Loading documents preview...
Power System Protection Date: 6th March 2010 Venue: L&T, Manapakkam, Chennai
Steady State Fault Analysis Dr. G. Pradeep Kumar
What is Fault Analysis? Fault Analysis
Analysis of a power system
during and after a fault
Involves computation of voltages and currents under the fault conditions.
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
2
Why Fault Analysis? Fault Analysis
Important to understand what happens in the system as a result of a fault
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
3
Why Fault Analysis? Study the effects of fault
How high will the current go?
Will the voltage rise above a limit or fall below a limit?
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
4
Why Fault Analysis? Ensure Ratings
Use calculated voltage and current values
Ensure that load and short circuit ratings of the plant are not exceeded
For proper selection of switchgear
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
5
Why Fault Analysis? Selection of Switchgear
Rating of a breaker
Current it has to carry under normal conditions
Continuous rating
Current flowing immediately after the fault occurs
Short time withstand
Current which the breaker must interrupt
Breaking capacity
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
6
Why Fault Analysis? Selection of Switchgear
Calculated fault voltages and currents
Verify that the breaking capacity is not exceeded
Short time withstand is not exceeded
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
7
Why Fault Analysis? Protection System Design
Fault detection
In which system parameters will the change due to fault be reflected more?
combination of both ??
Voltage
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
Current
8
Why Fault Analysis? Protection System Design
Fault detection
Fault voltages and currents calculated at various system locations
Select most suitable relay characteristics for fault detection
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
10
Why Fault Analysis? Software Packages
Software packages can do it - why bother?
Understanding what is happening is important
Eg. In a Δ-Y transformer for a single phase fault on the Y-side, why fault current in two phases on the Δ- side.
Spot check on the computer results
Catch data entry errors
Easier for simpler systems
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
15
How to Perform Fault Analysis? Computations
Steady state analysis
Solved by algebraic equations
Does not mean system is static
System may be fast changing
This is like taking a set of photographs of the system behavior under certain specified conditions
Algebraic equations are much easier to solve!
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
17
Per-unit Systems Definition
A is any quantity
A per unit quantity is a “normalized” quantity with respect to a chosen base value.
Any quantity can be converted to a selected base quantity of the same dimension.
Per unit quantities are dimensionless
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
20
Per-unit Systems Per-unit Applied to Power Systems
Power system quantities that are represented in per unit are:
Voltage
Current
Impedance
Apparent power
All of these are completely described by only two of them
Sufficient to choose only two base quantities
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
21
Per-unit Systems Per-unit Applied to Power Systems
Generally the two chosen base quantities are,
Apparent power (SB)
Voltage (VB)
Equipment ratings are usually given in MVA and kV
Other two base quantities (ZB, IB) can be fixed as follows:
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
22
Per-unit Systems Per-unit Calculations
Converting from actual values to per unit
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
23
Per-unit Systems Per-unit Calculations
Change of Base:
Often require to convert per unit values from one base to another
Most equipment impedances are given in its own MVA and kV base
Need to be converted to a common base when solving a network
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
24
Per-unit Systems Per-unit Calculations
A is any quantity
Basically we,
Multiply the old per unit value by the old base to get back the actual value
Then divide by new base to get the new per unit value
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
25
Per-unit Systems Per-unit Calculations – Example Problem T1 G
50 + j100 ohms
ΔY
Generator: 15 MVA, 13.8 kV, x = 0.15 pu
Load 1: 10 MVA at 0.9 pf lead
T1: 25 MVA, 13.2/161 kV, x = 0.10 pu
T2: 15 MVA, 161/13.8 kV, x = 0.10 pu
Load 2: 4 MVA at 0.8 pf lag
T2 YΔ
Load 1 Load 2
If the load bus voltage is 15.18 kV, find the voltage at the generator terminals, Vg.
