Crushing And Grinding Course_complete.ppt

  • Uploaded by: Murat Şimşek
  • 0
  • 0
  • February 2021
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Crushing And Grinding Course_complete.ppt as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 19,317
  • Pages: 449
Loading documents preview...
PIC Grinding September 2005 This manual was prepared by : E. Villa (CTG) - F. Spada (CTG) - M. Santini (CTG)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

1 TRAINING CORPORATE

Summary 12345-

678910 11 12 -

Introduction Crushing Process Particle size distribution Tests efficiency evaluation Grinding Mills  Vertical Mills  Horizontal Ball Mills  Autogenous Mill  Roller Press Separating Process Grinding Circuits Circuits Process Control Influent Parameters on Kwh/t Mill Check-up Data Evaluation Efficiency Evaluation

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

2

I - INTRODUCTION

1. Comminution Department 2 . World Energy

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

3

1- COMMINUTION DEPARTMENT Department Manager - E. Villa Department Assistant Manager - F. Spada

Secretary and performance data monitoring (n° 1 person) Grinding process technology (n° 6 persons) Grinding mechanical section (n° 2 persons) Crushing section (n° 1 person) CAD operator (n° 1 person) Type of machines concerned: horizontal and vertical mills, static and dynamic separators, crushers, screens, cement coolers) Total n° 13 persons located in Bergamo

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

4

1- COMMINUTION DEPARTMENT Performance data monitoring  Monthly and annual reports Grinding Process Technology  Evaluation and optimisation of existing plants  Process design parameters evaluation (new plant, new machine or plant modification)  New machine choice  Start up assistance  Training  Study of new solutions for process (ITC patent of horizontal roller mill) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

5

1- COMMINUTION DEPARTMENT Grinding mechanical section  Existing machines evaluation  New machines design (complete detail drawing of horizontal ball mills 2000-3000-4500-5500 kW, cement cooler for 160 t/h , static separators)  Existing machines modifications (examples: dynamic separators from 1st and 2nd to 3rd generation, vertical ball mills for coal)  Detail drawings for mill inlet, diaphragms, (intermediate, discharge, transfer)  Technical specifications for purchase of new machines  New materials test (liners, ball charge, diaphragms plates, abrasion resistant components)  Crucial point control during machine erection (alignment, etc.)  Start-up assistance  Vibration measurements and analysis  Training Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

6

1- COMMINUTION DEPARTMENT

Crushing Section  Evaluation and optimisation of existing machines  Process design parameters evaluation and machines technical specifications definition  New machines design (detail drawings of double rotors hammer crusher in the range 250 - 800 t/h, single rotor hammer crusher in the range 250 - 600 t/h, double cylindrical rotor crusher in the range 100 - 200 t/h, double cylindrical rotor tertiary crusher)  New machines choice  New materials tests (forged hammers, etc…)  Start-up assistance  Training

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

7

1- COMMINUTION DEPARTMENT In the laboratory of the ITC grinding centre of Albino (not anymore used for industrial production) the Comminution Department has suitable instruments for samples preliminary evaluation after mill circuit check-up, like:  sieve size distribution  laser size distribution  fineness  moisture

In the same laboratory we have a batch mill for material grindability evaluation according to C.T.G. experienced method In the same grinding centre we have installed semi-industrial experimental horizontal roller mill and a small roller press manufactured according to C.T.G. design Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

8

2- WORLD ENERGY  COST OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY

2 % OF THE WORLD ENERGY USED IN CEMENT MANUFACTURING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

9

2- WORLD ENERGY  CEMENT PRODUCTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

10

2- WORLD ENERGY  ENERGY CONSUMPTION OF COMMINUTION PLANTS

- CRUSHING

=>

1 - 3 kWh/tproduct

- RAW GRINDING

=>

15 - 30 kWh/ tproduct

- COAL GRINDING

=>

35 - 50 kWh/ tproduct

- CEMENT GRINDING

=>

30 - 80 kWh/ tproduct

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

11

2- WORLD ENERGY  COST OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY

WET PROCESS HEAT % kcal/kg

85%

ELECTRIC % equivalent kcal/kg

15%

DRY PROCESS

GLOBAL % kcal/kg

HEAT % kcal/kg

100%

75%

ELECTRIC % equivalent kcal/kg

25%

GLOBAL % kcal/kg

100%

COST OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY: 15 to 25 % OF GLOBAL COST

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

12

2- WORLD ENERGY  BREAKDOWN OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY USED IN A CEMENT PLANT RAW GRINDING 24%

16% OTHERS

28% CEMENT GRINDING

Italcementi Group

BURNING 22%

PIC Grinding September 2005

13

2- WORLD ENERGY  MAIN ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION 70 63 60 51 50 40 30

27

30

30

kWh/t min kWh/t max

20

16

10 0,8

2,5

0 CRUSHING

Italcementi Group

RAW GRINDING

COAL GRINDING

PIC Grinding September 2005

CEMENT GRINDING

14

2- WORLD ENERGY  RAW MEAL GRINDING SPECIFIC RAW MEAL GRINDING ENERGY Average kWh/t ITC Group (Italy) 24,2 24,0 23,8 23,6 23,4 23,2 23,0

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

01 20

00 20

99 19

98 19

97 19

96 19

95 19

94 19

93 19

19

92

22,8 22,6

15

2- WORLD ENERGY  COAL GRINDING

SPECIFIC COAL GRINDING ENERGY Average kWh/t ITC Group (Italy)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

01 20

00 20

99 19

98 19

97 19

96 19

95 19

94 19

93 19

19

92

38,0 37,5 37,0 36,5 36,0 35,5 35,0 34,5 34,0 33,5 33,0

16

2- WORLD ENERGY  CEMENT GRINDING SPECIFIC FINISH GRINDING ENERGY Average kWh/t ITC Group (Italy) 45,5 45,0 44,5 44,0 43,5 43,0 42,5 42,0 41,5 41,0

9 19

Italcementi Group

2

9 19

3

9 19

4

9 19

5

9 19

6

9 19

7

9 19

8

PIC Grinding September 2005

9 19

9

0 20

0

0 20

1

17

2- WORLD ENERGY  CONCLUSION

GRINDING AND CRUSHING CONCERN 60 TO 65% OF THE GLOBAL ELECTRIC PLANT CONSUMPTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

18

2- WORLD ENERGY  A WAY TO SAVE MONEY Mills installed power (MV)

Number of mills (Group data 2000)

342

231

250 117

200 150

350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

80

100 50 0 Coal

Raw

172 25

Coal

Cement

Raw

Cement

1 % REDUCTION OF THE PLANT ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION MAKES A TOTAL SAVING OF 5,4 MWh => SAVE Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

$ 19

2- WORLD ENERGY  HOW ?

