The Human Design, M Morgan

The Human Design An Introduction to the Design in Nature

Marcus David Morgan

Dedicated to my wonderful mother, Patricia (1928-2015)

Last Re-edited 2nd May 2015 Copyright M. D. Morgan 2011-2015 National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Author: Morgan, Marcus David, 1960Title: The human design – an introduction to the design in nature. ISBN: 9780646559605 (pbk.) Subjects: Human evolution. Human beings--Origin. Dewey Number: 128 or 576.82 1st Edition 2011, 2nd Edition 2012, 3rd Edition 2013, 4th Edition 2014, 5th Edition 2015 Published & Distributed by the Author. Free PDF download at http://thehumandesign.net subject to terms

Contents

Contents

1

1. Introduction

1 2 3 4

General Readership Humans in the Universe Design of our Anatomy Predetermined Anatomy

8

2. Environmental Adaptation

12 13

DNA & Chemicals Chemical Affinities

16

3. A Biosphere for Life

16 17 18 20 21 23 23 24 24 25

Quite Regular Planets Quite Regular Anatomies Cost-Benefit Analysis Active Chemicals Passive Chemicals Levity & Gravity Space & Time Cause & Effect Gravity & Levity Arcs Environmental Layers & Currents

27

5. The Design

30

Forms Delineate Substances

iii

Contents

iv

34

6. The Scheme of Existence

34 35 36 53

Definitions in Science Discreteness & Continuity Continual Physics Continual Biology

63

7. Modern Scientific Context

63 64 65 66

Isaac Newton Immanuel Kant Charles Darwin Albert Einstein

68

8. Organ Substructure

68 84 87 89 90 91 91 92

Blocks & Fields Involuntary & Voluntary Moves Thought Merely as “Integration” of Feelings Sexuality, Growth, & Awareness Cause, Effect, & Awareness Space, Time Complete Inversion as Sides of a Soup Spoon Twist in Block Merger & Twist in Field Accretion

93

9. Appendage Superstructure

101 103 107

Extra Levers & Springs to Keep Templates Intact Appendages Matching Organs Site Impetus favored across Levels

108

10. Facility of Neurons

115

Accretion for the Experience

Contents 117 118 122 126 128

Referral of Awareness by Brain to Sites Language as Syntax & Semantics Fidelity in a Cycle Shaped by a World From Recognition to Anticipation Plasticity in Site Processing by a Brain

133 11. Awareness in the World 133 135 136 136 138 140 140

Free Will, a Pure Idea Words in a World Maintaining Anticipation to favor a World Automatism & Health Freedom, Copying, & Niches Cause-Effect in a Niche Realities of Containment & Reasoning

147 12. The Design in Physics 147 162 165 160 170 171 172 173

Particles & Fields as Strings & Loops Spin as Rotation & Vibration in Physics & Anatomy Particle Distribution Field Distribution Distribution with Interaction Particle Interaction Field Interaction Constants & Variables

174 13. The Design in a Void 174 178 181 183 188

Right Handed Gravitons & Both Handed Photons Pure Isotropy Distorted Discrete Spaces & Times Dimensionality & Periodicity Strings & Loops, and Sexuality

v

Contents 192 14. Heat Loss in Physics & Biology 194 197

Heat & Homeostasis Concurrent & Recurrent Heat Loss

198 15. Ancient & Modern Ideas 198 201

Ancient & Modern Approaches Absolutely Continual & Relatively Discrete

203 16. Ideological Implications 203 204 205

Design & Designer Individual Human Value Consequences of Predetermination

208 17. Conclusion

vi

The Human Design

1

1. Introduction

I am a lawyer from Melbourne, Australia and I have been interested in human evolution since high school in the 1970’s, but only casually and not professionally. However, I have kept notes over four decades and compiled them gradually into this book explaining humans within nature. Hopefully, it will be of value to you, as it is completely new and original, and worth considering for its breadth and meaning. I avoid any jargon, and I present my ideas in plain language and very simply. I use geometrical diagrams rather than math equations. I deconstruct human existence within nature to its essential aspects, and combine all of them into a completely new theory, including a model for “awareness”, equated to consciousness. We are aware of ourselves by our thoughts and feelings, and aware of events in the world. I explain how humans may have evolved and may function under a Design, with awareness from a relation of our organs and appendages, and our brain. I consider the Design to be a reconciliation of the laws of nature, and that it does not need a designer. It would be a pattern to the laws of nature, and it does not include a designer as one of its features. Matter may not be created or destroyed, and the laws of nature are our starting point. The laws are selfconsistent and were not created. General Readership The style I use is personal and methodical. I use the first person throughout to explain my new theory, which is creative and requires working and reworking to emphasize and reinforce new ideas. You will understand the basic structure and message of my book, which is necessarily repetitive for full coverage. I may condense to 60 pages of my principles in future, but this book also deals with current theory to give

The Human Design

2

a complete assessment. I use only one Design to compare physics, chemistry, biology, and psychology. An aspect of the Design used for each of those four rigors for comparison, is action-reaction. I cover the work of Isaac Newton, Immanuel Kant, Charles Darwin, and Albert Einstein. If you are not familiar with basic facts or theories discussed here, any science encyclopedia will assist you. Non-technical words with regular meanings are used to explain technical issues, and a regular dictionary would also be useful. Technical words with specialized meanings have a capital letter, and are used as references in non-technical explanations. Words in inverted commas have a particular usage in a given context. I do not provide references in the style of an academic paper, and only rely on facts and theories that are very simple and well established. One can always misstate a fact or theory in error. Confirmation is easily found in encyclopedias, including Wikipedia. Humans in the Universe I explain human existence within the workings of nature in an unbroken thread. I consider the workings of nature by examining the particle forces of physics. Forces may be directly comparable to the human anatomy in h o w they are structured under the directions of the same Design. An identical match between the Design as a blueprint for our biological anatomies and the Design as an equation unifying physical particle forces may allow each of us to be aware of nature, including oneself within it, with great accuracy. Our Design enables us to measure and understand a world and our anatomical functions within it in the most appropriate ways for the world and oneself to be measured and understood. One knows oneself always in interface with a world, as an entity within the world, by experiences provided by our own moves while we use them to collect experiences provided by the world.

The Human Design

3

Human-types in a Biosphere are a Microcosm or mini universe, comparable to a universe as a Macrocosm, consistent with ancient philosophies. Human type anatomies with awareness may be central to evolution in the universe generally, and my work is Anthropocentric, meaning human-types would be clearly predetermined. I track an unbroken arrow of causation by action-reaction across all of nature for human evolution. Design of our Anatomy Neuroscientists probe the brain to determine which regions of it are responsible for states of awareness. My approach is to explain it by organ and appendage functions facilitated by a brain. The brain would not have evolved its neural networks alone by trial and error as to which connections between neurons are most beneficial for survival. Instead, our anatomy may have evolved an aligned anatomy with specific functions under the Design with neurons to function. Awareness is the peak product of organ and appendage functions using neurons as their facility for it. I define the specific features of our anatomy for relevance to producing awareness for the first time. I present the Design as a blueprint for our anatomy. The Design is simple, but it is not a standard anatomical chart with the usual labels for features. It is a new way of understanding all organ and appendage functions, according to their structure contributing to awareness. The Design in application to both the human anatomy and to the particle forces of physics is a Rosetta Stone, which provided a basis for the translation of Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs using Ancient Greek. The Design may define both their constituents, and by doing so across the extreme breadth of physics with chemistry, and biology with psychology, those constituents are explained in comparisons. Be persuaded rather than dissuaded by the incredible simplicity of my concepts and language compared to science in general. This is from invention & distillation, for your benefit.

The Human Design

3

Predetermined Anatomy I explain how the Design may apply to the universe generally within an overall Scheme for existence. If the Design applies to all of nature, then our anatomy may be the final product of evolution in the universe. Nature may evolve according to the Design across physics and then across biology. Evolutions are by heat loss after an “explosion” at a Big Bang, explained later, for atoms and compounds by more heat loss. A universe drives to economy after a Big Bang. In physics, the universe is in uniform expansion and evolves according to fundamental capacities of mass prescribed and reconciled by the Design. Particles and their fields would reconcile their capacities by the creation of a gravitationally “neutralized” universe in which they evolve cosmological structures to the extent of solar systems and Earth-type planetary surfaces for human-type evolution. Evolution of the entire universe, from a state of containment before a Big Bang event of expansion, may be led by the Design to inevitably evolve Earth-type planetary surfaces. In evolution of forces, the synthesis of the range of atoms on Earth is essential. Then anatomies evolve by biology in environmental landscapes of chemicals under an epicycle of Earth orbiting the Sun, and the Moon orbiting Earth, to shape landscapes. In biology, evolution by adaptation to an environment is necessary, but evolution may not be undirected. Structured layering of the chemical capacities of Earth’s surface may predetermine the structures of anatomies. It may be inevitable that anatomies will literally resemble their landscapes if DNA constructs them using the chemicals of the landscape. In my theory, DNA is not a “selfish replicator”. It is a replicator serving an environment that shapes it. Our landscape has a specific arrangement of layered compounds under an epicycle, from given “ affinities” between atoms to bond into those compounds under the epicycle. Those affinities also

The Human Design

5

allow atoms to bond into DNA and its mechanisms, to construct anatomies according to that layering. DNA has a formal digital sequence and accompanying mechanisms to construct phenotypes by proximate environmental chemicals. We are literal embodiments of our landscape. Some people speculate about Intelligent Design, as there appears to be more complexity to our anatomy than might be expected of undirected evolution. The complex structure of our anatomy suggests to some that an intelligent creator may have designed it. However, I say nature provides these features, and that there is no need for a designer. Around the first billion years after the formation of our planet four and a half billion years ago, DNA formed, and could replicate while enclosed within a membrane. DNA has basic mechanisms to replicate and express genes as phenotypes uniquely suited to environmental circumstances as they change, perhaps even within hours. Nature provides those capacities, together with environmental chemicals needed for DNA to construct the features of our anatomy. Missing pieces are inevitable but the process shows itself without them. We only need to structure knowledge properly, and add a few insights. Replication enables DNA to create new cells by encoding the formation of proteins using chemical segments that are sequenced for new cells. The proteins react with proximate chemicals to flexibly build the constituents of a cell. DNA may be encoded to knit together different expressions of proteins from the same fixed sequence of DNA, splicing DNA sequences to suit environmental circumstances as they change, for greater flexibility. We may re-sequence DNA by Epigenetics to flexibly suit environments. RNA may play an important part in the flexibility of DNA expressions, and perhaps also its mutations. Chemical bonding is by affinities that are not well understood, and mutations may be primed by Epigenetics rather than being “random”, later. The proximate chemicals used by DNA and its proteins to construct new

The Human Design

6

cells are those of the environment. DNA may use chemicals in the most economical possible way when constructing cells. Our anatomy may correspond to exact layering of chemicals in the environment, suggesting a purpose of Earth-type planets to evolve our type of anatomy. Charles Darwin’s Natural Selection is not scientific to the extent of being predictive, which is a weakness. In it, mutations are supposedly random, and novelties that survive will do so with novelty, even if we have a record of forms that survived in the past. It does not have a handle on the mutations or the environment for prediction. However, changing the idea of adaptation to direct use of chemical capacities for embodiments of landscapes makes it predictable. Embodiments may be functional, if mutations are prolific and economical enough to form them over time. There is an area of science that purports to deal with the “Evolvability” of life. DNA has mechanisms to replicate and express genes by affecting chemicals in its vicinity, including RNA and enzymes. Variety is enabled by those mechanisms, extending into Recombination in sexed species explained later. Scientists miss the point entirely. DNA and its mechanisms use non-living chemical capacities of an environment to construct anatomies. “Evolvability” depends upon what functional cells in an environment DNA can build using environmental chemicals in the first place. Mutational variety is extremely useful, but it is not the point at all. The ignorance of science in this area is astounding, with endless labels for anatomy. We have loose environmental narratives as to “why it is so”, simply because there are mechanisms for random sorting for variety based on random mutations for our DNA sequence. That is a weak basis for evolution, given that we have layered capacities ready to be engineered by DNA for anatomies in the first place. Later, on page 206, I note there are many Convergent species “types”. Dogs, cats, bears and other types

The Human Design

7

evolve separately despite the supposed sequential randomness of mutation. Biologists’ non-answer for abundant “coincidences” is “nature prefers certain types”. Math by Population Genetics is irrelevant to whether a specific “random” mutation happens, even based on workable success. Selection is irrelevant, as it is just success at a workable level of life that got there “randomly” for a specific sequence, to perhaps go further “randomly” to humans. In the next chapter, I explain our embodiment of landscapes in more detail. My inspiration was from a locally made picture book I got when I was a child. The layering of chemical elements under an epicycle used by DNA to build anatomies is straightforward. You will grasp it by the time our anatomy is detailed in chapters 8 & 9, but if you turn to diagrams briefly, you can see the simplicity to our anatomy. Science has not seen what you can simply see here, and that continues through physics, chemistry, psychology, and methodology to an equal degree to their supposed pillars. Just as I have identified and will shortly explain the ignorance of biology around its supposed pillar, I do so to the pillars of the remaining fundamental rigors in this compendium. I would be briefer, but my ideas are new and original, and the same basic principles apply in different ways for comparison and contrast throughout. I also have to deal with science as you currently know it, which is misguided.

The Human Design

8

2. Environmental Adaptation

I will now draw a line to separate our anatomy and the world around us. On one side of the line may be a landscape of rivers, lakes, hills, and valleys. Our anatomy has evolved from a single microscopic cell within a landscape. We have evolved over several billion years by adaptation. This means all our systems, senses, and appendages need to be suited to our environment and maintained by our environment. Usually, adaptation is understood by looking at what has already survived. We can find correlations to environmental conditions to which it may have adapted. However, I consider preexisting chemical layers and construct creatures based upon how they may be used to construct anatomies. Never spout narratives that a species has its features because it is environmentally Selected, working with what looks successful to the narrator. That is the work of an inventive artist, not a scientist. You start at lower levels of chemistry and physics, not up to a Selection filter by a mantra “if it works, that is why it evolved”. That is so shallow, it is ridiculous to rely on it. Population Genetics is shallow math from random mutation or duplication, for random shuffling. As with most of science explored here, it is so inadequate as an explanation as to be a sad joke. In fact, DNA engineers chemicals to be anatomies in environments. Chemicals stand between DNA and Selection. They are in pre-existing layers as constituents for engineering by DNA. I do not simply put endlessly labeled anatomical parts on a savannah to explain them by “narratives” around a 100% blind, purely accidental, mutation of our three billion sequence. Our anatomies are constructed using the chemicals of our environment, and this has been overlooked by science to date. I will show our anatomy may be a perfect embodiment of chemicals at Earth’s surface. My removal of biology’s pillar is probably the most obvious original idea ever presented, sadly.

The Human Design

9

Diagram 1, Head & Body Structures (from above) Left Mineral Loose Tongue

Gas Lifting Lungs

Liquid Flowing Heart

Solid Light Nose

Back

Front

Spine Mineral Tightening

Eye Gas Pocket

Ear Liquid Well

Gut Solid Heavy Right

Merged across both sides

Adjoined on each side

We literally resemble the environment, with chemicals formed by DNA into anatomies, as previewed in Diagram 1, in a view of our head and body from above. As a child I had a picture book of landscapes of people, with hills for bodies, lakes and clouds for heads, or rivers for arms. More entertaining than Darwin’s finches. Diagram 1 has its own reference points as chemical constituents engineered for functions by DNA. Consider pre-existing chemicals for DNA to shape into anatomies, then DNA shaping of chemical functions, and then Selection narratives about their continuation. Narratives are “just so” stories. 100% blind mutation is proposed with no long term specific observation, as the theory itself is very recent.

The Human Design

10

Diagram 2, Layered Chemicals on Earth’s Surface External Mineral Loose Tongue

Gas Lifting Lungs

Liquid Flowing Heart

Solid Light Nose

Horizon

Spine Mineral Tightening

Eye Gas Pocket

Ear Liquid Well

Gut Solid Heavy Internal

Anatomists' reductive constituents ignore basic non-living chemical structures. In chapter 8, I place biology on a secure footing and show anatomy is nothing more than pure economy eked out by particles and fields across split seconds continually over eons. Evolution is not an easy task. We evolved as part of an environment that loses heat. Nature builds up to wind down after a Big Bang, and Earth has life within environments to wind down by storing “heat” in plants from the Sun, and releasing it in mammals and birds that have their own warm chemical activity under a Sun, more than a plant. Evolution drives to economize compounds into stable lower energy orbitals in overall heat loss by an environment in which life is completely immersed.

The Human Design

11

DNA has preexisting layers with which to construct anatomies once DNA has mutated. A functional anatomical form that economically accords to layers of chemicals on a planetary surface may be inevitable, given time. Non-living chemical capacities are from integration of chemicals on Earth’s surface with four planetary conditions by Earth’s epicycle. The epicycle is the overlap between the orbits of the Moon around Earth, and Earth around the Sun. The conditions are Earth’s gravity attracting towards its center, Earth’s spin creating electromagnetic effects, the Moon’s drag upon the surface, and sunshine. Surface chemicals interact with the epicycle to shape the features of the landscape. DNA & Chemicals Evolution is based fundamentally on the capacities of DNA, which is found in the nucleus of cells. DNA is a strand of chemicals with a digital form. DNA is a macromolecule in a strand with a sequential binary form. DNA has contact with chemicals in its immediate proximity. Interacting with those chemicals, it constructs our cells using its mechanisms for replication and gene expression. DNA constructs according to the directions of its sequential code for the assembly of amino acids to build our cells. The chemicals of an environment used by DNA for the construction of anatomies are directed and fashioned by DNA using its encoded proteins. Chemicals are specifically selected for exact functions when formed into the cells and other constituents of our anatomies according to the directions of the DNA code. DNA encodes to construct an anatomy that reproduces, as well as constructing one that is adaptive to the environment. Given that an individual survives and reproduces, DNA can be passed on, complete with variations. Another generation of individuals then grows to manipulate specific proximate chemicals into an exact anatomy. Coding for its own perpetuation by growing anatomies that can reproduce,

The Human Design

12

individuals mutate gradually over generations to build new types of cells. DNA formed with sufficient coding capacity to maintain a single microscopic cell. It then grew and changed by extending its coding by replication with mutation via reproduction. Proximity of chemicals in environments to permeate the cell membrane to follow directions of DNA is essential. DNA mutations are shaped by environmental chemical availabilities around a cell in my model. Chemical Affinities Feedback from the environment creating mutations is controversial. The traditional view known as the Central Dogma, is that DNA mutates and its encoded proteins build using available chemicals, rather than those chemicals building proteins that become encoded in DNA as mutations. Biological mutations supposedly go from DNA to functions, rather than from functions to DNA. However, underpinning that view, there are chemical affinities that favor the formation of every specific compound of atoms. The affinities are as given by nature and capacities of atoms set out in the Periodic Table of Elements, which are not fully understood. There are huge gaps in knowledge about chemicals and their potentials. Chemistry cannot predict how the same protons, electrons, and neutrons combine in so many ways. A whole is exactly the sum of its parts unseparated, but Emergence Theories say wholes have parts that can be analyzed or compared. By definition, they cannot. This is a basic self-contradiction, which applies also to Godel’s First Incompleteness Theorem and Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. I obviate them on pages 142-144 using proper logic. In fact, the same particles change markedly as different atoms, and are only known in retrospect by a compendium from observations as they play out on Earth. Science knows little about chemistry. It is all preset potential to neutrons decaying in a void at Escape Velocity at a Big Bang. It ekes out its preset potential by evolution, and nothing ever

The Human Design

13

Emerges, which is an ass of a concept. Everything maximizes economy by a preset potential, as will be explained. Just track back and see the facts unfold to logical patterns. My model is based on clear affinities between atoms to allow them to bond into every compound that exists. Affinities are “non-random” by definition. Mutation is as subject to affinities as DNA itself or any compound. The explanation is tied to heat loss by “organism” and “environment” in “Homeostasis” all the way to replications, and increasing that continually by mutation. Plants are immobile and use heat from the Sun (and Earth) to bond as cells into more economical and stable atomic orbitals. Animals are mobile, and humans have high temperature with more heat loss by bonding, with less direct usage. Mutation for economical convection is unlikely to be “random”, but I do not separate organism and environment, as this is overall heat loss, storing it in plants and releasing it in animals as one system. Heat is lost at a Big Bang to then store as atoms by supernovae, to then store and release on Earth organically all across its surface, creeping, crawling. Mutations build effectively upon successful previous mutations, and even if entirely “random”, they work by predetermined chemical layers and we still have the most comprehensive structure on Earth. However, there is no clear work on all the mutations to make humans from amoeba, randomly upon success. Fred Hoyle’s Assembly of a 747 airplane in a Whirlwind remains very real, even though he goes straight to it rather than meandering. Hoyle applies even though mutations are Selected in individuals, meandering over eons. The point is random sequencing. A whirlwind also builds piece on piece randomly sequentially, and an airplane is “workable” before “completion”. The gap of humans to precursors is as great. Despite disdain for narcissism, human awareness is so far above other species, apes just taxi on runways. Science ignores the unlikelihood of random sequential change and uses foolish reasons like “Selection” to reject Hoyle.

The Human Design

14

There are three billion DNA Base Pair nucleotides specifically, but flexibly, sequenced to make a human. We may mutate changes to as few as 30 to 100 Base Pairs in a lifetime, supposedly randomly along the three billion sequence. Base Pair Mutations are accompanied by deletions and insertions of accumulated sections of DNA. 70% of mutations are deleterious and most of the rest are neutral. Nature builds a high mutation barrier, with a low estimate of several per billion beneficial. Supposedly we accumulated a specific three billion DNA beneficial sequence by chance from such mutations, albeit in three billion years not a whirlwind. I note an amoeba has more Base Pairs than a human, and if we evolved from such cells, deletions would be a fundamental process. Biology has not done the math on the likelihood of random sequencing to make humans, or for Convergent types generally. They prefer “random” Population Genetics as a circular sidetrack. The first but by no means the last step to solve this issue is in Epigenetics by environmentally induced flexibility to expression of fixed sequences in individuals extending into generations. They might settle as a n actual mutation to the DNA, or at least enable a mutated individual in a population with the same changes in temporary form to stay within it to pass on a mutation. Epigenetics shows that DNA expression in individuals may be flexible enough to adapt without the DNA mutating. Populations might be primed to spread mutations if they arise, and cells may work at a threshold of arising. This would mean Fred Hoyle fades, as each stage of success is primed in various directions and not blind, later in chapter 14. Over-simplification of evolution and mutation by Darwin stifles progress in science. Later, I also explain errors by Einstein, Newton, and Kant. Complexities of affinities may result from all atoms being created to a specific pattern in nature. Chemical affinities may have a predetermined purpose of our type of evolution on Earth-type planets. Next, I explore basics for the inevitability of earth type planets and human types.

The Human Design

15

3. A Biosphere for Life We have comprehensive awareness, and if it happens to be from an embodiment of specifically layered gasses, liquids, minerals, and solids of our landscape, there may be a conspiracy at work. In this case, there may be a conspiracy in the laws of nature. The conspiracy in nature may extend beyond our planet. It is possible, if not likely, that the laws of nature conspire to evolve Earth-type planets for human-type anatomies to evolve. In that process, the creation of a Biosphere of chemical elements and their combination into the layered chemical compounds of our landscape are essential. Earth is in a solar system that has abundances of chemical elements in the approximate proportions in which they are found in our galaxy and the universe generally. However, within our regular solar system, Earth has its own specific proportions, which might be considered regular if such inner planets laden with heavier elements can be expected to be of that composition. I will consider the combined role of atoms on Earth's surface and the epicycle around them to the shaping of our landscapes for the evolution of life. As noted, they would combine as one system. The Sun, Moon, attraction of Earth, and spin of Earth are essential to shaping atoms into layered compounds of gasses, liquids, minerals, and solids. The combination of atoms and epicycle are perfectly harmonious, adding to likelihood of predetermination if DNA and supporting chemicals become harbored by a membrane. A planetary surface with a range of elements in approximate proportions created in supernovae, as in Earth’s mantle, provides DNA with chemicals to build human types. It supports DNA by enveloping. It works continually around DNA by microseconds across eons to rigid laws cycling chemicals on that landscape. It shapes DNA in tiny bursts across one huge

The Human Design

16

burst of evolution for any life that winds, creeps, or crawls across it. Three billion years helps, but that is a natural cosmological time scale. The human type is on a scale midway between an atom and a solar system, and both huge and tiny cosmological time scales apply to gradual mutation of DNA for the evolution of a completed embodiment. Quite Regular Planets Upon Earth’s surface, there will be variations in abundances as chemicals accumulate as a Biosphere with a structured landscape for evolution. The most abundant elements by total mass in the universe, our galaxy, and our solar system, are found in stars, which comprise 74 % hydrogen and 24% helium. Our solar system has 1% oxygen and 0.5% carbon, but in Earth’s total composition, oxygen is 30%, hydrogen is 0.03%, helium is rare and carbon is 0.07%. Oxygen rates are aided by photosynthesis on earth. Big Bang Nucleosynthesis nearly fourteen billion years ago ensured abundant hydrogen and helium. Stars could not have formed the remaining elements of nature without their abundances. Likewise, our planet of heavy elements would not have evolved without a solar system of different overall composition from our planet, with the Sun having 99.8% of mass. Supernovae make heavier elements of nature and explode to disperse them as rotating clouds. In Wikipedia under Chemical Elements, “Abundance of elements in Earth's crust differs from those in the universe, but the composition of Earth's mantle, which has more magnesium and iron in place of aluminum, more closely mirrors that of the universe, save for the noted loss of volatile elements, as a result of solar heating in the early formation of the solar system”. We are 65% oxygen and 0.5% iron, and Earth’s abundance of oxygen is 30% and iron is 32%. We are 18% carbon and 10% hydrogen, while Earth has 0.07% and 0.03% in total.

The Human Design

17

Helium is in traces in anatomy, and on Earth. Variation across Earth’s entire structure allows specific elements to concentrate in a Biosphere to support life mostly between 500 meters below the oceans’ surface and six kilometers above it. The atoms o f the Periodic Table of Elements combine as compounds to provide the features of our landscape and our anatomy. Quite Regular Anatomies Chemicals do not have a one-to-one correspondence between the universe and humans. T hey lay different foundations of abundances as they refine to the combination found in our Biosphere, and they have continuing relevance to it as an epicycle. It might seem costly to have a sun with us as its purpose. However, many stars would exist to no great purpose with no life around them. The purposes of the Sun, Earth's spin and attraction, and the orbit of the Moon, may be our type of evolution and continuation. I am not concerned that we have not reproduced the conditions for a sliver of DNA enclosed in a membrane with supporting chemicals to form from a chemical soup, to replicate. Look next to where Earth’s mantle breaks its crust, given failure so far in labs. Missing pieces are a reality, but reality presents itself in their absence. Easily overlooked features of our Biosphere contributing to the layering of the chemical elements are gravitational and electromagnetic arcs created by Earth-Moon and Sun-Earth rotations respectively. Our distance from the Sun, and a large influential Moon, are features in the formation of arcs that produce a temperate environment. The charge from Earth’s surface by spin resolves as a surface with temperate radiation. Our surface is calm by a specific balance of electromagnetic and gravitational arcs within an epicycle. In the next chapter, I will set out the influences of the epicycle across our surface for annual, monthly, and daily cycles of chemical activity continually shaping other chemical activity, to release heat.

The Human Design

18

Later, the simple driver of evolution is pure economy of energy, evident in heat loss. After a Big Bang with heat loss, heat is stored as bigger atoms created in supernovae, but there is heat loss in that process. Then the atoms compound dynamically in stars for heat loss, and also as planets, far less dynamically, when atoms compound and lose heat. Earth’s surface has heat from the Sun, and also from below. On Earth, atoms compound under a Sun to both store heat driving plant cell creation, and release it in mammals, birds, and other life with mechanical motion. I use the word Homeostasis for heat balance of cells and environment, trying not to separate life and environment. It is all heat loss on Earth by storage and release using cells, in an overall drive to build heat in supernovae in order to lose it gradually via living cells on planetary surfaces as atoms bind into stable lower energy orbitals, compounding. Cost-Benefit Analysis Considering the effort of refining evolution down to its ultimate expression on Earth-type planets, our evolution in the universe may b e costly, but our anatomy and its awareness from cosmological and biological evolution of basic chemicals is a considerable beneficial outcome. There may be millions of evolutions of human types. The universe is gigantic, if you think that is interesting. Our planet is interesting and diverse in landscapes and life, which are failing. There is in fact genuine purpose here, and gigantic lifeless events that dominate the universe by size can be seen for what they are. They are just blobs compared to life in landscapes. Disparate “oxygen thieves” dominate the media, including speculative cosmology with zero relevance to human affairs. But, there is no need for something to design what has always existed. Particle forces under the Design may have always existed with capacities to change from a contracted state at the Big Bang to an evolving universe. We can turn to nature and the chemical constituents of nature for our evolution and our awareness.

The Human Design

19

4. Layered Chemicals

I will now begin to construct the Design for the human anatomy and explain it by the gradual introduction of new concepts. First, I will introduce various capacities that may make up the structure of our anatomy from chemicals of our landscape. I will define the capacities more fully in the following chapter. Active Chemicals For our materials to construct the Design, I will use eight categories of chemicals layered on Earth’s surface mentioned earlier. I will begin with four categories of the chemicals in active states showing their “energies”. External at the surface are gasses warmly lifting and liquids tidally flowing, and internal at the surface are minerals tightly shifting and solids heavily compacting. The chemicals are compounds of elements, and they are clearly recognizable on Earth's surface. We sometimes study these four active categories in junior school. Shortly, I will discuss the relevance of the epicycle of the combined orbit of Earth around the Sun with the Moon around Earth, and how it determines the layering of chemicals on Earth’s surface. Diagram 3 includes a preview of the organs that are the basis for the systems of our bodies. Our anatomy is cellular and two-thirds water. We have bones supporting our structure, muscles manipulating the bones, and skin upon muscles all across our anatomy, but our organs and appendages are chemically diverse across those shared features. Later, I will distinguish between our organ substructure from gross chemicals, and appendage superstructure from chemical traces across gross aggregates.

The Human Design

20

Diagram 3, Active Chemicals External (Left) Gas Lifting (Lungs) Liquid Flowing (Heart) (Back)

Horizon

(Front)

(Spine) Mineral Tightening (Gut) Solid Heavy (Right) Internal

Passive Chemicals I will double the number of categories. There is also a resting state, for their passive “sensitivities”. External to the surface are minerals loosened in pools, and solids settling as dust; and internal to the surface are gasses contained in pockets, and liquids sunken in drains. Passive chemicals would not move as they do in their active states. In passive states, they also have alternative positions in the landscape, higher or lower than active positions. Later, I explain our anatomy is formed by gas bubbles (eye & alveoli) and liquid canals (cochlea & heart) stretching; solid piles (nose & gut) and mineral seams (spine & tongue) stacking. I include all muscles to stretch and all receptors-effectors to stack, later.

The Human Design

21

Diagram 4, Passive Chemicals External (Left) Mineral Floating (Tongue) Solid Light (Nose) (Back)

Horizon

(Front) (Eye) Gas Pocket

(Ear) Liquid Well (Right) Internal

Minerals may spread like salt in water rather than tightly polarizing; lighter solids as dust may drift rather than compacting heavily in the ground; gasses may be contained in pressurized pockets rather than rising lightly; and liquids may settle when sinking rather than flowing. I propose a relation that allows passive suspension, for floating minerals suspended in liquids, drifting solids suspended in gasses, contained gasses suspended in solid pockets, and sinking liquids suspended in minerals. Head is suspended above body. Later, I explain this as Electrostatics across a head, between “mixed” levity conductors and gravity insulators. It houses an Electrostatic brain of neurons, comprised of equal nerve conduction and hormone insulation. A body is Electrodynamic by “pure” chemicals to move by neurons at a spine and gut in particular.

The Human Design

22

Levity & Gravity Two chemicals aggregate with more electromagnetic charge and may tend to rise with levity from agitation and heat, as do gasses and minerals. Two chemicals aggregate with more gravitational mass and may tend to fall with gravity from weight, as do liquids and solids. Rising levity capacities would position chemicals higher than falling gravity capacities, whether the chemicals have an external or internal position in the landscape. Gasses and minerals share charge and tend to rise with levity against gravity. Liquids and solids tend to fall evenly by weight from gravity without levity. This is a comparative statement, as electromagnetism and gravitation combine universally. Space & Time Two chemicals make temporal waves with compressing peaks and decompressing troughs, as in the gravitational waves of liquids and the electromagnetic waves of minerals. A temporal wave shows rhythm in its peaks (up) and troughs (down). I will explain shortly chemicals in the Design peak as tightening minerals and flowing liquids, and trough as loose minerals and liquid sinks. Two chemicals have spatial capacities that expand and contract under gravitational and electromagnetic forces, as solids and gasses respectively. They may contract (in), and expand (out). I will explain chemicals in the Design expand as lifting gasses and heavy solids, and contract as contained gasses and light solids. A wider definition of a wave may combine temporal and spatial aspects. A wave can have a high temporal peak and low trough, with a spatially expanding wave front and contracting wave crest. Later, in Diagram 13, our anatomy may resemble a water wave, with watery cells in general locomotion as a wave. It will be obvious from that diagram that we have a peak above a front

The Human Design

23

and behind a trough with a crest above it, in structure and movement. In physics, particles move in periodic waves and spatial pathways, and are also described as having coexisting aspects. Cause & Effect I will adjust my terms by replacing the words “internal” and “external” with “cause” and “effect”, respectively, to recognize chemicals as Earth-based and cause, or celestial and effect, for gravity or levity. Internal chemicals have Earth-based influences, and may be causal on Earth’s surface, while external chemicals may take the effects of the celestial Moon and Sun. The intact levity or gravity groupings of chemicals are grouped or divided into internal consistencies and external consistencies. Gravity & Levity Arcs An epicycle of two orbits is from an Earth type planet orbiting a star like the Sun, and a Moon like ours orbiting the planet. The orbits are created by gravitational attraction, but Earth’s orbit of the Sun has levity, and the Moon’s orbit of Earth has gravity. Meanwhile, chemicals compound by electromagnetic attraction on Earth under that epicycle, but, like gravitational orbits, this equally provides for levity & gravity chemistry compounding. Distinguishing gravitation for arcs and electromagnetism for compounds is important. It is explained later as nature mutually partitioned by the two forces. Each arc is external (celestial) & internal (Earth-based). External are the Sun’s warmth and the Moon’s drag. Internal are Earth’s spin and attraction. Internal chemicals are Earthbased, and causally securely rise by levity or fall by gravity below a horizon. Effected chemicals are exposed above to the Sun’s radiation downwards to rise above as levity, or a Moon’s pull upwards to fall from above as gravity.

The Human Design

24

Diagram 5, Orbits and Arcs (1) Electromagnetic Arc

Sunshine

Arc

Earth’s Spin (2) Gravitational Arc Moon’s Drag

Arc

Earth’s Pull

The arcs stretch and stack levity or gravity compounds, by forces below & above. Later, levity & gravity organs are embedded at locations. Causal are secure below, and effected exposed above. Eight organs rise or fall, and each moves asymmetrically up & down across levels and left & right across sides. Keep each organ dangling up by levity or down by gravity in Diagram 6. Now rotate the Design to be flat above a surface in Diagram 1, merged left & right, but keep “organs” up & down from Diagram 6, delicately, like hanging “mobiles” from a star shaped grid, made in any junior school.

The Human Design

25

Diagram 6, Arcs (as Triangles) on Earth’s Surface Celestial Effects Sunshine Mineral Loose

Gas Lift

Tongue

Lungs Moon’s Drag

Liquid Flow

Solid Light

Heart

Nose Horizon

Spine

Eye

Mineral Tight

Gas Pocket Earth’s Spin

Ear

Gut

Liquid Well

Solid Heavy Earth’s Pull

Earth-Based Causes

Environmental Layers & Currents Chemicals lift, lighten, compact, contain, sink, tighten, flow, and loosen, with the cycles of the Moon around Earth and Earth around the Sun, in daily, monthly, and yearly cycles. Atoms have neutral charge, but as chemical compounds in gravitational layers, they would have electromagnetic current running through them in their movements. As noted, these

The Human Design

26

descriptions reflect anatomical features. Gravitational layers and their electromagnetic currents are concentrated, for every cell of our anatomy. All cells are in turn facilitated by neuron cells among them, in layered neural channels with extreme current accreting to settle hormones, for precisely layered site functions. Humans are embodiments of landscapes. Neuron cells are an intact facility to enable diverse anatomical cells to function with an intact comprehensive awareness, later. An epicycle has gravitational concentrations at surfaces of “masses” around neutrality at centers, for arcs. Atoms have electromagnetically “charged” neutrality at surfaces around concentration at centers, for compounds. A massive sphere in a void has a concentrated surface around a neutral center. A neutron in a void has concentrated charge within a neutral surface. I explain later, we are compounds under arcs, and we reconcile those forces in physics. We reconcile them as a final product, by equal contributions of those forces, by a human anatomy that is on a scale exactly between an atom and a solar system. We are also an intact representation, because basic compounds under arcs rely on basic principles of forces, to the extent they shape a basic representation. A surface above the horizon concentrates mass and neutralizes charge, and a center below concentrates charge and neutralizes mass. Gravitation is “mass”, and electromagnetism is “charge”. In my model, all mass is made of “graviton” strings, and this includes “photons”. Charge has mass, as it is made of mass, and it gets momentum from it. However, a photon is a limit to a graviton. Gravitons interact with photons proportionally as masses, but photons also have electromagnetic interactions, and gravitons also have gravitational interactions. Photons may have been created by graviton compression in extreme gravitation at a Big Bang explosion. Gravitation surrounds electromagnetism proportionally and allows for it completely. Electromagnetism reduces to angles to gravitational momentum, as Angular Momentum. I refer to the Big Bang as an “explosion”, shortly.

The Human Design

27

5. The Design

This chapter presents the Design in a reconciliation of the chemical capacities of gasses, liquids, minerals, and solids. Terms for capacities so far should be reasonably familiar, but in their reconciliation I use concepts of “substance” and “form” in a strict geometrical Design. Diagram 7 shows the capacities of the eight states of the four chemicals in their layers on Earth’s surface. They are arranged naturally into layers as active or passive, levity or gravity, space or time, and cause or effect. Thanks to the strictness of every line in the Design delineating relations, explained throughout, there can be no smudges, and no magic at all, just distinct rules.

