Recent Developments In Agglomeration Technologies For Iron Ores Pelletizing and Sintering Colloquium 17-18 September 2008 SAIMM - Pretoria
2
2/24/2009
The Steel making Routes
3
2/24/2009
Steel Production World crude steel production (in million tons)
1400 269,2
1200
254,3
800 600
188,3 127,2 106,4
400 200
other
227,3
1000 203,1
422,7
489,2
280,5 112,7
116,2
120,2
119,8
124
98,5
101,2
113,4
134
121,6
132,7
130,4
130,1
193,3
188,3
202,3
206,8
210,3
0 2000
2002
2004
Japan GUS
182,2 107,7
China
2006
2007
NAFTA EU 27
4
2/24/2009
Steel Consumption in kg per Capita
2/24/2009
Development of raw material prices Iron Ore Price [US$ / t dry] Sources : CVRD, Wall Street Journal, US Steel and other steel producers.
140,00
fines lump ore
120,00
pellets
100,00 [US$ / t dry]
5
80,00 60,00 40,00 20,00 0,00 1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2/24/2009
Development of raw material prices Coking Coal Export Price [US$ / t] Source: www.s teelonthenet.com
120 100 80 60 40 20 0 20 00 Q1 20 00 Q3 20 01 Q1 20 01 Q 20 3 02 Q 20 1 02 Q 20 3 03 Q 20 1 03 Q3 20 04 Q 20 1 04 Q 20 3 05 Q 20 1 05 Q 20 3 06 Q 20 1 06 Q 20 3 07 Q 20 1 07 Q 20 3 08 Q1
[US$ / t]
6
2/24/2009
Development in transport charges Sea Freight Charges (Tubarao/Rotterdam) [US$ / t] source: Erzkontor, Germany
50 45 40 35 [US$ / t]
7
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 2005Q1
2005Q2
2005Q3
2005Q4
2006Q1
2006Q2
2006Q3
2006Q4
2007Q1
2007Q2
2007Q3
8
2/24/2009
Environmental Regulations Emission Limits Country
Dust
SO2
NO2
Source
Germany
Emission 20 mg/m³ ntp
Emission 500 mg/m³ ntp
Emission 400 mg/m³ ntp
TA Luft
Australia
24h Immissionaverage 120 µg/m³ Emission 100 mg/m³ ntp
24h Immissionaverage 200 µg/m³
24h Immissionaverage 150 µg/m³
WHO, USEPA, WAEPA
Emission 150 mg/m³ ntp
Immission 120 µg/m³ ntp
Brazil
India
local regulations Immission 120 µg/m³ ntp
Air Act 1981
9
2/24/2009
Consumption of Reductants
10
2/24/2009
CO2 emitents in BF steel production
11
2/24/2009
~ 64 Pellet P Pellet Market: New Projects ~2008 roje Mill LKAB KK4 5.0 Mill. t/a Northland 5.0 Mill. t/a
New Millennium 2x7.5 Mill. t/a
Vöest Alpine 2.0 Mill. t/a
QCM 7.5 Mill. t/a
Essar MIS 6.0 Mill. t/a
MBR 7.0 Mill. t/a
Essar Trinidad 6.0 Mill. t/a
Tubarão VIII 7.5 Mill. t/a
CSN 2x3.0 Mill. t/a
SNIM/Sphere 7.0 Mill. t/a
MMX Amapá 3.5 Mill. t/a
Minas-Rio 7.0 Mill. t/a Ferrous 6.0 Mill. t/a Usiminas 6.0 Mill. t/a
Samarco 4 7.5 Mill. t/a Gerdau 7.0 Mill. t/a
M-GOK 5.0 Mill. t/a
Gol-e-Gohar 5.0 Mill. t/a Sangan 2.4 Mill. t/a Gohar Zamin 2x5.0 Mill. t/a
GIC 5.0 Mill. t/a CVRD Sohar 4.5 Mill. t/a Al Tuwairqi 5.0 Mill. t/a Hadeed 6.0 Mill. t/a
c . 178 Mill t/a unde ts 2008 . t/a und r execu er e valu tion atio n S-GOK 6.0 Mill. t/a
SSGPO 6.0 Mill. t/a Ferrexpo 5.0 Mill. t/a
Zhuhai YPM 1.5 Mill. t/a
Caofeidian 1 4.0 Mill. t/a
Baosteel 4.0 Mill. t/a
CVRD JV’s 4x1.5 Mill. t/a
WISCO 5.0 Mill. t/a
Caofeidian 2 4.0 Mill. t/a
JSW 3.5 Mill. t/a Brahmani River 4.0 Mill. t/a Essar Paradeep 6.0 Mill. t/a
Amsteel 5.0 Mill. t/a Grange 6.0 Mill. t/a CITIC 5.0 Mill. t/a
Tata Pellet 6.0 Mill. t/a Gua & Bolani 4.0 Mill. t/a
JSW West Bengal 6.0 Mill. t/a
12
2/24/2009
Sinter Market: New Projects 2008
008 ion 2 cts ecut on e j ro er ex luati P ter und r eva n i S l. t/a e d n l i u 3 M ill. t/a 5 ~ M 97 1 ~
Krivoi Rog 10.0 Mill. t/a
Isdemir 3.4 Mill. t/a
Nucor 2.5 Mill. t/a Kardemir 2.8 Mill. t/a
Açominas 2.5 Mill. t/a Belgo Min. 3.0 Mill. t/a Baosteel 7.0 Mill. t/a
Usiminas 6.3 Mill. t/a Vallourec 1.2 Mill. t/a
Formosa 5.0 Mill. t/a
Tata SP4 2.3 Mill. t/a
CSA 4.8 Mill. t/a Kalahari 2.5 Mill. t/a Pecém 4.2 (5.3) Mill. t/a CSV 5.0 Mill. t/a