 BY OPTIMIZING THE GRINDING PROCESS

 BY RUNNING THE MILL AT OPTIMUM LEVEL  BY UPGRATING PLANTS WITH NEW TECHNOLOGY

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

20

II - CRUSHING PROCESS

1. Crusher Classification 2. Machine description & main parameters 3. Crushing Circuits

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

21

1- CRUSHERS CLASSIFICATION Crushers are classified according to: The function (product size): The main stress: primary impact secondary compression tertiary shear finishing attrition

The type of material: hard abrasive compact sticky wet Italcementi Group

The type of machine: jaw giratory hammer impact roll PIC Grinding September 2005

22

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION

       

JAW CRUSHERS GIRATORY CRUSHERS ROLL CRUSHERS DOUBLE-ROLL CRUSHERS SINGLE-ROTOR IMPACT CRUSHERS DOUBLE-ROTOR IMPACT CRUSHERS SINGLE-ROTOR HAMMER CRUSHERS DOUBLE-ROTOR HAMMER CRUSHERS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

23

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  JAW CRUSHERS • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Main stress Crushing part (mobil jaw) motion Type of crushing process Feeding design Maximum feed opening size Mini. gap between crushing elem. Maximum reduction ratio Drive motor power Electrical specific consumption Maximum throughput Maximum weight Type of feeding material Regulation of minimum gap (between crushing elements) by

Italcementi Group

: compression : alternative : primary, secondary : rectangular, horizontal : 400 to 2500 mm : 30 to 250 mm : 8 to 10 : 20 to 400 kW : 0.2 to 0.5 kWh/t : 1000 t/h : 250 t : hard, compact, abrasive, low moisture, not sticky

: nearing or moving away the inferior part of the mobil jawfrom/to the fixed jaw PIC Grinding September 2005

24

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  JAW CRUSHERS

1. Fixed jaw 2. Swinging jaw 3. Toggles 4. Eccentric shaft 5. Connecting rod 6. Pulley - flywheel

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

25

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  GYRATORY CRUSHERS • Main stress • Crushing part (oscillating cone) motion • Type (process) of crushing • Feeding design • Maximum feed opening radial size • Mini. gap between crushing elem. • Maximum reduction ratio • Drive motor power • Electrical specific consumption • Maximum throughput • Maximum weight • Type of feeding material • Regulation of minimum gap (between crushing elements) by Italcementi Group

: compression : rotation : primary, secondary : circular, horizontal : 600 to 1500 mm : 30 to 300 mm : 6 to 8 : 80 to 750 kW : 0.2 to 0.5 kWh/t : 3000 t/h : 550 t : hard, compact, abrasive, low moisture, not sticky : nearing or moving away the inferior part of the oscillating cone from/to the tank PIC Grinding September 2005

26

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  JAW CRUSHERS

1. Cross slide 2. Stack 3. Pendulum 4. Eccentric

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

27

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  ROLL CRUSHERS • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Main stress Crushing part (toothed roll) motion Type (process) of crushing Feeding design Maximum roll size (D x L) Teeth peripheral speed Maximum reduction ratio Drive motor power Electrical specific consumption Maximum throughput Maximum weight Type of feeding material Regulation of minimum gap (between crushing elements) by

Italcementi Group

: compression, shear : rotation : primary, secondary : rectangular, horizontal : (500 * 700 mm) to (1500 * 2000 mm) : 1 to 8 m/s :5 : 20 to 300 kW : 0.2 to 0.5 kWh/t : 1000 t/h : 200 t : medium hard, no abrasive, low moisture, sticky : nearing or moving away the mobile roll from/to the fixed jaw

PIC Grinding September 2005

28

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  JAW CRUSHERS

1. Casing 2. Toothed roll 3. Crushing wall

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

29

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  DOUBLE-ROLL CRUSHERS • Main stress • Crushing part (toothed rollers) motion • Type (process) of crushing • Feeding design • Maximum roll size (D x L) • Teeth peripheral speed • Maximum reduction ratio • Drive motor power • Electrical specific consumption • Maximum throughput • Maximum weight • Type of feeding material • Regulation of minimum gap by

Italcementi Group

: compression, shear : rotation : primary, secondary, tertialy : rectangular, horizontal : (600 * 800 mm) to (2000 * 2000 mm) : 1 to 8 m/s :5 : 30 to 600 kW : 0.1 to 0.5 kWh/t : 3000 t/h : 200 t : medium hard, medium abrasive, very wet and sticky : nearing or moving away the mobile roll from/to the fixed roller PIC Grinding September 2005

30

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  DOUBLE-ROLL CRUSHERS

1. Casing 2. Toothed rolls

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

31

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  SINGLE ROTOR IMPACT CRUSHERS • Main stress • Crushing part (rotor with impact bars) motion • Type(process) of crushing • Feeding design • Maximum rotor size (DxL) • Hammer peripheral speed • Maximum reduction ratio • Drive motor power • Electrical specific consumption • Maximum throughput • Maximum weight • Type of feeding material • Regulation of minimum gap by

Italcementi Group

: impact : rotation : single stage, primary, secondary : rectangular, oblique : (800 * 1000 mm) to (2500 * 3000 mm) : 30 to 50 m/s : 25 : 150 to 2500 kW : 0.5 to 1.5 kWh/t : 2000 t/h : 200 t : hard, compact, not abrasive, not very wet, not sticky : nearing or moving away the mobile part (finishing wall) from/to the rotor PIC Grinding September 2005

32

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  SINGLE ROTOR IMPACT CRUSHERS

1. Casing 2. Rotor 3. Crushing walls

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

33

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  DOUBLE ROTOR IMPACT CRUSHERS • Main stress • Crushing part (rotor with impact bars) motion • Type (process) of crushing • Feeding design • Maximum rotor size (DxL) • Hammer peripheral speed • Maximum reduction ratio • Drive motor power • Electrical specific consumption • Maximum throughput • Maximum weight • Type of feeding material • Regulation of minimum gap by

Italcementi Group

: impact

: rotation : single stage, primary : rectangular, oblique : (1000 * 1250 mm) to (2500 * 3000 mm) : 30 to 50 m/s : 40 : 400 to 3500 kW : 0.5 to 1.5 kWh/t : 3000 t/h : 300 t : hard, compact, not abrasive, not very wet, not sticky : nearing or moving away the mobile rotor from/to the secondary rotor

PIC Grinding September 2005

34

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  DOUBLE ROTOR IMPACT CRUSHERS

1. Casing 2. Rotors 3. Crushing walls

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

35

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  SINGLE ROTOR HAMMER CRUSHERS • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Main stress Crushing part (rotor) motion Type (process) of crushing Feeding design Maximum rotor size (DxL) Hammers peripheral speed Maximum reduction ratio Drive motor power Electrical specific consumption Maximum throughput Maximum weight Type of feeding material Regulation of minimum gap (between crushing elements) by Italcementi Group

: impact : rotation : single stage, primary, secondary, tertialy : rectangular, horizontal and oblique : (800 * 1000 mm) to (2500 * 3000 mm) : 25 to 50 m/s : 80 : 300 to 2500 kW : 0.5 to 2.5 kWh/t : 1500 t/h : 200 t : hard, not abrasive,compact, low moisture, not sticky : choice of grate opening

PIC Grinding September 2005

36

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  SINGLE ROTOR HAMMER CRUSHERS

1. Casing 2. Rotor 3. Hammers 4. Crushing walls 5. Grate

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

37

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  DOUBLE ROTOR HAMMER CRUSHERS • • • • • • • • • • • • •

Main stress Crushing part (rotor) motion Type of crushing process Feeding design Maximum rotor size (DxL) Hammer peripheral speed Maximum reduction ratio Drive motor power Electrical specific consumption Maximum throughput Maximum weight Type of feeding material Regulation of minimum gap (between crushing elements) by Italcementi Group

: impact : rotation : primary, secondary, tertialy : rectangular, horizontal and oblique : (800 * 1000 mm) to (2500 * 3000 mm) : 25 to 40 m/s : 80 : 300 to 2500 kW : 0.5 to 2.5 kWh/t : 3000 t/h : 300 t : hard, compact, not abrasive, low moisture, not sticky : choice of grate opening

PIC Grinding September 2005

38

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  DOUBLE ROTOR HAMMER CRUSHERS