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
29
Per-unit Systems Calculations – using per unit system
Choose an MVA base
25 MVA T1
15 MVA T2
10 MVA Load 1
G
Load 2
15 MVA
4 MVA Choose an MVA base of 15
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
30
Per-unit Systems Calculations – using per unit system
Choose a kV base at any part of the system and fix the kV bases at different sections of the system
13.2/161 kV
161/13.8 kV
T1
T2
13.2 kV
G
Load 1 Load 2
13.8 kV 13.2 kV
161 kV
13.8 kV
Choose a kV base of 161 kV at the transmission line
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
31
Per-unit Systems Calculations – using per unit system
MVAB = 15
Chosen bases T1
T2
G
Load 1 Load 2
kVB = 13.2
kVB = 161
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
kVB = 13.8
32
Per-unit Systems Calculations – using per unit system
Convert all impedances to pu in the chosen bases
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
33
Per-unit Systems Calculations – using per unit system
Solve the network to obtain required voltages & currents in pu Load bus voltage
Load 1 current
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
34
Per-unit Systems Calculations – using per unit system
Solve the network to obtain required voltages & currents in pu Load 2 current
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
35
Per-unit Systems Calculations – using per unit system
Solve the network to obtain required voltages & currents in pu Total load current
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
36
Per-unit Systems Calculations – using per unit system
Solve the network to obtain required voltages & currents in pu Generator terminal voltage
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
37
Per-unit Systems Calculations – using per unit system
Convert the pu values back to actual values
The generator terminal voltage is 14.623 ∠8.540 kV
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
38
Per-unit Systems Advantages
Name plate details
Manufacturers usually specify impedance of the equipment in per unit or percent
pu ?
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
39
Per-unit Systems Advantages
Relative strength of different parts of the system on the same scale
E.g. Currents in two parts of the system with a few transformers in between cannot be compared directly
Per unit gives the relative values directly
Actual values
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
PU values
40
Classification of Faults Power System Faults Symmetrical
Shunt Faults
Unsymmetrical
Shunt Faults
Series Faults
Three-phase
Single-line to gnd
Unequal Series
3-phase to gnd
phase-to-phase
One line open
2-phase to gnd
Two lines open
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
52
Classification of Faults Balanced or Symmetrical Faults
Three phase faults
System remains balanced even after the fault
Per-phase analysis can be done
the easiest fault to analyze
Generally the most severe fault a b c
a b c 3-phase
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
3 phase - ground
53
Classification of Faults Un-balanced or Un-symmetrical Faults
Un-balanced situation
Unbalanced load
Any other unsymmetrical condition
System becomes unbalanced
Single phase representation is not valid
Per phase analysis CANNOT be done
Further classified into
Shunt faults
Series faults
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
54
Classification of Faults Shunt Faults
Unbalance is between phases or between phase and neutral
Causes
Insulation breakdown
Lightning discharges and other over-voltages
Mechanical damage
a b c
a b c
a b c e
e Single-line to ground
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
Line to line
Double-line to ground
55
Classification of Faults Series Faults
Unbalance in the line impedances
Doesn’t involve ground or inter-connection between the phases
Causes
Broken conductor
Operation of fuses
Maloperation of single phase circuit breakers
a b c
za zb zc
Unequal series Impedances
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
a b c
a b c One line open
Two lines open
56
Classification of Faults Other Faults
Cross-country faults
a
a'
b
b'
c
c'
e
e
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
57
Classification of Faults Other Faults
Faults between adjacent parallel lines
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
58
Classification of Faults Other Faults
Open-circuit + Single-line to ground fault
a b c e
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
59
Classification of Faults Other Faults
Changing fault in cable - evolving faults
a
a c
b
