Agglomeration Of Iron Ores

  • Uploaded by: Anonymous NxpnI6jC
  • 0
  • 0
  • March 2021
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Agglomeration Of Iron Ores as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,369
  • Pages: 41
Loading documents preview...
Recent Developments In Agglomeration Technologies For Iron Ores Pelletizing and Sintering Colloquium 17-18 September 2008 SAIMM - Pretoria

2

2/24/2009

The Steel making Routes

3

2/24/2009

Steel Production World crude steel production (in million tons)

1400 269,2

1200

254,3

800 600

188,3 127,2 106,4

400 200

other

227,3

1000 203,1

422,7

489,2

280,5 112,7

116,2

120,2

119,8

124

98,5

101,2

113,4

134

121,6

132,7

130,4

130,1

193,3

188,3

202,3

206,8

210,3

0 2000

2002

2004

Japan GUS

182,2 107,7

China

2006

2007

NAFTA EU 27

4

2/24/2009

Steel Consumption in kg per Capita

2/24/2009

Development of raw material prices Iron Ore Price [US$ / t dry] Sources : CVRD, Wall Street Journal, US Steel and other steel producers.

140,00

fines lump ore

120,00

pellets

100,00 [US$ / t dry]

5

80,00 60,00 40,00 20,00 0,00 1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2/24/2009

Development of raw material prices Coking Coal Export Price [US$ / t] Source: www.s teelonthenet.com

120 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 00 Q1 20 00 Q3 20 01 Q1 20 01 Q 20 3 02 Q 20 1 02 Q 20 3 03 Q 20 1 03 Q3 20 04 Q 20 1 04 Q 20 3 05 Q 20 1 05 Q 20 3 06 Q 20 1 06 Q 20 3 07 Q 20 1 07 Q 20 3 08 Q1

[US$ / t]

6

2/24/2009

Development in transport charges Sea Freight Charges (Tubarao/Rotterdam) [US$ / t] source: Erzkontor, Germany

50 45 40 35 [US$ / t]

7

30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2005Q1

2005Q2

2005Q3

2005Q4

2006Q1

2006Q2

2006Q3

2006Q4

2007Q1

2007Q2

2007Q3

8

2/24/2009

Environmental Regulations Emission Limits Country

Dust

SO2

NO2

Source

Germany

Emission 20 mg/m³ ntp

Emission 500 mg/m³ ntp

Emission 400 mg/m³ ntp

TA Luft

Australia

24h Immissionaverage 120 µg/m³ Emission 100 mg/m³ ntp

24h Immissionaverage 200 µg/m³

24h Immissionaverage 150 µg/m³

WHO, USEPA, WAEPA

Emission 150 mg/m³ ntp

Immission 120 µg/m³ ntp

Brazil

India

local regulations Immission 120 µg/m³ ntp

Air Act 1981

9

2/24/2009

Consumption of Reductants

10

2/24/2009

CO2 emitents in BF steel production

11

2/24/2009

~ 64 Pellet P Pellet Market: New Projects ~2008 roje Mill LKAB KK4 5.0 Mill. t/a Northland 5.0 Mill. t/a

New Millennium 2x7.5 Mill. t/a

Vöest Alpine 2.0 Mill. t/a

QCM 7.5 Mill. t/a

Essar MIS 6.0 Mill. t/a

MBR 7.0 Mill. t/a

Essar Trinidad 6.0 Mill. t/a

Tubarão VIII 7.5 Mill. t/a

CSN 2x3.0 Mill. t/a

SNIM/Sphere 7.0 Mill. t/a

MMX Amapá 3.5 Mill. t/a

Minas-Rio 7.0 Mill. t/a Ferrous 6.0 Mill. t/a Usiminas 6.0 Mill. t/a

Samarco 4 7.5 Mill. t/a Gerdau 7.0 Mill. t/a

M-GOK 5.0 Mill. t/a

Gol-e-Gohar 5.0 Mill. t/a Sangan 2.4 Mill. t/a Gohar Zamin 2x5.0 Mill. t/a

GIC 5.0 Mill. t/a CVRD Sohar 4.5 Mill. t/a Al Tuwairqi 5.0 Mill. t/a Hadeed 6.0 Mill. t/a

c . 178 Mill t/a unde ts 2008 . t/a und r execu er e valu tion atio n S-GOK 6.0 Mill. t/a