Diagram 7, All Chemicals’ Capacities Effect Mineral Loose Passive, Levity

Gas Lift Active, Levity

Liquid Flow Active, Gravity

Solid Light Passive, Gravity

Time

Space

Mineral Tight Active, Levity

Gas Contained Passive, Levity

Liquid Sink Passive, Gravity

Solid Heavy Active, Gravity Cause

The Human Design

28

Diagram 8, The Design Effect (You) (Decompression To You)

(Compression From You) Time (When)

Space (Where) (Compression To Me)

(Decompression From Me) Cause (Me)

Electromagnetism . Gravitation (To) (From)

Rest Mass (Stop)

Energy (Go)

The Human Design

29

Diagram 8 has arrows for levity rising or gravity falling at set locations. Chemicals are compressed or decompressed around a horizontal center line, intact as levity or gravity. Organ rises or falls by arrows embed them at set locations above or below the horizon in relation to each other. Dealing with the single arrows in Diagrams 6 & 8 for now, they also indicate whether a relevant decompression or compression capacity is spatially or temporally decompressing or compressing. Chemicals compress as a temporal peak or a spatial contraction, and decompress as a temporal trough or a spatial expansion. Spatial solids and gasses compress in contraction as contained gasses and light solids, and decompress in expansion as lifting gasses and heavy solids. Temporal minerals and liquids compress in peaking as tightening minerals and flowing liquids, and decompress as troughs of loosening minerals and sinking liquids. Axes in the Design divide formal space, time, cause, and effect capacities. In the Design, the properties are in regions either side of each axis that divides them. Within their regions, they compress and decompress as space or time, and as cause or effect. Levity, gravity, active, and passive capacities are divided into enclosed substantive triangles. There are two chemicals at the base and two chemicals at the point of each triangle, and they decompress or compress. They are delineated by formal regions of the axes, as decompressing or compressing in space, time, cause or effect. The Design also applies to forces. Active, passive, levity, & gravity capacities are energetic, resting, electromagnetic, & gravitational masses respectively. In chapters 12 & 13, the Design reconciles particles with measurable substantive capacities within a framework of space, time, cause, and effect units. In chapters 8 & 9, our anatomy uses axes and triangles of the Design as a substantive rest, energy, gravity & levity anatomy formally delineated by space, time, cause, and effect capacities. The layout of our organs and their chemical

The Human Design

30

capacities will be quite evident then. We have comprehensive anatomical structure, to know the world and ourselves within it. In chapters 10 & 11, I explain how neurons are a facility for our formally delineated substantive anatomy to be aware of its functional interfaces with a world, fully preserved in processing by a brain after neural capture of vision, sound, touch, and so on, for fidelity to interfaces. A brain does nothing but preserve functional site interfaces by diverse intricate cell functions, to integrate and finalize them for one awareness, as “thoughts about feelings”. We rely on capacities of organs and appendages, processed by neurons as a faithful facility, for essential concepts of space, time, cause and effect. They “frame” existence itself, across its most essential “facts”. Neurons finalize inputs to the brain from all sites of function for the experience to arise. It would not be by an independent “little man” Homunculus in a brain. Our diverse neural inputs from site are “processed” in a brain for experience of hormonal feelings of sites, with vision, for example, preserved as diverse hormonal components of line, shade, color, and so on by receptors. Neurons integrate components by shared network commonalities (commons), for nervous thoughts. Anatomy and its neurons are equally hormonal mass & nervous charge. I simplify terms to “feelings” by hormone preserves, and “thoughts” by nerve networks, for thoughts about feelings. Hormones are integrated by nerves for networked thoughts “about” preserved feelings, which neurons integrate for an experience combining them. Forms Delineate Substances Note that space, time, cause, and effect are states of “form” delineating active, passive, levity, and gravity “substance”. Space & time discretely delineate distributive active & passive capacities. Cause & effect discr et ely delineate interactive levity & gravity capacities. Disregard ideas from ancient philosophy you may have about “substances”, “forms”,

The Human Design

31

and essences”. Consider substance & form afresh in my book. All of nature, living or not, is comprised of substances delineated by their forms. Space & time delineate substantive active, a large space in a short time, and passive, a small space in a long time, motions. Compression is smaller space & shorter time. Decompression is larger space & longer time. Active & passive states have motions & positions that are measurable in space & time units. As particles, the motions & positions of resting protons & energetic electrons are measurable in space & time units, as is the momentum of their field exchanges in relation to those particle, using a void. They are pivots & orbits as atoms using fields, which compound into pivots & orbits as solar systems using fields. In anatomy, active & passive are spatial & temporal, for innate awareness of motions and positions by a head & body and their appendage exchanges in relation to them, using a world. Electrons & protons use a void for their intact distributions and interactions, and a human head and body use a world likewise. Cause & effect delineate interactions by exchanges of electromagnetism, by taking as cause, and giving as effect. Gravitation gives as cause, and takes as effect. Exchange is by compressions to take, and decompressions to give, for both particles & anatomies. The Design provides both these capacities for resting & energetic parties to an interaction, for exchanges of fields between them. Effects follow causes. In the Design, charge orients to compress causally, and mass to decompress causally. Electromagnetism causes compressions to make atoms, and gravitation causes decompressions to make solar systems. Each party to an interaction would be both cause & effect around the equal & opposite relation of an action & reaction by charge or mass. Resting protons & energetic electrons are both electromagnetic and gravitational, and they have equal & opposite exchanges of electromagnetic fields for atoms. Each is a l s o cause & effect as intact atoms bound by gr avitat ion as int act solar systems.

The Human Design

32

They are also equal & opposite capacities for interaction between a passive head & active body that both have levity & gravity, and they exchange levity & gravity appendage movements. Mass obeys its rules, and charge goes its way with its rules, but they are mutual, shortly. This stretches the rules for mass to alternative extremes, for angles to mass intact as atoms by rules for both but tending to charged angles, within angles to mass intact as solar systems by rules for both but tending to massive momentum. Decaying neutrons evolve into every intact atom using a void. This is beyond prediction from “the neutron”, so science invents obfuscations like Emergence to cover their ignorance. A human head & body are likewise intact, and they use appendages in a world to function while combining with other humans. A world is interposed in anatomical functions to the same extent as a void is to atoms. A proton & electron using their fields are the equal of a human head & body using appendages. At root, “photons” and “gravitons” create neutrons to decay into protons & electrons. Later, a photon has potential to create neutrons, protons, and electrons using graviton compression, and then a full Periodic Table. Distribution & interaction are inverted, meaning more of one has less of the other. I use “compression” to stand for the inverted relation of interactive pressure increase while distributive extension lessens. I use “decompression” for less pressure and more extension. In chapter 8, I use compression & decompression to explain organs as cones, building upon Diagram 6. Rising levity or falling gravity are in a cone shape at a set location, but each moves first as compression action by a ring move, then compression action by a link move, then decompression reaction by a link move, then decompression reaction by a ring move. The link transition is to integrate diverse compressions using a brain before they decompress, to coordinated action-reaction by separate organs. Ring interface and link embedding makes a central accretion of

The Human Design

33

neurons around a brain for a brain to represent all sites that have neurons Psychology is within biology to represent it, with consistent ring & link biology, later. I note cause is the past in time and the space we have back behind us, while effect is the future in time and space we have ahead in front of us. The Design across Earth’s horizon or our anatomical center line between right and left is for time and space to apply equally across cause and effect, but that does not mean in the same way. A contracted or expanded period of time, as two discrete uses of time, always has a present moment between a past and future within it, and the Design allows for that by cause being strictly the past and effect the future side of any moment. Causes determine effects in different ways, by charge or mass, but always as a past cause with a future effect across a present moment of action-reaction by momentum. This is not magic, just clear your mind of muck and look for a logical frame. It is locked into capacities in the Design, with momentum across present moments between causal drives behind effects. This is exactly true also for anatomy, which has effect organs and appendages at front or above, driven by cause at back or below across every present moment, to literally frame experiences of awareness. “Cause” is “me”, and effect is “you”. I cause you to be effected and you cause me to be effected. We have a cause-effect anatomy by back-front, but also hemispherical differences for right side (left hemisphere) to favor cause, and left side (right hemisphere) effect, talking across sides to tend to favor cause or effect overall in thoughts, while locked into favoring it frontback in structure. Deductive thought is secure in the past as cause, as the future cannot literally be seen and only foreseen by induction about future effects of past causes, and insecure. We induce to extend the past to include the future. Science has the wrong levels of analysis and fails at logic, because it is obsessed with cobbling industrial rubbish like stooges. Strict principles apply to anatomies & physics, next.

The Human Design

34

6. The Scheme of Existence

I have proposed that the Design delineates substances by forms in a fundamental way for both physics and biology. However, the Design fits within an overall Scheme for existence that is not immediately apparent from the way the Design delineates substances using forms. We need to allow for the fact that the discrete substances and forms might have a continual existence with those capacities. Definitions in Science Substance is a mechanism and form is a framework for it, and they are the fundamental properties of things in existence. The ways they integrate establishes a basis for all scientific measurement, prescribed by the Design in a Scheme for existence explained in this chapter. Existence has measurable properties, with logical definitional underpinnings to physical and biological measurement of the properties. Science must include the study of its own measurements, as metaphysics, as “original cause”, and “beyond physics”. It extends to all of science, but physics reductively. Epistemology (knowledge) is merely methodology (reasoning) building partially to a whole theory. Ontology (existence) is merely a whole metaphysics (theory) of falsifiable & un-falsifiable parts, as a theory. Philosophy reduces to a methodical task of reasoning to greater satisfaction that hypothetical beliefs are secure knowledge, for a metaphysical Scheme as a basis for measurement but not measurable in itself. My methodology makes subjective use of reasoning a secure objective exercise, beyond the inductivedeductive Scientific Method. My metaphysical Scheme is the foundation for all science, and very simple. My book has no strange math models, or strange psychology for humans to lack Free Will. The universe merely ekes towards economy.

The Human Design

35

Diagram 9, T h e Scheme of Existence Inherent

Discrete

Complement

Forces

Life

Substance & its Form

Form & its Substance

Design as Product

Design as Product

Continuous

Form

Substance

Discreteness & Continuity The delineation of substances by forms in the Design is discrete in the rigors of physics and biology, meaning it is in many bits, pieces, or parts. However, in both physics and biology, discrete delineations may interface complementing continuous states that are completely uniform. Particles and anatomies may be discrete in delineation, but they would have a uniform setting provided by continuous states. Although particles and anatomies are discrete in their delineations, they would also have aspects of continuity by complementing the continuous states. They cannot be continuous because they are in bits and pieces, but they are continual in their discreteness, as they continually interface complementing continuous states. The Design within its Scheme shows itself fundamentally in the complementing relation of discreteness

The Human Design

36

and continuity. Form and substance are inseparable in the Design as discrete delineations. Discreteness and continuity are inseparable as complementing states in the Scheme. The relation of discreteness & continuity is as fundamental as substance & form. In Diagram 9, they fit in a Scheme of discrete substances and their forms complementing continuous forms in physics, and discrete forms and their substances complement continuous substances in biology. In Diagram 10, uniform formal axes of space, time, cause and effect for physical particles, and uniform substantive triangles of passive, active, levity, and gravity for biological anatomies are complementing continuous states. Complementarity is a simple idea, and it should be grasped easily, as it is probably how most people understood nature before General Relativity Theory, which is discussed in detail in later chapters. Continual Physics In physics, discrete particles and fields with resting & energetic mass would be defined by their space & time forms in the discrete Design, which applies universally and collectively to all particles and fields in prescribing their capacities. Particles with their own discrete space & time forms have rotations as atoms and solar systems, by exchanging fields delineated by their own discrete space & time forms. In addition, space & time may comprise a continuum of infinite space & time. Continuous space & time would complement all discrete particles and fields, and allow them to express their own discrete space & time forms. They have their own forms despite sharing a void. Given that particles and fields have those forms, science assumes they are the only forms in existence, and denies that a void exists. A void does not even reveal motion to a particle. It assumes rest by a field exchange at constant light speed despite particle motion. I explain later that void keeps you honest about momentum, rather than losing it by magical events like math curvature with force.

The Human Design

37

Diagram 10, Continuous Form & Substance

(1) Cont. Form (Physics) Effect

Time

Space

Cause

(2) Cont. Substance (Biology)

Ionic Levity

Covalent Gravity

Positive Rest

Negative Energy

The Human Design

38

Open continuity is represented by a void of infinite space and infinite time divided by the vertical axis of Diagram 10 ( 1). Space & time together make one open continuum, but divided by the vertical axis in the diagram to represent distinct aspects of that open continuum, or void. The discrete Design, shown earlier in Diagram 8 on page 28, defines capacities of individual particles and fields, and a collective of individual particles and fields as an entire universe with those capacities. It would be a feature of the universality of repeated examples of particles and fields, that when they integrate as one collective, the Design continues to represent them as a collective. Their forces are consistent, and they can be wound back to before and after a Big Bang event. The collective of all particles and fields may have had a precise balance to their substantive capacities for resting and energetic compression to, and decompression from, the horizontal axis of the discrete Design. The void simply provides a setting for the decompressions and compressions, as a complementing continuum of space and time for resting and energetic particle capacities. It would complement any active or passive states of mass, or their combinations. It is a an honest setting to show particle & field distributions, with rest & energy being “mutable” within that continuum, meaning they can change from one to the other in equilibrium between compression and decompression in the discrete Design. A particle has capacities for rest and energy in an “absolute” setting of space and time. Its capacities can also be considered absolute, being set in nothing. However, all measurements are in fact made “relative” to a particle, and a particle cannot know its own absolute state of coasting motion in a void unless it changes, as the void only offers a frame in which it assumes itself to be at rest. The void does not reveal its coasting motion to it, and if moved by a constant field force, that motion is also undetectable. Fields have constant light speed, and they couple to particles as if particles have

The Human Design

39

rest frames. I will discuss these issues later in considerable detail as I must refute Einstein’s General Relativity. He is a much loved icon whose “perspective” dominates physics, as an unfortunate byproduct to some okay, tendentious, work. Particles and fields also have “mutual” mass & charge with proportional interactions for mutable rest & energy capacities. Mutuality usefully frames a universe by mass & charge. I explain mutuality as “mass pushing momentum in a void”, and “charge pulling momentum in a void”. Momentum has a relation of rest & energy by a Lorentz Transformation that was extrapolated by Einstein into a familiar formula. Mutability & mutuality are from charge & mass as basic alternative examples of strings with loops, shortly. Gravitons are smooth loops along angled string building compressions by loops shearing each other in a void between alternative sources. The sources explode linearly around their own loops when their string reaches an explosive limit to density. A photon is “complete” as a smooth string with no angle that decays into angled photon loops to exchange between a proton & electron. A smooth complete photon decays into two angled loops exchanged by momentum across matching angles on smooth proton & electron string surfaces. Photons are “stable”, to pull towards “balanced” graviton explosions in nature, but a Big Bang was an original massive reservoir on edge with potential to explode extremely compressed strings. Particles exchange fields that unify rest & energy as atoms and as solar systems. Interactions are by equal & opposite proportional exchange of fields as cause and effect between the resting and energetic particles, but interactive continuity also applies uniformly to particles & fields. They are mutual in their alternative examples of cause & effect, by collectively complementing a continuum for all discrete interactions. The continuum arose when particles, which are neutral by equal attraction & repulsion in their photon exchanges, had their attraction from graviton exchanges neutralized at a Big Bang.

The Human Design

40

There may have been an equal and opposite expansion from contraction, as a one-off change around continuity between one action and reaction they share, at the dividing horizontal axis in Diagram 10 (1), as a closed Point-Instant coordinate. Action-reaction is a continuum between cause & effect, alternatively by electromagnetism or by gravitation, as a PointInstant without spatial or temporal extent because it is merely “equal opposition” at a change to both forces tending inward and tending outward. In the Design, a horizon with compressed action inward and decompressed reaction outward is neutral to electromagnetism or gravitation, working alternative ways using that Point-Instant. Past-to-future as cause-to-effect before a Big Bang is on the edge in compression as an original state with a slip tendency by both, and it slip released for both, continuing as cause-to-effect, past-to-future, now as decompression from that compression. Before and after a Big Bang, electromagnetic and gravitational cause precedes effect to literally drive effects by mechanisms that push as mass and pull as charge in a void, explained shortly. But electromagnetic cause is favored by the original compressed state in mutuality between the forces, while each continually drives as cause preceding effect. A gravitational potential to explode is retained by mechanisms of cause driving effect, which maintain compression. But the original compression can slip into favoring gravitation as cause, to release a given potential that is dormant because gravitation not only attracts as cause to compress as effect as an original state. It explodes equally from compression by decompressing a center in an explosion directly against its own linearity. Cause drives effect for gravitation to compress a “surface”, but its potential includes equal decompression from its neutral “center” to release compression. It is a slip release in mutuality to compromise charge just as mass was compromised before it. The product is neutrons by mass merged around a “complete photon”, and charge answers by using freedom in a void to decay stably by charge, to retain electrons & protons as atoms.

The Human Design

41

At root, electromagnetism and gravitation each have their own slip tendencies by compression. They also have slip releases to equalize the tendencies by decompression. Compressions appear in the Design inwards as charge by cause, and as mass by effect, mutually. The decompressions are outwards by charge as effect, and by mass as cause, mutually. Each is a mutual slip, where charge and mass combine to compress and to decompress, and they use the difference between their treatments of centers and surfaces to do it. Electromagnetism concentrates centers within neutral surfaces, while gravitation concentrates surfaces around neutral centers. Each force is a complete “opposite” in how it makes “wholes” using centers & surfaces. The centers and surfaces of each force have their own relations delimiting each force, while the two forces also have mutual relations between those alternative uses. These four mutual moves in & out across action-reaction underpin all natural processes, enabling nature to be easily understood by gravitation pushing and electromagnetism pulling momentum. Electromagnetism compresses as cause, and decompresses as effect, and its slip tendency in a void is to contain the slip release opening of a neutron by its decay into a proton and an electron. A neutron with charge concentrated between positive and negative has that concentration changed by decay into a positive proton and a negative electron. A neutrino is also produced. The charge separates using gravitational energy from a state with a concentrated center within a void as “all or nothing”, to having a separated center by neutralizing the intact relation of opposite charges. Its identity changes by a slip into decay, but center and surface relations stay consistent. A neutron has a concentrated center and its surface is its edge in a void. A surface exists exactly between a concentration and nothing. A void is a “fact” by definition here. To be concentrated is in comparison to de-concentrated nothingness of a void. A neutron in a void is in a deductive, black & white, relation of concentration against nothing outside its surface. The surface only has a void beyond it, and “neutral” compared to its center.

The Human Design

42

Decay changes a concentration into two equal parts in a void. The logic of a concentrated center in a void is consistent with the stretched product, stretched by intervention of a void between the two parts. It is now two concentrations that still seek to get as close as possible in lowest energy orbitals like they were before decay, and they still seek to have a neutral surface in the void as contained neutral atoms with no force in the void outside themselves, except by exchanging photons when compounding with each other. The logic before and after decay is the same, but the product gets stretched by the decay momentum of gravitation separating the two parts. It is a stretched relation, but not broken, logically or mechanically, because the products can now follow that logic in a dynamic relation in a void with other atoms. They form compounds after both forces create a mutual field accretion to compress and decompress as a supernova and leave a neutron star behind with extreme Angular Momentum due to its concentration. Containing concentrations ever inwards to lowest orbitals while compounding with others, makes a range of neutral surfaces in a void, as compounds. That is causal orientation back to a “neutron in a void” after potential for more dynamic relations is realized by decay using mutual gravitation. Charge cannot resist the minor gravitational explosion of decay in mutuality, as gravitation diverges causally by decompression from a state of compression, automatically in the Design. That decompression is matched by charge, which has matching products with preserved relations to attract to the extent they repel their own kind, to sort “neutrally” to contain as atoms. The two centers reduce the void between them attracting to the extent they increase it repelling their own kind. Electromagnetic cause is a black & white ideal in a void, as concentrated charge with a neutral surface. Its effect is grey, as neutral sorting when the parts separate and begin to emit photons to attract or repel. Photons are absorbed as cause in the Design, to determine, black & white, whether to attract or repel, depending on whether the particle that emitted grey as effect was a like or

The Human Design

43

unlike particle. Emission is to an equally inductive hypothesis of attraction or repulsion, and causal absorption determines deductively whether it will attract or repel, by taking it in. A void frames “concentration” and “neutrality”. Gravitation concentrates a surface around a neutral center by the inverse square law of gravitation, applied to a spherical mass in a void. Once again, the state itself has an intact relation of its neutral center and concentrated surface. To aid my argument for gravitation, which in General Relativity can somehow exist intact without a void, a sphere has no coordinate center. General Relativity relies on pure geometry, and a sphere creates an incalculable neutral center. A neutral center is by definition without force. It is also therefore a “void” coordinate of unknown extent inwards and devoid of force to the same extent as the void is, extending outwards from “it”. The void and the coordinate provide a perfect frame for gravitation. The area of a circle or sphere is defined by Pi, and impossible to center. Its diameter passes through its center, but drawing its diameter divides its circumference in half, with each half measuring “Pi multiplied by the radius”, impossible to nail. Drawing chords with lines perpendicular to midpoints to intersect at a center applies secure straight lines to a circle. Any points of contact of the chord lines with the circle to make the calculation cannot be nailed down to more than an approximation. A center can be known by straight lines, but not if applied to a circle. The difference between straight line and curved circle geometry restricts absolute certainty to finding a circle’s center. It is a basic fact that is not applied by science. Gravitation also has a basic deductive and inductive frame in the Design. Neutrons attract others to the same extent as they are attracted, all being equal, and at a Big Bang they are spread in a void at Escape Velocity. The Big Bang neutralized gravitation for neutrons to decay at Escape Velocity, which simply means there was an equal and opposite expansion from

The Human Design

44

contraction by the collective, for equal freedom at specific temperatures in decay. They attract as cause gravitationally, and are attracted as effect, in the Design. However, they literally explode away from their own capacity to attract others when others get too close, as an equal and opposite causal expansion from effected contraction. It is causal independence away from their own compression capacities, just as gravitation provides inevitably for neutron decay away from compression. In terms of strings & loops, by deductive and inductive stages in the Design, emission of “graviton” field loops along string is the first deductive step, after which there is inductive absorption and compression in the direction of emission. Receipt takes the recipient on a ride to a deductive source unknown to it, as it is a separate source effecting it. Induction is “grey”, because the recipient has its own causal independence in the void at a Big Bang, and they reach a grey compromise. Deduction is “black & white”, by emission attracting and then repelling, after the grey build up has concentrated too much and the center expands outwards in a linear explosion from center to surface. Minimum force at center has maximum force at surface, for a smooth explosion in all directions building from nothing to maximum using increasing gravitational energy from center to surface. The surface is neutralized to explode in a void, and this is by various mutual accretions in nature, but a Big Bang was a non-rotating compression with huge potential. In their double decompression, a slip inward by charge and mass before a Big Bang became a slip outward, but preset angles of electron and proton for intact atoms on decay to exchange photons compare to all angles at a Big Bang, as a puffball against intact linear density to its structure. Photons are angled loops of smooth string, while gravitons are smooth loops of angled string. A Big Bang had one smooth photon string as a pilot light near center of a dense graviton string lattice poised to explode. It is a “compete photon” that has angled loops if broken by decay. Gravitons are cold, and

The Human Design

45

photons heat when smooth graviton loops along angled string shear with photons in a void. A complete photon within cold dense strings sheared inwards to bounce cross-ways at a center line, as its tendency, until evenly around a center point to detonate dense string. Energy is available from zero at a center to maximum at a surface, by the universal inverse square law of gravitation, by loops along string to keep density linear. It is released for motion from density by angled graviton string detonation around the photon, to wind around it to make a neutron that has a direction of spin with poles, which is the basis for a complex mathematical model, “Spin” in Quantum Mechanics. Particles & fields rotate with magnetic & electrical lines. They have north or south poles by rotating left or right. Particle & field lines align in different ways for intact systems. Particles can only exchange fields at their poles in my model. A proton has a surface loop making a well, and an electron has a hill, but only at one pole, not both poles. They are aligned to each other from having been together as one intact smooth photon loop in a neutron before it decayed. I will refer to left & right poles for different alignments by particles & fields, or to left & right spin for poles. The basic polar alignments are set out in Diagram 11 (1), and easy to understand. The important thing is to remember the alternative alignments make an intact system, whether their poles align one way or another, particularly when an entire alternative system of alignments may be possible by antiparticles. A photon of intact smooth string has two loops together aligned in one direction to merge a neutron around it by mass upon detonation at a Big Bang. It rotates to make poles, with only one operative pole for field exchange, but we can distinguish a graviton that only rotates right handed, and a photon that can rotate either right handed to make particles or left to make anti-particles. A photon has only one pole for two equal (neutral) masses, electron or proton, to exchange. However, gravitons rotate only one direction as one mass, but geomagnetism has two equal (neutral) poles, north & south.

The Human Design

46

Diagram 11, Relation of Field Loops & Block Strings (1) Electron & Proton Set Poles, But Neutral to Spin Complete Photon Proton Well at One Pole (Head) Complete Photon Right Spin Down View from Above Loops Overlap Without Touching Backward Rotation Slip to Decay Inside a Neutron Low End High End Decay to Proton

Light Speed

Low Ends

Front

High Ends

“Peeled Apart” to Show Opposites Front

Front

Light Speed Left Spin Up High End Low End

Decay to Electron View From Below Backward Rotation Electron Hill at One Pole (Body) (2) Standard Right Spin of Gravitons Counter-Shearing Sets a Right Spin, But Neutral to Poles . Resting String Reels Right Hand Spin (Spine)

(Hearts) (Spine) Left Shear Points to Widen & Densify

Smaller Scale than Photon

Right Hand Spin Resting String Reels

The Human Design

47

Fixed right spin by gravitons without polar preference makes a neutron to contain a detonating pulse at a Big Bang as causal containment in compression, earlier. That decays “equally” by a slip to decompression to release an electron by a “charged” Weak Force while retaining the bulk of the neutron as a proton with a pivotal “massive” Strong Force, shortly. A compressed pulse & depth becomes a decompressed pulse & depth in the Design. You can track decompression from compression by the charged triangle in Diagram 8, to change from a neutron to realize a potential that should be released unless a neutron is intact in nuclei across a Periodic Table. The neutron slips to decay by decompressing its pulse & depth, rather than retaining them together by compressing. In Diagram 11 (1) a particle gets correctly spun “right”, which is all that matters to gravitons. However, the neutron has two fixed poles by its loops, not changeable poles by mass like on Earth, which reverse north & south “neutrally”, spontaneously. Those fixed poles of a neutron create one pole for each of its decayed particle, aligning to face each other when they slip away to decay from their shared rotation, for angled loop exchange at those poles. Massive orbital alignments are shared by particles, with exchanges to maintain them by polar alignments. In anatomy, there is a crucial difference between a direct massive vestibular at a head like a pivotal proton, and a twisted charged medulla at a body to decay an electron. A vestibular keeps both head & body in shared rotation without a medulla twist to a brain to function. A medulla keeps a head & body intact by recognizing equal integrity of each “pole” to exchange with the other, and therefore inevitably spin in different directions when facing each other, as basic polarity applied to decayed parts that align one pole with the other. Spin differentiates particles & anti-particles at a Big Bang to create particle systems. As noted, spin to a neutron right handed is preferred by graviton spin at a Big Bang, creating a particle rather than anti-particle preference. However, both

The Human Design

48

spin & anti-spin apply to each as intact systems. At a Big Bang, photon string can spin either way, and it retains that inherent capacity even after a preference is set by right-hand gravitons. Strings & loops have an intact relation as charge in particle systems, and unstable but intact anti-particle systems. My model simplifies Quantum Mechanics to intact right & left polar alignments of surviving particles using fields. That relation is across a uniform massive preference for right spin, also retained in the universe, for charged particle right & left poles with intact exchanges once two equal particles are created. A massive right hand spin is equal to north & south poles by charge setting its poles for its equal particles. Charge makes either end into a north or a south pole on Earth by spontaneously changing in geomagnetism. By massive poles, we cannot say if gravitons always spin right, as photon fields can tilt either way “neutrally”. However, the poles of particles are fixed by an original spin driven by right from causal past to left effected future, and there is an inevitable intact twist rightleft or left-right between them when they exchange loops from their equal but opposite faces within that shared rotation. The massive proton keeps the original graviton right spin by its pole, while the electron keeps a matching left spin by its pole. Angled photon loops realign particle poles of atoms to north or south in geomagnetism. Loops also do it within atoms to compound between them, as particles seal their intact neutral relation by workable alignments of poles to exchange. Within and across atoms, right spin or left spin is possible due to the spin option & alignments of the two particle poles. Alignments are studied in Quantum Mechanics, and beyond a simple hydrogen atom, they accommodate other electron orbitals and other protons & neutrons in atomic nuclei. The math and the angles become complex when particles with alternative spin to poles for loops align one pole towards or away for exchange, to give and make way for other particles in bigger atoms or when compounding. Root bases are set out here. .

The Human Design

49

Diagram 12, Accretion Disc Spring-Shift (Piston Line across Cog Line)

One Contour Cog Line Zoom View Higher Piston Line

Lower

(Adapted from Wikipedia)

Without a void, General Relativity has expanding Spacetime for compression, not particle & field mechanisms. A Big Bang has mysterious status in literally nothing. I simplify mass to smooth loops pushing with forward rotation at light speed in a void. Charge is string that breaks apart by decay into angled loops pulling with backward rotation in a void, for lines of least resistance to momentum. Each interacts with their own, and also directly by shearing in a void. We can get a view of them. The two forces have double compression in rotation from their decompression as a puffball at a Big Bang, for supernova accretion until decompression by a minor explosion. Accretion uses atoms with straight electrical lines, and right angled magnetic lines in massive field rotation. Atoms with neutral surfaces around concentrated centers pull centers together into lower energy orbitals while mass is pushed outwards to concentrate a surface around a neutral center by massive Angular Momentum. They can accrete after string merges for neutrons, to decay for accretion. Gravitational contours form, and atoms use their photons to sling Angular Momentum to a surface and atoms to a center. Interiors of contours compress and reduce momentum, and exteriors increase momentum by magnetic spring tension at right angles by a basic spring-shift.

The Human Design

50

You will not read much about accretion as a runaway process essential for supernova creation of a full Periodic Table. You will read a lot of piecemeal Quantum Mechanics fashioned by and for industry. Electrical lines are along, and magnetic lines are across protons & electrons that seek closer orbitals, but lose a photon to cross to it. Electrical lines seek economy between two concentrations as a line tending inward, and a magnetic line facilitates across it, to shift a line outward to move inward. When massive rotations accrete, the process also slings entire atoms across, by dividing contours to lower & higher lines for both forces, crossed by magnetism to sling for both lines. Being across its own electrical line, it is both a vibrational and rotational adjuster, enabling it to serve a catchall graviton field that creates the contours. The electrical takes its own “line” along contour “lines”. Magnetism slings for more Angular Momentum at a surface, to concentrate, while the inner line drops atoms to less momentum around them to concentrate. The Design has eight parts, but graviton strings merge angles around smooth photon string, then photon field loops accrete angles across smooth massive contours. Surface compression by gravitation is an effect in the Design, by a source extending attractive gravitons as cause by forward rotating loops pushing into each other from any directions, to expand their loops by shearing. Their angled string sections are drawn by larger loops to move particle sources. They exist in the void as a Dark Mass “fluid”. Sources extend loops along resting string at light speed to shear others for momentum in the void. Graviton loops move along their own resting string that moves as loops widen by shearing to build “Isometric” counter-tension, anchored to sources to attract them in a void by reeling string. Photons are loops detached to move at light speed in a void. They hinge at particle surfaces to attract or repel depending on the surface. A graviton rotates forwards. A photon rotates backwards, to attract by hinging its backward rotation to a particle surface and pulling back in the direction it came. It can also repel by direct drive on like surface.

The Human Design

51

Gravitation is only known as “weight” relative to other mass, and never relative to a void, which gives nothing to measure against. Everything we experience or measure is by relative action-reaction impacts, and neurons in particular. No-one can know, and nothing can measure, beyond an impact surface, including photons to & from a void that has gravitons, but only known at impact to say there is a “tree”, “over there” after shearing with gravitons, as a product. Nor do we measure momentum itself in passage, only impact each side, with a gap closed to a “wavelength”, later. A photon and relative weight are both in an unknown absolute field, including Redshifts & Blueshifts. We know products, and not the absolute itself. Physics speculates, exploiting this fact. It enjoys blind spots in knowledge, to protect its nonsense from exposure. It does not identify its own limits to “knowing”. It is “shut up and calculate”, or “speculate”, and little in between. There is no theory of gravitation in physics other than General Relativity as curved Spacetime geometry, not mechanisms. To fill an obvious gap, a Higgs Field is proposed and was perhaps made in a lab by repeated collisions to make a specific product, which a lab might do eventually, aimed at products. If curved Spacetime compresses weight, the issue is whether it has weight or not. Higgs retains Relativity and gives weight by a Field. Everything has it by relative compressions, like on Earth, in water, or on the Moon. Relativity is retained so curved Spacetime stays responsible for relative compression for the weight of a neutron provided now by Higgs. This belated gap filler, which can provide “fluid” and “background” as a “field”, and General Relativity itself, can be replaced by a graviton loop along string in a void as one mechanism. I note Weak & Strong Force are safe counterforces and not anti-states. They are safely encompassed in states to make a Periodic Table. Strong Force is by graviton compression retained in a reservoir consistent with a neutral center with a concentrated surface, to keep particles in “close orbit” against

The Human Design

42

charged repulsion. It holds compression for massive nuclei beyond iron, and releases if broken. The Strong retains mass to “equally” explode it when nuclei break apart, consistent with a Big Bang as an original reservoir that explodes equally from its own given mass. Weak Force has counter momentum by a neutrino to explode against attraction. Weak decays charged compression at angles for orbitals. Weak decay “repulsion” momentum is equal to “attractive” containment by neutrons as reserves, to equally attract & repel after decay to sort towards atoms. Causally, mass attracts and equally explodes “from” a past by built reserves. Using the reserves, charge contains and equally decays, to sort equally back “to” containment, but as a full Periodic Table in future, due to decay. See Diagram 8 for terms for the Design, with charge “to” and mass “from”. Later, I reject a popular Accelerating Universe theory overthrow of cosmology. A graviton has uniform height & distorted depth as a flat spatial plane of string, with uniform width by a loop extending by a distorted pulse along it as a wave. Width & height have linear motion as resting string by loops countershearing uniform heights to planes for more width. When energy is invested, a pulse gets dense with less depth as a distortion that slows the loop rotation around the string while keeping light speed for loops along it, for a linear relation of width & height around a density distortion. However, note that linear density at a spherical Big Bang is not subject to distortion in motion & density because it works the other way, by density for motion. But it must feedback motion to density as a constant reduction in a linear expansion rate, so distance recedes more slowly whilst linear, for a closed edge with the void. Regions do not overtake, but close without ever closing. Redshifts by distant objects do not show them as having accelerated far away to have low Redshifts despite distance. They show the recession marginally slower than expected, for less Redshift. Later, our anatomy is directly comparable, as suggested by a massive vestibular aligning head & body while a medulla twists between them, earlier. They inform each other directly.

The Human Design

53

Continual Biology In biology, form and substance as an anatomy are cellular, by pure discrete binary form of DNA in Diagram 9, with its own substantive nucleotides & chromosomes interfacing open and closed substantive continuities. It is comprised of substance to interface, but with pure form. DNA encodes a use for those interfaces by coding for growth from sexual reproduction. DNA is intact as chromosomes lined with nucleotides. It uses continuities and adapts sequences to make best use of them by coding to grow from a single cell under nurturing of parents encoded with sex. That is complete use of interface, as seamless in creating cells as use of continuities in physics. DNA is a formal strand of four substantive nucleotides of adenine, cytosine, g uanine, and thymine to initiate bonding for cell growth. All nucleotides have exactly two open protons, and two open electrons, as hydrogen bonds interfacing a chemical continuum. Open continuity is represented in Diagram 10 (2) by resting proton & energetic electron as equal triangles, with continuity to their open bonding into chemical compounds for all cells, initiated by DNA through mechanisms and proteins. Open charges of hydrogen bonds interface other atoms, tending continually to lower energy orbital bonding, for DNA’s mechanisms to extend bonding continually from the digital strand itself. It is substantive continuity used for continual DNA purposes. All atoms beyond the strand are subject to pure formal coding by DNA, including its mechanisms, proteins, and those from the landscape permeating a cell membrane. Biology has a closed continuum, with restriction to the freedom of bonding. DNA has substantive chromosomes, to use a chemical continuum for blending compounds between ionic and covalent limits. Ionic bonds conduct electromagnetic charge, while covalent bonds do not. Ionic compounds rise with levity, and covalent fall by gravity. Chromosomes carry genes for DNA to encode reproductive blending between

The Human Design

54

males and females. Blending is as simple as bonding. They combine as one continuous mechanism, just as there is one continuous framework for particles. DNA interfaces the closed continuum as two sets of chromosomes that separate in each sex cell, and blend at fertilization between sex cells. Ionic levity is male, and covalent gravity is female. Closed continuity is ionic levity and covalent gravity compounds as equal triangles in Diagram 10 (2), with blending in cells for DNA. Our cells have 46 chromosomes made up of two sets of 23, so we have two set of genes to help determine our features, and the sets share dominance across features. The 46 become 23 in male and female sex cells. Each set of 23 has a male “Y” or female “X” chromosome. One X needs to combine with one Y on fertilization for a male, or two Xs for a female, in characteristics they determine. Each individual is a product of two sets of chromosomes that share dominance and recession in coding for gene expression, and the presence of a Y dominates for male features. In sex cell formation, the two sets separate, and they combine when sex cells blend at fertilization. Males may be ionic, with levity, and females may be covalent, with gravity. Male reproductive organs rely on levity to a penis, which ejaculates multiple excited sperm, and a female relies on gravity of one falling egg, which is massive. Other male and female features of rise or fall, and sharpness or curvature, may be consistent with that difference. Synchronization with our epicycle may exist by levity daily to yearly cycles for male arousal and gravity daily to monthly cycles for female ovulation. We have continual sex and growth influencing shared human cognition. We are all encoded with features for discrete continual growth and breeding and also discrete features we share in the Design. Global discreteness has sex & growth using continuities, to be continual, just as mass is discretely continual in its global Big Bang frame. Sex is a global arc around copulation, not limited to a “grinding action”.