1. Casing 2. Hammer rotors 3. Breaker anvil 4. Grate

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

39

2- MACHINES DESCRIPTION & MAIN PARAMETERS  CRUSHERS CHOICE MAIN CRITERIA

Low speed crushers: jaw and gyratory type Suitable for abrasive, very hard, dry materials Low reduction ratio: more than one step required double roller crusher Suitable for very wet materials High speed crushers: hammer and impact type Not suitable for abrasive materials High reduction ratio: finishing in one step possible Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

40

3- CRUSHING CIRCUITS

1- ONE STAGE - OPEN CIRCUIT • Simple circuit design • Product size control by discharge gap • Fast machines needed • Not suitable for abrasive and sticky materials

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

41

3- CRUSHING CIRCUITS

1- ONE STAGE - OPEN CIRCUIT Storage silo feed bin

Plate feeder

Run of mine

One stage primary crusher (finishing machine)

Finished product

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

42

3- CRUSHING CIRCUITS

2 - DOUBLE STAGE - OPEN CIRCUIT: • Ability to direct feed to primary crusher (slow machines) • Ability to take out undersize material after primary crusher • Ability to feed only oversize material for next crushing • Control of product maximum size not always accurate • Needs fast machine as secondary crusher • Not very suitable for abrasive and sticky materials

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

43

3- CRUSHING CIRCUITS 2 - DOUBLE STAGE - OPEN CIRCUIT: Storage silo feed bin Plate feeder

Run of mine

Primary crusher

Primary crushed material Screen

Coarse

Screening

Secondary finishing crusher Secondary crushed material Finished product

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

44

3- CRUSHING CIRCUITS

3 - DOUBLE STAGE - CLOSED CIRCUIT: • Ability to direct feed to primary crusher (slow machines) • Ability to take out undersize material after primary crusher • Ability to feed only oversize material for next crushing • Accurate control of product maximum size • Suitable for slow machine • Suitable for abrasive and sticky materials

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

45

3- CRUSHING CIRCUITS 3 - DOUBLE STAGE - CLOSED CIRCUIT: Run of mine

Primary crusher Primary crushed material

Screen

Coarse

Secondary crusher Secondary crushed material Finished product

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

46

III - PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION 1. Laws 

Gaudin-Schumann Law  Rosin-Rammler Law  Charles Law

2. Measurement Methods 

Blaine Method  Bet Method  Alpine  Laser Particles Size Analyser  Sieves Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

47

1- LAWS  PARTICLES SIZE DISTRIBUTION

FIRST EVALUATION OF PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION (We only need 2 points) Why using the laws?

FIRST CORRELATION WITH CHEMICAL AND MECHANICAL CEMENT AND CONCRETE PROPERTIES EVALUATION OF ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

48

1- LAWS  GAUDIN-SCHUMANN LAW

Ln P(x) = m Ln (x) - m Ln (k) k: sieves size giving 100% passing m: slope of straight line

BASIC FORMULA

P( x ) 

Log

Passing (%)

100



m

No much representative for coarse particles

m = tg 

K

Italcementi Group

 x    k

Log Particle size (µm)

PIC Grinding September 2005

49

1- LAWS  GAUDIN-SCHUMANN LAW

Passing

Granulometry

Size (mm)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

50

1- LAWS  ROSIN-RAMMLER LAW

Ln Ln (1/R(x)) = n Ln (x) - n Ln (x0) x0 : sieves size for 36.8 % retained n: slope of straight line Retained (%)

Log Log

BASIC FORMULA Not very representative for fine particles

R( x ) 

 x n   e  x 0

36.8

n = tg 



Log

x0 Italcementi Group

Particle size (µm) PIC Grinding September 2005

51

1- LAWS  CHARLES LAW

100.C.m . k(1-n) • E = n-1 m-n+1 kWh/t

Workability

CHARLES LAW

If nRRS

40 20

n 0.7



EGrinding

1.1

Grinding energy

n: RRS slope m: Gaudin Schumann slope C: material data (between 20 & 40)

dE=-Cx(-n)dx Size x Size x-dx Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

52

2- MEASUREMENT METHODS  BLAINE METHOD

Measure the specific surface of a powder in cm2/g or m2/kg => FINENESS PRINCIPLE: Time for a volume of air to pass through a layer of particles. LIMITS: => used only for cement => measure not accurate up to 6000 Blaine. Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

53

2- MEASUREMENT METHODS  BET METHOD

PRINCIPLE: =>Surface nitrogen absorption => Multi-layers absorption theory =>Vaporisation & condensation balance calculation Used for limestone porosity evaluation LIMITS: => Cost => Difficulty in manipulating => Not so used in the cement industry (laboratory) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

54

2- MEASUREMENT METHODS  ALPINE

Content of coarse particles in % of weight. LIMITS: => Sieves must be clean => Sample lost => Mesh (32 mn)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

55

2- MEASUREMENT METHODS  LASER PARTICLES SIZE ANALYSER

% of retained particles for a certain mesh. Method based on light diffraction. LIMITS: => results depends on laser types :MALVERN # CILAS (liquid) # SYMPATEC (air - liquid) => for raw and coal material, pb of particles desagglomeration (ultrasound) => laser circuit has to be cleaned every time => water (raw material) or alcohol (cement and coal) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

56

2- MEASUREMENT METHODS MALVERN

CILAS

SAME SAMPLE and SAME TIME

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

57

2- MEASUREMENT METHODS

TROMP CURVE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

58

2- MEASUREMENT METHODS  SIEVES

WET/DRY FRANCE Opening Designation (mm) of sieves 0.040 17 0.050 18 0.063 19 0.080 20 0.100 21 0.125 22 0.160 23 0.200 24 0.250 25 0.315 26 0.400 27 0.500 28 0.630 29 0.800 30 1.000 31 1.250 32 1.600 33 2.000 34 2.500 35 3.150 36 4.000 37 5.000 38

USA (ASTM) Opening Designation (mm) of sieves 5.660 3.5 4.760 4 4.000 5 3.360 6 2.830 7 2.380 8 2.000 10 1.680 12 1.410 14 1.190 16 1.000 18 0.840 20 0.710 25 0.590 30 0.500 35 0.420 40 0.350 45 0.297 50 0.250 60 0.210 70 0.177 80 0.149 100 0.125 120 0.105 140 0.088 170 0.074 200 0.062 230 0.063 270 0.044 325 0.037 400

Italcementi Group

UK (BSA) Opening Designation (mm) of sieves 3.353 5 2.812 6 2.411 7 2.057 8 1.676 10 1.405 12 1.204 14 1.003 16 0.853 18 0.699 22 0.599 25 0.500 30 0.422 36 0.353 44 0.295 52 0.251 60 0.211 72 0.178 85 0.152 100 0.124 120 0.104 150 0.089 170 0.076 200 0.066 240 0.053 300

GERMANY (DIN) Opening Designation (mm) of sieves 6.000 6 5.000 5 4.000 4 3.000 3 2.500 2.5 2.000 2 1.500 1.5 1.200 1.2 1.000 1 0.750 0.75 0.600 0.6 0.500 0.5 0.430 0.43 0.400 0.4 0.300 0.3 0.250 0.25 0.200 0.2 0.150 0.15 0.120 0.12 0.100 0.1 0.090 0.09 0.075 0.075 0.060 0.06

PRINCIPLE: Give the content of coarse or fine particles by manual or mechanical sieving. Coarse and fine amount are stated in % of weight. LIMITS: => sieves have to be cleaned => unconsistancy due to men action for manual sieving => mesh limit : >10µ in laboratory >32µ in plant