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
a c
b
c b
60
Reactance of Synch. Machines Transients Caused by Synchronous Generator
Consider only this ac component
The amplitude of the ac component is given by,
Where E – Internal voltage or no-load voltage Xd – steady-state reactance, Xd’ – transient reactance, Xd” – sub-transient reactance Td’ – transient decay time constant, Td” – sub-transient decay time constant
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
61
Reactance of Synch. Machines Transients Caused by Synchronous Generator
The ac component of the current waveform
Has three components
Steady-state component
Sub-transient component
Transient component
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
62
Reactance of Synch. Machines Transients Caused by Synchronous Generator
Transient and sub-transient currents
decay at different rates over the sub-transient and transient period
Reduces to negligible values after a few cycles
The sub-transient component first
The transient component next
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
63
Reactance of Synch. Machines Sub Heading here
i(t)
t (sec) © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
64
Reactance of Synch. Machines Sub Heading here
Steady-state component
i(t)
t (sec) © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
65
Reactance of Synch. Machines Sub Heading here
Transient component
i(t)
t (sec) © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
66
Reactance of Synch. Machines Sub Heading here Sub-transient component
i(t)
t (sec) © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
67
Reactance of Synch. Machines Transients Caused by Synchronous Generator
The time after a fault occurs can be divided into 3 periods
Sub-transient – 2 to 3 cycles after the fault
Transient – 10 to 15 cycles after the fault
Characterized by the transient reactance Xd’
Steady-state – > 20 cycles after the fault
Characterized by the sub-transient reactance Xd”
Characterized by the steady-state reactance Xd
Xd” < Xd’ < Xd
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
68
Reactance of Synch. Machines Transients Caused by Synchronous Generator
rms value of the steady current I
rms value of the transient current I’
I’rms = Erms/Xd’
rms value of the sub-transient current I”
Irms = Erms/Xd
I”rms= Erms/Xd”
I”rms > I’rms > Irms
Since Xd” < Xd’ < Xd
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
69
Transients due to Faults Symmetrical and Un-Symmetrical Fault Currents
When to consider unsymmetrical ?
Circuit breaker rating
Unsymmetrical currents usually ignored
Assumed that it will decay fast
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
70
Transmission Lines & Cables Representation of Transmission Lines & Cables
Practical transmission lines
Not spaced equilaterally
May not be transposed
The errors due to this are considered minimal
Lines are taken to be symmetrical
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
71
Transmission Lines & Cables Representation of Transmission Lines & Cables
Distributed model of lines
L
R
L
R
C
L C
G
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
R
L C
G
R C
G
G
72
Transmission Lines & Cables Representation of Transmission Lines & Cables
Shunt branches are ignored for short circuit calculations
L
R
L
R
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
L
R
L
R
73
Transmission Lines & Cables Representation of Transmission Lines & Cables
A lumped parameter model is used
Entire line lumped into a single impedance XL
RL
RL = the total resistance of the line XL = 2ᴨf×LLine, where LLine - is the total inductance of the line
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
74
Transmission Lines & Cables Representation of Transmission Lines & Cables
Represented by a series impedance
Resistance equal to the total resistance of the line/cable
Reactance equal to the total series reactance of the line/cable
ZL
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
75
Transformers Two Winding Transformer Equivalent Circuit I1
XL1
R1
XL2
I’2= I2/n
R2
I2
n = N1/N2
I0
V1
Xm
Rc
E2=E1/n
E1
N1
Winding resistance & Leakage reactance
Secondary side impedance
N2
Primary side impedance
V2
Winding resistance & Leakage reactance
Magnetizing branch
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
76
Transformers Two Winding Transformer Equivalent Circuit I1
XL1
n2XL2
R1
Xm
Rc
V’2=nV2
N1
n = N1/N2
n2R2
I0 V1
I’2= I2/n
N2
Referring the secondary impedances to the primary side
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
77
Transformers Two Winding Transformer Equivalent Circuit I1
XL1
R1
n2XL2
