Joseph"