PIC Grinding September 2005

59

IV - TEST EFFICIENCY EVALUATION 1. General 2. Bond 3. Zeisel 4. Alsing 5. Hardgrove 6. CTG Test 7. Correlations 8. Time Evolution of Mill & Grinding Department Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

60

1- GENERAL

Grindability of the material is measured by:

Compressive strenght Bond index Alsing / CTG test Zeisel test Hardgrove

Italcementi Group

N/cm2 kWh/t kWh/t kWh/t number

PIC Grinding September 2005

(crushing) (raw material) (raw, clinker) (clinker, slag) (coal, pet coke)

61

2- BOND  BOND LAW

BOND LAW : Grinding energy first approximation

 1  1   W  10 x Wi x   P F Wi :

F : P : W :

Work Index kWh/st wet process (Laboratory test) multiply x 1.102 => kWh/t wet process multiply x 1.33 => kWh/st dry process multiply x 1.47 => kWh/t dry process mesh giving 80% passing for Feeding mesh giving 80% passing for final Product industrial specific consumption kWh/st

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

62

2- BOND  BOND WORK INDEX BOND WORK INDEX DRY GRINDING

MATERIAL

kWh/t Bauxite Cement clinker Cement raw material Clay Clay calcined Coal Dolomite Gypsum rock Limestone for cement Magnesite dead burned Sandstone Slag Slag-iron blast furnace

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

14 19 15 10 11 16 16 12 15 24 17 23 17

63

2- BOND  BOND TEST RAW GRINDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION DETERMINATION Mill feed and supplementary feed 90 mm - 4mm

Circulating material

< 90 mm

> 90 mm

Ball mill

Sieve 90 mm Box < 90 mm

Italcementi Group

Finished product

PIC Grinding September 2005

64

3- ZEISEL  ZEISEL TEST CLINKER AND SLAG GRINDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION DETERMINATION

1 - Grinding plate 2 - Steel ball 3 - Pressure ring 4 - Driving shaft 5 - Extensometer 6 - Calculator

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

65

4- ALSING  ALSING TEST

GIVES THE "INDUSTRIAL GRINDING ENERGY" NECESSARY TO GRIND THE TYPE OF MATERIAL CONSIDERED OPEN CIRCUIT

CLOSE CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

=> Industrial grinding energy > Alsing energy (20% to 30%) => •FIRST GENERATION CLASSIFIER Industrial grinding energy > Alsing energy (#15%) => •SECOND OR THIRD GENERATION Industrial grinding energy # Alsing energy PIC Grinding September 2005

66

4- ALSING  ALSING ENERGY

• SAMPLING PROCEDURE: TAKE DURING 4 HOURS (EVERY HALF HOUR) AN AVERAGE 10 kg OF FEEDING MATERIAL AND HALF A POUND OF FINAL PRODUCT • CHECK LIST:

Italcementi Group

Time t0: record the energy consumption of the main motor Time t0 + 4 hours: record the energy consumption of the main motor PIC Grinding September 2005

67

4- ALSING  ALSING ENERGY

• BATCH MILL CARACTERISTICS:

Batch mill

BALL MILL: External diameter = 664 mm (261.4 in) Spin velocity = 38 rpm (73% of critical speed) Lining = lifter liners LOAD: steel balls: 40 mm (beginning) (1.18 in) 18 mm (end) (0.71 in)

ANALYSES WITH STRAIN GAUGES => MECHANICAL COUPLE => kWh/t for a given fineness (FCB know how: telemetry) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

68

4- ALSING  ALSING ENERGY

• TESTING PROCEDURE: Ball charge: X t0 (40mm) t0+t1

t0+t2

t0+T Italcementi Group

Ball charge: X Material sample 1

New ball charge: Y (18mm) Material sample 2

Blaine Granulometry Blaine Granulometry

Ball charge: Y Material sample having a given fineness PIC Grinding September 2005

69

4- ALSING  ALSING ENERGY

kWh/t

kWh/t

RESULTS: 3 types of graph: • SPECIFIC ENERGY FUNCTION • SPECIFIC ENERGY FUNCTION OF BLAINE SURFACE OF d80 (80% Passing Mesh) (Log-Log graph)

Blaine/1000

Italcementi Group

d80

PIC Grinding September 2005

70

4- ALSING  ALSING ENERGY

• SPECIFIC ENERGY FUNCTION OF 40µm RETAINED (Semi-Log graph)

4omm retained

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

71

5- HARDGROVE  HARDGROVE TEST Weights

COAL GRINDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION DETERMINATION

Drive Counter Box

Grinding plate

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

72

6- CTG TEST CEMENT GRINDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION DETERMINATION

Ball charge:  First step => 120 Kg diameter 40 mm  Second step => 120 Kg diameter 18 mm Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

73

6- CTG TEST CEMENT GRINDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION DETERMINATION

Grinding Specific Consumption =

EkWh - LkWh

= kWh/t

Tmaterial EkWh = Meter measure LkWh = Motor and gear box lost energy Tmaterial = Material weight (t) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

74

6- CTG TEST CEMENT GRINDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION DETERMINATION

Spec. cons. (kWh/t)

Lines comparison

ALSING TEST C.T.G. TEST

Blaine (cm2/g) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

75

7- CORRELATIONS

In order to have a first evaluation of the global specific electrical consumption of a cement grinding shop, from the industrial data available in ITC we have established correlations between: • the % of clinker content in cement • the kWh/t (global specific consumption in the workshop) • the mortar compressive strength, in N/mm2

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

76

7- CORRELATIONS MAIN CORRELATIONS ARE: For Portland cements or cements with low additives: -20,39 + 0,384 * % CK + 0,294 * kWh/t (tot.) = N/mm² (2 days) 0,508 + 0,447 * % CK + 0,249 * kWh/t (tot.) = N/mm² (28 days) For pouzzolanic or slag cements: -12,45 + 0,395 * % CK + 0,130 * kWh/t (tot.) = N/mm² (2 days) -3,480 + 0,503 * % CK + 0,392 *kWh/t (tot.) = N/mm² (28 days) Global correlation 0,37 * %CK + 0,30 * kWh/t (tot.) = N/mm2 (28 days) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

77

7- CORRELATIONS

IMPORTANT: CORRELATIONS ARE USEFUL ONLY IF DATA CONSIDERED FOR ENERGY CONSUMPTION ARE HOMOGENEOUS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

78

8- TIME EVOLUTION OF MILL AND GRINDING DEPARTMENT

BY COMPARING EVERY MONTH THE PERFORMANCES OF A MILL, IT IS POSSIBLE TO FOLLOW ANY IMPORTANT CHANGE IN MILL MOTOR OR MILL CIRCUIT POWER CONSUMPTION. ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND AND TO CORRECT ANY WRONG SITUATION.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

79

8- TIME EVOLUTION OF MILL AND GRINDING DEPARTMENT IMPORTANT • • •

mill production measurements and electrical energy meters must be available and tested compare also long period data (5 - 10 - 15 years) in order to detect slow but constant increases check the sequence of machines start-up and stop in order to be sure that machines don't run without reason

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

80

8- TIME EVOLUTION OF MILL AND GRINDING DEPARTMENT

kWh/t

SAMATZAI plant (1998) figures of raw and coal specific consumption

months

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

81

8- TIME EVOLUTION OF MILL AND GRINDING DEPARTMENT

kWh/t

TRIESTE raw grinding figures (specific consumption)

years

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

82

V - GRINDING MILLS 1. Vertical Mills 2. Horizontal Ball Mills 3. Autogenous Mills 4. Roller Press 5. Horizontal Roller Mills 6. Systems and other