I’2= I2/n
n = N1/N2
n2R2 V’2=nV2
V1
N1
N2
Magnetizing impedance is very large compared to the leakage reactance
Can be ignored without much error
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
78
Transformers Two Winding Transformer Equivalent Circuit I1
XL1
n2XL2
I’2= I2/n
V’2=nV2
V1
N1
n = N1/N2
N2
The winding resistances are very small
Can be safely neglected
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
79
Transformers Two Winding Transformer Equivalent Circuit n = N1/N2
XT = XL1 + n2XL2
N1
N2
The primary & secondary leakage reactances can be lumped together
Single reactance, XT
Obtained from the short circuit test of the transformer
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
80
Transformers Two Winding Transformer Equivalent Circuit XTpu = XL1pu + XL2pu
n = N1/N2
Per unit equivalent diagram
Total reactance is sum of the per unit reactance of the two windings
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
81
Transformers Representation of Two Winding Transformers
Represented by a series reactance
Equal to the leakage impedance of the transformer
Obtained from the short circuit testing of the transformer
P
S
P
XTpu
S
Transformer
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
82
Transformers Representation of Three Winding Transformers
Each winding is represented by its own leakage reactance
XP, XS, XT
Magnetizing impedance represented by the parallel branch ZM
Transformer
P
S
T
P
XP-pu
ZM-pu
XS-pu S XT-pu T N
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
83
Transformers Representation of Three Winding Transformers
Magnetizing impedance is very large
Usually ignored
Transformer
P
S
P
XP-pu
XS-pu S XT-pu
T
T N
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
84
Transformers Representation of Autotransformers
The HV & LV windings are represented by the leakage reactances XH & XL
Magnetizing impedance represented by the parallel branch ZM
Autotransformer
H
L
H
XH-pu
XL-pu L
ZM-pu N
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
85
Transformers Representation of Autotransformers
Magnetizing impedance is very large
Usually ignored
Autotransformer
H
L
H
XH-pu
XL-pu L
N
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
86
Transformers Representation of Autotransformers
Represented by a single leakage reactance
XH & XL lumped together
Same as two winding transformer
Autotransformer
H
L
H
XHL-pu
L
N
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
87
Transformers Representation of Autotransformers with Tertiary Delta Winding
The HV & LV windings are represented by the leakage reactances XH & XL
The tertiary delta winding is represented by its leakage reactance XT
Magnetizing impedance is ignored
Autotransformer
H
L
∆ T
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
H
XH-pu
XL-pu L XT-pu T N
88
Synchronous Machines Representation of a Synchronous Generator
An unloaded generator is represented by the no-load phase to neutral voltage in series with the appropriate reactance
Xg +
Eg -
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
89
Synchronous Machines Representation of a Synchronous Generator
Appropriate reactance is considered
depends on time-period is of interest
Xg = Xd” or Xd’ or Xd +
Eg -
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
90
Synchronous Machines Representation of a Synchronous Generator
For fault currents immediately after the fault (typically 2-5 cycles)
Use sub-transient reactance
Eg: Instantaneous protection setting calculations
For fault currents few cycles after the fault (typically 25 cycles)
Use transient reactance
Eg: Time delayed protections such as generator back-up impedance protection
For sustained fault currents
Use steady-state reactance
Eg: Power swing calculations
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
91
Synchronous Machines Representation of a Synchronous Motor
When short-circuited,
No more electric energy supplied to it
Still keeps rotating for some time
Inertia of its rotor and connected load
Field remains energized
Starts acting like a generator
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
92
Synchronous Machines Representation of a Synchronous Motor
Synchronous motor behaves like a generator
Especially larger capacity motors
Contributes current to the fault
Contribution to fault current is significant
This current decays with time
Stored energy is dissipated
Rotor starts slowing down
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
93
Synchronous Machines Representation of a Synchronous Motor
Contribution from small capacity motors
Neglected – not included in fault calculations