SSGPO 6.0 Mill. t/a Ferrexpo 5.0 Mill. t/a

Zhuhai YPM 1.5 Mill. t/a

Caofeidian 1 4.0 Mill. t/a

Baosteel 4.0 Mill. t/a

CVRD JV’s 4x1.5 Mill. t/a

WISCO 5.0 Mill. t/a

Caofeidian 2 4.0 Mill. t/a

JSW 3.5 Mill. t/a Brahmani River 4.0 Mill. t/a Essar Paradeep 6.0 Mill. t/a

Amsteel 5.0 Mill. t/a Grange 6.0 Mill. t/a CITIC 5.0 Mill. t/a

Tata Pellet 6.0 Mill. t/a Gua & Bolani 4.0 Mill. t/a

JSW West Bengal 6.0 Mill. t/a

12

2/24/2009

Sinter Market: New Projects 2008

008 ion 2 cts ecut on e j ro er ex luati P ter und r eva n i S l. t/a e d n l i u 3 M ill. t/a 5 ~ M 97 1 ~

Krivoi Rog 10.0 Mill. t/a

Isdemir 3.4 Mill. t/a

Nucor 2.5 Mill. t/a Kardemir 2.8 Mill. t/a

Açominas 2.5 Mill. t/a Belgo Min. 3.0 Mill. t/a Baosteel 7.0 Mill. t/a

Usiminas 6.3 Mill. t/a Vallourec 1.2 Mill. t/a

Formosa 5.0 Mill. t/a

Tata SP4 2.3 Mill. t/a

CSA 4.8 Mill. t/a Kalahari 2.5 Mill. t/a Pecém 4.2 (5.3) Mill. t/a CSV 5.0 Mill. t/a

P.R. China 33 plants 140.0 Mill. t/a Dragon Steel 2.5 Mill. t/a

Tata KPO 5.75 Mill. t/a

JSW 3 5.75 Mill. t/a Vizag Steel JSPL 3.6 Mill. t/a 7.2 Mill. t/a

JSW 2 2.3 Mill. t/a

IISCO 4.6 Mill. t/a Rourkela 3.7 Mill. t/a

Bhushan 4.6 Mill. t/a Durgapur 3.4 Mill. t/a

Bhilai 3.7 Mill. t/a

13

2/24/2009

14

2/24/2009

Typical flow sheet

15

2/24/2009

Typical layout of a 7.5 million tpa plant Green Pelletizing

Induration

Central Plant Dedusting

Substation Process Gas Cleaning

Cooling System Fuel Oil System

Additive Preparation

Dosing & Mixing

Regrinding

Filtration

Homogenization

Wet Grinding

2/24/2009

Plant Sizes vs. Investment Costs 100

90

80

70 Specific Investment Costs [%].

16

60

50

40 Limonite/ Whethered Ores

30

Hematite 20 Magnetite 10

0 0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

Plant Capacity [mtpy]

5.0

6.0

7.0

2/24/2009

Development of pellet plant size Capacity in million t/a

7.5 Million t/a

8 Samarco 3

7 Plant capacity (single strands) [mtpy]

17

6

Samarco 2

5

Samarco 1

4

Tilden Ijmuiden

3 2 1 0 1950

Hamersley Krivoi Rog Eagle Mountain Wabush Carol Lake Republic Eagle Mills Malmberget 1 1960