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

83

HORIZONTAL BALL MILL

ROLLER PRESS

Italcementi Group

VERTICAL MILL

PIC Grinding September 2005

84

1- VERTICAL MILLS

Grinding elements: Rollers

Grinding elements: Balls

VERTICAL ROLLER MILL Italcementi Group

VERTICAL BALL MILL

PIC Grinding September 2005

85

1- VERTICAL MILLS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

86

1- VERTICAL MILLS GRINDING PERFORMANCES:

• 10 TO 20 % GLOBAL (50 % MILL ITSELF) ENERGY CONSUMPTION SAVED BETWEEN HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL GRINDING

• DEPENDING ON : * INLET MATERIAL GRINDABILITY * MOISTURE * WEAR

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

87

1- VERTICAL MILLS (ROLLER MILLS)

• PFEIFFER MILL Characteristics:  Three rollers  Annular path of concave cross-section  Hydro-pneumatic tensioned spring system  Continuous contact between roller and grinding table  Hot gas stream issuing from the ported air ring  Hot gas inlet joint to the mill structure  60 to 100% capacity range throughput Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

88

1- VERTICAL MILLS

(ROLLER MILLS)

PFEIFFER MILL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

89

1- VERTICAL MILLS (ROLLER MILLS)

• LOESCHE MILL Characteristics:  2, 3 or 4 conical rollers  Annular flat grinding table  Rollers fixed on swinging arms => Lower maintenance cost  Roller pressure exerted by springs on smaller machines and hydro-pneumatically on larger ones  40 to 100% capacity range throughput  Wear sensible  no contact between rollers and table  mill structure independent of hot gas inlet. Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

90

1- VERTICAL MILLS Gas + fine material outlet

Raw material inlet

(LOESCHE)

Separator motor

Dynamic separator

Separator reject Lining

Dam ring Grinding rollers Grinding table Hot gas inlet

Mill gear box Hydraulic cylinder

Rollers frame

Mill motor Mill reject

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

91

1- VERTICAL MILLS (ROLLER MILLS)

• POLYSIUS MILL Characteristics: Same PFEIFFER MILL with two double rollers and two annular grinding tables.

 Higher wear resistance

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

92

1- VERTICAL MILLS

(ROLLER MILLS)

POLYSIUS MILL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

93

1- VERTICAL MILLS (ROLLER MILLS)

• RAYMOND MILL Characteristics:  Conical rollers  Conical grinding table  Spring or hydraulic pressure system  No contact between rollers and table  reduction gear integrated to the mill structure.

Grinding bowl

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

94

1- VERTICAL MILLS (BALL MILLS)

• PETERS MILL Characteristics:  Grinding elements: balls  Circular grinding table Hydro-pneumatic& spring tensioned system  Especially used for coal grinding

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

95

1- VERTICAL MILLS (BALL MILLS)

• FCB "E" MILL Characteristics: Same PETERS MILL with only hydraulic tensioned system and external reject recalculation

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

96

1- VERTICAL MILLS ADVANTAGES: • LOW SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION (kWh/t) • SPACE REQUIREMENT • THROUGHPUT TILL 600 t/h • HIGH DRYING CAPACITY • SIZE OF THE FEED MATERIAL (50 to 100mm) • IMPROVE THE SIZE DISTRIBUTION SLOPE => nRRS • ABLE TO USE LARGE HOT GAS FLOW AT LOW TEMPERATURE • LOW SYSTEM REACTION TIME

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

97

1- VERTICAL MILLS

DISADVANTAGES: • SENSIBILITY TO WEAR • SIZE DISTRIBUTION SLOPE FOR CEMENT => nRRS => Problem with cement and concrete workability and short term strength • RISK OF VIBRATION (foundation design very important)

• SENSIBLE TO DRY AND HARD RAW MATERIAL Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

98

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS Mill feed Gas /air outlet Main gearbox

Main motor Auxiliary drive

Material discharge

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

99

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS CHARACTERISTICS: • COMMAND: => EXTERNAL DRIVE => CENTRAL DRIVE => GEARLESS DRIVE COST RATING FOR A 4400kW ENGINE POWER: 200%

160% 100%

115%

100% 0%

Italcementi Group

Cost External

Central

Gearless

PIC Grinding September 2005

100

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS EXTERNAL DRIVE: Types: Single pinion drive

Dual pinion drive

Italcementi Group

Characteristics: * Single or dual pinion drive (maximum power for single one is 3500 kW or 4700 HP) * Shoe or plain bearing mills (higher air flow for plain bearing) Advantages: * Standard, inexpensive motors * Investment cost Disadvantages: * Low efficiency * Dustightness of pinion drive

PIC Grinding September 2005

101

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS CENTRAL DRIVE: Types: Planetary gearing

Axially gearing (with twin or single motor drive)

Italcementi Group

Characteristics: Planetary or axially gearing (planetary gearing efficiency: 97%, axially gearing efficiency: 92%) Advantages: * No gearing on the mill itself *Low maintenance cost point of vie (balancing) * Less space requirement than external drive Disadvantages: * Problem for venting the mill

PIC Grinding September 2005

102

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS GEARLESS DRIVE: Advantages : *High power mill:> 4000 kW (5400HP) *Low space requirement *Adjustable mill speed

Type:

Disadvantages: *Complex electrical feature *Low efficiency: 90% *Cost

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

103

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS Lubrication system for double-pinion drives

1- lubrication reservoir 2- shut-off valve 3- pump 4- pressure relief valve 5- shut-off valve 6- filter 7- not-return valve 8- distribution pipe

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

104

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS MILL MAIN SUPPORT

1 White metal bearing 2 Support casing 3 Support frame 4 Spherical surface

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

105

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS MILL MAIN SUPPORTS LUBRICATION SYSTEM

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

106

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS PAD SHOE BEARING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

107

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS LENGHT / DIAMETER OPEN CIRCUIT

5 6

RAW CLOSED CIRCUIT

2 3

SWEPT CLOSED CIRCUIT CEMENT CLOSED CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

2 3  3.5

108

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS

ONE CHAMBER : BETTER MATERIAL DISTRIBUTION INTO THE MILL  PROPER LINER  CARE WITH COARSE MATERIAL FEEDING  USUALLY USED FOR MILL WITH L/D < 2.5  LOWER MAINTENANCE COST  HIGHER VENTILATION 

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

109

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS ONE CHAMBER (K.H.D. MILL 3.4 x 6.1)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

110

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS

Useful diam. 5200

ONE CHAMBER (TOSI MILL 5.4 x 12)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

111

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS ONE CHAMBER (TOSI MILL 4 x 8)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

112

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS TWO CHAMBERS SECOND CHAMBER :

FIRST CHAMBER : 

  

 

 

Material size reduction : from feed 0 - 35 mm to max 5 % > 2,5 mm Breakage effect Lifter liners Specific energy in consumption :  8-10 kWh/t (closed circuit)  10-12 kWh/t (open circuit) Specific ball charge surface: 9-11 m2/t of balls Length =30-35 % total mill length Ball average weight : 1600 - 2000 g Ball size : 100 - 60 mm Italcementi Group

Material size reduction : from 5% > 2,5 mm to 10 - 20 % < 90 µm (closed circuit) 5 % < 90 µm (open circuit) Attrition effect Classifying liners 25-40 m2 /t of balls (according to L/D ratio) Length =70-65 % total mill length Ball size 60-17 mm Cylpebs 50x25 - 16x16 mm