The Human Design

55

Differences between charged levity and massive gravity may extend to males functioning as an edge to a world to ideal ends of a home, often with violence. Females tend to hold from real origins of a home, often with ignorance of the world, discussed later. Sexes are ends of a blending continuum, and blending for an individual to grow is the point, not division. Life as individuals evolved without sex, but sex no doubt enriches reproduction. There is a continuum of features, and we must accept people who respect the other sex by evidently thinking and feeling as would the other around a continuum that only divides to reproduce. Homosexuality is around new growth, not in opposition to it. Individual behavior within species behavior is a global sex arc, not just a local “grinding action”. Some simply fertilize, but most have great activities around it of many kinds. Some never fertilize. A normal range applies. Reproduction is a slip release of levity and gravity for growth from fertilization. A fertilized cell is itself a state of “neutralized decay”, neutral between ionic male and covalent female while having a membrane to import and export across its surface membrane. Action-reaction applies to biological cell chemistry as gravity action inwards around a membrane, for levity bonding inwards within a membrane, for heat loss outwards around the membrane and, in my model, mutation outwards within it. Neutralized merger has a full set of 46 chromosomes together within one cell membrane to use stored nutrition in the egg and begin to divide. It continues by permeating membranes in cooperation with other cells. Explosive actionreaction applies to chemistry for that merger in cell biology. Layered chemicals and heat have action inward at the surface of a cell membrane, tending to compress to lower orbital stable electromagnetic bonding within the membrane, to grow cells on a warm, layered chemical surface. Compatibility in growth by double compression on Earth’s surface is precise under the Design on pages 24-27, for our anatomy to function on Earth in chapters 8 & 9. It is achieved by mutual action-reaction at a

The Human Design

56

Big Bang to a Periodic Table, continuing double compressions and decompressions. Decompressions are heat loss decay outwards around a cell membrane by bonding within it, and explosive mutation in leaps outwards within a membrane from compression inwards around it. The frame to remove 100 per cent blind mutation is convective action-reaction chemistry. Mutations, which are gene expressions when they take hold, are leaps from available chemicals around a membrane to bond within it by environmental Homeostasis, ongoing. A merged fertilized egg cell has a membrane as a surface for levity and gravity to import and export crossways and around it. Cells grow explosively with others, and are encoded together, using membrane surfaces for compression imports and decompression exports suitable for functions. Distance is covered by neuron cells, with excitable gravity hormone gateways for ionic levity current to shift hormone sediment along networks. Internal charge extends considerable length, embedded at all sites as input receptors and output effectors, to gateways to others at ends crossed by gravity hormone neurotransmitters to enhance or inhibit levity current. Accretion by action-reaction applies to neurons, like neutrons in physics, within explosive, merging and dividing, action-reaction biology. I use accretion between levity and gravity in broad structure to explain neural action-reaction within a chemical explosion by action-reaction to grow cells biologically. Psychology is within biology as its facility for awareness & enablement by combined roles of neurons. Return to the basic operation of levity and gravity at page 49 for physics in mutuality, accreting around a central rotation, which is a rotational neural cycle here. Hormones in pivotal synaptic gravity bulbs, and nerves in lateral network lines of levity current, merge in neurons they comprise. Later, economical electrical lines share a massive hormone rotation around anatomy to alternative center-surface orientations of charge & mass. A magnetic line across it sorts it, but also serves the gravity orientation when sorting. Merged

The Human Design

57

levity & gravity neurons within anatomy are serviced entirely by biological cells around them, to build and drive them, to be facilitated by neurons for enablement & awareness. Actionreaction biology extends shortly into a completely consistent arrangement by organs, by DNA encoding for our “explosive” cell functions to “accrete” as neurons. Organ causal centers & effected surfaces accrete for a “central brain” & “surface sites” rotation, by dividing organs into “link & “ring” moves to do so. Neuron inputs are actions of hormone mass pushing pressure inwards & levity nerve current also pulling it by lines of least resistance. Outputs are reactions by gravity sediment pushing pressure outwards & levity current also pulling it by lines of least resistance. They are gravity layered site channels for ions, with momentum in one direction to ends, but they use openings on their membranes for import and export to those ends along it, and across it at right angles. Endogenous neurotransmitters are neuron cell hormones. The gateway is crossed from a reservoir as a bulb at ends for insulating hormones to block or allow the current crossing the gateway to other neurons. Electric current flows along, while magnetic has polarities to go across, to use as necessary, under insulation. In nature, events are by action inward to realize an inevitable outward potential from action inwards. All moves are motor reactions to a world's actions cycling with self-stimulation by an intact chemical unit level in a world, to collect stimulation from a world to be comfortable, continually. Life is open to a world while “self-contained”, and we evolved to resolve inputs interfacing a world by processing inputs from our own moves. Motor moves lead to sensory inputs in a self-contained cycle begun by action of a world interfacing a cell for sensory “action” inwards to react by motor “reactions” outward. Sensing a world in which we are entirely immersed is more important than self-stimulation, to grow from one cell, after a world provides essential actions upon cells by chemicals and heat for evolution from a single cell amoeba.

The Human Design

58

Awareness is neural sensory identification. Motor moves cannot be known until return by inputs, but we use memory to anticipate. Identification encompasses anticipation. We identify using memory and we identify past anticipations by using memory. It is less secure identification of future possibility. It is present flow across past flow retained in stronger extended neurons. It always includes anticipation of future moves. Close control of future moves using memory relies on networking between input action and output reaction to have confidence that our anticipations can be accurate and smooth, which they can. We evolved automatic, matching, outputs from inputs to move all the time, but we can learn about them and extend them, by continual intricate moves using memory to identify what worked and how we anticipated it, to condition oneself. Present flow across past flow in the moment is “I”, as a pure point of reference for experiences after delay for processing makes them recognizable “now”. They are only recognized by further tracking across its past base to inform it by secure memory. It is a continual, ready, nervous edge tracking its own hormonal base by patterns to enable “I” to know “who” I am by tracking in the present across the past, open to conditioning. I note awareness is extended present moments, for sensory framed by motor with impetus between past & future, or cause & effect, in continual action-reaction events in a brain. We have a psychological present by a biological anatomy divided into causal functional sites behind & below driving effected functional sites at front & above. Forward momentum is literally cause-to-effect as past-to-future, represented faithfully by neurons. We have a common neural frame between motor and sensory to cycle frames read by sensory from past interfaces, but representing past-to-future because motor moves are framed for sites that are past-to-future, to be read. Psychology is consistently serviced by biology, to represent biology, but to its rules of neural action-reaction correlating to site moves. Neural action-reaction in a brain is the point of it all, as actionreaction is defined as a Point-Instant, not events either side.

The Human Design

59

Awareness is experienced as “thoughts about feelings”, but thoughts are no more than hormonal feelings networked for commonalities to their preserved components, as well-shaped feelings. They arise after diverse delineations from sites as components are split for commons to finalize for experiences. A “table” in thought has components of line, shade, depth, height, level, and so on that are integrated by their commons across other sites, for components of “feelings” shared with my legs for line, gut for height, or brow for shade, and so on. There are key structural hormonal components of each site function, and they are shared by analogy across our Design, which relies as much on overlap as it does to separation. We are set for analogy by commons “about” shared components. Nerve networks shape feelings into an experience of thoughts “about” feelings that accompany them, seeing or hearing and thinking “about” what we see or hear, seamlessly together. We are automatons until self-stimulation & world stimulus are both processed. And when the experience arises, it is of thoughts seamlessly combined with feelings of self-stimulation & world. I suspect many species have “glimmers” of thought, which are merely shaped feelings, if it networks common concepts to components in a brain. Hormones only contribute feelings, and nerves only contribute the conceptual shaping of feelings. Thoughts are self-stimulated attenuated feelings to collect stimulus from a world and settle in one experience of “oneself within the world”. I explain later we attenuate or lessen feelings from our own self-stimulation, to be chemically level with a world without feedback to our own moves, to level at goals in a world. Each species has its own attenuated levels to collect un-attenuated goals, and thoughts would be attenuated by modulation, to create our own scenes or sounds as thoughts. We are aware of one interface of oneself and a world for one experience of it. Light “out there” is changed by receptors for our own captured experience of vision. We speculate about what is “out there”. We are subjects, and we explore ourselves

The Human Design

60

as “purported” objects. Sites only know they exist because they have the experience after delay to process their inputs in a brain. Descartes said “I think, therefore I am”, but this is only true because we have an experience and therefore assume, in the experience, that we exist. This is due to brief delay for processing awareness of self-stimulation and world stimulus for one experience of both. We use the experience itself to “work out” our separateness from a world, but we move between different objects in a world by dependency from a zygote. Attributing interface to “oneself” or to “world” is difficult. Mutuality shapes atoms as solar systems from a Big Bang, for a cloud from a supernova, for layered compounds within an epicycle, for human types on a scale exactly between an atom and a solar system. We are an embodiment of a landscape of reconciled levity and gravity, and a testament to reconciliation of atoms as solar systems, by forms we embody to principles easily repeated by compounds. In DNA explosive cell biology, organs have compression at a broad end, and decompression at a narrow end in Diagram 6, but not as a conduit. Levity organs compress a center and decompress a surface. Gravity compress a surface and decompress a center. For example, a spine with nerve effectors-receptors, and a gut for endogenous hormone supply, are centrally causal. A heart with muscular sites, and lungs for oxygenation, are an effected surface. Apply logic from Diagram 8, for charge moving “to”, and mass moving “from”, and a mechanism for charge to “pull” momentum by laying lines of least resistance at angles, and mass to “push” momentum pivotally by building reserves. “To & from” are heart & gut as hormone supply compressing from sites and decompressing from a brain by building reserves; and spine & lungs as oxygenated nerves compressing to a brain and decompressing to sites by laying lines. “Push & pull” are compression pushing from sites & decompression pushing from a brain by reserves; and nerve compression pulling to a brain & oxygen decompression pulling to sites by laying lines.

The Human Design

61

This broad biology can be extended. Each organ in Diagram 6 has four moves, asymmetrically up & down and left & right, for each organ. Later, I separate them into “ring” moves that have world interfaces, and “link” moves embedded in organs closer to a brain to link rings into ring-a-rosy, by each organ linking to one other organ or to a brain. It is shockingly simple. Causal organs tend to centers and effected tend to surfaces, but center-surface logic can be applied two ways. The sequence of ring & link moves for cause & effect organs is the same, as a ring compression action, then a link compression action, then a link decompression reaction, then a ring decompression reaction. However, causal organ rings interface at their center and embed their surface. Effected organ rings interface at their surface and embed their center. Rings interface a world, at the “accretion surface”, and links are embedded closer to a brain at the “accretion center” to adjust ring transitions between action & reaction, using the cause-effect organ setup. Accretion has embedding as its center and interfacing as its surface, across causal “centers” & effected “surfaces” interfacing, and across causal “surfaces” & effected “centers” embedding. It is a crossover use of center-surface definitions. Action-reaction is directly relevant to center-surface accretion, as the flow by neurons of sites around a brain serviced by our eight organs is by input action inwards and output reaction outwards between sites & brain. The purpose of accretion is action-reaction events of continual Point-Instant experiences in a brain. The purpose of inputs & outputs is their transition, as action-reaction is defined as no more than a Point Instant, and in this case, continual. This is explained in detail later. I note action-reaction in the universe as a whole has mutuality of mass & charge by causation, but I correlate across rigors. Physics is a Big Bang explosion for particles, and chemistry is a supernova accretion for fields to build heat as a Periodic Table, for planetary landscapes to use it. The relation is direct by neutrons to a full Periodic Table, but known by correlation after it plays out. Cells explode within biology, for accretions by

The Human Design

62

neurons in cellular biology that only correlates to subjective experiences despite direct relation. Potential of “the neutron” includes a chemical mind, impossible to “know”. An experience is a product that cannot access its own prior process to “know itself”, as it is a logical impossibility. Explosive physics founds accretion chemistry, to found explosive biology, to found accretion psychology, known by correlation after they play out. I noted that one Big Bang has many concurrent supernovae in tending to epicycles with landscapes of atoms, but always by ongoing neutralized decay. Our recurrent reproductive slip release also provides a context for a shared species anatomy with sexual differences for a recurrent spread of genes. We do not personally regenerate, and neither does a Big Bang. The divide of male and female for merger & division as cells, by repeated replication of the DNA code after fertilization, means we have evolved to stand as sexes beside a threshold for new life. A Big Bang is poised between expansion and contraction by matched forces, and it released at a threshold, to exist beside that threshold, in ongoing evolution. Individuals show ongoing origins by perfect division as male or female, not perfect diffusion on neutralization at a Big Bang. Precision in a Big Bang never compressing back speaks for replacement by reproduction in Australia, which does not quite happen. Sexes stand beside a threshold precariously to reproduce or not. We are locked in by origins, and taken by hormones to slip from beside a threshold to at it globally across local individuals. Globally, DNA encodes for bonding by cell division, and blending by sex division. Male sex organs are concentrated centers within neutral surfaces, and female are neutral centers within concentrated surfaces, for actionreaction shearing to fertilize. Later, I compare Strong and Weak Force atom creation to female Strong linguistics and male Weak logistics, to mutually partner and parent on the chance of replacing oneself by reproduction, which is equal in Australia. Populations need to be more limited in future.

The Human Design

63

7. Modern Scientific Context

I will now briefly mention some issues of relevance to my work theorized by the four most significant modern scientists and philosophers. This may help you to see the context of the Design within current science. I will not provide a comprehensive analysis of their work in this chapter, although later I will discuss them further. They are useful case studies in the methods of science, including assumptions underlying theories. Isaac Newton First, Isaac Newton (1642-1727), in his Three Laws of Motion, shows our environment is made up of space and time motions, around equal and opposite actions and reactions, in a setting of continuous space and time. His view was of fixed capacities of mass in a void, and it is a view with which I agree in my model detailed later, subject to the condition that any actual measurement is always relative to the measurer. Newton’s masses moved and interacted in a complementing void of infinite space from which to view them, and time. Time is simultaneous for all, as past becomes future at every present moment at the same time, everywhere in space. Everything also has an absolute direction interacting in space at all times, ahead to a future and behind in the past, even though always measured relatively. Newton is very limited about mass itself, being unaware of fields at light speed. He said gravitation acts across space and time instantaneously, and he should have seen that combustion might counter gravitation in action-reaction at a Big Bang. Later, ideas about fields led Albert Einstein to measure masses relative to their assumed states of rest, extrapolate the rest and energy relation in masses, and put a new theory of gravitation.

The Human Design

64

Newton’s action-reaction underpins discrete interactions by cause and effect by masses. He also had a basic void for gravitational distributions. He could not have grasped particlefield relations for resting frames of moving particles, nor the stark reality of subjective confinement to a relative view. Later discoveries made those restrictions clear for Einstein, but I model relative measurement in a void, reconciling Newton and Einstein. I will use Newton’s God’s Eye in a void to literally view gravitational interfaces of masses. Infinite space is not measurable, being only a frame in “dimensions”. Simultaneous time passing equably for all is likewise a continuous reality enabling measurement rather than being measureable in itself. Later, I explain Relativity theory is equivocal. Events are simultaneous for all observers, even though their observations will not coincide due to delay in receiving light and gravitation from it. It is basic, and not deep. Immanuel Kant Next in time, and immediately following Newton, is Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), who created his Categories for Awareness. He proposed that our awareness is the product of a mental framework that should include capacities for awareness of space, time, cause and effect. That was accurate, and he made the important simple union of oneself and the world in one contained experience of awareness, but without a basis in permanent interface. Kant was born after Newton defined nature by using concepts of space, time, “cause”, and “effect”. He established the concept that humans may formally order experiences into categories of space, time, cause, and effect, but with other categories, and without delineated levity, gravity, active, and passive substances. He also left behind a Homunculus brain with its own will like a “soul”, by failing to see a rapid automatic facility for manual organ and appendage sites to be aware of their interfaces with a world, at manual rates of function and awareness. A brain is not independent at all, but it is sensitive, and it can be diseased or disabled.

The Human Design

65

Kant took the bold step of saying that we cannot know if those forms exist in the world. We have them unified under a soul to work with what we can sense from the world. We impose ordered forms upon “sense datum” for an experience of “entity in relation to sense datum” as objects perceived by a soul. The experience is not from finalized neural activity, known today but not to Kant, it is from a soul perceiving entity and a world as objects in one experience. He unified entity & world necessarily in the experience but not clearly by interface of self-stimulation with a world of stimulation for capture of both by neurons in a contained neural representation of “entity within a world”. Neural activity for both entity and world equate to the word “I”. “I” am a subjective experience of a representation of both, by the interactive capacities of “I” to cause effects on others or be effected by cause of others. I use the word “I” here, but I could use ““oneself” as equally causal and effected in Diagram 8. We have experiences representing an interactive interface, and using the experience at all times, we consider its objective reality. I think, therefore, I assume I am an object thinking about its interfaces after delay, by Descartes. A subjective experience is just that, and it assumes things are “out there”, as necessary, in the locked-in experience itself. We only experience after delay for processing. We are always immersed in a world of objects, from one cell, and never separate. We assume “things” are out there”, including entity as an object, as “entity in world”, in what appear in experiences to be objects in interface. “I” is a pure point of reference in experiences. The world is “mine”, but “it” owns “me” in reality. “I” explore interfaces with my world to differentiate them as objects, to attain my goals in my world. Charles Darwin Next in time, immediately following Kant, is Charles Darwin (1809-1882). He said in his theory of Natural Selection that life evolves by absolutes of growth and reproduction, and by adaptation to the environment. Viewing from universal

The Human Design

66

absolutes, he did not consider a final product species, but he did not realize an environment has specific chemical layers corresponding to the structure of our anatomy, preferring our form of adaptation. Nor did he know about cellular chemical activity serving overall heat loss on a planetary surface. Darwin realized there is an absolute continuous mechanism for growth and reproduction. Division into two sexes and reproduction between them provides for growth and gradual mutation of growing anatomies over time. Adaptation has that context, but in discrete subjective form, we are embodiments of a landscape, for a much, much, deeper view of adaptation, for humans with comprehensive subjective awareness. Albert Einstein Next in time, and immediately following Darwin, is Albert Einstein (1879-1955). In Special Relativity, he confined observers to their own “subjective” frames of reference, just as Kant did for our anatomical frame. Discrete particles have their own discrete space and time forms as a framework relative to which they measure the world. It is a theory about how one mass measures another by using fields, theorized from the fact that the motion of light is constant whatever the motion of its atomic source. Particles use photons for measurements in a void that otherwise provides no indication of their motions. Special Relativity Theory entirely confined particles to their own frames, and used parsimony to deny a void. That denial extended to the General Theory. To me, Special Relativity reconciles particle measurements, required as constant photon exchanges automatically create a rest frame for particles. I will explain later that regardless of particle motions, fields extend to and from them by coupling at a constant speed by their own mechanism, creating rest frames by doing so. This does not mean there is no underlying reality to the reconciliation, beyond being an adjustment

The Human Design

67

because particles in motion have rest frames created by a field mechanism for constant speed. This is consistent with two facts. Rest mass can convert to energy by the speed of light squared, and back again, so they can convert from one form to the other. Moreover, when rest mass is given energy, its motion does not increase in direct proportion. Invested with high energy, its momentum increases more than its motion, suggesting but not concluding that it cannot reach light speed. These facts are consistent with lab tests of particle and field properties, explained later. The Special from photon transfers at light speed, was developed into a General for relative motion under gravitation. Relativity says curved Spacetime geometry gives gravitational attraction, not interfaces creating each relative “view”. It prevents views of mechanical interfaces using a void. Pure Spacetime, with no mass, supposedly expands with mass just as fast as it needs to escape at a Big Bang. It denies a void, but particles can be as fast as needed under ad hoc and quite bizarre “Inflation” from non-existence, matched by rapid expansion of Spacetime geometry with nonexistence around it. It has blunt geometry preventing use of a void to explore mechanical interfaces, a Singularity of infinite compression before a Big Bang, and pure linear Isotropy for all observers, which are all impossible. Mass has supposed Symmetry Breaking, ignoring Spacetime expanding linearly, which is how particles exploding in a void expand anyway. Homogeneity, or sameness, depends on what is said to be the same. Pure linear Isotropy about all observers requires models so far from human reasoning as to be impossible. To the extent we have pure Isotropy around Earth, then we are near the center of a puffball, or else expanding Spacetime creates a Hologram in which we live. A void can contain Einstein’s Spacetime, which does not extend beyond “three” spatial dimensions, but that puts an impossible Hologram in a void. I choose the puffball, but I reserve my opinion on limits to motion & density relations, later, relying on Escape Velocity.

The Human Design

68

8. Organ Substructure

I will now explain the discrete capacities of our anatomy under the Design. In this chapter, I explain moves of levity and gravity organs, in & out, up & down, front & back, and left & right. In the next chapter, appendages conform to all organ moves in this chapter, graphically. Organs are “blocks” because they stand alone, as gross chemicals. Appendages are “fields” across the organ blocks, as trace chemicals. Organs are a substructure with distributive spatial and temporal organs around equal and opposite causal and effected organs merged at our center line. Appendages conform in a standard template at each organ sector, by location, composition, and function, and more obviously at a head than a body. They also have their own features as eight fields at each of eight organ sectors. Diagram 13 is a view of our organ anatomy from above, and Diagram 14 transforms that view into a watery wave-like structure upright on Earth rather than from above. Arrows in Diagram 13 are compressions and decompressions of space, time, cause, and effect across active, passive, levity and gravity examples. Diagram 13 shows causal organs tending behind (or below) in the past driving effected organs at front (or above). Upright in Diagram 14, organs are set as cause, effect, levity, and gravity by cone shapes, at logical locations. Each organ moves between levels up & down, and sides left & right, by interfacing ring and embedded link moves. Each link is to another organ or the brain, for literal ring-a-rosy. In turn, a ring compresses, a link compresses, a link decompresses, and a ring decompresses. Rings interface a world & links interface a brain, for accretion to represent both, most likely by their roles as world-stimulation & self-stimulation. Cause embeds links around rings, and effect embeds links within rings, for ring-a-rosy around a central brain accretion, to represent all sites peripherally by Point-Instants of action-reaction in a brain.

The Human Design

69

Diagram 13, Organ Design (Anatomy from above)

Effect Left Mineral Loose Gas Lift 8 Tongue 1 Lungs

Liquid Flow Heart 7

Solid Light 2 Nose

Time Back

Space Front

Spine 6 Mineral Tight

3 Eye Gas Contained

5 Ear 4 Gut Liquid Well Solid Heavy Cause Right Merged across both sides

Adjoined on each side

In Diagram 6, each organ “mobile” favors the compression or decompression end as cause or effect, but they all have the other end as well, as cones. I keep root moves from Diagram 6 in Diagram 15, by a legend in Diagram 16, which has apparent “symmetry”, but root asymmetries from Diagram 6. We favor the compression or decompression end as cause or effect, as a root ring move. The other end of the cone is a root link move upon transition. “Symmetry” in Diagram 16, is a generality from balanced mass slicing in & splaying out, and stable charge mirroring left & right. It has two root moves to make four moves.

The Human Design

70

Diagram 14, Organ Substructure as a Water Wave Two Arrows, With Two Levels & Two Sides

Head, looking up to left Narrow Crest

2 Nose Upright Levity Organ

3 Eye

Right

Front Back

Left 8 Tongue

5 Ear

Upright Gravity Organ

Broad Trough

Body, leaning down to left Narrow Peak Appendage Templates 7 Heart 6 Spine

Back Right

Left Front

4 Gut

Broad Front

1 Lungs

The Human Design

71

Diagram 15, Organ Rings & Links in Four Layers (1) Logistical Cycle of Sites & Supply Cycle of Sites Spine Cycles in Nervous Brain Heart Cycles around Hormonal Brain Pulse Up to Down Back Stretch In to Out Front N Cloth=Link Junction Circle of Willis, Spine, & All Sites Flat Equal Table Cloth Muscular Activity Pumping Full Cone Half Cycle Sensory Motor Motor Sensory Aorta 4 Pulm. Lungs 2 Wind Unwind 3 1 SVC Fixed Wind C Link Slices Mirrors Across Center Line SA Atrium High Fixed IVC Atrium Out Left Gut Out In 3 In Cord 1 Half Cycle 2 AV Stacks 4 Low Right M Link Left Ventricles Slice Levers Along Center Point Receptors & Effectors Gut Half Cycle Cooperates Lungs Half Cycle Oscillates Stack Low to High Back Stretch Deep to Shallow Front Lever & Stall Across Center Point Mirror & Bounce Splay Liver Wind 2 Splay Along Center Line H Link Right Bile 1 Stomach Tidal Air Wind Bronchi Portal Free Free Small Int Duod. 4 Unwind 3 Chest Ring Full Cone Full Cone Heart Out In In Out 3 Alveoli Rip Gap Large Int Unwind Settled Air D Link Left Free Free 1 Diaphragm (Appendix) (Bladder) 4 Bounce (Bowel) Splay 2 Splay

The Human Design

72

(2) Balanced Circle of Sites & Circle of Linguistics of Sites Eye Half-Circle Oscillates Nose Half-Circle Cooperates (One Eye Side View) (One Nostril Side View) Open Pupil Close Olfactory 1 Seek X 2 Use 4 Snort Plane Two Sacs Down Light Wind Cone Up Cone Up X Y 1 Sniff Plane Fovea Ball Saccades Level Optic 3 Sniff Olfac One Sac Up X Cone Down 3 Edge Y 4 Get X Unwind 2 Snort Olfac Depth Link Up & Survey Down Height Link Down & Survey Up Bounce Shallow to Deep Back Stack High to Low Front Slice by Stretched Turn Slice by Levering a Plane Mirror Along Center Line Stall Across Center Point Oscillating Cooperative Vestibular Vestibular High Lens X X Crosses X Shallow Y Deep Low X Ear Circles Head Around Tongue Circles in Head (One Ear, Right Rear View) Helix (Tongue, Right Rear View) Stretch Out to In Back Pulse Down to Up Front Helix Winds Splay Mirrors Across Center Line Vestib. 2 M Link Unwind Dish by Edges Wind 1 Stack Intrinsic Surface Waves Wind Stack by Gutter Face Down Coch @ Drum In 3 4 (Listening for Tone) Palate Free Free Stall & Lever Along Center Point Splay Edges Above Coch.Unwinds Vestib. 1 Intrinsic Level 3 M Link C Link Below 4 Coch @ Unwind 2 Tolerant Level Free Waves Out Splay Face Up Waves Out Drum Epiglottis Extrinsic Level (Speaking with Tone) Flat Equal Napkin N Cords=Link Junction Stalls to Circle Width by Stretch Tilt & Turn + Stack Bob & Nod Cooperating Vestibulocochlear Wind & Unwind

The Human Design

73

Diagram 16, Down Causal & Up Effected Rings (Links Counter) Head “Symmetry”

Solid

Root Tilts for Head “Symmetry” Eye Compress Nose Up

Fovea

Tilt Down

Olfact

Slice Gas

Down

Optic

Sandwich Rings, Spread Links Mineral

Ear

Up

Vestib.

Tilt Up

Vomer.

Decompress Tongue Tilt Up

Edges

Splay Liquid

Down

Coch. Tilt Down Gutter

N Cords Periphery Middle Body “Symmetry” N Cloth Liquid

Middle Periphery

Root Bulges for Body “Symmetry” Spine Compress Heart Up

Med .

Bulge Down

Atrium

Slice Mineral

Down

Cord

Spread Rings, Sandwich Links Gas

Gut

Up

Liver

Bulge Up Decompress

Ventr. Lungs

Bulge Up

Chest

Splay Solid

Down

Bowel Bulge Down Diaph.

Horizontal: Convex & Concave with Spread & Sandwiched Rings & Links

Splay Gut

Nose Slice

Lung

Splay Slice

Heart Splay Tongue

Spine

Slice

Ear Splay

Slice Eye

The Human Design

74

Diagram 17, Survey & Occupy by Head Solids & Gasses Focus Up Convergent Blind Optic Link Light Overlap Liquids & Minerals Unset Surveys Less Olfact Helix Apex Dust Level Optic Vision Sun Level More Snort Plane Link Up Sniff Plane Ring Cochlea Drum Down Sacc. Down Sea Level for Waves Fovea Ring Set from Below Snort Olfact Link Ring Divergent Ring Down Blitz Olfact Harmony Tongue Surface Palate Nods Surf Level Set Gutter Neck Rotates Link Epiglottis Extrinsic Waves N Cords

The correct side for links is seen in Diagram 13, as eight relative positions that are also absolute from a landscapes using “color by numbers”. A correct level for rings is also absolute, by causal rings below their links, and effected rings above their links for cause and effect in a landscape. Those levels have correct relative positions, but you will see in Diagrams 16 & 17, upper organs have almost complete overlap of ring & link levels of two organs together, slicing. Lower organs have almost complete distancing of ring & link levels of two organs apart, splaying. Upper organs slice inwards by links from ring compression to decompression. Lower organs splay outward by their links from ring compression to decompression. Links slice or splay at transition, but rings conform by fixing for a slice or freeing for a splay, so slice or splay is by both links & rings. Links counter to rings are like twists between action & reaction of inertial rings,

The Human Design

75

which change their inertia by links, and this may apply also in general to physics, including collisions for anti-state formation. Respectively, slice or splay are concave or convex, upper or lower. Concave-convex have opposite depths back-front. Slice & splay have opposite widths in-out. Upper & lower have opposite heights up-down. A present moment of pulse mirrors left-right sides. Gas has depth, liquid has width, solid has height, and mineral has pulse. Two charged axes of depth & pulse seen from above flat on the surface for forward traction, combine with two pivots by width using height seen from the side to wind a mound around axes for circular momentum for that traction. Charge unifies flat, by axes to four sides laterally. Mass unifies pivotally around the axes, as width extending to or from height for momentum around crossways charged axes that are flat on the surface for forward traction by momentum. This enables charge to be causal back & effected front for traction, while mass can be causal down & effect up for momentum cycles. There is “complete inversion” of slice versus splay on each side, and unity between both sides by two axes and two pivots. All moves match between two organs in each of four layers, to provide perfect traction to momentum across an entire system. The lines for rings and dashed lines for links in Diagrams 15 & 16 each have moves by arrows. Moves of each organ match for both in layers. Time flows or ebbs by waves, and space converges or diverges by planes. The moves are achieved by tilts at a head or bulges at a body by rings & links from set positions, in a legend at right in Diagram 16, as root moves. Upper organs overlap by compression in shared layers by waves or planes. Lower organs disperse by decompression. The legend of root moves underlies the apparent “symmetrical” moves in the diagram, which are moves from Diagram 15. Liquid flows down from up at an atrium and up from down at a ventricle in overlap to make a flow direct from sites to an atrium that can be modulated by a ventricle at transition to pump back

The Human Design

76

to sites. Liquid ebbs down from down at a cochlea and up from up at a vestibular in dispersal to make an ebb by collected external waves for sites that can be modulated by a vestibular for sites to balance at transitions for collection. Mineral flows up from down at a spine and down from up at a medulla in overlap to flow from sites with crossover impetus to a brain for a medulla to take a flow back for site reactions after processing. Mineral ebbs up from up at edges and down from down at a gutter in dispersal to make an ebb of sounds for sites by a tongue using edges for impetus in a muscular wave to vocal cords, to collect and then project back by crossover at a gutter. Solid converges up from down at a vomeronasal plane and down from up at an olfactory in overlap to make a terrace of tilting planes by a lift to sniff across the lowest to settle and then gather by dipping the highest to snort and settle again. Solid diverges up from up a liver and down from down at a bowel in dispersal as a catchment of high planes to collect and then stall by a liver to move nutrients up and let waste go down. Gas converges down from up at a fovea and up from down at an optic in overlapping planes by tilting an eye down to take light from depth at upper fovea, then to depth up for brighter light at lower optic nerve to edge objects from above. Gas diverges up from up at a chest and down from down at a diaphragm in dispersal as one extended plane to collect air and stretch it to a flat base by depth for saturation and then exhale. At a head, rings sandwich and links spread. Rings at eye & nose sandwich together as planes, and rings at ear & tongue sandwich apart as waves. There is overlap between rings of receptors downward by an olfactory nerve plane directly above fovea receptors upward by an optic nerve plane, to overlap in sandwich using a border. There is dispersal between rings at tongue edges and a cochlea to find harmony in sandwich. By tilting, nose and eye survey space at any level, while ear and tongue occupy an actual level of timing. Conversely, at a body, rings spread and links sandwich. There is a spread of spinal and heart flow in overlap across sites, and a sandwich at an N

The Human Design

77

Cloth between medulla and sinoatrial to modulate. There is a spread of chest and bowel in their dispersals, and a sandwich of diaphragm and liver using a border. By bulging, upper body surveys time at any level, and lower occupies an actual level of space. Use the view at foot of Diagram 16 as a guide. As a complete layer of rings & links across left & right, each eye stretches along its center line for a cone, by a ring fovea for a light cone along a line of depth set by an optic nerve link with one Point of Vision for both eyes. Each lung stretches along its center line for a cone, by ring chest heaves pulling a lung for its air cone along a line of depth set by one linked diaphragm arch to mirror both lungs. A spine stacks across its center line for a cone on each side with sensory actions to spit out mirrored motor reactions, across a line for pulses set by a linked medulla to a brain, with cross talk working to one pulse axis left & right. A tongue stacks across a ring tongue edge on each side as a cone shaping waves across a line for a mirrored pulses set by a linked gutter to one set of vocal folds talking for both hemispheres. Gravity organs at ears wind by stretching along each ring cochlea spiral, levering each helix as a cone to collect waves around it using a linked vestibular nerve for one point balance for both, with a middle ear to adjust. At a heart, ring atria for vessels make a cone stretching along each ventricle linked by nodes to one brain for supply of blood to spinal logistics at sites in one full beat for both sides. A gut stacks by cones across each side, for one central blood supply at a liver to and from a heart. A nose stacks mucus across each nostril cone down to a ring plane, by levering it around one bridged olfactory nerve linking for both sides. Gas has bubbles at an eyeball and lung alveoli, liquid has canals at heart and ear, mineral has seams at spine and tongue, and solid has piles at nose and gut. Gasses and liquids stretch. Minerals and solids stack. I suspect an eye & ear may stretch by causal density, by etching into matting, to “sketch”.