Contribution from large motors
Usually considered only if the sub-transient fault current is calculated
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
94
Synchronous Machines Representation of a Synchronous Motor
Usually modeled as a voltage behind Xd”
Xm = Xd”
Typical values from IEEE standard 399
+
Em
2 - 6 poles
8 - 14 poles
-
Xd” = 20%
≥ 16 poles
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
Xd” = 15%
Xd” = 28%
95
Transients due to Faults Representation of a Induction Motor
When fault occurs
Input power to motor is cut
Energy stored in the motor contributes to the fault
Contribution decays with time
Typical decay rate - 100 to 150 ms
Modeled like the synchronous motor
Voltage behind an impedance
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
96
Transients due to Faults Representation of a Induction Motor
Small Motors
Contribution from small motors are negligible
Not considered for fault calculations
Motors of ratings < 35kW considered as small motors
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
97
Transients due to Faults Representation of a Induction Motor Modeled as a voltage behind an impedance
Xm = Xd”
Large Motors > 35kW
Xd” is approximately equal to the locked rotor reactance
+
Em -
Typical value can be used when exact values not known
Typical value Xd” = 16.7% (IEEE Standard 399)
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
98
Summary Synchronous Motors
Xm = Xd”
Xg = Xd” or Xd’ or Xd
+ Em
Induction Motors
Synchronous Generators
Xm = Xd”
+
+
-
Eg
Em
-
Typical Xd” = 16.7%
-
Trans. Lines & Cables ZL Autotransformer with ∆ tertiary
Three-winding transformer
P
XP-pu
2-wdg txfr & Auto-txfr XT-pu
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
XS-pu S
H
XH-pu
XL-pu L XT-pu
XT-pu T
T
N
N
99
Analysis of Symmetrical Faults
Introduction Symmetrical Faults
As we saw earlier
These are three-phase faults
System remains balanced
Per-phase analysis can be done
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
101
Introduction Procedure
In the given network replace …
Transformers with their leakage reactances
Transmission lines with their series impedance All shunt connections are neglected
Load impedances are neglected Much larger than the network components
Synchronous machines represented by No load-voltage behind Xd” or Xd’
Depends on time period of interest
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
102
Introduction Procedure (contd.)
Express voltage and impedances in per unit
Reduce the network
Solve for
Fault current
Current through each branch
Bus voltages
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
103
Single Source System Problem 1 T1
G
50 + j100 ohms
ΔY
Generator: 15 MVA, 13.8 kV, xd” = 0.15 pu
Load: 10 MVA at 0.9 pf lead
T1: 25 MVA, 13.2/161 kV, x = 0.10 pu
T2: 15 MVA, 161/13.8 kV, x = 0.10 pu
T2
Load
YΔ
For a three-phase fault at the load bus, find the symmetrical current fed into the fault
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
104
Single Source System Problem 1 - Per-unit equivalent
MVA base = 15 kV base of 161 kV at the transmission line
0.0289 + j0.0579
G j0.06
j0.1639
j0.06
j0.1
0.0289 + j0.0579
j0.1
j0.1639 +
IF”
1.045 © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
105
Single Source System Problem 1 - Reduced equivalent circuit 0.0289 + j0.0579
G j0.1639
j0.06
j0.1
0.0289 + j0.3818 + 1.045
IF” -
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
106
Single Source System Problem 1 - Fault current calculation 0.0289 + j0.0579
G j0.1639
j0.06
j0.1
0.0289 + j0.3818
IF" =
+ 1.045
IF” -
1.045 = 0.206 " j2.7214 pu 0.0289 + j0.3818
IF" = 2.7292# " 85.67 0 pu
! © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
107
Single Source System Problem 1 - Fault current calculation 0.0289 + j0.0579
G j0.1639
j0.06
j0.1
0.0289 + j0.3818
IBase =
+ 1.045
IF” -
MVA B 15 = kA = 627.55 A 3 " kVB 3 "13.8
IF" = 2.7292 " 627.55 = 1712.72# $ 85.67 0 A
! © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
108
Single Source System Problem 1 - Solution T1
T2
ΔY
YΔ
Load
G
Fault current = 1712.72 ∠-85.670 A
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
109
Three-phase Systems Unbalanced 3 Phase system
Va
Vc
Vb Its Sequence Components POSITIVE SEQUENCE
NEGATIVE SEQUENCE
Vb2
Vc1 1200
1200 1200
Vb1
ZERO SEQUENCE
1200
Va1
Vc2
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
Va0
1200
Vb0
1200
Va2
Vc0
126
Three-phase Systems Points to note Vc1
Vb2 1200
Va1
1200
Vc2
Vb1
1200
1200
1200 Positive Sequence
1200
Va0 Vb0 Vc0
Va2 Negative Sequence
Zero Sequence
There is no direct relationship between the magnitude or angles of Va0, Va1 and Va2.