P.R. China 33 plants 140.0 Mill. t/a Dragon Steel 2.5 Mill. t/a
Tata KPO 5.75 Mill. t/a
JSW 3 5.75 Mill. t/a Vizag Steel JSPL 3.6 Mill. t/a 7.2 Mill. t/a
JSW 2 2.3 Mill. t/a
IISCO 4.6 Mill. t/a Rourkela 3.7 Mill. t/a
Bhushan 4.6 Mill. t/a Durgapur 3.4 Mill. t/a
Bhilai 3.7 Mill. t/a
13
2/24/2009
14
2/24/2009
Typical flow sheet
15
2/24/2009
Typical layout of a 7.5 million tpa plant Green Pelletizing
Induration
Central Plant Dedusting
Substation Process Gas Cleaning
Cooling System Fuel Oil System
Additive Preparation
Dosing & Mixing
Regrinding
Filtration
Homogenization
Wet Grinding
2/24/2009
Plant Sizes vs. Investment Costs 100
90
80
70 Specific Investment Costs [%].
16
60
50
40 Limonite/ Whethered Ores
30
Hematite 20 Magnetite 10
0 0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
Plant Capacity [mtpy]
5.0
6.0
7.0
2/24/2009
Development of pellet plant size Capacity in million t/a
7.5 Million t/a
8 Samarco 3
7 Plant capacity (single strands) [mtpy]
17
6
Samarco 2
5
Samarco 1
4
Tilden Ijmuiden
3 2 1 0 1950
Hamersley Krivoi Rog Eagle Mountain Wabush Carol Lake Republic Eagle Mills Malmberget 1 1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
18
2/24/2009
Samarco 3 with 768m² and 7.5 Mtpy World’s largest Pellet Plant
19
2/24/2009
Steel belt plant – general layout Pellets
Concentrate
20
2/24/2009
Steel belt – process concept
21
2/24/2009
Simplification of Plant Design Roller Presses vs. Ball Mills
22
2/24/2009
Simplification of Plant Design Roller Presses vs. Ball Mills Slurry Storage
Bins
Bins
Grinding
Filtration
Thickening
Grinding and Filtration Section of a 4,000,000 t/a Pelletizing Plant
Roller Presses
Comminution Section of a 7,000,000 t/a Plant
23
2/24/2009
Simplification of Plant Design Conventional Vacuum Disc Filters Ceramic Filters
Vertical Filter Presses
standard equipment for pellet feed dewatering
high investment costs (170 %), significant energy savings (-95%) => pay back in 3 – 5 years, larger sizes possible, few references with iron ore simplified plant layouts due to large sizes (up to 132m² filtration area), significant energy savings, improved moisture control
24
2/24/2009
Improvement of Operating Costs Ø
Conservation or introduction of thermal energy to pellet feed/green pellets
Ø
Improved green pellet qualities with narrow size distributions
Ø
Improved screening concepts for hearth- and side layers
Ø
Increased pellet bed heights
Ø
Optimized heat balances and gas flow schemes
Ø
External cooling areas
Ø
Frequency controlled drives
25
2/24/2009
Specific Capacities
26
2/24/2009
27
2/24/2009
Ore
Fluxes
Return Lime Coke Material Bins Fines
Sinter plant – typical flow sheet High Intensity Mixer
Granulator
Sinter Machine Waste Gas Fan and Gas Cleaning Sinter Cooler
Cold Crushing
Screening Hearth Layer
Product Sinter Return Fines
28
2/24/2009
Typical layout
Plant Dedusting
Sinter Machine with Ignition Furnace
Sinter Cooler
Mixing
Coke Raw Material Grinding Dosing
Screening
Waste Gas Cleaning
29
2/24/2009
30
2/24/2009
Principle of EOS process
Sinter Emissions
LBS
HBS
Residual Gas Volume
-40%
-45%
Dust
-50%
-60%
NOx
-35%
-45%
SO2
-30%
CO
-45%
-50%
CO2
-25%
-30%
Dioxines
-70%
-65%
31
2/24/2009
Sinter plant with EOS hood
32
2/24/2009
EOS process principle compared to conventional sintering Conventional sintering
EOS ® Process Ambient air
Ambient air longitudinal sealing Evaporation
Evaporation
Calcining
Calcining
C combustion with O 2 of air to CO 2 Formation of CO, S ox etc.
Ambient air inleak cross and longitudinal sealing
C/CO combustion with O 2 Formation of CO, S ox etc. Recirculated gas
Residual air
Residual gas to be exhausted
Ambient air inleak cross sealing only
33
2/24/2009
LEEP waste gas recycling process
34
2/24/2009
EPOSINT waste gas recycling process
35
2/24/2009
Bag filter technology
36
2/24/2009
37
2/24/2009
High intensity mixer for sinter mix
38
2/24/2009
Dust mixer/granulator
39
2/24/2009
Space requirement for drums vs. HIM
40
2/24/2009
Future developments in Sintering Ø
Use of pellet fines in the sinter mix
Ø
Fine grinding of additives and coke
Ø
Granulation process with pelletizing discs and/or drums
Ø
Mixing/granulation with HIM
Ø
Modified sinter machine feeding arrangements
Ø
Frequency controlled drives
Ø
Use of other solid fuels
Ø
Modified process gas cleaning systems
41
2/24/2009
Thank you for your attention!
Walter Gerlach Outotec GmbH
[email protected]