The Human Design

78

At a compressed upper body, overlapping heart and spine make clear cones with links counter to rings in cones. A spine links to a brain’s neurons, via a medulla oblongata, and a heart’s sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes also link to a brain for blood flow to sites to supply to spinal logistics at sites. We are two thirds water in locomotion as a wave. Like an ear has its own integrity to hear hormonally, a heart has integrity by rubbery walls as a pump for sites with muscles working to keep a flow. It can half cycle with a gut and half cycle with lungs by taking links from them to extend their capacities across sites. Liquids and minerals are waves flowing across all sites by vessels and nerves to and from heart and spine. All sites are therefore wavelike by liquids and minerals at all sites, but head sites also have sound waves used by ears and tongue in its circular chamber for sound production. We are walking compasses & talking clocks by neurons representing sites, rather than by abstruse neural magic, and our frame is comprehensive across fundamentals in Diagram 8. At the spine, the first ring move is sensory action in & up before motor reaction out & down, using a crossover C Link medulla to a brain’s neurons in a flat refolded table cloth of neurons, N Cloth. The links send sensory from in & up to go out & up to resolve as motor at the N Cloth and go in & down to a spine to flow out & down as responses. A first ring move in & up is sensory flow, and it has reflexes for sensory to react by motor at a spine, but it can adjust sensory via an N Cloth before motor outputs. In chapter 10 on neurons, sensory inputs compress in a brain until a threshold of intensity to “experience” awareness, and then it decompresses as motor outputs for reactive moves, consistent with the compressiondecompression crossover vectors in Diagram 15 (1). A heart supplies oxygen from lungs and nutrients from a gut to all sites, as supply to spine logistics. Its first ring flow is in & down to a heart and then out & up, which is automatic by rings using rubbery walls of a heart itself. A heart has a modulating

The Human Design

79

M Link, its nodes to the N Cloth. It uses a gut link in the right atrium cooperating with spinal logistics via the sinoatrial to favor a gut & spinal logistics before flow to lungs, coordinating atrioventricular nodes to modulate ventricle flow for both gut and lungs. The rings are Full Cones above and right at a heart, and I prioritize the ventricles to slice, but using a sinoatrial to settle atria for a gut & spinal logistics. The nodes adjust ring flow for supply of oxygen and nutrients by blood at sites for logistics. Modulation controls filling out & down and beating in & up to get the blood out, as counter cycles extending a ring to sites. Its location at left sets locations for other body organ links. A full cone is right & above, and links tend left & below. Muscles at sites are integral as the effected periphery driving regularly to enable a heart to compress blood flow back to it. A first spinal ring move is at front of back in & up. A first link is at back of back out & up in a deep brain with sensory at back in Diagram 26, later. A second link for motor moves is front of front in & down in a brain, slicing back to front. A second ring move is back of front out & down to move, behind to forward. A medulla braces a brain deeper back and front than a spine. To match a spine, a heart sends a blood flow from SVC & IVC blasted front of front by atria in & down, then a ventricle stops it to fill back of front out & down, then it flows front of back by slicing in & up from that fill, to then flow back of back out & up behind the SVC & IVC by an aorta or pulmonary. Later, an arm & hand throw objects using the same sequence. All moves of two organs sharing each layer are synchronized for front, back, left, right, in, out, up, and down moves. This extends clearly to appendages they share in Diagram 21, later. Each organ has a different starting move by ring compression from its layer partner, but all moves are matched, despite starting and finishing differently in a shared “cycle”. At lower body, a liver links rings of a gut to a heart to extend beyond its stomach & large intestine, for nutrition to sites by blood vessels. Link moves are counter to ring, using a portal to

The Human Design

80

send blood to a liver from a small intestine stripping nutrients. Its alternate, lungs, uses rings of a ribcage to inhale and exhale, with a diaphragm as a link to draw directly from bronchi to alveoli down to the gut level, below a ribcage level, to bounce inhale to exhale. A diaphragm acts on lungs down the middle to pull air, and it is counter to a ribcage in each lung to draw oxygen to transport to sites and brain by a heart. Their splay has a shared harmony with gut splay, for a lung level to invade down, and a gut level to invade it up. Downwards Peristalsis is not used in a gut beyond the duodenum. Small and large intestines have weight for gravity across their bulk served by regular muscle contractions. They decompress in broad biology. Gut rings open down center of a body as causal gravity. Rib rings open a surface ribcage as effected levity. Chest ring moves pull lungs out & down front, then drive them in & up back, with links between. Air moves deep at front of front, out & down as the first ring move for both lungs, to draw fresh air at back of front linking in & down to settle from bronchi to alveoli, using the draw of a central diaphragm for both lungs. Then air moves out & up, at front of back linking to remove stale air at alveoli back to bronchi, as a diaphragm closes by a secondary ring move and a chest drives lungs back in & up to exhale. Lungs stretch depth to extend air to sites by linking to a heart. Lungs decompress as a surface. At a gut, a liver serves digestion to transfer nutrients to blood from the entire tract, placed above a stomach. A bladder is supplied by kidneys, not in the diagram but placed each side of a liver for blood purification. A gut has as about as many neurons as a spine. While it accompanies lungs in sequences matching up or down bulges by their rings and links, it begins at back and then rounds to front, rather than at front and then at back like lungs. First, we fill a stomach out & up at front of back to begin a flow of digested nutrients for blood supply to a liver back of back. We use bile storage at a pancreas in & up to a duodenum bend, to mix with food moving out & down to

The Human Design

81

small intestines as the process moves to front of front. Nutrients gradually digest in the small intestine for flow up to a liver by an opened portal, and continue back of front for large intestines to compact in & down. Gut and lungs alternate rings and links front & back, with ribs as a ring surface front & back around a gut ring centering front & back, to both decompress. At upper head, an olfactory nerve links a ring vomeronasal plane for settled odor, to a vestibular for central balance up & down. A solid nostril and concha in a cone shape take gas with odor along narrowing passages to settle below an olfactory above a lower plane, for a full stack of odor. The gas angle inhaling by a throat through a nose is along the lower plane for gas cones made by a low passage, but it can “blitz” an olfactory by tilting down to odor to sniff up the hypotenuse angle. That blitz is not a smell, due to intensity, but it can settle from the blitz, down to the plane, for an extended stack from higher up. An olfactory connects direct to brain cortices for its vestibular link to balance a plane up & down to gather & stack. A nose settles dust onto its own terraced landscape in a high cathedral as a recreated environment. A vomeronasal plane is a level in animals for pheromone reception of familiar odor, with a Flehman Response in dogs & cats. It may still be for “familiarity” in humans, as the lowest ring stack down from up. In Diagram 15 (2), a nose sequences from its plane tilted above level, to move in & down inhaling at the plane draining back in the throat, to level it out. It can stay above level by lifting to snort the plane out & up, or it can link to move below level to exhale gently nuzzling with the olfactory lowered out & down, and then inhaling in & up down to be blitzed by a sniff, then moving above level to snort out & up. We settle to a flavor plane, with an organ in snakes. An eye likewise settles from a “blind” spot near bright objects to a fovea below, for reflected sharp edges. An optic nerve links to a vestibular for central balance tilt to gather light for a

The Human Design

82

central & shallow below fovea from a deep & wide arc of light above, to etch. A solid eyeball shudder tends downwards in pressure, as saccades tend to read down a page and not up, in all languages except a few ancient religious ones. This sends light cones in an eyeball upwards as a levity cone to a fovea. It benefits from a half link oscillating centrally to a vestibular from the optic nerve, but an eye has a blind spot at the optic nerve when light comes from bright sources above. The blind spot gives range to find bright edges for a fovea with less harm, and the link extends eye function to balance a whole head for it. An eye can voluntarily move on its own, and also oscillate into a vestibular for static balance. An optic nerve enables a “mirror” between eyes for width & depth, to level at a fovea more centrally focused, by etching over its tight images below using arcs of light from above & sides. An eye has a pure light cone captured in its ball as a recreated environment for light to excite “gasses” in pressurized solid pockets. In Diagram 15 (2,) a cone is made by a lens from a saccade tending down from X, in & up to compress dim light to a fovea, which is not preferred. Saccades move all ways, but tend down. This literally drains light from the eye out & up as a link, to then seek light at the upper edge of X, towards Y, to saccade an edge to X using light above it. The pupil closes from edging at Y, to return to X and open for a clear view of the object revealed by edging, taking in light by opening for dim light. In my current model, edging reveals objects for ring examination in a relation of pupil moves for light levels, and saccade moves for edges that excite from above but favor “cooler” objects below in doing so. Saccades are our fastest anatomical moves, and at lower head we use our smallest anatomical muscle to reflex by an ossicles pedal at a middle ear. The cone of an ear is set from auricle out with helix as an apex, down a canal to a drum angled down, and then down to a cochlea. Ossicles intercede that cone to amplify waves at the drum and to speak using a reflexive sensitivity. The drum is a cone angled down to the

The Human Design

83

helix and cochlea cone, and the middle ear link creates a leveraged reflex, so that waves externally tighten to increase hearing. A cochlea is liquid in a well with mineral hairs, to detect sound waves, below added canals for vestibular balance. Ossicles are between the cochlea and drum and below the vestibular. A cochlea uses a vestibular to reflex balance, for turns to hear from the leverage of ossicles with a helix as an apex. Cochlea reception of internal waves from vocal folds can loosen by a Vocalization-Induced Stapedius Reflex. We can favor external over the internal. A bird uses it to sing, and a bat blocks its cry to hear its echo. A heart is subject to sinoatrial logistics for supply to sites, while a tongue and its use of vocal cords is subject to a high level of supply by ears to replicate by tones. An ear helix stop waves out & up as a reservoir to canal down to a drum angled for an M Link to go in & up by pressure from ossicles to an oval window at a cochlea to intensify drum waves. A helix tilts for any waves in any direction. With a face lowered, ears go up at back for the helix to be an apex for favored waves from below, to go down a canal to the drum. However, ossicles can release the pressure pedal out & down as a reflex for internal waves, to favor the external and continue in & down to a cochlea, which swings to relate external & internal. In Diagram 15 (2) the swing up to speak to unfix ossicles is tolerance to still go in & down to a cochlea. It compares to a gut as a lower gravity organ by collection wide to channel down, then up by link and down by link, and then down with nothing left to digest or hear. A tongue can move on its own like an eye, in tilts up and down alternating to hear and speak. Its link is also muscular, and it also goes to vocal folds, by a gutter crossing over ring tongue edges to shape waves blown from vocal folds. The ring edges make a mineral cone level, barely above its own gutter as a counter cone tending back and down relative to ring up and front. The gutter collects waves to blow and cross over in a mouth chamber, in wave formation. It wets continually, and its

The Human Design

84

link to vocal folds for waves benefits from balance of an ear at a vestibular. However, it sets its own level, like surf over a sea level set by an ear, with a mere margin for tongue rings to be above the tilt of a helix ring with face down, to harmonize. It can substitute for a damaged vestibular in providing general balance. It is loose to circle for all sites like a spine, but unlike heart supply to spine logistics, there is tongue linguistics to ear supply, favoring an ear to veto & tone speech to “fit in” hormonally externally. Receptors are in triangles with a gutter, and muscles run deep to move its intrinsic surface. Crossover of a tongue linking with N Cords vocal folds is from a lower link gutter cutting across upper tongue edges in Diagram 15 (2). The out & down move is the first ring tilt down by its edges to anticipate specific waves to shape. Then it links with N Cords to bounce a wave using the tongue’s gutter in & down for blown waves. The gutter opens to blow out & up, to shape by upper tongue edges in & up, as readily collected in anticipation. N Cords are tiny flaps hung out there to dry by the N Cloth, so to speak. We adjust tone at N Cord muscles until tuned to ears using modulation. Pacing and edging waves from N Cords for linguistics may edge basic ideas into complex ones with tone for tunes. A tongue is mineral acting on air to shape waves, using a gutter for solids or gasses, contained by edges for liquids in particular when drinking upwards. Involuntary & Voluntary Moves We have voluntary moves by a medulla bracing nerves across stable hemispheres by unifying pulses across the left & right axis, for a unified structure sharing two axes and two pivots. They provide ideal confinements to goals in the world, along & across an intact cerebrum. We have involuntary moves as continual corrections in extensive balance from a pivotal vestibular, for static reflex using a pivotal cerebellum. As noted, electromagnetism & gravitation, in mutuality by actionreaction, partition all of nature. Levity current by nerve &

The Human Design

85

gravity sediment by hormone combine in neurons. They have partitioned flows for current & hormone that are pivotal at a rounded intact cerebellum to maintain extended reflexive “levels” in a world by all organs and appendages, and laterally divided at a cerebrum to confine the maintenance of levels in a world for moves aimed at goals in a world by conditioning. Maintenance is adjusted for smooth levelling in this chapter and the next, for anatomy to maintain an intact state that is level in relation to a world, continually adjusting to see objects without saccades being mistimed as jerky vision, for example. All levels, including for appendages, are structural by gravity to maintain diverse cellular chemical levels in relation to a world. Organs and appendages are immersed in a world, and their chemically delimited moves reflex naturally in interface with a chemical world in this chapter and the next. Structural reflexive moves condition voluntarily by nerves confining hormonal sites preemptively to goals, and levels are settled around them. The nerve cycle tied to a medulla for voluntary confinement as levity is lateral to a pivotal hormone cycle tied to a vestibular for involuntary maintenance of level interfaces. Nerve is rapid and hormone lasts longer, but pivotal & lateral extends to both nerve & hormone. Loops & string with lateral angles & smooth momentum also combine in photons & gravitons, earlier. Given that we have automatic chemical levelling by anatomy, unknown until now, we can clarify “Cortical Discharge” to backcheck to attenuate reflex to our moves, for levelling at goals in a world. In my model, there is no “working backwards” to prevent reflexing sequentially, to suppress feeling every little move we make when we detect interface with a world. As the self-stimulated and contained aspect of a cycle that is also crucially open to collect everything from a world, we control it by hormonal regulation and send attenuated moves to be felt as attenuated moves. Continual back-checks are a processing burden, if the brain can deal with burdens. If not, it may more efficiently stall for the output, by an extant hormone distribution

The Human Design

86

in a brain that sent it. My model simplifies to attenuation by self-stimulation for levels, including self-stimulation for sequential level experiences of thought. Levels condition to un-attenuated goals in a world, to “attenuate” our levels to them for greater ease within a niche. Moves for levels & goals, by each different species with its own chemical levels, are coordinated using a central brain that only needs to tend to favor moves, and tendencies become conditioned. We can favor our moves in comfortable cycling, more distant from suitable levels in a world, or be more immersed in it. The experience is always of “oneself in the world” as interface. We generate warmth and we have our own gravity, but if we move in a cold ocean we experience our warmth & gravity and an ocean’s, not a beach’s. Proprioception gives intactness as we move to adjust levels by conditioning. It does not give feelings of pressure distributed in and around anatomy by receptors capturing impact with a world, including weight and warmth, to retain as our experience of one impact at interface. We are attenuated in our intactness to favor goals in a world, but that does not sort which part is due to us, and which part the world. It just confirms the primacy of the world. It confirms that our moves are reactions to actions of a world in interface, in our experience and in reality. We need experience in a world to condition our impacts and avoid clumsiness from attenuation. In Diagram 15 (2), black dots are direct to cortices bypassing the medulla to have vestibular access. Static reflex is also at eye and tongue direct to reflex by nerves to the cerebellum. Static reflex is from Electrostatics by insulating gravity and electrical levity organs combining for a head. Electrodynamics for energy would apply at a body, but each system completely overlaps, by centers & surfaces for inputs to a brain, and outputs from it. In Diagram 26, cortical structure conforms to broad biology by charged axes & massive pivots partitioning brain cortices appropriately across the board, for actionreaction present moments with impetus as past-to-future sites.

The Human Design

87

In chapter 13, I explain linguistics at vocal folds is based on a vestibular at ears serving head & body. Logistics by a spine is based on a medulla for head & body served by a heart. Vocal folds and a medulla are both in the neck between body and head, but nerves favor a spinal body, and linguistic balance favors a vestibular head. A relation to Strong & Weak Nuclear Forces in physics arises from an offset of counter & regular force. Vestibular balance for static reflex to keep levels are regular at a head, as neutral centers for concentrated surfaces at ear & nose, countered by concentrated centers & neutral surfaces at an eye & tongue. Involuntary reflexes encompass voluntary moves at a head. At a body, voluntary spine & lung logistics have a concentrated center & neutral surface to encompass involuntary energy decay by gut & heart as a neutral center and concentrated surface. This applies to sway males to logistics to ideal ends of a home, edging. Females sway to linguistics from real origins of a home, pivoting. Thought Merely as “Integration” of Feelings All moves during thought may contribute to it, and so regularly they simply go together. Sites are represented by neurons on finalization of inputs in continual Point-Instant experiences. “Complexity” to awareness is mostly an obfuscation. In almost all of neuroscience, a brain is a silly intact little person, Homunculus, with its own will, and not an automatic facility to represent site interfaces. Thoughts are diverse feelings that are integrated & modulated when inputs of site receptor components are networked for commons pivotally & laterally in a brain. It is an experience of “thoughts about feelings”, but it is hormonally modulated and nervously confined feelings in itself, as settled across all sites by networking their commons. It is the “ethereal” or conceptual reality of networking feelings to create a state that is actually experienced ethereally or conceptually “about” feelings that remain preserved. But feelings can be intricate by their components, at an eye or ear for example, and concepts about them match intricately.

The Human Design

88

Feelings that are unrecognized by obvious thought at any moment are “subtle”, supporting the more “obvious”, rather than merely unrecognizable. The subtle accompanies the obvious, which is a peak. I do not use “subconscious”, as low level conscious events. The only events below the continual combination of subtle & obvious experiences are preconscious processes, of which we are never conscious. Thoughts use preconscious delay for components of line, shade, and color for vision, for example, to split for vision and thought about it by commons, involving all sites. We do not experience the assembly of diverse specifics for one vision as they happen “before our eyes”. Thoughts “attend” feelings when they arise. By “plasticity”, various active sites instigate thoughts involving past & potential patterns across many inactive sites during that moment by integration in a brain using plasticity. Some will instigate and be more obvious, and other subtly support. An automatic flow continually spits out motor moves as reaction to sensory actions, as inputs build to outputs. Each site will join that flow by its inputs with variable timing to finalize their processing, faster for hearing at 30 milliseconds and slower for touch, at 150, for example. Some build enough, and others do not. Sites literally carry each other across activities from subtle to obvious to subtle. Flow can fill partly in cortices, ready to feel or move by synchronized patterns. We construct an intact representation of “oneself in the world” with fidelity to all site interfaces. Awareness is a sensory experience continually refreshed by fresh interfaces with a world, cycling as memory. I equate sensory with memory, from the process of continual refreshment and adjustment to an accumulating sensory flow. Our gravity & levity cause-to-effect sites use automatic motor outputs from sensory inputs to spit out moves continually, some of which we know and control. They provide for their forward momentum by replenishing sites and neural networks to know our evolved and stored reaction potential from actual actions to the extent they can before

The Human Design

89

reactions. Anticipation is for improved sensory satisfaction. We collect stimulation from a world and condition moves that differentiate us from it, to explore and not return to the same sensory inputs for satisfaction with a world. This enables us to extend beyond niches to condition the appearance of Free Will from comprehensive capacities. We are always subjective, but we can try to be objective by motor control of sensory inputs. Awareness “satisfactorily” matches “reality” for humans, but it is a construct using neurons, and only experienced when site inputs synchronize to finalize in a brain. It is a “representation” because sites do not experience events at sites immediately by awareness. The event is evidenced by feelings of sites and conceptual thoughts about them, but it is an intact actionreaction event in the brain, with variable processing times for sites joining the flow after receptor stimulation. We are automata in a world until processed, but the delay is brief, we have reflexes to ameliorate, and we have conditioned expectations. But we are always inevitably open to being interrupted by the world necessarily during automatism, as that interface is vital. A brain is automatic in representing site interfaces with fidelity, but we are dependent on its intact capacities. We can correlate neural activity to sites and subjective experiences by chemistry, not merely brain scans. To date, Embodied Mind in psychology & neuroscience has been pushed aside to preserve “other” academic reputations. Sexuality, Growth & Awareness Levity at edges and gravity as bases applies to sex organs, and also to appendages in the next chapter. Male testes and penis are at the edge of anatomy with levity. They aim multiple levity sperm at a massive gravity egg that falls down into a massive womb. A vagina extends down from a womb to hold and insulate friction of a risen and rising penis head until fertilization. A womb expands for an embryo till a baby falls down. Levity daily across yearly cycles are for male arousal. Gravity daily across monthly

The Human Design

90

cycles are for female ovulation. Human females exactly match our lunar cycle’s duration, which is as precise as any features matching landscapes. Gravity concentrates a vaginal surface around a neutral center womb for an egg. Levity concentrates a center at testes building sperm for a shaft, with a neutral surface penis head to decay when a concentrated shaft penetrates a concentrated vaginal surface for neutral head to meet womb. In chapters 12 & 13, I apply gravity Strong Force linguistics by females mutual to levity Weak Force logistics by males. Sex is by direct action-reaction shearing by sex organs in mutuality. We have a welcoming base with edged border, as a home for a child. A mother extends herself into the world to hold from the causal origin of a home, but too often in ignorance of a world. A father contains himself as an edged border to sort the world to the causal ideal of a home, but too often with violence in the world. Society can substitute for family in an extension of altruism, or to extend its ignorance and violence. Cause, Effect & Awareness We have causal organs tending back and below in the past driving effected at front and above in the future. Future is also effect by induction in right brain hemisphere and past is cause by deduction in left hemisphere, talking across sides. Cause is “me” affecting the other, effect is “the other” affecting me, and both aspects comprise the “entity”, “I”, or “oneself”. We are an entity that is entirely interactive to progress from a zygote, and we regulate interactivity by dividing functions between causal security and effected exposure. Political systems conform, to right wing for initiatives of self, and left wing for others. Organs infiltrate across both sides by merger, but may tend to favor one side or other in cross talk. Cause is from the ground up for my consistent “outlook” that you can note, and effect is from top down for you to cause me to have “insight” about you. Cause is known by assured steps from the past, and effect is to future knowledge by insights in need of secure

The Human Design

91

relations to causes. Deductive knowledge is secured by your past while inductive belief based upon it is open to refutation in your future. Reasoning does not conform to a shaky past, as your past and your future, whether your time is used for either. Space & Time There are spatial dimensions and temporal periods. Later, I discuss this to allow for temporal width, but any discrete space or time has reducing or increasing spatial “sizes” or temporal “periods”. Upper head has less size and lower body more size. Upper body has shorter periods, and lower head longer periods. Spatial sizes and temporal periods can be used discretely, alternatively, and together for active and passive motions. We extend from a causal past with space behind us to an effected future with space ahead, with upper & lower as complete inversions. Complete Inversion as Sides of a Soup Spoon A flat mirror distorts a “charged” pulse left-right & depth frontback-front, but “massive” height up & down and width in & out remain uniform and undistorted as a frame for pulse & depth distortion. I will discuss the uniformity of gravitons as mass and distortion by photons as charge in physics later, with charge as a product of a density distortions to graviton pulses & depths. Add concave & convex depth by curvature of mass up & down, in & out, and it completely inverts the “distortion” if you look into a round soup spoon each way completely inverted from each other. Each soup spoon eye lens on each side has an image made at a fovea automatically completely de-inverted by neurons. It will apply more generally to neurons to reconcile upper & lower layers each side to mirror between, to represent an actual inverted structure. The next chapter shows some geometrical potential, with spoons as appendage templates each side aligning to mirror two concave spoons slicing at upper levels, or two convex spoons splaying at lower levels.

The Human Design

92

Twist in Block Merger & Twist in Field Accretion As noted in my general physics coverage, there is merger by blocks and accretion by fields. Using Diagrams 11 (1) & (2) for anatomy, it simplifies to a twist at a medulla by a charged body in relation to a massive vestibular head with brain encased. The head keeps an original rotation, and a body must twist in relation to it when mass merges around intact charge to spin it in a “particle” direction sympathetic to mass, with right causal past driving left effected future. Merger requires a twisted relation as it spins to create a necessarily twisted reconciliation of body & head in Diagram 11 (1). A vestibular primary works at a head direct to brain cortices, and a medulla at a body by crossover, although they overlap by appendages in particular, which follow both regimes. A head stays pivotal by mass like a proton, with massive Strong Force linguistics at a vestibular, and a body is laterally orbital to it by Weak Force logistics at a medulla. It is a relation of charge & mass across rest & energy to mutually keep rest & energy balanced & stable, with a twist for intact rest & energy in shared rotation. Consistently, field appendages also twist when blocks decay to release them for exchange, as a relation between mass & charge across rest & energy. There is a necessary twist to the relation for accretion in physics in Diagram 12, and also for anatomy, to create a piston line across a cog line. I noted in physics that a proton actually decompresses to twist away from a compressed electron pulse, as mass twisting for charge for decay, but in appendages, charge twists away from mass. Blocks are intact as an “atom” of head & body organs with flat traction by charge served by cycles of massive momentum. Atoms compound flat on a surface in Diagram 6 and also conform to massive epicycle field momentum. The epicycle is for appendage momentum. Flat charged traction & massive momentum cycles with a twist for organs, become flat charged springs that twist for massive levers around those organs. The Design applies complementing logic for field capacities, next.

The Human Design

93

9. Appendage Superstructure

Organs are gross chemicals and appendages are traces. Appendages are in templates of joints & lengths as slanted coils, adapting the Design in Diagram 18. They do not merge to adjoin like organs. Appendages uncoil from compression to decompress and coil again compressing. Appendages serve by conforming to organs in location, composition, and function. The flat charged grid on a surface for compounds as organs is a smooth intact relation of rest & energy with traction as causeeffect, back-front. The grid is filled in by massive pivots around it with epicycle momentum as cause-effect, down-up. Merger for the grid to dangle organs resolves as a “diagonal” between cause back & below and effect front & above, and this shows graphically in conforming brain cortices for organs in Diagram 26 later. A diagonal division enables organ mass up-down, inout to support traction to that momentum front-back, left-right. Appendages also use a diagonal, across a common template, shortly. Momentum is provided up-down, in-out, with traction to it front-back, left-right, as a standard template that pivots mass smoothly and angles charge at extremities. Charge has flat traction by rolls across angles, using massive cyclical leverage. A template levers a pivot up & down, in & out for momentum, and flattens a spring front-back, left-right for traction, by shared “pistons” at upper or “cogs” at lower. Pivotal cycles of mass have lateral springs at extremities to flatten at impact for levered traction. Charged axes for springs provide forward angles for momentum. Upper templates infiltrate across sides as pistons with traction to momentum out & back. Lower undulate across sides as cogs with traction to momentum round & round. Cogs & pistons accrete as one system that follows accretion in physics from Diagram 12 exactly, shown in Diagram 22 shortly.

The Human Design

94

Diagram 18, Design for Slanted Template Upright in an Epicycle Effect Mineral Loose Joint 8

Gas Lift Length 1

Liquid Flow 7 Length

Solid Light 2 Joint

Time

(Horizon)

Space

6 Length Mineral Tight

3 Joint Gas Contained 5 Joint Liquid Sink

Edges

4 Length Solid Heavy Cause

Bases

Diagram 19, Fields Always Relative, but Absolute in a World Relative View

View in World by Results In

Relative View Out

Organ 6

Organ 4 Out

In

The Human Design

95

Diagram 20, Arrowed Pulls of Coils to Lever Open & Closed (Concave Space, Back-Front) (Concave Time, Back-Front) Right Upper Head (Sliced Front Views) Right Upper Body (Palm over mouth) Slice Slice 7 brow 1 thumb Out Fix In 3 wrist In 8 palm 1 upper lid Out Fix 6 fingers 5 temple

3 orbit 8 duct In Slice

2 sinus

7 lower arm

6 lower lid Fix Out

5 shoulder

In 2 elbow

Out Fix 4 cheek

4 upper arm Slice

Upper and Lower Templates Complete Inversions (Convex Space, Front-Back) (Convex Time, Front-Back) Right Lower Body (Splayed Front Views) Right Lower Head Splay 4 thigh

2 knee In Free

Out

Splay 4 palate

5 hip

Out

6 upper teeth Free In

7 calf 2 lips 6 toes

Free

In 8 sole 3 ankle Out Free 1 big toe Splay

8 gums 3 hinge Splay Out In 1 lower teeth 7 chin

5 arch

The Human Design

96

Diagram 21, Coils with a Diagonal Compromise Level to Lever Upper Template, Right Front Slice (Applies to Head or Body) Front & Back, Left & Right for Lateral Infiltration to Twist 7 Pivotal Momentum Out & Back as Piston Old Horizon Effect Rings 1 C B Up Front 5

3

8

2

Lever

Slice In

Down

Back D A Cause Rings (From the Front, Slice Follows Diagram 15)

6 4

Lower Template, Right Front Splay (Applies to Head or Body) Front & Back, Left & Right for Lateral Undulation to Ride 4 Pivotal Momentum Out & Back as Cog Old Horizon Effect Rings 6 A D Front Up 2

8

3

5

Splay Out

Lever

Back

1 7

Down B C Cause Rings (From the Front, Splay Follows Diagram 15)

Levering Matches Organ Rings & Links Stage Move

A Out & Down

B In & Down

C Out & Up

D In & Up

Match to Numbered Moves 1 – 4 in Organ Diagram 14 (& 15) Upper: Gravity Sequ. 1D, 2C, 3B, 4A; Levity Sequ. 1B, 2A, 3D, 4C Lower: Gravity Sequ. 1C, 2D, 3A, 4B; Levity Sequ. 1A, 2B, 3C, 4D

The Human Design

97

Gate Slice & Splay from Above, Inversion Each Side to Mirror Between Right Front Spatial Gates Right Back Temporal Gates Center Center Splay Hip Wrist Orbit Slice Splay Arch Slice Slice Slice Sinus

Gape Splay

Sole Splay

Elbow

Diagram 22 Accretion in Anatomy & Physics (1) Piston & Cog, with Cycling & Traction, Right Front Head or Body Traction Ahead (Front) Bright Leaf Cycle Down Twist Back Traction Ahead (Front) High Grass Twist Out Cycle Up

Cycle Down Ride Out Dark Branch Ride Back Cycle Up

Traction Ahead (Back) Low Root

Traction Ahead (Back) (2) Accretion Disc Spring-Shift (Piston Line across Cog Line) Zoom View High Piston Line

Low

One Contour Cog Line (Adapted from Wikipedia)

The Human Design

98

Mass provides momentum by levering in Diagram 21. An intact template is comprised of equal resting joints and energetic lengths as a spring lever by both tilting & bulging. It levers with causal appendage rings behind & below their links and effected in front & above their links, by setting a compromise leverage level. As noted, organ mass cuts through charged axes to “dangle angles” up & down by merger. Organs are not neat by angled dangling internally, but we have hemispheres that crosstalk to settle asymmetry. In templates, a vestibular tends to aid mass pivotally around organs, and a cerebrum tends to aid charge laterally at extremities. But, in levering flat with charge at extremities, we have a smooth level pivot for all templates around organs in Diagrams 20 & 21. Charge angles its springs less neatly at extremities, dangling. Charge is free to angle for traction, not anchor to a trunk smoothly pivotally. Organs have smooth charge mirroring for crosstalk, and mass “dangles angles” by pivotal balance at a vestibular. Templates have springs at extremities that now “dangle angles”, like angled mass does in organs, with mass smoothly pivoting. Appendages loosen, lift, lighten, contain, weight, sink, tighten, & flow, consistently across each template, using the same words from comparable organ functions. They make one coil of sharp “sorting edges” and massive “explosive bases”. A coil has contraction on the inside of coils to compress, and outside to decompress in Diagrams 20 & 21, for “in” and “out” moves of edges and bases. Muscles pull by nerves and push by hormones to “explode” to set conditioned levels to a world. A line of common contraction on one side uses relaxation on the other to pull open or pull closed. They sort by edges that pull equally both ways as a cup, free at extremities to snap both ways, sorting. It extends to hold & explode by bases pushing one way around as an Isometric “hook” to build pressure with bulk muscles on both sides as if holding others in check. Cups have confined intensity, rolling across flat, when sorting, and electrical and magnetic lines cross each other, but the massive bases have one line to cycle to build pressure.

The Human Design

99

In Diagrams 20 & 21, electrical gas lines contain using massive liquid & solid extensions on the same line. Magnetic lines sharing electrical containment sort across the electrical line, to contain and also sling for extension, with mass as a “catch-all” in mutuality by shared rotation. The Design has eight distinct capacities, but block merger & field accretion across it arise after a Big Bang, as mutuality across distinct “opposites”. Depth & pulse make a spring-shift mutually with base cycles. At a hand, a cup contracts on the outside of a palm and then a thumb to open, and inside of a wrist and then fingers to close. By that alignment the cup can roll across flat to open and close each appendage in turn because thumb & wrist are crossed by palm & fingers. We can fully roll a closed cup around an opening, to lever to or from, rolling across flat to scoop and then drink by levering away as it tips a stream into a mouth. Levering rolls across flat, also at feet, eyes, or teeth. Conversely, bases lever to pivot rather than roll flat, to carry edges at extremities to find paths of least resistance to hooks holding tension in one line of pulls in by lower arm & elbow while it eases out by upper arm & shoulder. It can compress or make way by decompression with tension both ways in Isometric holds in check around a head & body, like graviton loops fully counter-shearing to hold as one between sources. Cups & hooks serve an intact relation of head & body. Cups sort laterally, and hooks hold tension pivotally for longer in extended function using a vestibular, with adjustable give & take to one line of tension. Edges sort for an intact head & body as an “atom” by sorting one way or the other by rolls, while bases hold to keep a head & body intact with a shared interlocked tension as an atom within a wider species rotation shared by human “atoms”. By appendages, we move objects around us by charge to keep a head & body intact, as “atoms” by accretion. We also move ourselves entirely as “atoms” by massive fields in accretion, to be intact around others. Field loops in mutual accretion across merged blocks create a human atom as a member of a species

The Human Design

100

intact by accretion applied to be intact itself and in a species dance. Wrists, ankles, eye orbits & jaw hinges all “saccade” to contain by switching between moving something around us, or moving ourselves around something. Blocks merge across sides to provide a block foundation for sufficient crosstalk & vestibular balance to direct the lateral and pivotal appendages. Diagram 22 (1) conforms directly to Diagram 22 (2), as a basis for entire templates to piston across cog lines that adjust for lower & higher tension using pistons. An economical electrical gas line of depth with massive solid inertial height is set lower at lower body, and higher at upper head. Mineral & liquid at an upper body piston stably across lower head balance, to adjust wave tempo, and also gas & solid piston & cog lines higher & lower. Two cog lines alternate in Diagram 22 (2) equally high & low by pistons & cogs adjusting tighter & looser tensions. Upper & lower reconcile by changes of tempo & line, but each template has its edges opening and closing in turn to one line one way, and then the opposite way by reversing the line of pull, to snap either way. Each is also a massive contour by bases in one line of pivotal Isometric tension. Adjustments are managed within templates by loosening & tightening tension to suit changes to higher & lower. I explain basic moves shortly. Accretion has a twist of charge around the vertical axis, borne as a “180 turn” to face mass, comparing Diagrams 18 & 20, just as mass bears a “180 turn” for charge at a medulla. For organs, merger by mass to spin around the horizontal axis creates labels left & right, by direction of spin to right. On decay from particles with that aligned spin, charged fields twist across the vertical axis to economically follow a massive contour by electrical line, while a magnetic line slings across it to both massive & charged purposes as mutuality between charge & mass. Then, Diagram 20 & 21 simply leans a horizon in Diagram 18 for template levels. The diagonal lean is a perfect compromise for flat charge and upright mass to both be causeeffect across the horizon. The level accretes diagonally, like a

The Human Design

101

diagonal relation of organs seen in brain cortices in Diagram 26. Accretion uses momentum on pages 103-107, so do not be concerned about the “inverted” positions of lower templates, as their momentum is correct in Diagram 21. In Diagram 21, upper templates swing on pivots inward as a slicing flat gate. Mass and charge combine for an overall levered springing template with specific moves levering as mass and springing as charge within it. Appendages move in & out, but as entire templates they favor slice at upper with “out” moves fixed to slice; and splay at lower with “in” moves free to splay. As noted, upper & lower each side are complete inversions to mirror across. I note blocks have absolute directions to momentum. Fields have momentum in directions relative to blocks to keep them intact. In anatomy, fields use a world just as a void is used in physics. Momentum cannot be measured, as it exists “in passage”, later. We do not know fields separately from their relation to blocks. Appendages are sent and taken relatively to organs in Diagram 19, but with intact purpose in the world. They move in & out of each block, but coordinate in between in a world that carries their impacts. This applies to physics, later. Fields are measured relative to particles exchanging them and not “in passage”, which is impossible. I note anatomy is intact by logic as organs & appendages, but also intact by examples of field loop & block string in an exact biological replica of physics. Biological & psychological drivers of our organs & appendages also drive sex. We are subject to sex organs, with block & field intact in fact, as a photon loop upon a string surface for males, and graviton loops along string for females, for mutual shearing as a factual microcosm of physics. At root, all is gravitons dealing with a photon by merger and then accretion. Sex organs evidence that level in a hormonal anatomy of organs & appendages generally, and also specifically by sex when taken over by “Strong & Weak Forces”. Strong & Weak are reconstructive in anatomy as female linguistics & male logistics. A microcosm exists as intact sex organs, to influence

The Human Design

102

intact organs & appendages hormonally to linguistics or logistics, consistently across biology & psychology. General anatomy apart from sex has intact logic keeping atoms intact, while sex extends beyond intact, wholly reconstructing. DNA encodes discretely for global features along with local, for continuation by factual biological replicas discretely at the chemical lynchpin. Lots of strange species have still got recognizable sex gear. Extra Levers & Springs to keep Templates Intact Edges and bases use a gravity lever and a levity spring for each entire template above & below in shared momentum. Levers & springs stack or stretch for cause or effect moves of organs. Upper body has pectoral muscles primarily to hold as a lever stretching for gravity bases across sides, related to muscular heart stretch. A levity spring at each shoulder blade angles edges at extremities for stacked vertebrae. Lower body has a stacked lever at buttocks to hold bases for a pelvis to stack a gut. A stretched spring at groins edges heels across sides for a stretched diaphragm. They are for entire templates, and rely on bulk or extremity to attract a vestibular into balance. However, upper head barely moves in itself for vestibular interest, so it has unique nerves direct to cortices that go further, to make clear connections for concentration & balance, as levers and springs. Sites have full cross-over to brain cortices, except nose and eye, divided at eye to spring a mirror across right & left divided fields of vision, and strutted at nose to lever. A template springs and levers across sides for eyes & nose using opposite cortices, uniquely. A lower head has a mandible with muscular stretchy bands at the jaws, and it springs at throat cartilage. A mandible with bands are a weight for undulation of a lower head to balance or speak, extending down from ear bones. A throat and its stacked cartilage are more directly related to a tongue retracting in and out of it, and it springs for a tongue. Jaws lever while a throat springs epiglottis cartilage to swallow alternating with breathing, and to speak.

The Human Design

103

Appendages Matching Organs Matching appendages to Diagram 20, upper body has an arm inward with palm near mouth, or to cradle an infant, or to arm wrestle properly, or like The Thinker statue by Rodin. A hand more easily opens a twisted closed wrist, keeping elbow in. An elbow more easily opens from body to side to leave a hand closed in. But arm and hand can work as a metronome to twist open and closed together, or settle. They slice, bearing stress at our centerline in a twisting rhythm, but never fully invert. Hands have rings below level, with links above, like a spine. Arms have rings above level, with links below, like a heart. Range to hands may need neural bulk as the spine’s traveler. Moves “in” one side balance with moves “out” the other side. A thumb is a “diaphragm” as an arched spur. Under your gaze, turn palms to chest slicing in correctly as in Diagram 20, and make two fists against each other, as a spine with the two final thumb joints as a diaphragm arch to lift way from the index finger to open a hand to inhale, but with diaphragm above rather than below spine, “upside down”. That relation is upside down at a hand but “normal” at a foot, in Diagram 20. Now sit to rotate feet in against splay out, incorrectly with soles against each other and “fists” by toes, spraining ankles. Hands and feet match. When splayed, big toe & toes have diaphragm below spine, correctly. Consider wrist and palm (or ankle and sole) and how the wrist swivels the palm around to sort, just as an eye swivels to direct a tongue to what we see. Wrists and ankles “saccade” to move in relation to objects or vice versa. Sequencing back from stage D in Diagram 21, a hand at hip is below level for closed wrist & finger grip below a stick in & up first, for a spine to swing an arm with a bent elbow in & up and a hand is twisted down by a stick front of back. Then a hand goes above level and opens at stage C, levering up to send a hand around a neck out & up to back of back using a swing of the arm from middle to side and pulled back with palm at back

The Human Design

104

of head at a sensory brain, to brace at back of back upward to throw a stick. The hand and eye are both sighting a target as they swing from D to C. Then at B, a hand closes in again by fingers & wrist with palm at front of front over brow and arm swings down at front to throw at front of front. Then below level, a hand and arm go out & down to back of front at A as a follow through. Up and down moves are reversals in a twisting metronome. To favour arms & heart, we start at B. This is an alignment to lift & pick in Diagram 22, or throw a paper plane. A boomerang is a rigid branch in the shape of a leaf, so in the old olden days, you denude low branches for boomerangs and make gardens, animals gather in the shade, and you know the rest. This piston cycle has flows tracking each other to move out & back by the same line in cooperation, whereas legs & feet move round & round by alternating apart to cooperate. At lower body, feet chew into a path and legs gulp it back. Levity rings close around openings to contain them to front ahead, and again to front from behind after two link moves, using heels to undulate. Gravity pivots open around closures to extend them to back from front, and then from front to back after two link moves, using a pelvis to undulate. Moves behind are first as a ring to stack by a buttock lever for a stomach, and ahead is down for excretion. Legs hover above to link for rings below. A foot ahead to drop down splays a groin for inhale by diaphragm stretch, and back is up for exhale. Feet hover below by pressure to bounce up as a link, for lungs to stretch inhale to exhale. Ankle and hip in Diagram 20 drop into slots between torso and thigh, or “saccade” by an achilles tendon upon ankle closure. Sequencing forward from stage A to favor levity, a move above level goes out & down for a big toe and sole open by a closed instep to drop a heel ideally at level, using thigh and hip out & down extended upside down from the last step. Then at B below level, an instep opens for a foot to lever down as an ankle and toes close, to grip land and lower a knee and calf in & down at the same time as we move land behind and drive down

The Human Design

105

below level to bounce, even if land does not give way. Then still below level at C, a foot angles to open the instep for a big toe open out & up using hip and thigh extended again to support and lever us forward. Then at D, above level ankle and toes close and instep opens again in & up to for a next step, using knee and calf closure upright in & up behind to swing ahead. Feet open and close ahead and behind to complete a sequence of “inhale to exhale”. Leg pivots have an alternative sequence of “eat to excrete”, starting at C to eat at a stomach. At lower head, sequencing forward from stage A to favor levity (C starts gravity), a mouth is above level, but lowers its lower teeth & gums to open out & down to be level, gaping with a palate & arches hovering open as a sound dish. Then at B, upper teeth & hinge close by biting to make a mouth lever down below level in & down, with a chin & lips hovering with them, in & down, to bite and cradle solids, to pack by a tongue. Then at C, palate & arches open out & up from packing solids by tongue edges & gutter, with lower teeth and gums hovering open out & up by a swallow moving to level. Then, moving from level to above it again at D, chin and lips close in & up to use edges & gutter, with upper teeth & hinge hovering in & up to open up. Gas waves are collected below like solids and projected above like liquids in speech. These moves harmonize for collection of waves at N Cords, begun by a ring opening above level for a tongue to drop out & down to speak, continuing to a stage of listening in & down for an opportunity, to readiness to speak out & up, to projecting outwards in & up. A mineral tongue may have solidity below and liquidity above for gas shaping as it nods with pauses between speaking and listening using the ears’ vestibular for balanced nodding. That nodding can be very subtle across a level of harmony shared with ears, like surf on an undulating sea level gathering tones to utter. It would go round & round like surf over undertow rolling back as surf. Balance is maintained by a vestibular, while a tongue also reflexes at a cerebellum for pulses over waves rolling forward.