PIC Grinding September 2005

113

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS TWO CHAMBERS (TOSI MILL 5.4 x12)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

114

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS TWO CHAMBERS (SMIDTH MILL 3.5 x 12)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

115

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS

THREE CHAMBERS : USED IN OPENED CIRCUIT  LOW VENTILATION  CYLPEBS IN THIRD CHAMBER => 30%  TOTAL LENGHT :  First chamber  Second chamber => 20%  Third chamber => 50% 

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

116

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS THREE CHAMBERS (MILL 2.4 x 13)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

117

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS DOUBLE ROTATOR MILL (MILL 10’ x 22’ + 12’) First compartment

Second compartment

Useful diam. 2878

Drying chamber

discharge Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

118

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS MILL ON PAD SHOE BEARINGS AND ANULAR MOTOR DRIVE RING MOTOR

PAD SHOE BEARING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

119

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS ADVANTAGES  LARGE FINAL PRODUCT RANGE (final product fineness from 2800 to 5500 Blaine)  LOW COST OF MAINTENANCE (care with ball charge wearing; material and internal part design)  VERY WELL KNOWN COMPONENTS  NO VIBRATION  EASY TO OPERATE Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

120

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS DISADVANTAGES

 HIGH SPECIFIC POWER CONSUMPTION (kWh/t)  HIGH INSTALLATION COST

 LOW VENTILATION  LOW DRYING CAPACITY  NOISE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

121

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS TREND



DOUBLE ROTATOR BALL MILL AS DRYER MILL FOR ABRASIVE MATERIAL.



FINE AND ULTRA-FINE PRODUCTS.



MAIN EVOLUTION WILL CONCERN INTERNAL PARTS (LINERS, AND DIAPHRAMS).

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

122

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  VERTICAL MILLS

Number of vertical mills (ITC Group data 2000) 56 Raw Coal Slag

25

1

Installed power:

50 ÷ 3500 kW

(n.1 cement mill in construction not yet in operation) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

123

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS Number of horizontal ball mills (ITC Group data 2000) 222 91

Raw Coal Cement

24

Italcementi Group

Installed power:

100 ÷ 8700 kW

Biggest mill:

Ø5.8 x 17 m (CCB)

Max capacity:

- Raw 350 t/h - Cement 300 t/h - Coal 40 t/h

PIC Grinding September 2005

124

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  GRINDING MILLS

Number of roller press (ITC Group data 2000)

8 Raw Coal Cement

1 0

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

125

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  GRINDING MILLS

Number of grinding mills (ITC Group data 2000)

80

231 Raw Coal Cement

117

Total number: 428

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

126

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  GRINDING MILLS

Number of grinding mills (ITC Group data 2000)

337

82

Horizontal Vertical Roller press

9

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

127

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  INLET MILL CHUTE

Gas Material

Material

Gas

LOW VENTILATION Italcementi Group

HIGH VENTILATION PIC Grinding September 2005

128

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  INLET MILL CHUTE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

129

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  INLET MILL CHUTE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

130

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  INLET MILL CHUTE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

131

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  INLET MILL CHUTE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

132

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  OVERVIEW INTERNAL ELEMENTS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

133

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  OVERVIEW INTERNAL ELEMENTS Mill head liner

Shell liner (lifting liner)

Shell liner (classifying liner)

A: B: C: D: E:

Slot plate

Italcementi Group

Blind plate

Coarse grinding compartment Intermediate diaphragm Finish grinding compartment Discharge diaphragm Grinding media: Ø 90÷60 mm 1st chamber Ø 50÷17 mm 2nd chamber

Slot plate

PIC Grinding September 2005

134

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

LINERS: • Wet process: to decrease wearing, rubber lining can be used (except in first chamber) • Dry process: steel lining First chamber Alloy type: Function: Second chamber Alloy type: Function: Italcementi Group

12-14% of Chromium martensitic steel Protect the shell against wear & lift the balls 12-14% of Chromium martensitic steel Protect the shell against wear & classify the balls PIC Grinding September 2005

135

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

136

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

137

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS Wide wave liners

Step liners

Lifter classifying liners

Wave liners

Bar liners

Italcementi Group

Classifying liners

PIC Grinding September 2005

138

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

DIAPHRAGMS:  Goals:

=> optimised the filling ratio (adjustable diaphragms) => keep the coarse into the first compartment => let the fines passed into the second compartment => separate the balls (from one chamber to the others) => allow air to pass through the mill => maximum central opening according to ball charge filling degree

 Discharge diaphragm slots > central diaphragm slots  Trend: Flow controlling devices Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

139

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

DIAPHRAGMS Adjustable intermediate diaphragm for tube mills grinding dry minerals.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

140

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

Blind plates

Slotted plates

lifter

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

141

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

Flow control INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

Adjustable lifters

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

142

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

143

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

144

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

145

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

146

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

147

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

148

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

149

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

150

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

INTERMEDIATE DIAPHRAGMS

151

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

OUTLET DIAPHRAGM

PIC Grinding September 2005

152

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS Slotted plates

OUTLET DIAPHRAGM frame

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

153

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  LINERS & DIAPHRAGMS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

OUTLET DIAPHRAGM

154

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  OUTLET MILL CHUTE Final outlet

Central outlet (double rotator mill)

Air swept outlet

Italcementi Group

Humid outlet

PIC Grinding September 2005

155

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  OUTLET MILL CHUTE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

156

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  OUTLET MILL CHUTE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

157

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  OUTLET MILL CHUTE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

158

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  VENTILATION

A particular attention has to be taken for the mill inlet & outlet head. We must also have a good idea of the ventilation in the mill. Filter exhaure False air Tube ventilation head section Mill outlet head ventilation

Italcementi Group

Open circuit: 250-350 Nm3/mt of finished product 0.5-0.8 m/s Closed circuit 300-600 Nm3/mt of finished product 1-1.5 m/s Maximum of 35 m/s

PIC Grinding September 2005

159

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  VENTILATION

THE PLANT ENERGY CONSUMPTION DEPENDS ON THE PRESSURE DROPS IN FILTERS, MILL...

THE CONTROL OF PRESSURES FOR ALL STEPS OF CIRCUIT IN THE GRINDING PLANT IS CRUCIAL TO OPTIMIZE THE GRINDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION CHECK THE PROCESS FAN EFFICENCY AND THE DAMPER OPENING: THIS POINTS COULD COST A LOT OF ENERGY Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

160

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  VENTILATION

False air affects a lot the mill ventilation. False air can provide from: * Mill tube: inlet sealings outlet sealings material feed * Mill discharge * Dedusting * Bag filter jet pulsing * Flaps airtightness * High negative pressure ducts and machines *... Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

161

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  VENTILATION

Point to care after for checking false air in the grinding circuit

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

162

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE

GENERAL LAW:  INPUT   OUTPUT

Q:Calorific power = Temperature * Specific heat * Throughput Q express in th/h, kcal/h, BTU/h or MJ/h 1 thermie = 4,186 MJoules = 1 163 kWh = 106 calories = 3968,3 BTU

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

163

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE

MILL:

MECHANICAL MILL MOTOR POWER

MATERIAL GAS

MATERIAL moisture % flow t/h temperature °C specific heat Kcal/kg°C kcal./Nm3°C HEAT LOST mill shell: surface m2 temperature °C heat transfer ratio kcal./h°Cm2 Italcementi Group

MATERIAL GAS HEAT LOST GAS composition moisture % flow Nm3/h temperature °C

FALSE AIR moisture % flow Nm3/h temperature specific heat

specific heat kcal./Nm3°C MECHANICAL MILL POWER electrical absorb. kW mechanical efficiency grinding efficiency