Similarly no direct relationship between the magnitude or angles of Vb0, Vb1 and Vb2
or Vc0, Vc1 and Vc2.
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
127
Three-phase Systems Points to note Vb2
Vc1
Va0 1200
1200
Va1
1200 1200
Vc2
Vb1 Positive Sequence
1200
1200
Va2
Negative Sequence
Vb0 Vc0 Zero Sequence
The magnitude and the angles of Va0, Va1 and Va2 are determined by the system conditions.
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
128
Symmetrical Transmission Line Sequence Impedances
a
Z0
+ Van0
I0
a’
a +
_ n
Zero
+
Va’n’0
_ n’
Z1
Van1
a’
I1
a +
_ n
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
Positive
+
Va’n’1
_ n’
Z2
Van2
a’
I2
+ Va’n’2
_
_ n
Negative
n’
142
Star/star - Both Neutrals Grounded A
⦁
IA
⦁
N1:N2
N C B I0
P
3ZN
IC
⦁
a
Ia
n
ZN
⦁ ⦁
IN
⦁
Zn
In
IB
Ib
b
Ic
ZT
3Zn
V0’
Q
V0
P
I1
ZT
V1’
Reference Bus
Zero © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
I1
Q
V1 Reference Bus
Positive
P
I2
c ZT
I2
V2’
Q
V2 Reference Bus
Negative 143
Star/star - Ungrounded Neutral A
⦁
IA
N C B I0
P
3ZN
IC
⦁
⦁
N1:N2
a
Ia
n
ZN
⦁ ⦁
IN
⦁
Zn= ∞
IB
Ib
b
Ic
ZT
V0’
Q
V0
P
I1
ZT
V1’
Reference Bus
Zero © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
I1
Q
V1 Reference Bus
Positive
P
I2
c ZT
I2
V2’
Q
V2 Reference Bus
Negative 144
Delta/delta - Pu Sequence Circuit N1:N2
A
Ia
IA
∆
P
∆
Q
C
IC
⦁
⦁
Transformer
I0
ZT
V0’
⦁
⦁ ⦁
⦁
Vab
Ib Ic
IB
B
P
VAB
Q
V0
P
I1
ZT
V1’
Reference Bus
Zero © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
I1
Q
V1 Reference Bus
Positive
a
P
I2
ZT
b c I2
V2’
Q
V2 Reference Bus
Negative 145
Star/delta - Neutral Grounded A
∆
P
Per-unit Sequence Ckt. P V0’
Q
V0
B
P
IC
⦁
⦁
⦁
N C
ZT
Ia
VAN
Q
Transformer
I0 3ZN
N1:N2
⦁
IA
VN
ZN
Vab
⦁
⦁
IN
Ib Ic
IB
IA1
ZT
1∠30˚:1
VA1
Ia1
Q
Va1
P
IA1
ZT
1∠-30˚:1
Ia1
VA1
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
Positive
b c
Q
Va1
Reference Bus
Zero
a
Negative 146
Star/delta - Neutral Ungrounded A
∆
P
Per-unit Sequence Ckt. P V0’
Q
V0
B
P
IC
⦁
⦁
N C
ZT
Ia
VAN
Q
Transformer
I0
N1:N2
⦁
IA
⦁
Vab
⦁
⦁
Ib Ic
IB
IA1
ZT
1∠30˚:1
VA1
Ia1
Q
Va1
P
IA1
ZT
1∠-30˚:1
Ia1
VA1
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
Positive
b c
Q
Va1
Reference Bus
Zero
a
Negative 147
Synchronous Machines
Positive & Negative sequence circuits
n
Grounding has no effect
Zero sequence impedance
Grounding impedance is included
Ungrounded generators - no path for zero sequence
XG1
I1
n
a +
XG2
I2
V1 _
Positive
n
n
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
Negative
a +
V1 _
n
3ZN
gnd
XG0
I0
a +
V0 _
Zero 148
Sequence Networks Positive Sequence Network T1
T2
Load
G ZE
(Dyn1) ΔY
YY ZF
Equivalent Positive Sequence Network ZT1(1)
ZLine(1)
ZT2(1)
F1
1:1∠-300
ZG(1) + Eg
1:1∠-300 -
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
Reference bus
N1 149