The Human Design

106

At an upper head, a nose levers bases to open around pinched closure to extend mucus stacks. This arc may enable levity edges to contain around openings for light. Like an upper body, there is a slice across center by one side balancing the other automatically “out” and “in” on each side. Levity and gravity may make alternative spatial arcs for survey, which can open and close together, despite sequencing differently. Nose and eyes may track a concave “infinity sign” or “mask”. Sequencing back from stage B, for bases, a vomeronasal sniffs above level upside down, in & down, with inhale using sinus and eyebrow. Then at A, it levers below to snort out & down by open temple and cheek to stack and seek new odor. Then still below level at stage D, a nose with a pinched sinus and eye brow moves in & up, sniffing to an olfactory. Then at C, the nose lever moves above level to snort again to stack by open temple and cheek, out & up above level. Bases of an upper head make one huge “sinus” around a nose, but my diagrams use one sinus location. To alternate with a nose, eyes may stretch for peripheral light, levering edges by pinched closure of orbit and lower lid around openings at upper lid and duct. Sequencing back from stage D, a nose is above level, and an eye fixed in space at level saccades down as a ring when a nose sniffs up, using a pinched orbit and lower lid to control light from below level. Then at C, moving a nose below level, an eye saccades up to stay at level with open upper lid and duct out & up to control light from above. Then at B with a nose still below level, an orbit and lower lid pinch closes in & down for saccades up into an eye for light from above. Then at A, returning above level, an upper lid and duct open again out & down for more light for saccades up from darkness below. Edges may frame images. I note we favor impression surveyed in a world by upper organs and expression levelled at a world by lower organs. We have an impression of a future coming in braced by our past, and we express by going out to a future braced by our past. Upper organs have the impression that this is our, me as cause, and

The Human Design

107

as effected by you, time and place; and lower organs give expression to it. Impression and expression might also overlay as racial genetics from migration, on page 206. Site Impetus Favored across Levels Awareness represents levity or gravity impetus, even though time locked as an input in the past with an output in the future. They each serve past-to-future site moves. Moves are known from continually refreshed neural “frames” that capture site moments. The sensory reads motor frames and their collections in the world, which are frames that represent anatomy. Sites function in forward momentum and are represented as such by past-to-future in every present moment of rapid, sequential, action-reaction processing. Rapid neural action-reaction frames represent “impetus across” site moments. Our cause-to-effect biology frames its own forward momentum by motor moves, and this is represented in the experience using inputs to read what is framed by outputs for collections in the world. Actionreaction is not cause-effect, by definition. Given that cause is past and effect is future, action-reaction is primarily an instant within a full biological state of impetus around a contained cycle for action-reaction. It is a full state that will cycle motor back to be felt continually for present moments by which the unit can know it exists. A present moment favors neither past nor future. Neurons are contained within cause-to-effect biology to cycle continually as self-stimulation to collect stimulation from a world to keep impetus. Action as past inputs and reaction as future outputs are in a contained cycle within a full state of impetus shared between charge & mass at all times. A Big Bang also lurches a relation between a full state of charge & mass across a moment of action-reaction. The issue is merely containment of an action-reaction neural cycle entirely within intact past cause-to-future effect biological anatomies. We prioritize a world to continue biological impetus to maintain a neural cycle by self-stimulation for present moments in all awareness.

The Human Design

108

10. Facility of Neurons

In this chapter, I discuss awareness by organs & appendages using neurons as a facility. I will self-evidently show neurons are an automatic facility for manual organs & appendages to be aware of their functional interfaces with the world, by an intact representation finalized in a brain by rapid neurons. The means of enablement is by impulses for functions, to move them to “feel” as levity ion current through gravity layered sites with hormonal sediment in neurons appropriate for sites. Layered sediment in neurons has reservoirs at round bulbs at ends of lines of ionic current. Neurons themselves have ionic current and hormonal insulation, with mutual Electrostatic roles in my model, for the experience to arise by a relation between them, perhaps related to friction or shearing. Nerve current draws network lines of least resistance to pressure. Hormone insulators collect in bulb reserves, made endogenously to insulate allowances of current between neurons, to build & release pressure along networks. Neurotransmitters are “neural hormones”, used to represent hormonal sites. Diagram 23 is m y contained model. Feelings are by a cycle of neural activity from hormonal & nervous interface captured by receptors, to integrate for an experience of “integrated feelings” representing site interfaces with a world. It includes self-stimulation from moves when collecting from the world, including self-stimulation for thoughts. Neurons change, but contain capture. The cycle is intact, with cross-over, brain to body, right to left sides. In chapter 8, straight vectors have cross-talk by hemispheres to close the loop left and right, with a stable brace by crossover below it, for talk with a medulla, but retaining some tide direct to cortices using a vestibular. We have one full heartbeat of two flows, and one neural finalization across two brain hemispheres around a vestibular.

The Human Design

109

Diagram 23, One-Way Accretion Cycle for Experiences World Stimulating

Functioning

Retain

Release Manual - Automatism -

Delineation

Delineation

Input

Output Awareness - Automatic -

Sensory

Motor Identifying

Anticipating Brain

Awareness represent sites by neurons as sites’ facility. Functions include neurons within them, and biological functions have psychology in my model, with neurons as their facility for it. Each site has its own distance from a brain and processing time to finalize experiences. They enter & exit the flow by receptors & effectors variably to contribute. Hearing is the fastest, perhaps related to linguistics and nurturing. Sites interrupt each other, and timing is set variably below an overall “full state” of neural activity that is ready to adjust for awareness across the variation in processing times of sites. I will explain how neurons may comprise levity as nerve and gravity as hormone in equal proportions but to opposite systems and scales of function. Nerve & hormone together retain a line-network structure of a nerve, to contain hormones in bulb-reserves at their ends, adapted to hold “transmitters” of hormonal sediment to cross a gap between a synapse of one neuron & dendrite of another to continue the current, or not.

The Human Design

110

Diagram 24, Gravity & Levity Differ in Scale, but Accrete Together

Synapse

Bulbous

Nerve Point to Join Nerve Flow for Hormone Hooks

Hormone “Transmitters” Hormone Flow Hormone Hook-joins “Receptors” Hormone Ends to Join Dendrite Nerve Cup-join

The two flows accrete together in one direction, but to their different preferences in flow. Brain cortices, partitioned to favor either aspect of the same neurons, might sort their alternative contribution to the experience of awareness. In physics, Diagrams 11 (1) & (2), photon & graviton structures compare by “cup-joins” for photons, and “hook-joins” for gravitons. Neurons are an intact system finalizing in a brain, as evidence of intactness. We do not have an independent brain thinking about anatomy. A brain takes inputs by receptors of sites, and times a finalization of their preconscious processing. Manual functions at manual rates are automatically facilitated by a rapid neural cycle, building and subsiding as it facilitates to patterns. Our “subconscious”, which is a misnomer, is subtle awareness of which we less aware than obvious we prioritize as a peak to subtle, above preconscious processing. Sites create awareness in each moment, fresh, but using patterns. There is nothing to fear except poor conditioning of patterns. .

The Human Design

111

Diagram 25, Neurons, Tend to Nerve Network & Hormone Preserve Motor Sensory Front

Back Cerebrum

Corpus Callosum Thalamus Hypothalamus Network

Hippocampus Amygdala

Pituitary

Preserve

Cerebellum Medulla Neurons

In my model, awareness is input flow of specific hormones with intense generality when released, and nerves with specific channels in general networking. Terms like specific and general can be used for either, so I use “network” and “preserve” for their influences partitioned across a brain. Feelings are from friction between hormone insulation and nerve current in an Electrostatic brain in my model, but feelings are confined by networks and enhanced by hormones. Nerve lateral networks and hormone pivotal reserves partition across brain regions. Preservation and networking combine in neurons themselves, across limbic preservation that is both pivotal & lateral, and a pivotal cerebellum & lateral cerebrum spreading a network. Networking is for goals by nerve current “bouncing” to & from ‘stalls” of hormonal levels in the world to condition them.

The Human Design

112

At a limbic reserve of preserved hormones, pivotal hippocampus & amygdala at back tend to hormonal sensory memory of levels, and lower pivotal hypothalamus & pituitary at front tend to motor release for hormone levels. I note an amygdala can quickly respond to danger, challenging nerves to preempt regularity, but conditioning enables it. A limbic has a lateral thalamus & corpus callosum to send flow into cerebral areas. Inputs tend back, and outputs tend front in a brain, from a spine at page 78. Flow for pivotal & lateral preservation of site levels is networked to lateral cerebrum & pivotal cerebellum, for motor flow to sites supported by hormonal reserves at a hypothalamus & pituitary. A cerebrum is lateral along & across for voluntary moves, and a cerebellum is pivotal for enhanced or inhibited hormone levels for goals. Hormonal limbic pivotal & lateral cortices connect to network pivotal & lateral cortices, to overlap their partitioning. Later, I explain a relation of pivotal “facts” and lateral “logic”, using hormonal & nerve partitioning together for those experiences. However, as hormone & nerve separately in a brain, hormone tends to stalls by sediment building. Nerves tend to invasive current preempting, and it is to the extent of providing “thingness” for hormonal “things”. Neurons may tend to hormonal components with commons confined by current networking the components, by falling like dominoes any which way. But, current would be timed in its flow to finalize across a brain, synchronously connecting diverse regions. Hormonal sites are “layered” in neuron as extensions, and layering may be timed by current for a well-split, but intact, experience to finalize. I imagine a table by preserved components of line, shade, brown, and so on, with networked commons of line-ness, shade-ness, brown-ness, shared in line-ness with legs, and shade- ness with brow. Awareness is preserved components split by networking shared with other preserved components, for moves by outputs supported by hormones from a reserve. Find preserved components in words for analogies to site functions by commons. It needs insight into words and

The Human Design

113

anatomy, but words may have that basis for that purpose as familiar rote cues. Neurons preserve by hormone and network by nerve, with components networked for rapid exchange of words in speech by cerebrum & cerebellum to commons. As noted on pages 82-85 on levels & goals, interface of moves and world are automatically regulated. Neuroscience is well set in its view of a literal “back-check” of our own moves, to avoid being in a reflexive loop to our own moves when levelling to a world. In my model, there is no back-check from motor to sensory, for each sequential levelling move, to continually attenuate. All species are chemically level, with automatic adjustment to maintain levels in a flow that is one-way in each neuron, although it falls like dominoes within overall pivotal & lateral flow. I value forward momentum, but allow cycling stalls, as a hormonal stall to edge experiences to and from it by current. Back-checks are hypothesized in all papers, dealing with species including birds, insects, fish, and primates. Although we need to “manually” differentiate our moves and a world in “one impact” at interface, our moves are our own. They are sent delimited for levelling. Attenuation for automatic levels means we have goals in a world that are un-attenuated, but we condition by nerves for comfort, like our own automatic levels for comfort. In my model, mass stalls, and charge bounces. By partitioning of influences, hormonal stalls preserve extant states for attenuated levels felt by inputs, while bounces to & from stalls preempt to condition levels to goals in a world. A medulla allows stable talk across hemispheres and a vestibular is a more tidal pivot, and there might be some tidal aspect to stalls in processing, while bounces condition around. I note awareness is a continual present moment that does not favor past or future. It represents past-to-future sites in chapter 8 equably. Sensory input is action “preceding” motor output as reaction, even though cause is past and effect is future, and even though cause is action by levity and cause is reaction by

The Human Design

114

gravity. It applies at a Big Bang on edge as “action” before “reaction”, by an original massive potential. It is a “full state” ready to slip release by a “Point-Instant” action-reaction, which is the very definition of action-reaction. An original intact reservoir stays intact, but as a puffball. Anatomy is also a full original biological state from which psychology evolves. We replenish continually, to keep a full state of mass & charge to process around a cycle for an ongoing present moment, at Point-Instant action-reaction events in a brain. Given that cause is past and effect is future, action-reaction is an instant in an offset of forces. We have a full biological state of cause-toeffect as anatomy around a contained cycle for action-reaction, to cycle motor back to be felt, with impetus to do so. A slip by charge & mass around action-to-reaction is a by a sufficiently full state that improves by better replenishment and activity. An intact human with a full cycle self-stimulates present moments to continually seal action-reaction to favor neither cause nor effect. It is a present moment of awareness by which an entity knows it exists. Favoring inputs from a world is nevertheless by an intact unit that constructs its own present moments for that favoritism. For now, I only say humans are equally sensory & motor for the purposes of a closed cycle to create present moments that extend beyond the unit to favor inputs from a world, for impetus, to keep the fullest state we can. We experience site forward momentum as cause-to-effect by inputs-to-outputs-to-inputs-to-outputs and so on, by rapid firing frames to sustain a present moment. We use future induction from past deduction by left & right brain cortical crosstalk. It is time used to improve our sites’ past or future, as we experience them equally in present moments. We continually induce from having deduced, use time equably, applying it freely to improve our own past or future. Our intact frame of cause-to-effect may tend to a truer knowledge of its own past to correct for future plans, or a truer knowledge of its own future using a correct past, using time in reasoning to either preference by crosstalk.

The Human Design

115

Accretion for the Experience As noted, we may have an accretion process in a “rotational” flow between sites and brain as the very basis for psychology within biology, from chapter 8. There may be a twist between action & reaction, like rings & links, or maybe state & anti-state. At “annihilation”, there might be momentary continual activity as the experience itself, derived from preconscious processing but being something more than the last straw on a stack, as a regular activity at a purposeful transition of action-reaction. Within that architecture, there may be direct electrical & right angled magnetic flows to sort a relation of mass & charge across pivotal & lateral limbic, and pivotal & lateral network cortices, and between them. By nerve & hormone, it is “I” tracking as nerve to a future, from a past preserve, repeatedly. My model allows crosstalk between hemispheres to resolve thoughts about feelings, but thought would not be talking and hearing or showing and viewing across hemispheres, as such. An experience would be intact across diverse cortices firing synchronously by network current, with influences by both sides resolved in a more integrated frame than strict division, despite having specific language hubs on the left side and asymmetry in a brain due to organ asymmetry in any event. The other side can often substitute or adapt for deficits, and language hubs can be on the right side for some. It is not a direct “chat” between sides, and there are people who are born with only one hemisphere & a brain stem living quite normally. We have recognizable events by finalization of diversities using delay, which gain recognition using that continual recognizable edge. Feelings accompany thoughts, and the edge and its gaining of recognition will be enhanced by feelings, but the issue is to relate those feelings & thoughts to one’s experience of confidently knowing oneself and working through one’s options. This is by the edge merely tracking its own hormonal base in past patterns to recreate the facts & logic we always experience, for confident self-knowledge. There is no more to

The Human Design

116

it, but we need to value a relation of current & hormone across self-stimulated hormonal stalls. The edge lays lines of least resistance for goals in the world, conditioning hormonal levels. The experience is “I”, and it has access to other experiences of “I”, from immediate or long past, to know “who” “I” am. “I” identify by delay, by recognizable experiences in any moment that are recognized across moments, using access to past experiences. We “stall” hormonal preserves for recognition by self-stimulated contemplation around stalls. We “bounce” lines to goals in a world from stalls, for recognizable experiences to be recognized using hormonal preserves. “I” tracks to goals with new levels that are built hormonally around their new tracks for further impetus from them by new levels. The preserve, as biology, exists first and then a network tracks from it, to goals supported by hormones building around tracks. The preserve is there to “inform” “I” as it tracks its own past and the potential it has for present purposes. Mass & charge operate together in mutuality by the edge being stalled and the stall being edged. An edge pulls a base with it as it tracks. A base pushes tracks along their lines of least resistance for more tracking. Feelings provide contiguity to experience events of self in world, and thoughts provide consistency in experiences about any events. The combination of contiguity & consistency in tracking using past patterns is sufficient for confident self-knowledge without more obscure systems or hemispherical interface. The process is by a recognizable edge continually reinforced by recognition across its living base, but always open to stimulation from a world. We have automatism, and are open to the world during delay to finalize processing. An edge continually tracks economical lines around a base to pull current to recognizable but as yet unrecognized “news” by commons. The base pushes components to enhance that tracking. The base is open to stall, for “I” to know “itself” in a journey by flow, in a bespoke match by process for a narrative, rather than using computer models imposing process. The experience is by pushes of components

The Human Design

117

locking and unlocking enhancing network gates, and pulls of network lines of economy to keep a recognizable edge directed to present relevance, while getting stalled and redirected by gates. The edge knows itself from tracking its base, by drawing on past edges sufficiently preserved and useful to an edge now. We recognize a ball, first, because it is recognizable, and then because we draw from a flow around a base to substantiate it as recognized. Recognition is just continual reinforcement of the recognizable edge, and it is dependent on that continual edge to call it recognition at some point, not “a thing”. “Something” could be anything in potential, but “I” accepts that it is the “thing” we “recognize” by biological necessity “for present purposes”. The process is effective, but an edge cannot guarantee it will stall in a base, or to what extent, while always open to the world to interrupt automatism. Recognition is presently available memory accessed by an edge perfecting its capacity for recognizable experiences, by applying them to practical circumstances as recognition. The ideal always accepts practical reality at some point, and just moves on to suit its logistical requirements. Referral of Awareness by Brain to Sites An issue for researchers is they rely on people reporting what their experience is of stimulation, and where and when they experience it. Researchers must interpret reports of locked-in subjective experiences from subjects’ reports. Awareness is a subjective experience, even though we attempt to explain it in objective scientific terms. From a well-tested delay to awareness by external or self-stimulation, it is assumed that awareness is an event across cortices of the brain after processing of inputs. However, I experience touch at my hand and sight at my eyes, and not in my brain. I also think that I feel at sites in thoughts. The event in the brain is experienced “as if” at sites in feelings, and “as if” at sites in thoughts, by thoughts’ own consistent assumption about feelings. The experience is referred with preservation of events at sites.

The Human Design

118

The brain is a silent facilitator because the experience it facilitates represents sites and not itself. We are automatons until awareness is finalized, but the delay is brief; it meets regular expectations; and reflexes ameliorate delay as a primary function of a nervous system. I will be brief about alternatives, but I keep an open mind. I cannot see input feedback to sites to finalize after processing, as networked current back to sites that provided the raw current, as finalized extensions rapidly collapsing back along the channels in which they came. Outputs are equally unlikely to feed to sites to finalize there, as outputs might not carry properties of finalized awareness to send back to sites. Effectors may be suited to moving sites rather than to providing the experience. Languages as Syntax & Semantics Communication is aided by words with some secure syntax for ideas. Languages are thoughts about functional interfaces with a world, securing some conditional experiences of interfaces, as a personal construct using two hubs in the secure deductive left hemisphere, Broca & Wernicke. But meanings encompass more than the “rigidity” of Broca & Wernicke, which are used “flexibly” for words. I can simply say that “meaning” applies to the experience of awareness itself. Thoughts & feelings have meaning as representations of interfaces, whatever their levels of reality or abstraction. If we experience, it has a meaning, and thoughts are merely integrated & modulated feelings, and we retain feelings across that integration. We deconstruct the experience for its value, but meaning in thoughts & feelings is from integration of components across commons, and open to conditioning grounded by action interfacing a world. A related word, “conditional”, is for words by thoughts & feelings that are conditioned for action a world. Words are thoughts & feelings, but sites acknowledge the conditional state of their words, by inventing them to stand for interfaces, for conditioned actions. Conditioned thoughts & feelings invent conditional words, by choice, as conditional names for interfaces.

The Human Design

119

A word is a rote name or symbol we choose to represent an interface, which simply amounts to saying thoughts & feelings name thoughts & feelings. An experience of interfaces at all times names itself by words, and is conditional with itself in its choice of words. We invent names for experiences and take responsibility for them. Words are a conditional state acknowledged by us when we take responsibility for our use of rigid hubs to cycle words for conditioned interfaces. Helen Keller had sensory deprivation preventing naming, and delayed learning from others about naming. When learned, it was a revelation for Keller. Words appear to directly represent interfaces, but they directly represent thoughts & feelings by representing their conditional interfaces. Feelings accompany thoughts, and both are conditioned for actions interfacing a world if we choose to rely on words beyond choosing words to rely upon. Hormone & nerve must reconcile for transitions of conditional to conditioned, to conditional and so on. Being our awareness of a two-sided interface with a world, languages must encompass purported “logic & facts” of the world. Words are conditional on hubs securing “a structure” for sites to build around them. All is networking, but intact hubs are used conditionally by functions driven by hub assurance in use of words. Noam Chomsky is rigid, but wrong in not valuing sites as sources. I give rigid hubs a rote secure role within networks around them for conditional assurance, but entirely for functional purposes around it. They are used by sites to provide “enough” assurance. George Lakoff values flexible over rigid, but they are equal so far as words are concerned, although thoughts & feelings are more valuable than their use of words, by definition. Hubs may be for rigid etching of visual & verbal rote cues, in particular, for regular rearrangement. Sites use logistical balance to make, use, and arrange words, to usefully model interfaces with a world. If useful, it should mean hubs stand a test of conditioning for conventional actions. Words, as thoughts, correlate to functional interfaces with a world in each moment of experience. We can lose

The Human Design

120

language starkly when a hub is damaged, but Broca damage can leave speech intact. We do not lose thoughts & feelings, generally. Thoughts & feelings sequentially level themselves by self-stimulation to goals, including attenuated levels, selfstimulated for words. Hubs may network for word attenuation levels, or they constitute them, as intact hubs for that selfstimulated purpose. Visually, written words are lines identified for features of curve, length, direction, and so on, that are literally assembled into letters in words. Verbal cues can be likewise deconstructed. Actual follow through from words as if words were real things in a world needs conditioning to overcome their conditionality. That is easy if words have a good match to nature in their flexibility & rigidity, to progress within it. We react to a world by framing it using words belonging to functional sites to guide them. Choice of words is by functions interfacing a world in moments of thought and sites bow to matching to purported “logic & facts” of nature in sites’ use of words, for those most useful for living in it. The Design also prescribes the logic & facts of nature, to close that loop with a tidy ribbon on top. Words are correlated to functions by networking, apparent in analogies shared across sites, based on rigidity & flexibility. Thought is analogy by commons across components apparent as “thingness” across “things”. The word “table” means line, level, shade, color, texture, timing, flatness, and many component “things” preserved to match across many functional sites by legs, a stomach, a palm, and other site “things” interfacing a world by shared “thingness”. Deconstruct each word for functional components that match functional site interfaces, then value sites contributing to them. Analogy by commons applies to flexibly unify words. Analogy needs functions to be broad enough to overlap each other, and this is provided in the Design, equally differentiating and overlapping all parts. Our anatomy is made for analogy, and sites have well defined struts to their functions represented by words.

The Human Design

121

Work in Linguistics refers to Cogs, which are struts, but poorly defined. They are fundamental components, extending to all hormonal feelings of functions for thought by commons “about” them. Feelings are components, and thoughts are commons shaping them. You can read work from 2012 by George Lakoff, Explaining Embodied Cognition Results, free on the net. The paper says networks follow low-energy pathways, which corresponds to the low-energy pull of charge, by definition in the Design. Be wary about “categories” for Cogs you might read. Struts are shared by sites by integrated networking by commons. All experiences by combined thought & feeling, like “logic”, “fact”, “abstract” & “real”, are components by commons, and analogies. They are components integrated by commons. Networking contributes timed completions to feelings, to shape feelings. We can strip to component feelings to unify flexibly by analogy, for the combination of thoughts & feelings. Networked thoughts & hormonal feelings combine by a pivotal hormonal vestibular & networked cerebellum for the experience of “fact” itself, and a lateral hormonal thalamus & networked cerebrum for the experience of “logic” itself, later on pages 145-146. Thought & feeling combine for each of them. The process of biology combines stable medulla logistics with balanced vestibular linguistics. “Logic” and “fact” are primary experiences by feelings & thoughts combined for each, and their components & commons are processed using continual balanced logistics. Life evolved to human-types from wordless life. We use balanced logistics across our human Design to explore “logic & fact” in experiences. The product, “I”, explores “entity in world” as objects in an experience, by using it. The product cannot explore the root creation of an experience by preceding process, as that is impossible, but analogy is still evident, and a means of useful deconstruction. An experience is a product of a process, but it can deconstruct itself in recent or long retrospect by exploring site analogies apparent in the experience. Analogies, as conditioned thoughts & feelings, can be deconstructed by words strutting for them.

The Human Design

122

Conditioned functions and the conditional words they use can be deconstructed. In my model, the biological process is primary, and the experiences we have by thoughts & feelings are secondary, although meaningful in themselves to some extent, whatever they may be. Balanced logistics, as biology, can apply itself to explain its product by whatever means it can find as a logistical enterprise across anatomy in a world, but without an assumed logical basis to it. Assuming logical thoughts or feelings is hubris. We have logical potential by the comprehensive logical layout of the Design, but subject to a logistical tracking process using hormonal stalls. The process is never persuaded by the product. It is about process, not hubristic logic, which I crush on pages 140-142. Feelings condition by conditionals to improve in my model, but in the next chapter, hormones can overly rely on words to condition action to commands. Words are also both given to us and used inventively by each of us, requiring shared responsibility. Fidelity in a Cycle Shaped by a World In a necessarily rapid continual cycle to represent manual functions in the world by awareness, the cycle automatically r a p i d l y processes inputs with fidelity to site interfaces. The capacities added by the brain would be extensions of sites, evolving to facilitate them with a diagonal line between cause & effect to match their relation as organs, and as appendages. Diagram 26 is a standard labelling of brain regions, with a brace created by a diagonal wrap for eye & ear processing back & below, and exposed region front & above for tongue & nose. Gas depth is back, liquid width at sides, tongue central, and nose height low. Conformity of brain cortices to the Design is exact by relevant organ axes for links to a brain to process. Those locations are allowed by a spine at page 78, by links “flowering” from middle to extend back of back sensory to front of front motor. Within that allowance, spinal ring logistics is up the middle, and sensory-motor as action-reaction can have Point-Instant events flowering around the apex as a strict line.

The Human Design

123

Diagram 26, Cause-Effect Diagonal, Action-Reaction Vertical (Spinal Apex) Front

Back Motor Sensory Leg Leg Trunk Trunk Arm Arm Associations Hand Hand Face Face Tongue Tongue Vision Taste Effect Exposed Hearing Causal Brace Smell

Medulla Neurons

I note experience of space, time, cause, and effect, is intact, and it has a broader frame in Diagram 8 incorporating levity, gravity, rest, and energy, as “me, you, where, when, stop, go, to, and from”. This is a complete frame within which we create site analogies across shared functions. “Linguistics” evidences by use of “metaphor”, as evident behavioural expressions of private experiences of analogy. Go to the personal analogies, but see our shared metaphors. Do not fall into the obfuscation of over-valuing any aspect of the frame. We do not spatialize time any more than we temporalize space in awareness, even though they work together in lock-step. They converge and diverge, and they are direct analogies of each other. As noted, the Design overlaps every distinct part in their functions and as it appears on the page. We are made for analogies.

The Human Design

124

Return to the fact that awareness is a neural representation. Vision at an eye is a neural representation of “spatial” slices after delay for processing. An ear is represented by “temporal” sequences. Neither representation “is” the space or time it represents, as they are representations by neurons firing, but we purport that sites provide the experiences using neurons as their facility. Space and time as we experience them, are accurate constructs of reality, generally speaking, for humans. I cannot see time, but it is not merely an analogy of space, either in an experience or by the event of neurons firing. Time accompanies space as cause effect, back-front or down-up, and as cause-effect left-right brain with crosstalk Languages universally apply our compass, with specialization included. Aymara people of the Andes coincide with use of a causal eye looking ahead to a past. Mandarins coincide with use of an effected nose linking down for a future. English is written left to right, and Hebrew is right to left, which may condition consistent past-future gestures. But conventions are subject to the fixed compass. Reading is passive, and seeing words or external objects passing truly may not lock us into imposing our frame of past-future to their moves, which go either way, even when we track a real logical direction laid by words. It is a convenience to lay words one way or the other. By brain crosstalk, seeing words or objects passing truly for them may not impose our frame of past-future in reading their directions. They go either way, even when we track a set direction laid by words. Upper head resolves by unique nerves direct to cortices, where Aymara & Mandarins have specializations. We read equably while tending to induction or deduction overall by crosstalk, but a body has commitment. In body moves, we are left ahead, driven by right behind, in sports & stances universally, rarely southpaw. Specialization or convention will apply by convenience. There is a lot of shallow speculation by psychologists, building hubris by bits & pieces of fact, not intact logistical strategies to find them.

The Human Design

125

The cycle has fidelity to a purpose. Life has reactive motor moves, but sensory may be favored, consistent with impetus of change being inward to a unit from a world for evolution, and growth by one fertilized egg. Inward impetus includes detecting moves when in impact with a world, for inward sensory flow of combined stimuli. Other species may be more tied to identifying their last move rather than anticipating their next move, and more tied to a niche. All species would favor new stimulus from a world, for continuation, despite the possibility of favoring past or future moves when collecting. As noted, interface of oneself and a world is not a fixed line. Other species might have feelings of niche impact, of their own past moves interfacing a world to collect new stimulus like a hand in glove. Humans might control future moves aimed at goals. We would favor development, but fall into niches. Other species might favor return to niches, but try to develop. A reservation is the difference might be simply due to our capacities under the Design for comprehensive awareness. Perhaps other animals control what they do, but limited structures have less comprehension, and the process may tend to quick repetitions in a limited niche. In any event, all species would favor the world’s interfaces in their feelings. I discuss other species in the next chapter, based on a handin-glove cerebellum versus motor for goals at a cerebrum. I have mentioned attenuating not only our own self-stimulus but also stimulus from a world, even though it would “normally” be un-attenuated. Other species attenuate using species levels, but I wonder how closely they experience the hand-in-glove, perhaps by conditioned attenuation or simple suitability to a niche. The difference between attenuating and not attenuating might be “overcome” by a niche if life favors attenuation overall for “natural” levels of comfort, rather than jerking to a world. I suspect it does. Our goals are isolated human worlds within natural ones, with mostly robotic behavior. Human freedom from niches does not mean freedom to eradicate niches.

The Human Design

126

From Identification to Anticipation The motor frames sites, and sensory reads the frames and is specialized for the frames’ collections in the world. We may not need abstruse networking for the cycle. When we think about future moves, as identification-to-anticipation using past patterns, we are entitled to have confidence. We cannot know moves in advance, but a smooth build in motor cortices as thoughts build to move provides every reason to be confident. A sensory neuron has a narrow receiving end and multiple giving ends, a motor neuron has an opposite structure to intensify. Diagram 27 has a faint line of Old Motor, from a delimited output sent for return by input. It builds by pivotal & lateral flow around cortices that only extend one way as neurons, but very extensively. They are like reset dominoes, falling in many directions synchronously. The flow is to sensory & motor apexes within an extensive pivotal & lateral structure. Flow for New Motor may closely follow New Sensory, paring memory of available moves while identifying. Activity builds readiness in motor cortices to experience something less than a real move, as thoughts about moves in sensory-motor cortices without a sufficient build up in motor cortices to move. Shortly, I will explain plasticity, relevant to activity in Diagram 28 building until an input is felt and output is sent. Scans of a wrist motor cortex before a move by B. Libet & others in 1983 had low activity for thought and high for a move, as in Diagram 28. They found a subtle build imperceptible to a subject before a “random” thought to move, and then a move. In my model, motor cortices are instigated by other cortices for subtly supportive and obvious moves, for a thought then move. In a BBC documentary in 2000, Brain Story, activity before thought inspires wrong ideas, and the show claims we are prey to our “subconscious”, and merely invent using fiction after the event to “justify” an unknown subconscious. The opposite is correct. Activity follows sensory inputs to the threshold of outputs.

The Human Design

127

Diagram 27, Development & Timing in Cerebral Apexes Buildup by Pivotal & Lateral Flows Around, to Settle Between Output New Motor Built Sensory Level Built

S & M Level Experience

Apex Motor Options

Apex Sensory Goals Sensory Builds Old Motor Level

Input

Diagram 28, Wrist Apex Motor Cortex, Under Instigation Cortex Activity

“Readiness Potential”

Milliseconds

350 Thought

470 550 “Feeling” Move

The chart does not show other sites instigating for a flex. Prior functions include any subtle poise before a flex. Subtle rise & fall in support becomes obvious as needed, as the subject will flex eventually. Scans invade privacy to reveal that we are entitled to be confident in anticipations, but scans reveal subtleties that are not important enough to be obvious. We can leave the subtle to rise and fall. Privacy is always the issue during automatism, because we are fractionally open to being read by others before we read ourselves anyway. We feel our self-stimulation and world stimulus after processing in a brain builds to finalization.

The Human Design

128

We are always open to a world to interrupt, as that interface is vital. Scans make it possible to read others, but hypnotists and pathetic advertisers use the open interface to lead you and read their leading of you, by working you over. Obvious awareness conditions itself for better undistracted decisions as a peak, from peak to peak, including satisfaction of hormonal imperatives. This makes it important to choose that use of your Free Will, to condition useful interfaces with a world. In the next chapter, Free Will is the choice to pursue objectivity using comprehensive sites, despite genetic bias and subjective conditioning. A claim that humans lack Free Will is abstract and ignorant, and will never stand up to credible laws. The errant view has an opening, as awareness just “pops” on finalizations from preconscious (no awareness) to conscious (subtle & obvious awareness). They cannot oversee their own delayed arrival, which is impossible. Thought is a product of a process inaccessible to it in moments, by being a product. We condition self-knowledge. Thoughts are determinative rather than mere epiphenomenal by-products. Thoughts remember thoughts, transparent and crucial. They are not “immediate”, as we are automatons from the process. All moves, including for thoughts, cannot actually be known until processed, but delay is brief and unnoticed when thinking. We all experience thoughts and know their value. There is no doubt that thoughts are crucial to build upon, even if fleeting. If you hold a good fleeting thought, it is a supposed “inspiration”, but a fleeting edge is continual, so try to toss thoughts around with some sensible dexterity. Plasticity in Site Processing by a Brain Plasticity extends fidelity into merest relations between sites in coordination to create assumptions between them, by sites instigating each other to perform subtly in support. Network sensory & motor cerebral-apex cortices build to feel sites

The Human Design

129

before they are felt, and build to send moves to site effectors before they are sent. In Diagram 29, three sensory & motor cerebral-apex cortices are separated, but they in fact lateralize in layers by different patterns, rather than by clear borders. Splitting of components into commons is intricate. In Diagram 29, plastic processing might work with the merest relation of a “thing” and “thingness”. Automatic outputs from inputs, as reaction from action, using matching apex cortices for motor and sensory, should always be functionally direct while subject to intricate continual adjustment to appear controlled. We learn about our evolved potential for connection of sensory action and motor reaction by taking them both for workouts. Variation to a regular flow might be revealed by Phantom Limbs. Flows backtracking from, or invading across, cerebralapex cortices are theorized. V. S. Ramachandran suggests invasion into a sensory apex. When a hand is missing and its cortices are working, touching a cheek is reported by a subject as if a missing hand is being touched. Instigations could be by back flow or directly between apexes. Two-way lines in Diagram 29 are for back or direct flow. In my model, a cheek instigates to confirm a “hand” in a conditioned cycle of cheek & hand, to mistake a touch as by a missing hand. Perhaps a stump contributes “feelings” for plastic “thoughts” of a hand. Invasion might be limited to creation of pain. There is a brief delay before the subject starts to feel a missing hand. There is priming, with a cheek anticipating a relation in plastic processing. In my model, it is the hand touching the cheek, and simultaneous. Touch a cheek and a hand is identified, but insufficiently to align it to the face, which may only deal in touch in this instigation of a hand relation. A cheek instigates anticipation of the subject’s own hand touching it “as usual”, and both feel it. The subject was a smoker with an intensified relation of hand and cheek. In Diagram 20, a compressed arm and hand position has a hand to face, ready for a shoulder, also felt by the subject. They are proximate.

The Human Design

130

Diagram 29, Pivotal Flow Builds in Laterally Divided Cerebrum

Site

Limbic Cerebral Apex Cerebral Limbic Accretion Motor Sensory Accretion Front

(Hand)

Site

Back Fill Fire

Fill

Cheek

(Hand)

Cheek Fill Fire

Fill

Fill Fire

Fill

Fire

Eye

Eye Fire

The subject’s report suggests the “feeling” may be supported by sensory hand cortices, beyond prior instigation in motor hand cortices for “assumed” movement, and beyond my view of cheek and hand relations as integrated thoughts about feelings of a cheek confused by conditioning. These research works are discussed in encyclopedias, such as Wikipedia. L. Moseley & P. Brugger in 2009 sugg est eyes may process images of hand positions, to instigate thought of a missing hand move. I suggest we might anticipate and identify a hand in relation to cheek or eye feelings, rather than a hand alone. In the eye study the subjects instigated according to diagrams of impossible hand positions and yet they were constructed in thoughts. Neurons on the level of plastic assumption construct

The Human Design

131

abstracts easily. We need specific targeting for reconditioning of sites to accept the non-involvement of the missing part. Real sites remain responsible, with or without infiltration in sensory input cortices, as they instigate. A missing part is not there to use input & output cortices to buck reconditioning. I note brain lesions interrupt functional regularity and may be overcome in part by plasticity, perhaps assisted by regularity imposed upon functions just as in overcoming phantom feelings. However, rather than inhibiting the re-mapping of healthy neurons to remove phantoms, healthy neurons may be extended by re-mapping to avoid use of the area affected by lesion. Healthy networks may instigate plastic thoughts across cortices in Blindsight. Plasticity confirms location of thoughts and feelings at sites, even though it appears to show a brain ignores site reality. There is intact plasticity for some experience of a missing site by thought, at least, about its abstract existence. Alternatively, stop cortical processing if a site is missing, but we favor use of intact resources of a brain and try to change them. Instigators can try to recondition to remove Phantoms using those intact resources. Phantoms may not always be insurmountable, and instigations by sites across cortices can overcome brain lesions, showing primacy of sites. Being within biology, psychology is more dependent upon biology. Thoughts and feelings fall short of execution if a site is missing, but support continues. It may extend to instigate meaning in thoughts, even if abstract as we cannot use missing sites meaningfully. Neural networks are an intact resource for sites to instigate for sites’ benefit, to the extent any sites can instigate thingness. Meager instigations may be sufficient to instigate thoughts during Autonomic flow. Thoughts would not be from direct moves if sites are missing or paralyzed, and not from specific moves if other moves instigate. Evidence is clear that that sites recondition the brain for site and brain deficits. Neurons facilitate as best they can.