PIC Grinding September 2005

164

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE

MATERIAL GAS

GAS

CLASSIFIER: HEAT LOST MATERIAL MATERIAL moisture % flow t/h temperature °C specific heat Kcal./kg°C

Italcementi Group

GAS composition moisture % flow Nm3/h temperature °C specific heat (Kcal./h°Cm2) PIC Grinding September 2005

HEAT LOST separator shell surface m2 temperature °C heat transfer ratio (Kcal./h.°C.m2)

165

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE

FURNACE:

AIR

GAS

FUEL HEAT LOST AIR moisture % flow Nm3/h temperature °C specific heat Kcal/Nm3°C

Italcementi Group

GAS composition moisture % flow Nm3/h temperature °C specific heat Kcal/Nm3°C

PIC Grinding September 2005

FUEL composition moisture % flow kg/h temperature °C specific heat (Kcal./kg°C)

HEAT LOST furnace shell surface m2 temperature °C heat transfer ratio (Kcal./h°Cm2°)

166

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE - DEW POINT

Due to the material moisture, the dew point has to prevent bag filter from clogging. =>  (bag filter gas temperature - dew point temperature) > 30°C P Vaporisation pressure: Pv  in Kg/cm2 Pgs.(1  %H 2 O) 1 with P: absolute pressure in Pgh .%H 2 O Kg/cm2 (mbars*0.00102) P = Patm.-chimney depressure Pgs = Volumic mass of dry gas Pgh = Volumic mass of wet gas

Italcementi Group

Temperature of condensation: 5168 Tc   273,16 in °C 13,89  ln( Pv)

PIC Grinding September 2005

167

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE WATER INJECTION

Water spraying system according to the CTG standard

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

168

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE WATER INJECTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

169

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE WATER INJECTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

170

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE WATER INJECTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

171

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE WATER INJECTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

172

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE WATER INJECTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

173

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE WATER INJECTION

 STANDARD ITC

Water injection in the first chamber or, if possible, in the second chamber:

1.5 - 2% max of the mill cement production Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

174

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  THERMAL BALANCE WATER INJECTION

 MAGOTTEAUX: Chamber 1 : 0.9 % x production (kg/h) Chamber 2 : water required (thermal balance) - 0.9 % x kg/h % of water needed for different kWh/t and air speeds T° clinker : 50°C, 100°C and 150°C

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

175

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS CIMAR MARRAKECH

COMPANY PLANT

 MILL POWER D useful L useful J s Vactual ball size max htot

m m % t/m3 rpm mm %

MILL TYPE

1st compart.

2nd compart.

tot/avg

m

m

m

3,440 4,008 31,3 4,5 16,2 90 0,870

3,420 3,790 25,8 4,7 % Vcritical

3,43 7,80 28,6 4,6 70,9

RAW MILL POLYSIUS 3.6 x 12 m drying compartment 3,554 D useful m L useful m

2,5

Mec kW

89,3

balls charge tons 1st compart.

2nd compart.

52

42 94

ABSORBED POWER CALCULATION MECHANICAL

ELECTRICAL

1st comp. 2nd comp. totale 1st comp. 2nd comp. totale

Italcementi Group

kW kW kW kW kW kW

Magotteaux

CMM

Slegten (old)

FCB

A. C. 2

AVERAGES

600 509 1 209 690 585 1390

630 536 1 257 725 617 1445

600 511 1 203 690 587 1383

589 482 1 160 677 554 1231

630 537 1 259 724 617 1447

610 515 1 218 701 592 1379

PIC Grinding September 2005

176

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  MILL POWER

n

C = mill axle G = centre of gravity F = material and balls weight b = lever arm n = mill rotation speed

b

C

POWER =  n(F  b)

G

F Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

177

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  MILL POWER

MILL POWER CALCULATION FORMULA SLEGTEN formula : P = Mill length x (pm/Vcrit)1.27 x Kpm x nmotor with KJ,Kj = filling ratio x (1.36 - 1.2 x filling ratio) and KPm = 40.688 x D2.379

and nmotor = total trasmission efficiency (motor, gear box, couplings)

CMM formula : P = [0.4735 - 0.0746 x Ln (filling ratio)] x D x 12 pm x Tballs

(for mills with L/D < 2.5) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

178

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  BALL CHARGE

 FIRST CHAMBER : CEMENT AND RAW : 100 mm to 60 mm BALLS GAUDIN-SCHUMANN LAW :

P ( X )   X / Xmax

m

X max : Maximum ball diameter. P(x) : % of X mm Ball. m = 1.4  MINIMUM POROSITY Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

179

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  BALL CHARGE

 SECOND CHAMBER : CEMENT AND RAW : 60 mm to 17 mm BALLS (CYLPEBS) PAPADAKIS LAW :

D

D0 L   k .  1  L max 

1. 5

DO : Maximum ball diameter; k = 1.92 ; Lmax: Chamber length Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

180

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  BALL CHARGE

B = 20.17 x

F(80) k

Wi x S

x 3

Cs x Di

B = Balls diameter (mm) Wi = Inlet mill material max size (mm) Cs = Work index in kWh/st (st = 907 kg) S = Material specific weight (g/cm3) Di = Mill diameter (m) k = Proportionality constant (335) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

181

29/04/2002

C.T.G. - Italcementi Group - Comminution Department Company Plant Department Circuit type New charge date Mill speed Critical speed

Mill Feed point Hot gases Hot gas temperature Separator g/1' g/1'

Critical speed 1st chamber

Characteristics Type of liner Diaphragm slots Measured free height Ratio steel / cement Useful diameter Useful lenght Useful lenght Total volume compart. Ball charge density Charge volume Filling degree Calculated free height Ball charge to add for each cm of free height Ball charge D = 100 mm D = 90 mm D = 80 mm D = 70 mm D = 60 mm D = 50 mm D = 40 mm D = 30 mm D = 25 mm D = 20 mm D = 17 mm Cil 25x25 mm Cil 22x22 mm Cil 19x19 mm Cil 16x16 mm

18,63 Installed power 27,8 Absorbed power 67,1% Ratio L/Ø

mm m % m m % m³ t/m³ m³ % m

Av. size ball

mm

Inlet 5,32

1st compartment

2nd compartment

6,0

6,0

Free area for gases Outlet m² m² 3rd compartment

2,320 3,200 25,9 13,5 4,49 4,0 29,9 1,53

mm m % m m % m³ t/m³ m³ % m

2,320 9,150 74,1 38,7 4,79 11,6 30,1 1,53

mm m % m m % m³ t/m³ m³ % m

t

0,32

t

0,97

t

t

%

t

%

6,42 3,75 3,75 4,28

18,2 Total compartement Mill total t 74,0 Ball S.S. Surface m² 1.711 Surface Av, weight ball g

kW kW

°C

35,3 20,6 20,6 23,5

24,6 m²/t m²

150 Av, weight ball g 33 Av. size ball mm

Italcementi Group

m

2

m

2

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS

t

%

m

 BALL CHARGE

2

54 36 41 54

4,22 8,45 3,56

7,6 15,1 6,4

65 161 91

39,60

70,9

1209

185 55,8 10,2 Ball S.S. 185 Surface

75,4 m²/t m²

1598 Av, weight ball g 73 Av. size ball mm

1525

27,3 Ball S.S. 1.525 Surface

m²/t m²

116 Av, weight ball g 30 Av. size ball mm

PIC Grinding September 2005

182

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  GRINDING SPECIFIC RATIO

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

183

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  GRINDING SPECIFIC RATIO

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

184

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  GRINDING SPECIFIC RATIO

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

185

2- HORIZONTAL BALL MILLS  GRINDING SPECIFIC RATIO

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

186

3- AUTOGENOUS MILL

ROTATION LINERS LIFTERS

DEFLECTOR LINERS PERIPHERAL PORTS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