1970

1980

1990

2000

18

2/24/2009

Samarco 3 with 768m² and 7.5 Mtpy World’s largest Pellet Plant

19

2/24/2009

Steel belt plant – general layout Pellets

Concentrate

20

2/24/2009

Steel belt – process concept

21

2/24/2009

Simplification of Plant Design Roller Presses vs. Ball Mills

22

2/24/2009

Simplification of Plant Design Roller Presses vs. Ball Mills Slurry Storage

Bins

Bins

Grinding

Filtration

Thickening

Grinding and Filtration Section of a 4,000,000 t/a Pelletizing Plant

Roller Presses

Comminution Section of a 7,000,000 t/a Plant

23

2/24/2009

Simplification of Plant Design Conventional Vacuum Disc Filters Ceramic Filters

Vertical Filter Presses

standard equipment for pellet feed dewatering

high investment costs (170 %), significant energy savings (-95%) => pay back in 3 – 5 years, larger sizes possible, few references with iron ore simplified plant layouts due to large sizes (up to 132m² filtration area), significant energy savings, improved moisture control

24

2/24/2009

Improvement of Operating Costs Ø

Conservation or introduction of thermal energy to pellet feed/green pellets

Ø

Improved green pellet qualities with narrow size distributions

Ø

Improved screening concepts for hearth- and side layers

Ø

Increased pellet bed heights

Ø

Optimized heat balances and gas flow schemes

Ø

External cooling areas

Ø

Frequency controlled drives

25

2/24/2009

Specific Capacities

26

2/24/2009

27

2/24/2009

Ore

Fluxes

Return Lime Coke Material Bins Fines

Sinter plant – typical flow sheet High Intensity Mixer

Granulator

Sinter Machine Waste Gas Fan and Gas Cleaning Sinter Cooler

Cold Crushing

Screening Hearth Layer

Product Sinter Return Fines

28

2/24/2009

Typical layout

Plant Dedusting

Sinter Machine with Ignition Furnace

Sinter Cooler

Mixing

Coke Raw Material Grinding Dosing

Screening

Waste Gas Cleaning

29

2/24/2009

30

2/24/2009

Principle of EOS process

Sinter Emissions

LBS

HBS

Residual Gas Volume

-40%

-45%

Dust

-50%

-60%

NOx

-35%

-45%

SO2

-30%

CO

-45%

-50%

CO2

-25%

-30%

Dioxines

-70%

-65%

31

2/24/2009

Sinter plant with EOS hood

32

2/24/2009

EOS process principle compared to conventional sintering Conventional sintering

EOS ® Process Ambient air

Ambient air longitudinal sealing Evaporation

Evaporation

Calcining

Calcining

C combustion with O 2 of air to CO 2 Formation of CO, S ox etc.

Ambient air inleak cross and longitudinal sealing

C/CO combustion with O 2 Formation of CO, S ox etc. Recirculated gas

Residual air

Residual gas to be exhausted

Ambient air inleak cross sealing only

33

2/24/2009

LEEP waste gas recycling process

34

2/24/2009

EPOSINT waste gas recycling process

35

2/24/2009

Bag filter technology

36

2/24/2009

37

2/24/2009

High intensity mixer for sinter mix

38

2/24/2009

Dust mixer/granulator

39

2/24/2009

Space requirement for drums vs. HIM

40

2/24/2009

Future developments in Sintering Ø

Use of pellet fines in the sinter mix

Ø

Fine grinding of additives and coke

Ø

Granulation process with pelletizing discs and/or drums

Ø

Mixing/granulation with HIM

Ø

Modified sinter machine feeding arrangements

Ø

Frequency controlled drives

Ø

Use of other solid fuels

Ø

Modified process gas cleaning systems

41

2/24/2009

Thank you for your attention!

Walter Gerlach Outotec GmbH [email protected]

Related Documents

Welding Of Cast Iron
February 2021 0
Cross Of Iron
March 2021 0
Iron Body
January 2021 1

More Documents from "blogerSCRIBD"

45-vibrating Screens.pdf
January 2021 0
Kiln Equations
February 2021 0
Manual De Acupunctura
February 2021 3
Esquema Opo.pdf
January 2021 1