The Human Design

132

I note Mirror Neurons are likely rapid responses in a hormonal state for interaction in a species. We recognize the emotional states of others, or simply their moves to mimic. Continual feedback is created between the parties by familiarity with moves that are usually presented for the purpose of copying, for shared emotional states in which mimicry is easy. We do not immediately recognize emotional states of others. We are primed for them by feedback that can lapse into a loss of selfcontrol in favor of the species, or mob. Familiarity in a species, or priming by events that prompt emotional species reactions, may have feedback rapid enough to keep our levels with that world as if willed by ourselves. It can lead to mob rule. It may be for easy “attenuation” to a species to match our attenuated levels, but within reason. If we condition an “attenuation” to a significant object rather than a species, the result is also open to unreasonable or obsessive ritual, and disregard for species, as in old brute Musashi’s Book of Five Rings, free on the net. In the next chapter, I conclude a brain can be anarchistic in its plasticity. Reality is biology, and psychology is prone to cryptic & romantic anarchy. Real logistics & linguistics rein in abstract psychology. In my model, both sexes are equally biological & psychological. Biology is intact efficacy of male nerves in stable logistics, and a species level of female hormones in balanced linguistics. Male hormones and female nerves tend abstract. Hormones are enhancers or promoters, and you will see it across human behavior to differentiate tendencies. Males by nerve or hormone tend to individuality for personal traction or personal enhancement respectively, while females by hormone or nerve tend to species enhancement or traction respectively. Female hormones work at a species level without much use for a male past a DNA ratio in one tiny sperm to grow a complete biological offspring. But offspring still need fathers, and for his part the male uses nerve to bang out pathways for growth, to explore beyond a mother’s breast. By nerve, all is technique. It is not about exploding, it is about dismantling obstacles as quickly as possible.

The Human Design

133

11. Awareness in the World

In this chapter, I continue self-evident modeling, and propose that comprehensive structure gives us a pivotal position in the world for the appearance of Free Will in awareness, as we develop languages to further our knowledge of “oneself in the world” using that Free Will. I will also settle the controversy of other species’ awareness. There may be a difference in an experience between collecting from a world and enjoying the detection of our moves in impact as a hand-in-glove, or enjoying intricate cycling for goals by anticipation of moves, rather than feeling them in impact. In each case, the entity fits its world, but for humans that world is continually shaped for our wanton goals, not worthwhile goals. I finish the chapter grounding psychology by biology, using the fundamentals of cortical partitioning from the last chapter to speculate about bases for key aspects of an experience. Free Will, a Pure Idea A regular and continual appearance of comprehensive options in feelings and thoughts might condition us to have the pure idea of choice, which we overlay with bias in reality. We may have permanent genetic bias by individual genetic features overlaying “neutral” species features with that conditioning. We apply balance in unbalanced personal schemes, strictly speaking. There may be a set of principles for functional structures of other species’ anatomies, repeated for variations in individual applications of the Design. We also have our own unique environmental conditioning to our fixed genetic sequence delimiting our awareness. If the genetics is known in principle, the environmental can be better understood. The only impediment to Free Will worth worrying about is the definition itself, which is reserved for “Gods” in some theories.

The Human Design

134

Options are presented to us, but our choice is willed by us upon those options, rather than determined by the options that happen to be available. It turns us from tinkering with events that happen to be going on, to fully imposing our choices, unlocked by reliance on a pure idea applied with inevitable genetic bias and subjective conditioning. We can then rely on other ideas being pure and choose to pursue them, like building to the pure idea of a home. Once we are conditioned to recognize the pure idea of choice, we can have the essential impression of behaving freely at will. We may have predetermined structures resembling different animal species. We may even securely identify genetic bias, on page 206. We have inevitable genetic bias by niche and race, and conditioning by unique immersion in the world, but we can be objective in cognition by motor control of sensory satisfaction, to accumulate reliable knowledge about “oneself in the world” using facts & logic. Philosophy uses abstracts to define Free Will. We are subject to deterministic laws, and bias & conditioning, but we can freely condition greater objectivity, which is non-abstract Free Will. We are in a world of fixed laws as an interpreter. We reasonably, freely shape our world to our choices using its determinism. Legal systems should never bend to a plea that “Humans lack Free Will”. Awareness about all of nature including oneself places our own view of ourselves in the world in the same terms as we understand the world, by the lawful terms of nature as set by its laws and facts, and their logical arrangements and operations in logical syntax and creative semantics. It would be a rule that if human understanding of our side of a twosided interface with nature is not subservient to nature’s laws and facts, it is abstract and less useful in nature or in understanding it. Every creature should know its surrounds as intimately as it knows itself, but we can know ourselves specifically in forces’ terms by Design, using rote cues as words to match facts by valuable logic.

The Human Design

135

Words in a World Words are thoughts & feelings conditional with themselves, using rigid hubs for assured construction and perhaps also for their own attenuated levels by self-stimulation. Thoughts guide feelings by networking them, to delimit them by commons across components of feelings. Thoughts & feelings are conditioned to a world, and words can be deconstructed using key struts by commons across site components. Settled languages should use struts effectively for conditioned use in a world, and site analogies evidence struts by thoughts & feelings, which deconstruct their own words for their struts. The issue reduces now to responsibility for words. We are given words from infancy, and we personally adopt them as conditional thoughts & feelings. They are conditional on useful analogy in choice of words, and that depends on whether our words incorporate the worlds laws, which they generally do by settled languages. Conditioning of conditionals enables action. We can reinvent or reshape inadequate settled languages if their conditioning of conditionals is poor, as judged by the actions that accompany words. That is the shortcut answer to the issue, giving personal adoption of words some freedom from responsibility for settled “errors”, by invention to remove them. However, it does not remove the ever-present dynamic between social and personal reliance on words for action, and responsibility by relying on them. A measure of responsibility is reliance beyond conditionality, for felt action in a world in some measure of conformity with the words we use. That dynamic is relevant also to animals that are given words by human conditioning for action, generally. Some species may have invention to reshape words to suit their personal preferences, but they might be less conditional by thought and more felt as hormonal commands for habitual actions. We need to know hormonal feelings to any conditional words in thought, by humans & other species. Words may sometimes represent a conditioned rather than a conditional state, important to know.

The Human Design

136

Words can always be used if they are not for a conditioned action, and if for conditioned action, assess the action by law. Conditional words can be used freely without being conditioned. It is a rule, but you need to know why words are conditional, how they are conditioned, and where the line is, case by case. Anticipation to Favor a World We need to discount our own moves interfacing a world, and in my model, this is by continual conditioning from infancy to extend our attenuated comfort with ourselves to “attenuated” comfort by conditioned familiarity with levels & goals in the world. It is comfortable intact attenuation by self-stimulation in preserved hormonal states as stalls, as a basis for current for goals from & to those stalls, to favor a world by conditioning for goals. I tend to see other animals in greater comfort with their niches and less concerned with diverse goals. Maybe limited structures retain niche comfort, lost in abstract lifestyles. We need to condition and resist conditioning for comfort, while other species only need to resist humans. In future, humans can apply lower-energy in life, as conditioned comfort with a world has less clumsy interface. When conditioned, a rough edge is refined by current for proper goals and levels. We can try to attenuate our impacts with a world as if they were impacting oneself, by familiarity, or we favor our attenuated impact with ourselves apart from a world. When reliance without interface with a world is “off”, we experience commands from a world that actually come from oneself, in Schizophrenia. Automatism & Health From statistics, genes might contribute several times more than environment to “mental health” issues, and Hybrid Genetic Vigor reduces issues. A key relation is in delay for processing. We are in the immediate past due to delay, and open to immediate stimulation for a world to interrupt our self-stimulation. We are

The Human Design

137

always necessarily open and rolled around by the world in function and evolution generally. Genes might be more relevant than environment, but environments are tailored as niches for genes, and that can be explored to promote better expressions. As we are automata in a world, if we have poorly conditioned anticipation, we need exposure to a world to settle us. These are matters of report and consensus, but confused people can report a consensus view. Find a reasonable level of interface with an environment. As noted, resisting conditioning is as important to humans as conditioning, while other animals might only need to resist our conditioning, or eradication, of them. Neural deficits can sometimes be overcome, or not. They can be genetic or acquired. Neuron cells are subject to disease and disablement. Identifying what can or cannot be reconditioned by exposure to environment and in what ways, is essential for personality and performance. We need to properly settle report and consensus about interfacing different environments, to deconstruct a dynamic relation, involving a trusted physician. Then correlate to neurons and genes. Build a compendium of opinions as correlated, and avoid exaggeration. This area is full of pundits like ABC Science “brain parrots”. Meditation is a huge stall, if that helps you somehow. Personal progress is by rigor, by continual peaks with traction. I do not rule out intervention for degeneration if it is well known and targeted for stimulation, like Parkinson’s. We do not know how they work, but we may know sufficiently how they do not work in some cases to intervene. Congratulations as always to Cuba battling away with medicine in isolation. You can get into this work now if you have the time. Freedom, Copying, & Niches A bird is intricate in its embedded interface with its niche, in concert with a world as a conductor, adjusting to impact strokes of its baton, but with a low developmental scaffold of new motor. Other animals have motor control, but are limited and repetitive. I tend to think other species have a greater

The Human Design

138

appreciation of sensory feelings of their own moves in impact as a hand-in-glove. They may feel every beat conducted by nature reinforced by moves felt with fewer rough edges, as they are do not stray so much. Limited structures fit limited niches with exactitude. Humans might rely on the capacity to condition the removal of rough edges, by acceptance and rejection, in isolated contemplation. Favoring sensory feelings of last move over motor anticipation of next move would put a different emphasis on experiences, if that distinction exists across species. I consider it relevant. In fish, a developed cerebellum works without any developed cerebrum, which streamlines it to keep its natural chemical reflexive levels with a world, but without much conditioning for goals using a cerebrum. A cerebellum tends to maintain levels and it may serve sensory experiences of impact of moves and world that create much interest for the fish, in its subjective experience. It might be more “hand in glove” (match), rather than “try something else” (mix), by levelling moves in impact. I do not assume finalizations by single neurons synchronously across a brain, which equate to the experience itself, are different in process for other species, even if our advanced dependence on a cerebrum is likely unique. Fish may “feel” & “think” without our integration & modulation, but experiencing vision, hearing, smell, touch, and its moves, by synchronous finalization. Experiences will differ from ours, but thoughts are integrated feelings using memory, and integration would exist for many species. I do not even rule out a glimmer of thought by insects. Be cautious, as advertisers are intimately involved in campaigns to promote industries that disregard animals. All species have automatic chemical levelling for interfaces with a world. That is a subjective experience, whatever the level of complexity providing the appearance of immediate control. We need to tighten definitions, to bridge species by terms. Terms of the Homunculus brain theory are “feelings” cannot be “felt” till we “think about them”, to be “aware” that we “feel”.

The Human Design

139

However, thoughts are integrated feelings, and all feelings are either too subtle for report, or they are obvious in a subjective experience. All awareness is experienced fresh from moves, on single neurons finalizing synchronously, regardless of the cortical integration and its complexity. Thoughts are merely intricately coordinated feelings, which other species lack at our level. They would have feelings of vision, hearing, touch, moves, and so on as subjective experiences, but with less capacity to cycle moves intricately using memory fresh in the moment, for states of contemplation. Thoughts cycle across moments to constrain our activities reasonably & responsibly. Glimmers of cortical clogging would arise for fish and many other species, perhaps even insects. Cause-Effect in a Niche Species make causal markings to sketch known territory for a secure outlook on the world to own it. Parasites have insight into carriers to ride as an effect of causal provision. A marker stays within his outlook as loose prey passes. Parasites find secure carriers. Species make up for each other’s deficiencies in lack of fresh exposures or secure bracing by their anatomies. Human individuals do not have fully intact poise and flow, despite a species structure for it, and we cooperate to pool genetic or conditioned security or exposure. The tendencies also extend to spatial or temporal, and organ or appendage in my current model across a web of life in niches. This is all preset potential in an environment for a web of interdependent life based fundamentally around causal bracing or effected exposure to anatomy. I will explain later, our species may lend itself to structural genetics for individual types reflecting other species, extending the preset patterns to within our species. Our functions, and awareness about them, are always subject to a world sustaining us, including every breath. We are immersed in a world, and awareness is our construct about interfaces both ways with a world. Life embedded in niches will

The Human Design

140

know them intimately and define themselves, to the extent they can, in terms of interface recognizing basic consistencies, facts, or laws about the niche. We make assumptions about ourselves and the world, but we can recognize interdependence. You would be foraging without languages or ideas from society, so be thankful to others that you are not grunting right now. Importance of society to species, beyond providing for simple grinding actions of successful copulation, and beyond all the analyses that follow from the statement that you would be grunting right now without it, is evident by geometry. I will explain later how physics is spatial planes of height & depth, with temporal pulses around string making loops along it at light speed. Two-dimensional planes align in relative momentum, or counter-momentum by opposite plane alignments, by freefloating in space (and time) as aligned planes. Their rhythm is set by pulse with loops running through those aligned planes. Humans have an advanced cerebrum & cerebellum, and likewise a horse. A fish has only an advanced cerebellum for reflexive levelling, but that would be sufficient along with a horse to set planes between members of a society for them to move as one to common momentum. That form of alignment would underlie human societal structures, by simple planar alignments in aligned or opposed forward momentum by individuals within it. Copying is a feature of societies. Realities of Containment & Reasoning Kant said correctly that our awareness is our own construct, but he makes a blunt distinction between a constructed world as one thing and the real world as another thing, saying all we can know is our construct rather than the real thing. I would say knowledge is always about the interface of oneself and the world. Awareness provides reasoning to explore any objective reality to interfaces, comprehensively “to us”. It is all we can hope to do. Kant used a Homunculus soul to impose “forms” on “sense datum” rather than tying awareness to sites.

The Human Design

141

We can use universal laws, as laws of the land, to purport to reconcile relative views. However, we can go beyond shared human consistencies, and say that each of us reasonably knows reality as it is. Our functions are perfectly suited to the world by evolution. We can all purport to reasonably know reality as it may be, under the universal prescriptions of adaptive evolution. We do the same in physics, discussed later, where we also purport beyond confinement to a relative view. We can say what others measure, using a universal set of laws for calculation, and we can take a step further and purport a void and neutralizing coordinate are also facts of nature, for an absolute mechanism expanding in a void. Self-awareness, as awareness that one has awareness, is a tricky term. One thinking about oneself may not require any deep ideas about those two parties in awareness. They are two things that exist in one entity that is aware of change to its “being” over time, with its “being” experienced by an outlook or insight at any time. More deeply, we realize we can think quite freely about past thoughts and feelings over time. We have developed the Scientific Method to evaluate our regularities and those of the world in detail. However, as noted, we might tend to favor induction or deduction in our use of the Scientific Method, viewed objectively. Analysis of the world needs objective self-analysis of selfstimulation to have an objective view of the world merging with us. Self-analysis needs objective analysis of stimulation from the world, for objective analysis of oneself within the world. We are subjective, but try to be objective. We can go incrementally from existing theory, or to new paradigms such as mine. Deductive self-consistency needs to be challenged. This has implications for extension from existing theory based upon Bayesian Probability. Bayes builds probabilities based on given priors that can be challenged, but are assumed, to build something. But inventive hypotheses do not respect givens or priors, and they crash by falsifications, continually crashing.

The Human Design

142

Whether the average person always uses bad logic is irrelevant to our species capacity to learn, and Bayes is not your source for logic and how to use it. Science & philosophy are a sad joke, by logic. We learn from our betters to progress. Use balanced logistics to always return to the old to not only build the new upon it, but to break the old apart for a “new” new. Expand all fronts, and hold until vagaries are removed, by regular practice. This will not help if you are gutless or lazy. Reasoning in use of awareness takes us past slow mutational survival at a broad evolutionary level, although psychology is part of biology by basic logic that whatever survives is thus Selected. Stooges love that simplicity, as luck is a factor. This book may or may not be Selected, but we can reason freely for traction. We may mutate by migration, but anyone can reason freely to reconcile freedoms. Distinguishing abstract from real in subtle & obvious transition from preconscious is essential for personal sanity and reasoning. Self-fulfillment is an obsession for some, but most value what the world has given them. Know facts from the world to have worldviews, and be custodians “of” the world rather than gamblers “in” the world. Language needs revision to avoid a paradox. Conditional words are conditioned for actions. A statement like “I always tell lies” must account for the fact that particular statement is also an action inconsistent with the words it uses. That action and those words cannot both be correct. Logic is not restricted to specific words, it also assesses a statement as an action or basis, or fact, which logically contradicts its own words. In logic it amounts to no more than saying “I am lying, but truthfully”. Close your logic around facts, to remove self-contradictions. There are no “paradoxes”, just badly framed logic for facts. Math is a language, and bad axioms persist. Set Theory says there are sets with members of common status, with subsets allowed as borders within one border, but I say bordered parts do not exist within a whole. A whole is one border with parts

The Human Design

143

under one self-consistent logic. There is no value to internal abstract borders that should be subject only to the border of a whole. For goofball “Logicians” who like Bertrand Russell or Cantor, you have two alternatives that resolve as one, the relative view from a point, or the absolute view within a border, and the absolute logically informs us about every isolated point. The relative view is subject to the absolute, and you never draw a border around any points within a bigger border. That is retention of a relative view beyond its “point” purview, to a small border that proposes a level of consistency to inform us around that point, and yet is it within a big border supposedly doing it inwards. But no, because interposing the small border suggests that the big one cannot penetrate within the small to inform us about its points, we stop at its small border and use its own supposed “consistency”. Poppycock. This is deduction to induction to deduction, as cause driving effect over time. It is logical by definition, and real process, to ignore a self-consistent border hypothesized in a bigger selfconsistent border, if it withstands deductive trials. Removal of a lesser border is the point of the process, or it fails and you do not draw a bigger border. The identities of all points improve as we draw borders further out directly from them, not encircled by some abstract consistency that, by definition, can only restrict application of the whole border logic to a point fact within its border. Every single atom is a whole of point facts that dissolves as we wind back to an intact whole for all point facts at a Big Bang. It is logic & process, not relativistic error. Mereology is a related field of math dealing with “parts”, and it should say a part by definition connects to make something bigger, and it can only logically extend to a bordered whole with intact logic untroubled by lesser borders within it, because part “proof” is by definition irrelevant separately from a whole “proof”. Kurt Godel cannot prove any part of a whole, because a part is entirely subject to a whole. By failure of Mereology or Set Theory, Emergence Theory and Godel’s First Theorem fail

The Human Design

144

to understand logical definition and process. Godel wrote several volumes to “establish” that a part proof is impossible unless you have a whole proof, which is also impossible because no-one has a crystal ball to make the measurements. Goofball stuff. Never assume value to limited borders. Always improve a “point fact” identity by extending to a “full view” of it. To a directly related issue of point facts resolved by extended logic, note first that “oneself & world” are an experience by neurons firing, whether or not they ‘really” exist. Truth & existence are constructs by neurons firing to model. “Feelings” secure themselves by their own reasoning. It is a construct and not simply “real”. Look to neurons and cortices as a shortcut in the absence of direct site neural correlations to experience “logic” and “facts” in experiences of combined thought & feeling. Feelings allow any concepts as a preserve. Thoughts are just integrated feelings, and my partitioning here is not by hormone or nerve, it is by pivotal or lateral feelings and thoughts. They are both pivotal as fact by a vestibular & cerebellum, and lateral as logic by a thalamus & cerebrum. Component “thing” & common “thingness” apply to “anything”, including logic or fact across hormone & nerve, relying on their pivotal or lateral tracking. Logic is lateral and relates to itself by self-consistency. Fact is pivotal and relates to itself by proximate contiguity. Components & commons apply to each and correspond for both, as logic about facts at all times, rather than wanton facts with no logical relations or abstract logic with no reality in fact. Unity by components & commons combine with unity by logic & fact. A brain has hormone as mass and nerve as charge, pivotally & laterally. Lateral hormone & nerve grasp logic, and pivotal grasp fact. Logic binds across proximities, and fact binds by proximities. Metaphysics & methodology tend to logic. Physics, chemistry, biology, and psychology tend to fact. Logic provides frames to match observable facts, and so we come to a very brief

The Human Design

145

summary of the logic & facts of science. Newton has a void that is not a measureable fact, but it is a logical frame for measurement that people might even try to view as a container for masses. Einstein’s measurement relative to individual particles is consistent, with reciprocity in Light Clock Experiments across frames, as a subjective relative view used as a fact for unknowable views of others, by abstract frames for pure Isotropy. Darwin’s Selection is not predictive, as his factual breeding has no universal frame for evolution. Kant confined awareness to a subjective fact that cannot be confirmed as a frame despite being personally experienced, because it is confined to one subject. A subjective experience cannot frame itself as a frame even though it may be a fact, as it is on delay and cannot use itself to know itself, logically. As noted on page 34, Epistemology is merely methodology and Ontology is merely metaphysics. By use of methodology for metaphysics, awareness is an experience by cortical neurons that we need to deconstruct by “rules” to faithfully represent biology. It is a representation of “oneself & world” as objects we check by logic & fact in the representation itself, to continually assess the representation for its value to biology, as we are always locked into it. Existence is a theory by one’s own experience, as a metaphysical scheme. Knowledge is continual reasoning to adjust a theory by better logic & fact. Every object is a fact that does something, and a mechanism when we find it does logical things. You can explore what it does, by logic, and explain the mechanisms. Seek perfection on the basis it may be possible, wisely nominated by Gottfried Leibniz, but popularized by Einstein to find what “God” would prescribe. Be a polymath, and also an athlete for real progress. Philosophy reduces to two rigors, and the test of methodology is to find metaphysics by logic using consistent conformity to definition for contiguous facts as mechanisms. People tend to lateral logic or pivotal fact. Biology tends to female hormones for vestibular linguistic facts and male nerves for medulla

The Human Design

146

logistical frames. Female nerve is on topic to reflex logistics by cerebellar romantic linguistics. Male hormones are poetic to confine linguistics by cryptic thalamic logistics. Romantic & cryptic abstracts need to be grounded by a vestibular & medulla. This is bold and general, but they may be fixed genetic tendencies on a spectrum in the Design, without favorites. There are only four types, and this may be a reality to some extent, more useful than harmful. It has nothing to do with niche or racial types, and avoids usual human prejudices. A Sophist will manipulate you to your face. An uncooperative Passive-Aggressive cannot be read for an outlook. They might tend causal or effected, respectively, by genes. We know it in politics. I mention these niche, non-racial, genes on page 206, but left & right politics covers it. It is from a root level of logic & fact used deductively or inductively. Deduction is black & white, win & lose. Induction is grey, hypothetical, potentially “either way”. You will hear deductive types rave on about strict dichotomies to behavior, master & servant, all along the way, by hierarchical win & lose. But ignorant narratives are spouted by both, with inductive types providing every excuse for failure. Just take tendentious pundits in the media with a huge grain of salt if they spout ignorant narratives about humanity. You can lay it on the line or negotiate the line. By sway today, capitalists want to be free to apply an outlook and manipulate us to love it. If a human being rises each morning to the stink & filth of industry to feed greed, it is time to end the con game on that basis, and reform our manipulated, win & lose, civil & criminal law. Seek democratic legal reform, and just cancel the fake love game that has you crawling over each other for approval. The sooner the better, but be aware of the logic that applies from Set Theory. There is intact logic to society applying equally to everyone, and it supersedes any borders people like to draw around themselves as a “private sector”. If you are poor or uncomfortable with contracts, which define that sector, do not feel badly. We can change that.

The Human Design

147

12. The Design in Physics

In the remaining third part of my book, I return to the Design applied to physics. The reversible Scheme for existence also allows some comparisons between its two main levels of physics and biology, and physics predetermines human existence. In Diagram 8, the capacities in the Design read as the fundamentals of any activity in physics or by anatomy. Me, you, where, and when apply to formal axes of cause, effect, space, and time. To, from, stop, and go apply to electromagnetic, gravitational, rest mass, and energy triangles. Particles & Fields as Strings & Loops The Design simply defines rest mass and energy by their space and time forms, evident as particles and fields. It do not theorize whether pure energy can exist without rest mass, and in my current model, they are integrated aspects of one state of momentum defined by motion and direction. That momentum has an angle of rotation from exchanges of tension between charged & massive capacities of rest & energy. My field definition is not the usual term from physics as “momentum without rest mass”, which is illogical. Rest & energy are by strict definitions, with alternative uses for “rest & energy” particles, or “rest-energy” fields. Their distributions are defined by position & motion for directional momentum, differently for particles & fields, but to the same framework to unify. Their interactions are defined by electromagnetic & gravitational tension & rotation for angles to their directions. Distribution & interaction resolve as Angular Momentum directed to intact structures for atoms as solar systems. Mass is one mechanism integrating to an intact definitional logic for atoms as solar systems, and for integration as an intact collective at the Big Bang.

The Human Design

148

Particles have energy contained in their rest masses by the square of the speed of light, with varying quantities of energy as motion converted from rest. They are fixed frames across the universe, but only detect relative motions of other particles. They have motion, but fields extend to and from them with their own adjustments creating the incorrect assumption of rest to particles in motion in a void. A particle is also unable to detect its motion under constant acceleration in a uniform field. A field extends to and from particles by its own mechanism, with a constant motion at light speed in a void. I will focus on my strings & loops as they are beyond speculation, they are likely facts, fundamental, and simple to grasp. Both forces have a two-step mechanism, but with a complete difference in application by forwards or backwards rotations. Gravitons shear with others of their own, linearly or smoothly in a void. This means they smoothly interface and widen each other’s’ loops by shearing. Their loops all have an anchor at their back end to stream as continual successive loops along resting string from vibrating sources in particles. That resting string moves as loops shear and take up the string slack, to draw towards any counter-shearing events. Loops make a compression “front” between them, to lessen available strings at back ends. Anchoring is to common momentum of those successive loops to keep them aligned, but the back end anchor is angled, not smooth. When loops are sent along string from a particle source, their front end loop is at light speed, but the back end anchor angles for particle direction, while the front end is radial. This creates a changeable radial stream with a string history of particle directions relative to its own continual light speed loops as a field around it at all times as it changes directions. The angle does not need to adjust for particle motion because it is a particle fixture with whatever motion a particle may have, but provided by loops shearing for motion. Shearing sends motion back through string to move sources, and consistently, when a particle is pushed directly, its loops will adjust for that motion in a void as it moves.

The Human Design

149

These are fine strings that shear each other for compression fronts in a void radially around particles for adjustable linear motion, while particles are anchored to those successive loops by a back end providing adjustable angled direction. On pages 183-188, this is by a two-dimensional spatial plane as a string with uniform height and distorted depth, to shear standard heights to widen loops that are also uniform in their relation to string by providing direct linear motion by loop widths. Height & width are uniform relations of mass, and the depth & pulse along string for a loop are distorted charged relations within a graviton. A pulse distorts with depth in the direction of motion, when loops shear to “compress” string to move it, or when a particle is pushed to compress string in that direction, as loops also compress in a void for a particle moved by an explosion. Although loops will widen linearly with motion, a pulse thickens & depth shortens to resting string as density inverse to motion for momentum, summarized by a fundamental graph in Diagram 30 for energy usage to accelerate motion linearly. A Lorentz relation is by thickened pulse & less depth slowing the loop rotation around string. The slower pulse around string remains along string for widths of loops to be uniform at light speed with uniform heights despite less depth & denser pulse. Light speed loops continue to shear linearly for motion, but thickening takes resting string, compressing it more directly rather than by loops. And that direct compression is non-linear, in Diagram 30, as an angled distortion to resting string. Depth would allow that angling by lessening for it, consistent with a slower temporal rate to resting string by slowed pulse, as the well-known Lorentz relation of “spatial contraction and temporal dilation”. At root, massive height paired with massive width are for linear string motion, and they relate to a charged pulse paired with charged depth as string distortions by a curve when motion becomes more string by density. Less depth takes up string to affect motion, but to a distorted curve along with a thicker pulse to densify, while mass gives motion.

The Human Design

150

Diagram 30, Avoiding the Curve of Density & Motion as Momentum Line for Linear Motion (Unreal) Motion

Light Speed

0.8

More Density, Less Motion

0.6

Curve of Linear Momentum Increase (Real) (Combines Density (Direction) & Motion)

0.4

0.2

Less Density, More Motion

2

4

6

8

10

Linear Momentum

Diagram 31, String Densifies by Shearing, for Curve of Distortion Slower, Stack Constant (Pillars) & Long Stretch (Bellows)

Low Density Loops Shear Fast Around at Constant Light Speed Along

Faster, Stack Constant (Pillars) & Short Stretch (Bellows) High Density Loops Shear Slow Around at Constant Light Speed Along

The Human Design

151

Diagram 31, Photon String Aligned for Mass & Charge “Peeled Apart at Back” to Show Opposite Poles Intact by Cross Medulla & Shared Vestibular Intact to Align Right Spin

.

Vestibular “Cycle” Begins at Ear, Right Spin Down all the Way Cup-join Lower End Ear Upper End Tongue Stretch View from Crown (Brain Direct) Stack

Right Eye

Left

Nose Front

Medulla Corrects

Left Spin of Body

Front Gut

Lungs View from Ground (Brain Crossover) Stretch

Right

Left

Stack Heart Spine Cup-join Upper End Lower End Medulla “Cycle” Begins at Spine, Left Spin Up to Cross Half Way

The Human Design

152

Diagram 32, Graviton String Aligned for Mass & Charge Front Edges of Loops Shear to Widen & Densify Both Spin Right, but from Opposite Sources

Near

Destinations

Hook-join

Right

Far Hook-join

Lefts (Muscles) Shearing Hearts

(Nerves) Spine

(Nerves) Spine Right

Widen & Densify (Shear Left Front) (Turn Right, Spine Behind) Reels In Behind as Loop Widens

Far

(Turn Right, Spine Behind) Reels In behind as Loop Widens

Sources

Near

The Human Design

153

Loop compressions give density to strings by pushing them together, by directions to compress rather than decompress, and it is linear by original conditions at a Big Bang. String explosion gives motion when loop density is extreme, but loop density works against it as a reservoir at a Big Bang, rather than forming around mass by motion in a lab when it is accelerated. The inversion in Diagram 30 for a laboratory applies to apportion momentum between density & motion, but it does not apply at a Big Bang, as a swing across balance for stability, because linear density is already available for motion. It works the other way by density to motion, but it must also feedback motion to density as it expands. In my model, feedback of motion to density reduces the rate of increasing motion outwards, but it always increases, so there is no “overtaking”. The discrete curve in Diagram 30 sets specific limits to motion & density, and a Big Bang reservoir avoids the curve by having an ideal quantity of mass for density to supply motion to limits, to make an intact linear puffball reducing to an outer “border”. It is by limits to density providing motion linearly, then motion reducing density to limits by feedback. I use “original conditions” ideally, as it is always a good start. The mechanism for photons ties in logically. A photon product hinges and rotates backward rather than forward. A photon is emitted with a front end at light speed if given a void, and it is given a void. It is able to do so by a back end allowing for particle motion and keeping the front end at light speed. However, unlike a smooth radial graviton, the front end at light speed is angled for a void to target an electron or proton, by photon momentum smoothly at loop surfaces. Smooth momentum is given to photons to transfer between electron & proton surfaces, provided by the back end. The back end keeps the front end at light speed and on absorption by the opposite particle, the angled front end goes all the way within a “well” or around “hill” surface of the opposite particle. It has a backward rotation and it hinges, rather than anchors, its back end, to swing back & angle as an opposite loop to send back.

The Human Design

154

A photon has a smooth angling at a hinge to take the receiving particle’s motion and maintain a light speed front end settling on the surface as an opposite loop. At a hinge, adjustment sets light speed transfer of specific momentum, with constant light speed motion for momentum, but also a direction or angle. There is a specific transfer of momentum at the hinge, likely at particle poles, for specific orbital energy, but it also settles on a loop surface. Angling is at light speed, as hinge adjustment keeps it at light speed, but only because motion gets directed across a surface rather than directly at the hinge. Smooth momentum at the pole requires a distribution through the loop itself to add or remove particle motion by angling it across the surface. The front end swings back with angles at light speed, and the back end is smooth at the hinge to stay at light speed, both emitting & absorbing, with angles directing momentum across a surface to do so. A line hinging at a pole is an electrical line for specific quanta, and a line across a surface between poles is magnetic for vibrational allowances around the economical line, or to move to a new orbital level. Received loops resettle on the opposite surface to send back. Photons may reflex back & forth depending upon angles and motions of receipt, to attract or repel effectively. Direct shearing applies to repel “like” surfaces & photons, with resettling also enabled in cushioned collisions to repel. Loop structures in Diagrams 32 & 33 are easily modelled using stiff wire to show how front ends shear in counter-rotation as gravitons, or hinge onto each other as proton wells or electron hills, one a surface and the other a photon by angles to match on a swing back. However, each mechanism has a balancing or stabilizing mechanism that is blunt. Graviton strings explode by loop compressions. Photon loops push with a backward rotation by direct impact, shearing to settle on the surface of a “like” particle, to keep stable relations between opposites attracting as “all or nothing” in a void. A photon pulls to attract when it swings on a hinge, but it can also shear directly and settle, rather than hinge & settle, evident using wire models.

The Human Design

155

Gravitons wind their own thickened pulses & depths to make smooth bulky photon loops with neutrons around them. Later, I rely on one original photon for replication, but the possibility of original creation might be open to gravitons. A thicker pulse & shorter depth to a graviton is extreme for a photon, and a standard graviton string of successive anchored loops might equate to a photon in mass. A photon has one with thirty nine zeroes more force by bulk & bounce at impact than extended graviton string. A photon loop does not move smoothly along angled string, it moves with an angle around smooth intact string surfaces of proton wells & electron hills. A direct relation between photons & gravitons by massive momentum is by compacting graviton pulse & depth within height & width of loops by contiguous shearing relations to make photons, to shear by heights for widths of both photons & gravitons. Momentum builds around photons by shearing for charge, but always mutual to massive purposes by shearing. Charged purpose is to hinge to attract within shearing as a massive purpose. Human sex organ shearing is a direct replica of a Big Bang, to assist modelling these events in physics. Mass is always bound by the graviton curve of distortion in Diagram 30, but it is not relevant when density feeds to motion, and its relevance feeding back as motion to density would be to vibrate back & forth as a brake on expansion by feedback. It may apply a linear brake within overall linear expansive motion, increasing if further away, for reducing rate of increase. The curve is a swing of massive balance for motion feeding density for stable density as photons & particles in Diagram 30, but in a Big Bang, there is already density available for stable mass as photons & particles. The decline in motion within the increase in motion further out simply makes a definable edge between the massive expansion and the void around it, as mass “closes” in proximity as it extends with increasing motion further out with that smoothing. At a Big Bang, an explosion is for particles to compress and remain in density within that decompression.