Sequence Networks Negative Sequence Network T1
T2
Load
G ZE
(Dyn1) ΔY
YY ZF
Equivalent Negative Sequence Network ZT1(2)
ZG(2)
ZLine(2)
ZT2(2)
F2
1:1∠300
1:1∠300
N2 © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
150
Sequence Networks Zero Sequence Network T1
T2
Load
G ZE
ΔY
YY ZF
Equivalent Zero Sequence Network ZT1(0)
ZLine(0)
ZT2(0)
F0
ZG(0)
3ZE
G0 © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
151
Inter-connection of seq. networks Power System Network – Before Fault T1
T2
G
ZE
YY
ΔY
Positive Sequence Network
Load
Negative Sequence Network
Z1
Z2
Zero Sequence Network Z0
+ Vf © Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
152
Inter-connection of seq. networks Power System Network – Before Fault
Positive Sequence
Voltage source is present Positive sequence currents flow
Negative and Zero Sequence
No negative and zero sequence sources
No Negative and zero sequence currents
Positive Sequence Network
Negative Sequence Network
Z1
Z2
i1
i2=0
Zero Sequence Network Z0
+ Vf
i0=0
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
153
Inter-connection of seq. networks Faulted Power System T1
T2
Load
G
ZE
YY
ΔY
ZF
Sequence circuits for a fault at the load bus Z1
F1
Z2
F2
Z0
F0
+ Vf -
N1
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
N2
N0 154
Inter-connection of seq. networks Faulted Power System– Redrawn sequence circuits Z1 Vf
+
-
+
I1
V1 -
Z2 I2
+
N1 F2
V2 -
Z0 +
I0
F1
N2 F0
V0 -
N0
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
155
Single Line to Ground Fault Inter-connection of Sequence Networks Z1 Vf
+
-
+
I1
F1
V1 N1
Z2 I2
F2 +
V2 -
Z0 +
I0
3 × ZF N2 F0
V0 N0
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
156
Three Phase Fault Inter-connection of sequence networks Z1 Vf
+
-
+
I1
F1 ZF
V1 N1
Z2 I2
F2 +
V2 -
Z0 +
I0
ZF
Fault impedance to ground Zg No effect on the fault
N2
current
F0 ZF + 3Zg
V0 N0
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
170
Analysis of Un-Symmetrical Faults Three Phase vs. Single Phase Fault Level
Three phase faults are generally the most severe ones
Three phase fault level is the highest
However, sometimes
Single phase fault levels can be higher than 3-phase
Solidly grounded systems
On the Y-grounded side of Δ-Y-grounded transformer banks
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
171
Analysis of Un-Symmetrical Faults Three Phase vs. Single Phase Fault Level
Consider the following system with fault as shown
T G ΔY
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
ZF
172
Analysis of Un-Symmetrical Faults Three Phase vs. Single Phase Fault Level
Hence for the system shown …
G
T1 ΔY
Single-phase fault current
ZF
If Z0 < Z1, then Three-phase fault current
© Protection Engineering And Research Laboratories
1-φ fault level > 3-
φ fault level
173