The Human Design

156

Motion is automatically balanced for density “linearly”, from zero to maximum motion outwards by remaining rest mass, as a product of density decompressed linearly by motion to enable it. A “linear” puffball must have a constant rate of more motion further outwards. However, I have a rate of increasing speed continually braking at a Big Bang, for an intact edge to the expansion. This is described by Calculus in math. No regions overtake, but further out they move away with less motion & density than expected of a “constant” increase. Speed declines to a “surface” that keeps linear momentum by slower motion with less density. It keeps a constant motion & density relation across that braking, as feedback by motion to density, but reducing to make a linearly extended edge to it. Original linear string may have been a compressed lattice in a settled alignment, and settlement in that way would apply also to a sphere like Earth with a neutral gravitational center and concentrated surface. That is a linear loop settlement of strings under gravity, or as an original sphere. Symmetry to formation is retained if an explosion from it does not follow a distorted curve, but is instead linear, although I hedge my bets by allowing some smoothing. The relation of smooth loops and their angled string has a settled or distorted relation. In explosions, they combine by loops compressing ahead of string, explained above when any particle gets an inertial push rather than being drawn by another source by countershearing loops. Height & width uniformly provide linear motion. “Density” in terms of momentum is direction, as density is set by directing momentum to compress or decompress. It is the angle of motion that decides compression or decompression, or states in between. At a Big Bang, neutrality at center to begin an explosion is not an acceleration in a void from a source of energy to gain density from it. It is a source of energy available ahead of an explosion with extant linear density for motion, rather than extant motion used for density. It preserves density to use for photons wound as neutrons,

The Human Design

157

compressing then immediately decompressing to neutralize in state & anti-state continual annihilations at pages 44-45. A residue of neutrons then decays in a void to complete decompression. It is compression as charge & mass within a decompression to decay at Escape Velocity. Avoiding the curve may also apply to neutron decay in a void by energy to accelerate an electron mass from zero to one percent of light speed, but for extant densities as an electron & proton sharing energy to make and keep orbitals. This is linear use of density for motion to rest mass on decompression at low speed for an electron. It is a decompressing pulse from an intact preserved photon compression that detonated a Big Bang. An intact pulse in a neutron releases to tend back to containment after decay. As energy used for motion to rest mass for electron momentum leaving a proton behind, this is stable motion & density on decay. At a Big Bang annihilation, Cosmic Microwave Background is made, but it is local. Gravity is also local. Events creating the CMB are frozen, and CMB does not have necessary contiguity for trajectories across vast regions, except as a uniform cloud revealing little differentiable inside it locally, but it reflects a Big Bang. Comparably, the contiguity of gravity is secure across all distance, but locally, every event is in a freefall by relative weight that tells us nothing about large scales. The trajectories we require are by particles evidenced by photons contiguously shearing gravitons all the way here. The CMB will not show a global density, so we extrapolate from local examples of it. But, although we cannot use relative weight on Earth to say if a universe is neutralized, we can view key particle trajectories. As noted, the most important current trajectories science is viewing are bright supernovae. There is a method to estimate distance or position of a supernova from the arc of its light rays here, by ancient Greek geometry to calculate distance of the source. They found that some of most distant ones are too far

The Human Design

158

away to have the Redshift they show by their photons from trajectories. Whilst a CMB has no contiguity, a photon shearing gravitons in a void from a source has contiguity, and it Redshifts for motion & direction (density). A photon is effected by both its density in relation to gravitational field density, and its motion in relation to gravitational field motion. When field density & motion of a source has momentum away from us, its photons Redshift. Science found far supernovae with too low Redshift, suggesting they have been accelerated away to distance, not constantly increasing in their coasting. That has overturned cosmology, but it clutches at straws. There may be a braking edge to motion & density that explains why Redshifts are not as high as they “should” be for linear expansion. They are moving more slowly than expected due to that braking. Dark Mass, Energy, or Matter, is unseen, extrapolated, particle or field mass in a void. Science does know what it is dealing with, and I avoid its definitions of “energy” or “matter”. Mass in the universe estimated by recent WMAP telescopes are quoted as “Dark Energy 72.8% (within 1.6%) as non-'particle' background, and Dark Matter 22.7% (within 1.4%) of nonbaryonic (sub atomic) 'particle' energy, and baryonic particles (atoms) at only 4.56% (within 0.16%).” As noted, resting string is particulate and can move up to light speed in any Frame. Loops in resting graviton string or decayed photon string, move at light speed as a field. Energy is by conversion of rest to energy by graviton strings exploding by compression. It only exists combined with rest mass as resting string moved by a push around a string compression explosion for it, as an alternative to string moved by counter-shearing loops. The non-luminous mass proposed by measurements would primarily be graviton string & loop sections in a void, as “fluid” in the void. There is also an energy investment for continual linear recession to be counted, rather than relying on expanding Spacetime carrying mass with it, when Spacetime somehow expands and continues to expand. Definitions for

The Human Design

159

logic & fact need complete revision in physics for progress. You can start by “seeing” these events using a God’s Eye in a void. That is not denied to you by my work. I rely on it, rather than math equations to describe momentum shifts by unknown mechanisms, denied visibility because there is literally no void from which to view mechanisms interfacing in current science. Graviton string explosive capacity is by pulse & depth, and it can be contained as a photon, rather than used by a graviton. The reduction in depth that thickens a pulse would detonate a pulse explosion, and that shortened depth is also contained as a bouncy photon. Photons are bulky resting string of gravitons. The complete loop is smooth to take angled graviton string around it as a neutron with intact mechanisms to hold nuclei by pivotal Strong Force and release for orbitals by lateral Weak Force. Strong holds gravitational compression for massive nuclei past iron. Weak decays electromagnetic compression at angles for orbitals. As momentum, the Strong retains it to equally explode using it to separate nuclei, consistent with a Big Bang as an original reservoir that explodes equally from its own attraction. Weak decay “repulsion” is equal to “attractive” containment by neutrons as massive reserves, to then equally attract & repel after decay to sort towards atoms. Graviton string provides momentum for a Big Bang and decay, and for angled proton wells & electron hills at one pole to give & take photon loops between surfaces. Levers & springs would apply, evident in some attempts at illustrating Strong & Weak in books. Graviton loops along string underpin all of nature, due to a structure for pulse & depth with height & width in Diagram 30, for gravitons to make photons, and also make lever & spring mechanism for particles. A neutron in free space is a long freeze frame of a delayed moment of action-reaction for tendency to causal containment to release by effected decay, for atoms. Neutrinos have some energy at decay, as a bracing product of rest to energy conversion by gravitons to preserve two specific rest masses differentiated by energy.

The Human Design

160

Atomic orbitals are a future ideal using emissions as field decompressions on decay as effects, for hypothetical attraction or repulsion. It is securely determined on causal absorption when it actually attracts or repels. Its hypothesis is to an ideal from potentials that applied to its original state as a neutron in a binary “all or nothing” state in a void. Conversely, gravitation emits from a real origin deductively in the past, and absorption is an effect hypothesizing about a past origin causing it after compression at a Big Bang tended to an extrinsic leap at detonation by a photon at its center. A mutual explosion from compression at a Big Bang was mediated by a photon inward for neutron formation around replicated photons. Atoms and solar systems form together by mutual accretion compressing to mutual decompression. Particles repel to the extent they attract, sorting to contain as atoms and compounds. A neutron uses a void to extend its neutral surface to become surfaces of protons and electrons sending “grey” photons to be sorted “black or white” on receipt. This is a concentrated charge with a neutral surface in a void at all times, as a neutron with binary potential, or as an atom. The terms “concentration” and “neutrality” are defined in relation to the “nothing” of a void, but mass can never be measured in relation to a void because a void provides nothing against which it can be measured. All measurement is relative to other mass in a void, and not in relation to a void. I explain in the next chapter graviton loops along string sections reel and unreel string according to the widths of loops, as a thoroughly consistent pulley system for regularly distorted momentum, as measured. Gravitons are all equal, unlike photons with different momenta. They are resting string that extends loops along it at light speed from a causal source that explodes from attractions, black & white, when overly compressed. Other sources are attracted, grey, as they have their own inertia to avoid compression, and in general the system rotates. Supernovae are inevitable after a Big Bang. Charge leads compression in by mass to its limits

The Human Design

161

until an energy release using neutrinos, to explode for the dispersal of a rotating cloud with proportions of heavier elements we find at a mantle for a Biosphere. Atoms rotate by “chasing their own tail” in a massive field for rotation. It settles into energetic planets orbiting a pivotal star. Cloud rotation increases under contraction as it flattens. Graviton loops extend between particles to bind in rotation. Neutrinos energize a supernova explosion. It is only under compression by initial conditions at a Big Bang that gravitons liberally create neutrons with photons in them, to annihilate with anti-states. Particle mass extends from real origins, and attractive fields extend from them. Particle charge contains to an ideal destination, and fields sort to contain to that ideal. Those causes have equal and opposite effects, taking fields as contracting masses for real integration with past origins, and giving fields as expanded charges sort ing to “all or nothing” ideals of atoms. Causally, mass attracts and equally explodes “from” a past by built reserves. By using the reserves, charge contains and equally decays, to sort equally back “to” containment, but as a full Periodic Table. Those mechanisms lock mass & charge into a logical frame of cause preceding effect. Opposing directions are mass “from” a past origin as a reserve taking from other reserves building to explode “from” them and build again, and charge “to” future ideals known by a sketch relation of unity able to be filled out in future by decay. At root, Quantum Mechanics is economical electrical lines of energy “quanta” for each “coasting” orbital upon decay, in its distortion with magnetism for orbital vibration or adjustment. Shortly, “constant & variable” capacities create a simple framework for bocks & fields, or strings & loops, summarized in Diagram 39. Blocks coast by absolute momentum in a void, with constancy & variability, for atoms & solar systems. Fields have relative momentum in a void, with constancy & variability, for exchange between blocks particles. Quantum distortion along & across for orbital lines is within a constant

The Human Design

162

& variable frame for blocks & fields, or strings & loops. This frames a root relation of electrical & magnetic lines. The magnetic slings equally to move the economical line in or out for interactions with other atoms, ultimately for molecular compounds, not the extremes of physics. Magnetism is also responsible for vibration around surfaces for orbital rotations, with either spin or anti-spin options inevitably by smooth or angled photons tilting with momentum and polarizing to opposite rotation at poles, positive north and negative south. An electrical line has economy by quanta for orbitals, while the magnetic line has variability by slinging both ways across it, for a new orbital level, or vibrate it around the economical line, as necessary. Momentum by atoms collectively creates vibration to their orbitals, as both electrical & magnetic lines align to any momentum of atoms. A surface vibration is from excess & shortfall of momentum at a pole, from relative momentum of particles in proximity. Any variation in relative momentum will have the effect of orbital magnetic vibration to resolve economy at pole and vibration across a surface for momentum excess or shortfall in any photon exchanges. Spin as Rotation & Vibration in Physics & Anatomy Underlying these relations there is a fundamental choice of spin made by a neutron for its proton on decay, and for an electron to have a spin to match a proton automatically on decay. Antiparticles are no more than particles that spin the opposite way, with poles reversed so that left-right becomes right-left. This does not concern an angled photon loop, which already has options of opposite spin between a proton & electron matching each other’s spins. But it concerns the intact photons within a neutron, as spin one way or the other will decay its two parts, proton & electron, with opposite poles to align to matching spins. A proton rotates backward left handed in my model, while an electron rotates backward right handed, and a graviton rotates forward right handed. Those simple oppositions and that

The Human Design

163

fixture resolve for spin, and a right-hand spin is non-frictional for a complete photon merging with gravitons for a neutron. A lefthanded spin by a proton might dissolve it at a Big Bang, as a complete and permanent failure to detonate. A complete photon in Diagram 11 (1) decays an electron away from a proton that spins one way or the other. They both send backward rotating loops, in matched opposition by right proton well rotation and left electron hill rotation. Simple mechanics dictates poles of neutrons tending to proton or electron aligned in one direction to spin together creates alternative spins of those two poles at the middle, from their different polar perspectives. An electron aligns its pole with a proton for an orbital to exchange photons with a proton in on decay in Diagram 11 (1), they will be sent with an opposite rotation in that direction. Electrons spin the same way as protons on decay and afterwards, noted by physics. But direct alignment for exchanges means that an opposite pole is aligned to exchange by spin for its photon hills left handed, from its perspective. The pole of a proton well stays aligned for hills right-handed, from its perspective. This is the twist at a medulla in anatomy, and it means that proton head & electron body both rotate in common with the same left & right side. That is maintained by a shared vestibular at a head for both, while also maintained for both at a body by a medulla that twists in between their aligned rotations. A brain extends far above a face in a human, but it starts at a medulla in between a face and body. The medulla twists left & right to opposite sides of a brain for it to serve both a body by spinal logistics as a twist between, and a head at a balanced ear without a twist, above a medulla. They share appendages that have medulla & vestibular bases & edges. Appendages fields knit a basic divide of head & body. Common left & right sides have pivotal vestibular Strong Force and lateral medulla Weak Force to keep twist to body & head created across separation.

The Human Design

164

To rotate right to be left forward to future and right back in past, or southpaw as the opposite, is a simple change in stance, but it is significant. A mirrored anatomy with appendages mirroring, and with potential to rotate both ways, only needs to resolve those stances by crosstalk to make either of them workable. Quite simply, it resolves as a means for a free floating anatomy with equal mirrored sides and appendages to favor cause turning to right or effect turning to left, as simple right or left handedness. Even though it seems logical to always turn right, as cause should be behind effect to drive it in that stance, it is a causal driving stance. The other stance turning left with right ahead to future is an effected stance absorbing a drive, as an equal driven stance. They obey internal alignment and share common directions of spin, but they allow regular momentum direction & absorption between individuals. In physics, “torque one way produces torque another way in a closed system”. The foundational neutrality of photons that gave them original spin enables particles to drive with inertia to their own spin, and be driven by the inertia of others to spin the other way. This is still strictly divided between cause & effect within their shared system. Any effect from any cause will be subject to that cause, which is always as cause by right driving left for particles, whatever their “spin” alignments for orbitals by electrical & magnetic lines. This is not an anti-particle drive, even though it may spin either way equally as a simple turn. In humans, it is corrective to drive and to be driven within a species and society, in alignments of individuals. It is an unavoidable fact of internal asymmetry to have difference between our turn right or left, but I noted on page 126 that in perceiving the moves of others to which we might align, we may respect their turns either way regardless of their directions in relation to us, by a pivotal head using a vestibular to reconcile across our own hemispheres to see “truly”. We would align to the directions of others, as planes of height & depth with pulsing loops directing or absorbing momentum, all sharing a heart at left to future.

.

The Human Design

165

In the next chapter, gravitons rotate one way, right handed, while photons rotate either way, and a forced choice for spin by charge may be right handed to suit a neutron & proton, not an electron. It is a forced choice for a neutron to rotate with a graviton upon merger, but it may be the only workable choice, as frictions may be counter to that direction, and that might dissolve a photon. I have the same structures for neurons, comprised of equal charge & mass in Diagram 24. Scale differs for charge & mass, but multitudes make up the difference. A charged nerve line, as a neuron, has bulb at synapse and a cup at dendrite to join ends, with the direction of flow in the direction of rotation of a photon in Diagram 11 (1), away from the cup-join at a dendrite to continue a flow. That nerve structure comprises a multitude of hooks flowing as mass in the same direction by accretion, but to alternative hormonal purposes across partitioned brain regions. Hooks build at the giving end of a nerve as a bulb for hormones to pass, or not, across the gap between synapse and dendrite. Charge & mass combine in that one structure. Particle Distribution At root, charge and mass merge as particles in mutual relations as strings with directions of magnetic lines from “spin”. Spin may be with vibration & rotation. Spin is from a choice of poles. They share a constant direction as particles, to coast in a void by rest & energy in varying motions. A constant course coasts at one rate. The direction is set by the relation of cause and effect, with cause as past and effect as future. This is represented by slanted lines in diagrams, for a direction driven by cause, at root. Our anatomy is illustrated by the Design, but in physics it is a geometrical reconciliation that almost illustrates particles and fields, because the real relations are so basic in Diagram 36. A constant rotation with variable motions is created in Diagram 34, in either direction for spin using the horizon as an axis. Pivots & orbits for atoms or solar systems are driven by cause, by the slant merging charge and mass whatever the direction of spin.

The Human Design

166

Diagram 34, Frame for Particle Motion & Direction Effect (Left)

Time (Back)

Lines of Alternative Motions

Space (Front)

(Right) Cause

Lines of Constant Directions

Mass and charge are merged in mutuality, to compress and decompress together, for resting pivots and energetic orbits in atoms and in solar systems. A block frame applies to particles with their own absolute direction in a void as its inertia. Mass angles around charge by set right hand rotation for a preferred right hand rotation of a neutron (and proton), angling around charge. Direction of that initial rotation right or left is optional, but the wrong way may dissolve a photon by friction. In the next chapter, I explore particle & anti-particle formation & annihilation further, and propose that anti-particles are intrinsically unstable gravitationally, and not long-lasting. A complementing field framework applies for photon and graviton field loops sharing constant motion rather than varying motions, with alternative

The Human Design

167

directions between particles rather than merged stand-alone for constant directions coasting. Fields are defined in relation to absolute particle momentum in void, to unify those absolutes by relative momentum in a void. Fields serve as a basis for particle bases to measure relative momentum. Physics has absolute directions to particle motions as momentum, and relative directions to field motions as momentum. The Uncertainty Principle says “it is impossible to determine accurately both the position and the direction and speed of a particle at the same instant.” Obviously, you cannot measure momentum at one spatial position at one instant, which is a stationary freeze frame. Direction and motion are defined by two positions and instants, for motion between them, and direction between them. Motion is defined by spatial & temporal positions, plural, between positions & instants, by definition, not frozen. Direction is likewise defined using two spatial positions and instants for an angle between. The gap can be closed to a wavelength, as a smear. No magic exists in the gap. Physics has a shocking disrespect for definitions. In the Uncertainty Principle, the definition of momentum is offended by a silly claim a freeze without motion or direction of force, as action-reaction impact to measure, has momentum, whether the measurer has it or not. Any momentum is frozen out by action-reaction measurement, which is a freeze frame. Momentum is not falsifiable, “in passage”. It is not measurable, by definition. I noted a whole does not have parts that can be compared with other wholes for “Emergent properties”, as a whole is undivided. In his First Theorem, Godel defines a whole as a “complete and consistent theory”, but he says a claim cannot be proven about a part of it, which is obvious. A proof about a part contradicts the theory being a whole. The Second Theorem lifts that into practical verification, as if we have a crystal ball, particularly as momentum is not falsifiable. Knowledge is by falsifiable parts of a theory comprised of logic & fact, continually secured but never secure, but science is not

The Human Design

168

merely falsifiable parts. Physics is falsifiable, and metaphysics is not falsifiable. Progressive theory for “a body of reliable knowledge” includes both, to discover root logic & facts. Field Distribution Photons have a “ duality” in physics, as spatial path-makers and temporal wave-makers. In Diagram 35, they integrate rest and energy equally, by constant motion at light speed and varying directions between particles. Fields have motion by straight lines for constant proportions of space and time, and angled lines for alternative space or time directions. They go away from one particle while coming in to another. They leave by energy with more space and at rest with more time, while they also arrive at rest with less space and by energy with less time. A passage is measured in the Design at all times relative to each block, but a loop can be isolated in Diagram 36 (2). In isolation, we use two separated blocks that give and take that loop with nothing interposed, other than a void. It is putative, unmeasurable, momentum in a void. As noted, momentum is only measured at emission or absorption, so it is putative, like appendage fields in a world on page 101 and in Diagram 19. Fields do not have “momentum without rest mass”. I combine rest and energy in momentum logically. Fields are extensions that unify particles as one mechanism. However, in reality, constant motion as measured by moving particles can only be maintained by flexible positioning, to distribute momentum and allow for particle motion by loops settling from and to particle surfaces. A photon at light speed motion has a smeared position for motion, by lack of proof from inevitable Uncertainty. Field loops have back and front ends. If position of a front end is measured, its motion cannot be known tighter than a smear. Particles do not exist “between” states, and mass does not appear and disappear in the gaps between measurements of any passage of momentum in a void. If anything, “between” is in measuring motion, and it relies on an inverse relation.

The Human Design

169

Diagram 35, Frame for Accretion Field Direction & Motion Effect Out Out Resting Energetic

Energetic In

Resting In

Time

Space

In Energetic Lines of Alternative Direction

In Resting

Resting Energetic Out Out Cause

Lines of Constant Motion

Fields distribute by giving or taking momentum on the surface by directional change to the extent the particle’s motion differs from light speed. Adjusted field motion at constant light speed for remaining momentum at the front end is measured by the particle. All loops bend between ends for motion in alternative directions when sent or taken. Stacking and stretching may be essentials of strings and loops to maintain consistency, including the limit to light speed acceleration of particles in labs, by storing momentum in loops that stack and stretch. In the next chapter, I will further explore the fundamental nature of gravitons and their responsibility for Lorentz Transformations at the unseen roots of nature, to remove all the magical pixies and so on inhabiting physics.

The Human Design

170

Distribution & Interaction Diagram 36, Particle & Field Rotation & Tension (1) Particle: Varying Tensions & Constant Axial Rotation

(2) Field: Varying Rotations & Constant Screw Tension Decompress

Decompress Neat Disc .

Compress Photon Compress Fuzzy Atom

Compress Graviton

Decompress

A photon, as a proton well & electron hill in a neutron, braces a minor graviton string explosion for a proton & electron to stay intact by angled photon loops of a proton or electron. A graviton has smooth loops with linear strings originally, to explode in neutrons formed around a photon for intact rest & energy angles. Before a Big Bang all was linear, and angled afterwards within linearity. Particle poles enable graviton string to send & receive photons with magnetism directed also across a surface for vibration across rotations. Diagrams 36 (1) & (2) purport to illustrate particles and fields in a void.

The Human Design

171

In Diagram 36 (1), tensions are charged or massive. On decay, orbitals angle at short range, rather than with smooth momentum for a solar system flattening and speeding up. Polarization of photon loops as positive wells or negative hills may initiate neutron decay by graviton string around a photon. Small angular momentum changes of a planet may initiate polarization to loops across it for shifty geomagnetism. Field loops in Diagram 36 (2) look like that in my model, or in Diagrams 32 & 33, with backward photon rotation in Circular Polarization animations in Wikipedia, or any physics book with electrical & magnetic lines made by a loop, but labelled a “probabilistic wave-function” as it cannot be “seen” in passage. Particle Interaction Diagram 37, Frame for Particle Tension & Rotation Effect (Left)

Time (Back)

Space (Front)

Lines of Alternative Tension

Lines of Constant Rotation

(Right) Cause

The Human Design

172

Juxtapose Diagram 34 on Diagram 37. Rest & energy combine in momentum with rotation by angled lines around a horizontal axis. Rest & energy combine in momentum in Diagram 34 that has a const ant rotation along the angled lines in Diagram 37. They also have constant position with alternative tension, as compressed pinches or decompressed bulges along the straight lines in Diagram 34. Charge & mass merge by straight lines for tension in constant rotation. Merger as particles would be around a complete photon for a neutron with Strong Force, and it decays intact by a Weak Force. Field Interaction Diagram 38, Frame for Field Rotation & Tension Effect Rot. Out Rot. Out

Rot. In

Rot. In

Time

Space

Rot. In

Lines of Alternative Rotation Lines of Constant Tension

Rot. In

Rot. Out Rot. Out Cause

The Human Design

173

Juxtapose Diagram 35 on Diagram 38, for photon or graviton intact loop tension at light speed. Straight lines are rotations with constant tension by angled lines. Photons and gravitons rotate as intact loops to for constant tension at constant motion. Fields compress at the front end by a tension delivered at light speed, and loosen a back end for directional adjustment for particle motion when given or taken. Loop tension declines constantly by the inverse square of distance. Constants & Variables Rest & energy in space & time distribution coast constantly in directions as particles, but by varying motions combining for those directions, for absolute momentum. Fields have varying directions relative to particles exchanging them, but by constant motion to directions, for relative momentum. Electromagnetism & gravitation by cause & effect interactions merge to both rotate constantly as particles, but their varying tensions create atoms or solar systems. Their fields have constant tension exchanges, but with varying forwards or backwards rotations for their alternative string tensions. Diagram 39, Constant and Variable Capacities Particles

Fields

Motion

Variable

Constant

Direction

Constant

Tension

Variable

Rotation

Constant

Variable

Constant

Variable

The Human Design

174

13. The Design in a Void

The previous chapter placed physics in its proper framework, but this chapter deals with its presently unseen bases. Description of momentum shift by math lacks understanding of what shifts. Without a void, math replaces mechanisms between particles. A universe becomes a math Hologram we somehow experience “normally”. After a Big Bang, math disperses with galaxies by continual linear “appearance”, “stretching”, and “expanding” of Spacetime geometry with literal “non-existence” around it. I am calling it the Emperor’s New Clothes, and physicists are royalty. Likewise, instead of valuing sites, Kant and modern neuroscience simply impose construction by thought upon feelings. Homunculus minds supposedly know and control feelings. Mass and Spacetime “reciprocate” by Einstein. Kant’s guiding principle is a bland “do unto others”. Interfaces are neglected by both salesmen. Right Handed Gravitons & Both Handed Photons There are two issues about a Big Bang. First, a photon needs to settle crossways around a center point, and secondly, that must neutralize graviton string density. Distribution of gravitational force around mass is linear. It is a smooth distribution of force radially around a center point, but without rotation at a Big Bang. It is by flat graviton loops off-setting each other in tension both ways in a void, relatively between loop sources at ends of strings that carry loops. Graviton loops from alternative sources hold tension both ways in a void to build motion & density to sources by reeling string from widened loops. At symmetrical detonation, there is a string explosion against the smooth linear distribution of gravitational energy of loops in the void around vibrating dense string. Strings would be compressed by loops, exactly “at” an explosive limit eternally, in my model. But detonation can compress to release string tension maintained by loops, and

The Human Design

175

decompress loops linearly for motion by exploding string. String compresses to wind around the complete photon detonator, for a neutron to form and annihilate in a massive linear expansion for formation & annihilation of states & anti-states, leaving a residue. It is a forced choice that may only work one way. Even angles to “explode” the relation between graviton strings and their loops is provided by a complete smooth photon string in a contained loop in Diagram 11 (1). The explosion is linear, but angled string is drawn around the photon to make a neutron, and then replicate neutrons for only a one-in-ten-billion residue to decay and remain after state & anti-state annihilation, Photon string can rotate or vibrate either of two ways, as spin or antispin. They wind one way as a neutron upon detonation, but are immediately countered the other way. Action-reaction transition, discretely, is compression for a neutron then an anti-neutron, then decompression of an anti- neutron then a neutron, creating more of the same, leaving a residue of neutrons to decay as photons were forced one way to start it. A forced choice by a photon has action-reaction by friction around annihilations in a smooth linear chain reaction of density to motion with an exponential edge to the void by feedback of motion to density. I noted mass twists to merge around a compressed pulse; and charge twists to accrete after a decompressed pulse on decay. The Design can represent intact relations of charge & mass, with merger by mass twisting and accretion by charge twisting, without adding the labels “left & right”. The Design is charged pulse & depth compressing to merge mass around it, or decompressing to accrete with mass around it, as states neutral to any directions of spin. We add spin in the Design, with cause at right and effect at left because that is a forced choice by mutuality. When mass merges around charge it can only spin one way in my model, to avoid graviton friction, then it has frictional anti-spin and annihilations. Left & right sides are an equal choice but not the same. Charge must go to right as a neutron for its mutuality with set graviton rotation.

The Human Design

176

Pulse & depth compress to twist graviton string away from its strict position in the Design to merge as a neutron to become a proton oppositely aligned to an electron. Decay decompresses for free photon loops to twist to accrete in massive rotations. String angles by mass create alternative spin around smooth photons that tilt by graviton momentum, as their fundamental relation by shearing for momentum. They reverse north & south spontaneously on Earth in geomagnetism, neutral to any preferred right hand rotation by gravitons. Gravitons require a right handed rotation for a residue of particles to be created by a Big Bang, but in geomagnetism, gravitons create poles and saying whether they are right or left handed depends entirely on a charged alignment to differentiate them. Gravitons care nothing for polar choices, it cares only for a right handed rotation. For its part, an original photon is neutral to rotation either way, even though it can only detonate one way, but it has one matching pole for each particle proton & electron after neutron decay. How do we know if gravitation only rotates right handed? It does not differentiate poles, even though it always spins. Photons spin either way for poles as particles and fields, but now merged as particles and accreting as their fields. A proton relates to mass as a pivot, and when a neutron decays, an electron is made and sent with Angular Momentum from extant massive density of a neutron. Matched rotations, whatever their spin, are built into the relation, and seen in anatomy by a twist at a medulla. The same photons can have the same spin for anti-spin particles, as angled loops exchanged with opposite spin from particle exchanges. Antiprotons send the left hand photons that an electron would send, and anti-electrons send the right hand photons that a proton would send, by reversing the particle spin. A “positive” charge of a proton becomes a “negative” charge of an antiproton, while a negative charge of an electron becomes a positive charge of an anti-electron. It is well known that particles and anti-particles are made in pairs. Even so, facing “equal” alternatives, a photon string can be spun either way.

The Human Design

177

A human anatomy is neutral by our mirrored anatomy to turn either way, but a choice has also been made by setting right as causal past and left as effected future in a rotation driving past-to-future one way in anatomy. Within a mirrored anatomy with apparent neutrality to turns as its foundational state, there is organ asymmetry retained by brain hemispheres and resolved by crosstalk for right past & left future sides, and that directs an apparently neutral frame. We turn left forward to future and right in past in sports & stances universally, and we are rarely southpaw. Bias underlies the free turn, and it is reconciled by neural crosstalk that is asymmetrical in a brain despite apparent mirrored symmetry. Appendage fields are likewise mirrored neutrally in anatomy along with the neutrality of a complete photon, and they will follow the spin direction set internally by right causal past driving left effected future. Spin is the basis for an equally mirrored anatomy that chooses to rotate either way by head or body, alternating as “north” or “south”. A vestibular is pivotal, while a medulla twists around it, for alternative neural flows in one cycle. A massive vestibular is quite involuntary in balance, and rotates either way for charge to align either way, as in geomagnetism. However, gravitons are right handed and favor a turn to right, rotating with left exposed around, forward to future braced by cause at back. A charged medulla is a stable brace that crosses leftright between body & head as an intact charged relation for Strong & Weak purposes, not spin or anti-spin. The twist of a medulla can apply to either a left or right handed spin. It is not necessarily tied to sides, as an intact head & body relation for Weak Force logistics. Charge turns either way by the stable interface of a mirror tending right past and left future, and either way by a massive pivot that is neutral to charged tilts, once spin direction has been set. Once set, any turns either way can be resolved by crosstalk between hemispheres. Appendage fields likewise remain neutral to spin in their accretion alignments in the Design, and they simply follow by a choice of “overall” spin having been made by organs.

The Human Design

178

Pure Isotropy I noted on page 43, a sphere has no knowable center. Pi used to find it is endless. Eternality is from the self-consistency of intactness. It need not change, being stable in rest-energy, but unbalanced by favoring a compressed form. Balance by neutralization keeps charged stability for decay to atoms. Gravitons “around” Pi cannot “center”, but may “center” on the shape of one photon as a discrete mechanism. All gravitons, by contiguous shearing, use one photon as a detonator for a mutual “center” with initial bounce for a wave, if a photon vibrates evenly. There is a simple tilt to flatten by the charged axes in Diagram 6, for merger upon detonation, aligning away from buffeting by epicycle field loop momentum. A detonator snuffs out from no energy at the center “slot” if aligns for antispin friction and the compression is permanent. It is no more than an even chance to a given compression, as it existed infinitely with that potential. Be thankful it did not snuff out. Continual Spacetime expansion in physics has Symmetry Breaking for particles to bridge separation conveniently as if it is not happening in our solar system. It requires a relation of mass and expanding Spacetime, which must relate anyway by tying ad hoc to an Inflation to disperse particles. Particles keep original proximities and velocities, and continue as if coasting in a void, consistent with my model. Einstein uses three spatial dimensions and time, and we should be able to wind back and see shape to expansion, but this is not possible in Relativity, which views from mass and not from a void at mass. Einstein’s Spacetime could be placed entirely within a void to view it, but an absolute God’s Eye view from a void is replaced by an absolute analogous to Expanding Rubber with pure Isotropy. It is two-dimensional rubber that is flat locally, and flat or curved as one universe. There is only a rubber surface, with all observers seeing pure Isotropic recession. This is uses one fact, Earth’s view of approximate Isotropy, and more approximate as we try to measure outwards.

The Human Design

179

Expanding Rubber provides pure Isotropy relative to every observer. Reconciling their views in the rubber analogy can only be by abstract frame translations referencing two dimensions as three and saying "they're reconciled". Place objects on a table and move them apart as if the table top were stretching everywhere at the same rate and see how every observer sees linearity around it, faster if further away, with all having pure Isotropy. Take that “concept”, and apply it to spherical view around you and it breaks down completely if every observer has that view. It is supposedly saved by actually existing in two dimensions, flat or curved, creating a Hologram that we experience as “three” dimensions. Continuous time is added to any spatial representation, but the Hologram obfuscates time. In Wikipedia under Metric Expansion of Space: "'space' is a mathematical concept that stands for the three-dimensional manifold in which our respective positions are embedded" and "metric expansion of space is considered by cosmologists to be an observed feature on the basis that although we cannot see it directly, scientists have tested the properties of the universe and observation provides compelling confirmation". In a puffball, we can exist near a center, assuming we have measured Isotropy around earth correctly. This is better than a math model we cannot see directly, which stands for what we can. The Metric is also applied to explosion in a void from a central location, but with an impossible twist in Relativity. Our visible universe becomes a Hologram based on a Geodesic. Instead, see gravitation as it is on Earth. Karl Popper noted pure Isotropy using Earth’s view is not falsifiable. General Relativity is also used to explain tricky accelerating expansion. At some point physics might awaken from dogmatic reliance on math without mechanism. Original compression at a Big Bang as a non-rotating sphere obeys the universal inverse square law of gravitation without accretion. My model has radial and tidal forces from a neutralizing wave that leaves particles independent in a neutral gravitational field at a Big

The Human Design

180

Bang. The compression is smoothed across the collective by uniform expansion, and locally every frame is the same, based on standard particle capacities in the Design. Abstract pure Isotropy would leave mass to clump into uniform balls. Mechanisms in a void would not attract by the convenient curvature of Spacetime. Gravitons push particles together in a void by being anchored to extended strings from particles to rotate forward. Photons hinge to protons and electrons to pull them together by drawing momentum with least resistance in a void by rotating backwards. A void does nothing. Nature has a push & pull of momentum in a void to less pressure out into a void, or into lower energy bonding in a void between particles. I rely on photon hinges with cup-like contact or graviton anchors with hook-like contact. Nature is inevitably limited in options for physics’ completely unexplained mechanisms for attraction or attraction & repulsion. In fact, the only options might be hinging by a cup-join and anchoring by a hook-join, to common directions of momentum for each, which is a key. The putative “wave-function” of Quantum Mechanics is no more than a loop with variation around an axis in a void, and always known relative to particles. In a void, it is literally unable to be known by correct definition of momentum, badly obfuscated by the Uncertainty Principle. Wake up, a void keeps you honest. The role of gravitons is completely unattributed in current physics and in Higgs Field speculations, which rely on General Relativity as math between masses. Mutuality extends from a Big Bang, when gravitons served photons, perhaps irresistibly from shearing, for whatever mass photons need to use their bounce. In procreation, it means one levity sperm enables a gravity egg and womb to gestate for a complete new person around a sperm contribution of specific DNA ratios. As noted, I leave open the possibility that in fact cold gravitons dominated before the Big Bang but for one photon to serve as a model for all others afterwards in a neutralizing chain reaction, as in biological reproduction.

The Human Design

181

Distorted Discrete Spaces & Times Each particle is unable to determine its coasting motion in a void. Ignoring gravitational attraction, any two parties in inertial motion would have symmetry to their relative views of motion from their states of assumed rest. We can say they all have absolute motion from the Big Bang in my model, but while that sets their overall scheme within an intact collective in a void, all measurement is relative in a void. Each particle measures fields at a constant speed at all times, which has consequences when parties can only measure motions relative to their state of rest. It means that they will systematically disagree in their observations of other events and reciprocally mirror observations of each other. Photons, as constants in a void, substitute for the void by providing an absolute when it frames a relative state of assumed rest as a basis for observation of inertial and gravitational motions of particles. Being an absolute at light speed, parties’ changes within the void of time and space between light signals will be relevant. Simultaneity and a set location are essential to measurement in Relativity, and my model. A single event will have its light start simultaneously in time from one location in space for all viewing parties. The absolute void allows specific locations within space, despite different motions relative to other parties. The void also allows simultaneous time for all parties, despite different delays in photon receipt for each party. Absolute space and time are a setting for a range of absolute motions of particles, and for the constant motion of fields, even if measurement is relative. Using light, we see that as parties approach light speed in particular, their motions between light signals will give them different measurements of events. Discrete particles and their extensive fields literally have discrete spaces and times in my model. This leads Relativity Theory to say they are the only spaces and times in

The Human Design

182

existence, with magical Spacetime as a “field”. As particles move, a distortion arises when we try to reconcile them as two rest frames using light signals. Light Clock Experiments show that one party can actually view a Light Clock in the rest frame of the other party and see it is running at a different rate than one’s own. Light reveals rest frames, and so a moving rest frame relative to a stationary one will be distorted. A particle with weight on a mountaintop is stationary, and light does not read its frame by the simple geometry of relative motions. Light instead reveals a rest frame consistent w i t h real relative momentum from the gravitational field affecting the particle. Photons may interact with gravitons to measure the field affecting the particle and its inertial state. This might distort for acceleration, consistent with continual weight to a particle that is stationary. Gravitation may distort discrete spaces and times between frames, and photons provide consistent measurements from their adjustments to gravitons. Unlike symmetry of two views of inertial particle motion, there is only one source of gravitation and observers a t o p and at base of a mountain would have opposite rather than the same distortions. Particles in weak fields would compress linearly within limits breached only on extreme compression. An extreme example of a source is the Sun, which Redshifts light escaping it, seen from a weak gravitational side, our side. Photons may be affected by directional change to loop back ends compacting to gain, or extending to lose, momentum in a graviton field while keeping light speed at front end. Loop directional change results in frequency change as Redshift moving away from the source of graviton loops or Blueshift moving towards it, and increased if the source is moving those ways. Directional change is by shearing of backward rotating photons with forward rotating gravitons in blending by shearing, unlike photons or gravitons with their own. A graviton loop can be increased or decreased by inertial motion of a source. Gravitons resolve a net relative

The Human Design

183

momentum by shearing with their own in the void, for photons to have paths to Earth from a source when loose after emission. Photons boost along graviton paths if a source moves with photons, and drain if against it, by shearing to affect frequency and curve a passage. Curve remains in graviton strings in a void as a history balancing out energy transfer for a frequency change. To leave a curve in gravitons, photons shear them, and in turn undergo frequency change. Dimensionality & Periodicity “Time” changes along with “space” in relative momentum. The periodic frame changes along with the dimensional. Lorentz Transformations are resting strings that shorten or lengthen as two-dimensional spatial vectors with temporal “third dimensional” widths carrying pulses. Discrete space and time by strings as particles compare to organs of a human anatomy, divided between two-dimensional spatial height and depth extending at our center line, with a temporal width extending around our center line to carry a pulse along depth. A void of continuous space & time is conceived by everyone as “space” in three dimensions, and “time”. Discrete space & time are conceived in Relativity as three dimensions over time that creates a curved Geodesic or Hologram. More mass means more curvature, which moves with mass and extends at light speed around mass. Descriptions of momentum shifts by math are not definitions. A ratio for a relation of properties, as the Lorentz relation of spatial contraction and temporal expansion, is quite secure. From that we can extrapolate the rest and energy relation of mass, which is quite secure. Other ratios exist to define the Twenty Physical Constants of Physics for two forces and their two mutual “forces”, Strong & Weak, which appear to be mostly secure. Einstein’s attempt at definitions of space & time in terms of mass, was nonexistent. It describes by using a Geodesic illustration of how the force appears to operate, as if the Geodesic is a mechanism.

The Human Design

184

Henrik Lorentz had rigor, like Gottfried Leibniz, and Arthur Schopenhauer. Mechanisms to his equations concerned him. Einstein generalized a new “view” of gravitation consistent with Lorentz. Geodesics rely on a common “view” of three dimensional space with time in Transformations. Geodesics add only a description consistent with Transformations. It needs to be defined by a mechanism, to prove that ratio, rather than relying on consistency with it in geometrical “illustrations” of it. Self-consistency and the direct relation of mass with Spacetime emboldened Einstein to postulate his theories, meaning “that’s all there is”. That is far too bold. The difficulty of gravitons arises from their most basic place in nature, being literally omnipresent. As we move through their “fluid”, measurement is relative to concentrations as relative weight at all times, or a photon product. We cannot know shared concentration as absolute background. We know “flat” action-reaction events relatively in an unknown absolute, including photon receipt after passage through that medium. Use a human anatomy as a model, consistent with Diagrams 34-35 & 37-38 in physics. Particles are made of graviton strings that have two dimensions, massive height with charged depth, extending as an upright plane. Organs likewise extend at the left-right center line of anatomy as a plane with height and depth, along and across that plane in function, for resolution between them by brain hemispheres in awareness. We also have circular width and a central pulse temporally merging with that spatial plane to extend it across a period extending to or from the present moment of a pulse. The spatial plane has width merged into it centrally at ears and peripherally at a heart, for planes around a pulse centrally at a spine or within a pulse peripherally at a tongue. The relation of a plane of height & depth as a spatial border between discrete states, and a width to that plane extending those borders by temporal sequences within or around pulses, defines the discrete relation of space and time. Newton’s void

The Human Design

185

provides a means to view the mechanical interfaces between strings with loops that are defined, discretely, by those spatial and temporal properties of mass. Newton’s void is adaptable as a preconception, to become three dimensions as curved space, with that space extending over time at light speed in proportion to masses as they move. Einstein relies on three dimensional space over time, and nothing more. He supports the use of that same preconceived frame, but as a Geodesic that can provide pure Isotropy by giving it a Metric derived from Lorentz, inserted ad hoc to suit our view of expansion. Space as three dimensions can be used by Newton and Einstein to some extent. At the level of proof of discrete spaces and times, my proposal is that mass is resting string with extended depth and height as a ribbon, with circular width accompanying height to make a loop, and a central pulse driving ahead across depth for a loop, as a vibrating string. As gravitons, regular vibrations create loops in resting string, and loops shear with other loops in the void. Motion is given to string by having less of it, from wider & denser loops, as a pulley. The relation of resting string motion with loop width & density is linear, so that more loop from width means more motion in that direction by string to provide it, but also denser string. Both width & density are temporal, as density relates to a pulse through string, densifying and slowing by counter-shearing other loops as width increases. Spatial electromagnetic depth changes with a pulse change, by reducing in its direction. Gravitational width & height of the string might remain constant because width change is for wider loops, and they stay constant as momentum is taken by a denser pulse. Height also remains constant as depth shortens with a pulse. Pulse & depth distort by confining the spatial ribbon along depth with height constant, and by confining the rate of pulse to slow it and keep width constant as it approaches light speed. Photons confine and gravitons extend, as opposites whose mutuality is for everything in

The Human Design

186

between compete opposites, which is all of nature. A photon might partition ultimately for a head & body, suggested in Diagram 33. I only use a graviton in Diagram 31 because they can make photons in my model, due to extreme compression in original conditions. I compare a photon well & hill to a head & body respectively, because photons provide the basis for neutrons to form, and then angles for protons & electrons. Gravitons can replicate the original photon, and both depth & pulse are capacities of a graviton. Massive width & height as “mass” have motion inverse to depth & pulse as “charged” resting string that distorts as such, with less space & more time created by density with extreme momentum, as an increase in rest mass. A relation of mass & charge may be a product of that inverted relation in gravitons alone. A pulse sets present moments, compressing to or decompressing from them, relevant to a Big Bang and decay. A contained pulse may detonate for neutrons around its containment at a Big Bang, and an extended pulse braces decay. Gravitons may be responsible by way of photons. Accretion by pulses mediate if economy to electrical neutrality is broken by decay. A pulse may appear from “no pulse”, uniquely in these events. Sharing “four factors” as height, width, depth, and pulse is the way to make progress in physics. Three dimensions of a void of space & time exist, but for two-dimensional discrete spatial existence side by side as planes, and temporal existence as width spreading with a pulse that sets a present time. They complement to the same logic as one void, which merges them interdependently, so one cannot exist without the other anyway. As a void, width has “space”, but relates to time, to spread “equally” around an immediate present, continually. Discretely, a pulse is a present that persists by width to a future with a past record, if that discrete present moment arises by a pulse. The true definition of continuity is by reference to discreteness. It is a void as continuity of discrete spatial planes, and as continuity of discrete temporal waves.

The Human Design

187

The “Twin Paradox” in Wikipedia and in all encyclopedias is a mess. Relativity relies on reciprocity, if parties view each other’s Light Clocks, as a Thought Experiment. Each has space contraction and time dilation in its direction of motion as viewed by the other. But atomic clocks actually fly around the world at fractionally slower rates than on the ground. Light reveals that there is contraction & dilation in the direction of motion, reciprocally. Contractions & dilations “cancel out” by directions, as “reciprocity” by light to view them, but limited to “mirrored” views by light that always lack attribution as to who is moving. Unattributed reality is a party in motion contracts & dilates, despite reciprocal views by light. By gravitation there is always physical change on page 182. Electromagnetic mirroring needs deconstruction. Relativity is shallow math from real Lorentz Transformations. “Relativity of Simultaneity” is merely absolute simultaneity measured relatively. Einstein opted to dodge this issue because the answer is his Special has light signals, and his General has one-way gravity, both in a void and badly partial. Einstein does not question his work. For the basics, at least revisit the simple relation of a photon to an electron, making it orbit by exchange at its pole, or vibrate by exchange across its surface. All illustrations in physics, such as Circular Polarization have the shape of a loop. Use the same inverse square law and light speed, for gravitons as sectioned loops, but opposite in function. Use a void to delineate. We can go further in, and further out to a universe in a void. Every particle has a void allowing free range to strings to create mechanisms. Omnipresent gravitons are likely cold, clear, tiny, and experienced by relative weight of “flat” actionreaction events within their absolute fluid. We never measure or experience what is “out there” beyond interfaces, including photons moving to and from that void, but known at impact to say there is a “tree”, “over there”. We only ever know or experience relative impacts to neurons and nothing beyond. You are a “free floater” by interfaces, and completely locked in. Unless you are in extreme deprivation, you have Free Will too.

The Human Design

188

Strings & Loops, and Sexuality In Diagram 32, the two gravitons make a vaginal opening with clitoris at the counter- rotation point. In Diagram 33, the two photons tog ether make the com plet e “photon” loops in Diagram 11 (1), both as a well one way, and a hill the other way, intact as a male penis head. Testes and penis are at the edge of anatomy, levitating to aim multiple tiny sperm to levitate towards an egg. A vagina extends from one massive fallen egg in a uterus based inside the anatomy extending as an embryo grows. Fertilization is by a complete charged oscillation, as both a well & hill, in insulated gravity for rising friction until a centered match at fertilization. The Weak Force is a split between head and body by levity males to ideal ends of a home, and the Strong Force is attraction by females at a nurturing distance from the real origins of a home. We have Testosterone and Estrogen sex hormones, for males to be excited in springtime and females tidal monthly. The Weak is a mechanism for charge by neutron decay, with an opposite process of formation. From decay, photons can be sent, and they are retained on formation. Strong Force is attractive at a specific distance for protons or neutrons to confine in a nucleus, by Binding Energy from gravitation in high compression for larger atomic nuclei, for more atoms than helium after a Big Bang. A Big Bang has particle & anti-particle annihilation and different types of neutron decay in the first minutes, and then protons and neutrons compress by gravitation to bind by the Strong Force while Weak decay continues around new nuclei formation for atoms beyond helium. In reproduction, those principles apply to levity and gravity chromosomal blending, but specific roles of Strong and Weak may be clearer in star and supernova syntheses. There is neutron formation by massive compression, hold of protons and neutrons by Strong Force, and decay by Weak Force to become a new atom.

The Human Design

189

In anatomy, graviton loops hold photon loops as a male compresses physically and hormonally to make and hold sperm, while reassured by Strong Force linguistics, and then decays by Weak Force release of sperm, then resumes intact template function. Neutrons can form and decay, and disrupt the intact template function of an atom. Photons are retained, just as sperm are made by that hormonal use rather than intact template function, to release on decay. In supernovae, compression for a new element is by gravitational compression as the reverse of decay, then Strong capture and Weak decay. Anatomically, the Weak Force operates at the neck at the junction between rest and energy, at the logistical link of the spine to the N Cloth discussed in chapter 8. It enables coordination of both, but favors logistics, which favors a body in moves coordinated by head linguistics when commands are given. For females, linguistics is soothing more than commanding, in its role of nurturing an infant closely but at a polite distance for parenting, as a Strong Force. A voice responds and reassures an infant by tones. It may be counterintuitive to see Weak as N Cloth logistics and Strong as N Cord linguistics, but small tones and words are important, and logistics can merely proceed down a line of least resistance. Polite distance is essential for psychological nurturing of an infant to be alternately a child and a parent, and for the mother to know herself also as a partner at equally close distancing. As noted, Strong & Weak forces are not anti-spin. They are safely encompassed within spin by extant particles after a Big Bang. In anatomy, they tend mass by pivotal vestibular and charge by lateral medulla systems determining site functions and their awareness by mutuality. Gravitons rotate right handed, while photons are intact to rotate right and left handed, but that gets resolved as right handed for a proton and left for an electron in my model, for a pivotal sympathetic rotation with gravitons for particle formation at a Big Bang. I note that my model is open to protons being hills and electrons wells, with

The Human Design

190

protons left handed and electrons right handed, and with gravitons left handed to match protons,. The important thing is symmetry between photon rotations and shearing between a complete photon and gravitons for a neutron, retaining Strong Force as a proton, and complying with graviton rotations for it. The Strong is a graviton force in my model, as a mechanism to retain a reserve of mass from compressions for atom formation beyond iron, and release a reserve when the nucleus divides as explosive energy. Mutuality with graviton rotation would be more relevant to a proton retained from neutron decay, for an electron to move away from its pivot for stable lateral orbitals. Linguistics is edged and toned, unlike rough commands of males with logistics as a sorting edge to a home. In springtime, a penis rises to soothing linguistics easily distracting the male head for mating, requiring logistical commitment. Compression into a neutron is like a male disengaged from “atomic” template function by diversion into a “void” insulated by graviton loops of a vagina extending on strings from a womb. That diversion compresses bodily and socially, like gravitation compresses particles into neutrons to be bound by the Strong and worked over by Weak decay. There is compression and decay. A male decays releasing photon sperm on edge between X or Y, with gene deficiency of Y for males somewhat problematic to male health. Males also live shorter lives, which must be related. Females might have a linguistic psychological approach. Males can recognize this as “no means no”. Retention by the Strong Force of females is throughout surrender to male logistics at the body, in a monthly cycle and a presentation of X or X, as one base. There is no decay, but there is the explosion, as they rely on linguistics to attract as a welcoming base to grow an infant. By linguistic reassurance in closeness with distance, a male compresses to nurturing used two ways, by female psychological reconciliation as partner and as mother. She knows that it is natural and bigger than both of them socially. Males edge alternately between parenthood and partnering.

The Human Design

191

Females distinguish psychologically between them at a close distance throughout. This difference is from the equal biological intimacy of females as partners and child bearers. Hormones are promoters, and sex may tend gravity females in species, and levity males as individuals, promoting alternative ways. With logistical or linguistic bias, male testosterone and female estrogen flood from hormonal regulation. Sex divides in order to create a new individual. Blending is the point, not separation, even though further creation requires that separation in some people, not all. It is a wide arc around “successful copulation”, on pages 54-55, rather than a simple “grinding action”. It is both psychological and physical. It extends altruistic drives into societies for balanced growth within a normal range. Cloth Mother Experiments with monkeys show the importance of nurturing to an infant, but in need of reciprocal attention from the mother, and, often overlooked, a father evident to it banging out pathways for it to venture beyond the mother.

The Human Design

192

14. Heat Loss in Physics & Biology

In this chapter, the Big Bang is a globally concurrent event of heat loss, when there is a one-off annihilation of particles & anti-particles. Our reproduction is a globally recurrent event involving heat loss, by repeated replication of DNA nucleotides & anti-nucleotide sheaths. A system develops to draw down to repeated replications. Each has double compression & double decompression, and economy drives each of them. “Entropy” is an ass of a concept. It is disorder left over when economy of energy drives to human types by mass & charge in mutuality, and best completely avoided. Just track the economical drive. In biology, DNA’s open nucleotides for discrete bonding have anti-nucleotides, but Y and X chromosomes aggregating them do not. Photons and gravitons, and X and Y chromosomes, integrate mutually without an offset, which is reserved for particles or nucleotides with their antis in offset. Comparably, in physics, there are anti-neutrons and their constituent subatomic particles, but not photon and graviton fields that aggregate them. A preference to particles or nucleotides is consistent all the way from an initial preference in my model at a Big Bang, and from the outset consistently for nucleotides as only they do the coding, from basic to complex life forms. Sex cells neutralize by mutual fertilization, for an accumulating residue to evolve from mutated replications for more stable bonding, for heat loss as enabled by fertilization. Y and X mutuality has one Y and three X’s, as Y and X genes with extra X and X in support. Gravitation is neutralized by mutual expansion, for remaining residue to evolve from annihilation, for escaping photons, as enabled by expansion. I generalize a Big Bang as gravitational rest mass lost as energy to neutralize the residue, including all energy invested for Cosmic Microwave Background made by a neutralized annihilation.

The Human Design

193

Diagram 40, Static-Dynamic Enabling of Heat Loss (1) Cosmology Effect Dynamic

Dynamic

Static

Static

Time

Space Static

Static Dynamic

Dynamic Cause

(2) Biology

Dynamic

Dynamic

Static

Static

Static

Static

Dynamic

Ionic Levity

Covalent Gravity

Dynamic

Positive Rest

Negative Energy

The Human Design

194

First, I will expand from pages 101-102. Sex systems are biological factual replicas of physics at a junction via chemistry. This is by the shearing sex organs themselves as loop & string intact for each, relevant to use of Strong & Weak reconstruction across an intact “human atom” when direct shearing happens within a “supernova” of species pressure to breed on pages 188-191. But as intact replicas in reconstruction across intact states, they might not differ from the state they have at the Big Bang. I also leave open the roles of Strong & Weak, created by gravitons winding around photons at a Big Bang, inevitably. The system is fundamentally static-dynamic in physics & biology. On page 180, I compared them at the level of one photon replicated by gravitons at a Big Bang. A better fit than reconstruction in a supernova is the Big Bang event itself, with Strong & Weak preserved for fuller use later. The irritant photon, like the sperm, has a striving role, but male & female folk are equal atoms. Fertilization to an even chance of replacing oneself as a model is necessity now for humans. Sadly, it has come to that. Heat loss after a Big Bang continues as atoms store heat forming in supernovae and lose it making compounds, then biology mutates dominant genes, with most heat exchange with environment being from gene expression not replication. DNA encodes reproduction to replicate repeatedly. In Diagram 40, static and dynamic states complement continuous states as a totality of discrete mass or DNA across neutralization. Annihilation or replication releases photons on static-dynamic neutralization at a Big Bang and reproductive “neutralization” in biology by blended fertilization. Heat & Homeostasis Concurrent explosion has only an estimated one in ten billion particles remaining as a residue, so we are talking about one in billions. In biology, ten per billion bases mutate in DNA replication, pared 70% for deleterious mutations, making a few per billion. Nature makes us fight a mutation barrier. More

The Human Design

195

dumb numbers are four forces & four nucleotide bases, and twenty physical constants for forces & twenty amino acids for nucleotide bases. Coding strands ride static-dynamic change, when repeated replications are pulled by more stable bonding as a functional or non-functional mutation growing. Plants tend to gain heat for chemical energy, to “lose” heat “from” around them. Warm mammals tend to lose heat “to” around them. All cells are in complete immersion in environments, for heat “loss” each way as a fundamental exchange. Forget terms like entropy and track the economy of exchange, to lose heat to a final human product still immersed in its environment. In Diagram 41, there is sheathing in sex cells statically for Recombination before fertilization, then dynamic release for replication. Cells are a product of drawing down to economical bonding, with mutation in leaps by momentum. Diagram 41, Nucleotides of DNA Strand (1) Static Offset

Code

A

Sheath

T

C G

A

T

G

T

G

A

C

T

A

C

A

C

T

G

T

G

A

C

A

C

T

G

(2) Dynamic Replication Code

A

C

Sheath

T

G

A

T

T

A

G

C

The Human Design

196

Drawing “in” around a cell challenges the Central Dogma “out”. Prior to fertilization, the sex cells of the male and female have static DNA Recombining. They fertilize for new combinations, for Recombination again when they mature. After fertilization, the single zygote cell has chemicals it needs from blending of sperm and egg to dynamically replicate and divide into new cells. Genes mutate from replications, and cells grow by gene expressions from exposed DNA coding. Growth gathers the chemicals DNA needs to replicate, mutate, and express genes. DNA point mutations are accompanied by deletions and insertions of sections, and perhaps duplications of sections. In Epigenetics, it is currently supposed that DNA flexibly splices genes based on Homeostasis, which needs to be broadened as a concept for heat gain and loss within overall heat loss after a Big Bang. In my model, DNA, its mechanisms, its internal environment, and its external environment, are all states of economy to shape DNA as an adaptable base for more economy. The outward view of DNA to functions, which I maintain in general in describing DNA promoting all bonding, even to its own mechanisms, becomes countered for mutation in the course of replication. Slippage in splicing to suit environment points to cracks in the Central Dogma by mechanisms, and mutation may obviate slippage in an overall drive of environmental convection drawing down to replications releasing heat by regular mutations. In growth, there is gravity action inwards around a membrane, for levity bonding inwards within it, for levity heat loss outwards around it, and explosive gravity mutation outwards within it, under the heat of a Sun. Plants, like supernovae, store heat to lose it eventually, and animals use that storage to lose heat more quickly than plants rotting. If spliced changes in populations suit environments, a mutated individual can remain undistinguished within a population to breed freely within it and pass on changes. Mutation may be obviation of splicing. Change may be achieved regularly in the

The Human Design

197

relation of DNA’s internal mechanisms and chemical availability in a setting of environmental heat. Environment may bond for cells to grow by losing heat and drawing back as mutations for more heat loss under a Sun, in an overall course of releases for mutations. We can willfully use functions, but safe mutation may be by chemicals using their environments suitably, as in the example given later at the foot of page 206, which will be achieved unknowingly, unless securely identified. I note if mutations are entirely “random”, humans still have the most comprehensive chemical embodiment on Earth, and the issue reverts to prolificacy of mutations furthering greatest economy from convective chemistry. Language in science is lazy about hubristic paradigms, like 51 percent chances promoted to 100. Concurrent & Recurrent Heat Loss In physics, global expansion was a concurrent explosive event of heat loss by annihilations, with independent photons as background radiation around a residue of particle trajectories in a completely gravitationally smoothed universe. In biology, recurrent reproduction enables repeated replication of DNA for a residue of mutations, drawing down to stable bonding of a new coding strand and sheath in a warm environment on Earth. In physics, concurrent residue remains in dispersal. In biology, a recurrent residue accumulates in dispersal. An island is a supernova, using gravitation of an accumulation of atoms to compress them at its center into containments of heat, as heavier atoms. There is heat loss, but containment in heavy atoms. Atoms are assemblages of preserved heat against the tide of global heat loss, but subject to further heat loss as they assemble into compounds. In local evolutions as epicycles, a Sun compounds dynamically to release heat, and on Earth, lower energy bonding of atoms creates compounds. Nature winds down to store heat in plants, like supernovae, and lose it in animals as atoms settle into compounds with stable lower energy orbitals all across a planetary surface.

The Human Design

198

15. Ancient & Modern Ideas I would like to provide some ideas about the history of human thought across ancient and modern science and philosophy, including methodology. I will begin with the ancient concept of the Microcosm and the Macrocosm. Comparisons between our anatomical capacities and the capacities of the forces of nature may make the evolution of our anatomies within our environment the realization of the ancient idea of the Microcosm of our environment corresponding to the Macrocosm universe. There was no particular scientific basis for this concept, but the Design defines both and presents our anatomy as an embodiment of the environment. I wonder if the mathematicians among ancients and alchemists could have arrived at the simple arrangement of chemicals that comprises the Design. We have valued Four Elements and a possible correspondence between the Macrocosm and the Microcosm for thousands of years without making much progress along those lines. Ancient & Modern Approaches Material and spiritual empires may have kept us pre-occupied until after the death of Galileo (1564-1642), and may have delayed the emergence of a modern world-view. Ancient speculation about substance, form, forces, and life may have been followed by more modern universalities and precision in a division of approaches between a discrete relative view by Einstein and Kant, and an absolute continuous view by Newton and Darwin. However, the modern world continued material and spiritual preoccupations, and has advanced little beyond those four moderns. We have been in a long industrial stupor and I do not like our chances at maintaining a healthy planet at this stage of ignorant development.

The Human Design

199

Progress is by a simple framework. Popper said science is falsifiable, and falsifications are subject to falsification. This correctly leaves us on an endless task of making knowledge more secure. It is never verified in whole or part, from Godel. Equating falsification with science is wrong. I define science as “reliable knowledge”. Falsification secures knowledge, while reliability is improved by better theories. We can make secure measurements, or speculate logically about a “whole logic” or “root fact” beyond our grasp, to progress. Physics needs falsification, but metaphysics does not, including a void, which is unmeasurable. Momentum is also unmeasurable by actionreaction at one time & place, which is how all measurement is done. Heisenberg just conforms to the definition of momentum by ruling out its measurement. I naturally include metaphysics within science, inextricably bound to physics in the Scheme, which makes a whole theory possible, to discover root facts. Deductively, contained awareness leaves us insecure about the future, including whether the Sun will rise tomorrow, as we sway to value “our” past, like David Hume. Inductively exposed to a future, containment challenges insight into itself because it is only experienced on the inside, avoiding analysis from the outside as cause and effect, by outside accessing the inside to know it. There is no access, merely use of the inside in rigorous objectivity around itself, but some are more insightful about their own insides than others. Ancient philosophers usefully considered: predetermined existence based on formal standards, by Plato; predetermined existence based on substantive essences, by Aristotle; applying universal principles to individual instances in physics, by Galileo; and applying universal principles to individual instances for humans, by Socrates. They had a context of challenges set by others, including: Parmenides’ view on rational access to reality; Anaximander’s model of reality; different views about one reality in physics by Copernicus; and different views about one reality for humans by Protagoras.

The Human Design

200

Diagram 42, Ancient & Modern Perspectives

The Scheme Forces

Substance Form

Discrete Continuous

Life

Continuous Discrete

Ancients and Moderns Galileo

Socrates

Aristotle

Einstein

Darwin

Plato

Newton

Kant

Industry backing empire enabled the Greeks to progress from 500 and 300 BC, then Galileo 1,900 years later when Italy had an empire from bookkeeping, then English & German empires backed partial efforts. Populations exploded using industry & spirituality to provide. Industrial & spiritual educators have failed. “Payers” overly value the product and resist change by invested inertia. I am amazed at lack of invention by leaders and the gullibility of the public, but misery finds company by leading. A long contagion can end, and our most pioneering era can begin, but we now have depletion. We have had two thousand years of sluggish ideas dotted with partial ones, with the odd effort by others supported by empires, like da Vinci.

The Human Design

201

Absolutely Continual & Relatively Discrete In physics, Newton tended to an absolute view of rest mass in motion in continuous space-time and around continual actionsreactions. He did not aggregate his actions-reactions by gravitation to propose a neutralized universe using combustion, as an obvious next step. Einstein tended to a relative view, with all objects having their own discrete space and time frames by which they measure the world after discoveries of fields for delays in electromagnetic (and gravitational) interactions. He could not extend to an adequate gravitational theory. He relied on parsimony to deny a void. Maintaining it, he opened a way for math models of pure Isotropy for expanding Spacetime dispersing with particles, otherwise particles would have literally nothing to move in. Newton admits relative measurement, but his ignorance of particle and field capacities in his absolute God’s Eye view overlooks the potential of the discrete relative space and time frames of Einstein in Special Relativity, which I apply in a void. A discrete event viewed from an absolute continuum must recognize the view from the discrete state itself more intimately than Newton imagined, but Einstein’s parsimony cannot remove a void in a view of gravitational events. A void is a way to a view of a whole universe and interfaces between discrete states creating their views. We can use universal laws of gravitation to model in a void and forget abstract pure Isotropy. I credit Newton for metaphysics, and in Diagram 42 his contribution to physics is formal, as interfaces can only be measured using a shared void of space and time. However, Einstein is credited for discrete substances having those forms, restricting actual measurement to subjectivity. Darwin had an absolute view by substantive continuities applying universally. He failed to provide an adequate scheme for discrete events like a human anatomy and its mind, with Selection lacking prediction of species evolution. Newton knew

The Human Design

202

action-at-a-distance was strange, but it meant he could not advance to a better discrete explanation of reality. Kant used David Hume’s skepticism about the relation of mind and world to confine us to our construct, but it is a discrete process open to continual stimulation that contains stimulation for contained awareness. It allows objectivity, despite bias and conditioning. Anyone can invent a fiction, but Kant had “faith” in rationality by ordered forms in discrete applications of logic. We can be rational and objective, from obvious peak to peak. I credit Kant for psychology despite errors, but there is no soul hiding in the instants that comprise the subject, “I”. It is also behavioral and continual, in shaping by a world. I spilt into biology there to credit Darwin despite errors. Science is metaphysics, physics, chemistry, biology, psychology and methodology. Chemistry is industry, not biology or psychology, no credit to anyone. Methodology ties Socrates’ conformity to definition and Popper’s falsifiability, but combine falsifiable physics and un-falsifiable metaphysics for a whole theory, with a spare metaphysical frame. Reality leads invention to lead discovery of theories about reality, in my own progress. Form as logic follows function as fact in observation, but form leads understanding of fact. Aesthetics supposedly discriminates between form and function across their combinations, by trifles despite the clear economical drive of the Design. I note billion dollar Supercollider flotsam, Blue Brain Project jetsam, and Manned Space Mission joyrides, show ridiculous ignorance. Newton & Darwin had naïve ideas. Einstein & Kant theorized naked forms clothed with substances so well, naked emperors appear clothed to onlookers. Naïve practicality may be English from openness to invasion. Claustrophobic relativism may be German as an enclosed hub. English attempts at empire cut down villagers in naïve practical cultivation across centuries. German relativism provided our most vicious example of terror based only on the babblings of a goon. There is no jest here, I am trying to find a context for fully tendentious perspectives.

The Human Design

203

16. Ideological Implications There may be ideological implications from knowledge provided by the Design. Ideological implications shape views of ourselves in religion, politics, economics, and other “stuff”. Design & Designer I propose only that the laws of the universe are as given, and are our starting point. The limit to asking “why” may be reached if existence shows itself to be logically self-consistent in creating human awareness capable of understanding existence itself. A burden of proof is set by existing hypotheses using parsimony, as economy in reasoning, and it would apply to ignore Gods if you reasonably tire of refutations. Belief is not “arrogant”. It is “reasoned”, and anyone can only reject each individual subjective account of Gods one by one on their own terms, facing difficulties if people claim personal miracles. Reasoning is by hypotheses defined by more secure knowledge to extend it, test it, and so on, until you have a selfconsistent whole. I cannot “ultimately” believe either way about Gods. I rely on others to define Gods. To date their logic and evidence is unsatisfactory. Absence of a good argument to date is no “reason” for “Gods” to be absent except in refuted accounts. Reasoning is not arrogant, so just ignore claims about Gods if you tire of refutations. That might be reasonable. A subjective account may follow a trend but that does not mean it will continue by actual logic and evidence in the next hypothesis. It is reasonable not to seek better logic and evidence for Gods, only because parsimony as economy says not to bother anyway, but that is gambling not “reasoning”. It is totalling past reasoning, and its relevance in future is unknown. There is no crystal ball. Deductive “knowledge” is

The Human Design

204

“secured” by our past, but not secure. Inductive “belief” casts knowledge to make a satisfactory whole, but not satisfied, as falsification is ongoing. Reasoning is a process to improved knowledge using a whole as an aim. A whole theory will encompass falsifiable and un-falsifiable logic and facts, continually restructured for more falsifiable ones. We apply reasoning to analyse past or future events, using our time. Religions spin out at reconciling a whole. Jesus Christ may have seen us genetically, with no need for old tribal clusters. A moral to his claimed parentage may be that wider contributions are good. Universal human qualities aside, he may have seen that individuals’ characteristics repeat anyway across all tribes. Dealing with people as familiar types might influence them, but some would baulk at too much familiarity. There may even be a complete set of principles for individuals to be examples of different animal species as functional examples of the Design. Individual Human Value No person should regard himself or herself as a lesser human, even if others try to say they are. Intact value can be used to justify all kinds of personal ignorance, but it remains for individuals to use awareness as best they can. I would make it compulsory to vote if 18 or older. These are now pioneering times for all, and everyone needs to participate. Universal laws should maintain equality for all. Avoid being told who to love. We echo now from Alexander the Great’s personality, bridged by militaristic “faith” that grew in his dread shadow. Democratic politics can stop industrial razing, and overcome past echoes. Papers on psychology in economic behavior show when we are given a choice of a gamble to gain or avoid losing, we tend to gamble less to gain and more to avoid loss. It can be one more or less item guaranteed, or a double to nothing gamble. Organs may reflex wildly. Economies grow slowly and fall fast by usage on a conditioned level by coasting, for absolute

The Human Design

205

confidence. We also wildly cut off our noses to spite our faces if we assume equality, and others get better access. Access is by appendages on a conditioned level of freer momentum, relative to others in gaining access, for relative confidence. A binary gamble for usage is a waste, and not grounded by biology. Equality of access is maintained by grounded biology. We can recondition to reasonable levels of satisfaction. Social aims must be restructured to avoid waste, both knowledgably & openly. Reduce absolute use, and equalize relative access. On the ground, just stay in trades for goods & services. Always adequately service at a trade level and be open to the public for enquiry. Spread a name, trade, extras, waste, and social aim, as we determine nature now. Advertising creates ideas and conditions you to them. Avoid being told who, or what, to love. Here is a tip to avoid binary reflex from overload of bad info and denial of good. Fill in the gaps yourself. Subjects overloaded are tested, allowing a guess or tying them in futile analyses to find an accurate answer so they end up tossing a coin. They guess a bit more accurately than a toss by subtle trends otherwise suppressed by futile analysis. Again, we do not know how it works, but we know how it does not work. We draw useful pops whose content we regulate to be regular, by undistracted decisions. Always flatten a plate. Note, the world’s leading brand is too limited. Hot air. Use Meccano to model. Consequences of Predetermination A consequence of predetermination is that we would be the purpose of nature, and that purpose may have a purpose. Try to define it. Predetermination refines to individual anatomical structures regardless of sex, age, or race. We may range in standard organ & appendage use in landscapes. Species are Convergent, which challenges “random” mutation of types. Australia has evolved marsupial species like cats, dogs, bears, rats and others, separately from placentals. Hox Genes may provide standard structures for niches.

The Human Design

206

Distinguish dense or heavy Earthy animals from delicate or light celestials. Tending causal or affected, we may be horses or dogs, cats or possums, bears or monkeys, and pigs or birds (I include birds structurally). That is a valuable clue, but there can be small causal and large effected, so size is not reliable. Variations may also tend spatial or temporal, and organ or appendage, across a set of specific traits. I use “bias” for unavoidable genetic traits, and “conditioning” for avoidable behavior. Principles for bias may help us understand more flexible conditioning. They are open to analysis without favoring “niche” and “racial” traits, by a spectrum in the Design. A clue to race across niche variation is compression as Polar light and decompression as Equatorial dark, consistent with impression & survey or expression & occupation, by adaptation of functions. East is solid & mineral, and West is gas & liquid, consistent with organs stacking and stretching. Consistently, we replenish after midnight using a cortisol rush to rise and sniff fresh air, squat, excrete, sing out a tune, and eat & drink, facing a morning Sun as a spine stacks. Extend a rush if obese, but drink & eat. After noon, stretch a stack by warm air intake and blood flow, urinate, gaze down and tune ears with balance in darkening. Stacks tend before noon and stretches after, to stack from stretch then stretch from stack, with the Sun. Ring large intestine after midnight, ring stomach before midday, link small intestines after midday, and link liver before midnight. Balance energy for digestion and from it, daily. As in physics, ring inertia stacks towards a Sun’s approach East, and stretches with its departure West. We widen or lengthen pursuing the Sun. Chemicals eke an adaptation East or West over tens of thousands of years to Equator or Poles from East Africa. One species spreads from one location. We refine locally by Recombination, drift off & on. If we mutate by Epigenetics it may build well by homeostasis if cells move to their paths. You are your chemistries, and race might be pure Lorentz. That is another amazing consistency.

The Human Design

207

We can speculate about Artificial Intelligence, but we do not know the neural basis for the subjective experience, which is how “intelligence” is accessed. Digitization may order mechanical calculations if they can be made. Neural representation of sites may be too intricate and chemically diverse for calculation and replication. A hypothesis that anything can be measured and given order is a basis only for Laplace’s Demon in a machine. I note Laplace is used as a Straw Man to refute determinism, as if we have a crystal ball. Just track back and see the facts unfold to logical patterns. We can hope to contact human types on other planets to learn their ways of life, even if it is only a message in a bottle. It may fall to one person to write a book like this on other planets if their mantle has plenty of iron for excessive industry behind warfare and ravage. That dominates today, extending from the Greek Academy to English and German empires, as unbroken “wealth” to extend knowledge that serves it. A popular single God then diverts us to the sky while subverted on the ground. To a notable fawning cryptic court copyist, “(life) is a tale told by an idiot, full of sound & fury, signifying nothing”. No, rise & fall is rise & fall to natural rhythm, not rules set by sheer idiots. Science is complicit in abject failure of creativity. Both fawn to industry. Some of its hubris are undirected evolution in biology, lack of insight into biology by chemistry, lack of a formal framework for causation to particles and fields in physics and beyond, and pure Isotropic expansion in cosmology. Then there is a Homunculus brain of neuroscientists. I removed and replaced the main pillar of physics to create the main pillar for chemistry, and extended that to remove and replace the main pillar of biology to create the main pillar for psychology. I removed and replaced the main pillar of methodology to create the main pillar for metaphysics. A fair go. This compendium of hypotheses is falsifiable to reasonable limits. It has extreme potential, but it is bold and cautious. It must be taken literally by cryptic copyists, in its modelling using words and arrows.

The Human Design

208

17. Conclusion I have shared my ideas about nature in my book, using new terms for new ideas. The first part presents my theory; the second details the human anatomy; and the third details particles for human evolution. I used action-reaction on the four rigors of physics, chemistry, biology, and psychology, as intact rigors that build one upon the other. I used the mutuality of electromagnetism and gravitation around an action-reaction frame and within a space-time frame for rest mass and energy. Science attempts to unify the forces of nature to a single particle or field, when in fact the appropriate level of unification may be to define the mass that constitutes all particles according to the fundamental properties of mass reconciled by the Design within its Scheme. We might simply have a logical universe, and we may need to use the Design and its Scheme like a Rosetta Stone. Our anatomy may be predetermined. This may change many of our values, given that we might now speculate about the purpose of our existence within nature. Such speculations may be more useful than spirituality. My book is literal, unlike confusing spiritual texts I have read. Metaphysics is difficult, as a void is undetectable. Science needs broad principles to encompass non-measurable “facts” of nature, but science must study substantive and formal definitional bases for measurement, which include a void as a “frame” in my Scheme. I include the study of metaphysics among the fundamental rigors. I like the classical definition of science as a body of reliable knowledge, with philosophy included in it. Science may have six rigors in foundational order as metaphysics, physics, chemistry, biology, psychology, and methodology. In reading science, I have found it difficult to be methodical, as I must always question conformity to definition, like our old friend Socrates.

The Human Design

209

The six subjects can be paired, and by my reckoning, in order of certainty, at the top is biology and its rules based on chemistry, but more certain; then methodology and its logic based on psychology, but more certain; and then physics and its laws based on metaphysics, but more certain. It might seem strange that more certain rigors exist on less certain, but that should be expected of a universe that evolves through to significant things from basics whose potential is only evident in retrospect. Science likes to predict, and so it ignores the most important questions requiring retrospect to know where we stand now. Instead, science drives to a future it securely predicts by industrial processes. A flywheel is very predictable, as seen by H.G. Wells and Jules Verne, but very destructive. Pure knowledge from retrospect to know exactly where we stand today is neglected, and so I have satisfied the need. I am a lawyer who dislikes jargon with clients and if reading facts on Sundays. I used color-by-numbers from a landscape, join-the-dots for anatomy, a slab body & spud head, a hanging mobile with more mobiles, mix-n-match for awareness of oneself in a world, and spot-the-difference from physics. Imre Lakatos said "scientific changes are connected with vast cataclysmic metaphysical revolutions”, and so here we are. My book is a manifesto, which usually set up feuds by contrary borders, but mine is universal. You can all feud sensibly now. We are not rank “accidents of nature”. The stupor is universal. Some use far more of our basic comprehension than others. For four years, academics and media chose to ignore my work or reject it without any reference at all to its content, with no hope, initiative, invention, or gratitude. Blogs like “Scientia Salon” are “Lord of the Flies”. My comments are deleted or trolled by ambitious climbers fawning to authorities. The site owner said my book is quite simply “utter nonsense” and “shit”, with no facts or logic whatsoever. That sums up his character. “Neurologica” & “Preposterous Universe” are equally bad for trolls & inertia, with no character at all. Dirty backward clubs.

The Human Design

210

Another is a “Psychologist” at University of Chicago who edits journals, who said time is entirely culture specific, left or right, ignoring left forward to future and right back in past across all cultures. “I'm afraid your emails do not provide any inducement for me to read your work, although we clearly share interests, I would not be able to trust your scholarship. Thanks, though, for your interest.” Calm, but ignorant, old bean. I use invention, not scholarship. Maybe my whirlwind can make some junk into an airplane, but not his. I refer to past efforts fairly. I read “Man a Machine” by de La Mettrie recently, free on the net, but not everything to check originality. An academic is a scholastic snipe, not an intellect honed to put up or shut up, except for industry or by theft. Stats on academic honesty are shocking, and black holes stall originality, so check if my work is stolen. The Australian national network, ABC, rejected my ideas as “self-promotion” at their site. The producer banned naming my book, so I wrote to the science host, who invites ideas from Australians, to scan it for 5 minutes, and his entire reply was “I do not have 5 minutes”. Media fawns to academics & spews out press releases, globally. I have crucial new ideas, and I did try to promote them, not myself. Our future should be set by people, not sluggish priestly scientists, but for years everyone has been a stooge in response to my book. I am not a teacher, but you are welcome to what I have learned. I will let my book grow on its own as my efforts were counter-productive. School students can still read, and if it grows, media do not snoop me. Extreme evil in the world is also primarily from lack of guts, corrected by many examples of real guts. This book leads, but words are not a hard lesson. Corrupt adults & corruptible children need cast iron chains of idiocy shattered, but the only person of sufficient touch I have known to do that is my own mother from Aotearoa, the end of human migration. Even if my readership grows, without a good driver, you would lapse to stooging. My book is not poetic, prosaic, or ironic. It is a pathetic ledger.