187

3- AUTOGENOUS MILL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

188

4- ROLLER PRESS SYNOPTIC:

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

189

4- ROLLER PRESS CHARATERISTICS: MAIN PARAMETERS:  D = Roller diameter  L = Effective roller length  S = Gap Width  U = Circumferential velocity  F = Grinding force  ac = Compression angle  bf = Angle of force action  Pm= Maximum pressure in gap  d = maximum value of solids volume (2x1250kW) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

190

4- ROLLER PRESS CHARACTERISTICS: • MAIN PARAMETER:

Specific Pressure =

F

= 5 or 6 MPa

D.L F

• LIMITS: => Humidity: 5 to 6% => Installed Power # 2500-3000 kW (2*1250 kW)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

D

L

191

4- ROLLER PRESS ADVANTAGES:  REDUCTION OF THE ELECTRICAL GRINDING DEPARTMENT CONSUMPTION : 20 to 30% LESS  PRODUCTION INCREASE OF EXISTING PLANT : 30 to 35% MORE  SPECIFIC WEAR REDUCTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

192

4- ROLLER PRESS DISADVANTAGES:  INTEGRAL FINISH GRINDING CIRCUIT ACCEPTABLE FOR BLAINE SURFACE < 4000 cm2/g.

 NOT ADAPTED TO SOFT MATERIAL  VIBRATION PROBLEM LINKED WITH REGULATION

 MECHANICAL PROBLEMS WITH : - REDUCTION GEAR - ROLLER - SEGMENT ROLLER Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

193

4- ROLLER PRESS



FINISH GRINDING



HYBRID GRINDING



PRE-GRINDING



SEMI-FINISH GRINDING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

194

4- ROLLER PRESS  FINISH - GRINDING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

195

4- ROLLER PRESS  FINISH - GRINDING  ADVANTAGES : • THE GREATEST ENERGY SAVING • SMALL SPACE REQUIREMENT • LOW SPECIFIC WEAR (g/t) • DRYING CAPACITY

 DISADVANTAGES : • NOT ADAPTED TO HIGH FINENESS TREND • LARGE MECHANICAL ELEVATOR (HIGH CIRCULATING LOAD) AND SEPARATOR • HEAVY MAINTENANCE (SPARE ROLLERS) • CEMENT AND CONCRETE WORKABILITY • GRINDING PLANT HEIGHT Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

196

4- ROLLER PRESS  HYBRID - GRINDING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

197

4- ROLLER PRESS  HYBRID - GRINDING  ADVANTAGES : • ADAPTED TO HIGH FINENESS TREND • GOOD CEMENT AND CONCRETE WORKABILITY • LOW BALLS SPECIFIC WEAR (g/t) • POSSIBILITY TO WORK WITHOUT PRESS  DISADVANTAGES : • HEAVY MAINTENANCE • MOISTURE LIMITED • PRESS VIBRATIONS RECIRCULATING SEPARATOR REJECTS • DIFFICULT TO CONTROL CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

198

4- ROLLER PRESS  PRE- GRINDING

kWh/t = 30% less

t/h

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

= 80% more

199

4- ROLLER PRESS  PRE- GRINDING  ADVANTAGES : • ADAPTED TO HIGH FINENESS TREND • GOOD CEMENT AND CONCRETE WORKABILITY • LOW BALLS SPECIFIC WEAR (g/t) • POSSIBILITY TO WORK WITHOUT PRESS

 DISADVANTAGES : • HEAVY MAINTENANCE • MOISTURE LIMITED

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

200

4- ROLLER PRESS  SEMI-FINISH GRINDING

kWh/t = 30% less

t/h

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

= 80% more

201

4- ROLLER PRESS  SEMI-FINISH GRINDING

 ADVANTAGES : • ADAPTED TO HIGH FINENESS TREND • LOW BALLS SPECIFIC WEAR (g/t) • GOOD SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION • DRYING POSSIBILITIES

 DISADVANTAGES : • HEAVY MAINTENANCE => NUMBER OF MACHINES • TWO FINENESS CHECK POINTS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

202

4- ROLLER PRESS  n.5 Roller Press in Italcementi Group (1998):  CCB (Belgium; Gaurain) : Raw material POLYSIUS - 1989 - Nominal power=2 x 1200kW - roller width=1000mm roller diameter=2000mm  CCB (Belgium; Gaurain) : Cement POLYSIUS - 1990 - Nominal power=2 x 1200kW - roller width=1000mm roller diameter=2000mm  CALCIA (France; Cruas) : White cement FCB - 1990 - Nominal power=2 x 160kW - roller width=400mm roller diameter=820mm  ESSROC (USA; Nazareth): Cement KHD - 1987 - Nominal power=2 x 800kW - roller width=1000mm roller diameter=1150mm  ESSROC (USA; Speed): Cement KHD - 1998 - Nominal power=2 x 450kW - roller width=800mm roller diameter=1400mm Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

203

4- ROLLER PRESS Example of CCB (Belgium; Gaurain):  Raw grinding :

MILL 7 ROLLER PRESS MILL 1775 kW WORK SHOP 2199 kW STPH 106.6 kWh/st 22.8 Maintenance Cost 5.69 $pst

MILL 8 MILL 8/MILL7 1479 kW 3547 kW 200% 6193 kW 282% 355.3 333% 19.7 - 13.6 % 4.66 $pst - 18.1 %

To fulfil the same production as the grinding plant # 8 with the grinding plant # 7 WE SHOULD NEED a 7334 kW installed power plant. Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

204

4- ROLLER PRESS  Cement grinding

MILL 8 MILL 9 MILL 9 /MILL8 ROLLER PRESS 912 kW MILL 4392 kW 8566 kW 194% WORK SHOP 4901 kW 11634 kW 237% STPH 84.2 251.7 299% kWh/st 58.2 46.2 - 20.6 % Maintenance Cost 10.7 $pst 8.1 $pst -24.3 % To fulfil the same production as the grinding plant # 9 with the grinding plant # 8 WE SHOULD NEED a 14755 kW installed power grinding plant.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

205

SYSTEMES DE BROYAGE CIMENTS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

206

4- ROLLER PRESS  HOROMILL (FCB)

 Limits: New technology  New plants in the world: R.C.C. (Turkey): 1 Horomill with TSV classifier 110 stph; 3200 Blaine OPC Asian Cement (Lafarge, Turkey) 1 Horomill with TSV classifier 110 stph; 4200 Blaine; 2100 kW installed power

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

207

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS COMPARISON OF THE ANGLES OF NIPS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

208

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS  PROCESS PRINCIPLE INSIDE HOROMILL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

209

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS

BUILT A MILL ABLE TO GRIND: • • • • • • •

with compression effect with low mechanical strains in a steady way with a limited wear of grinding media with low investment cost without the roller press power limit with an operating flexibility

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

210

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS

MILL TYPE

SPECIFIC PRESSURE (exerced by the rollers on the material layer) : 150 - 200 8-14 20-60 25

Roller press Raw vertical mill Cement vertical mill Horizontal roller mill

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

MPa MPa MPa MPa

211

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS  HOROMILL (FCB)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

212

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS  HOROMILL (FCB)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

213

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS  TREND

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

214

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS

ADVANTAGES: - Grinding efficiency

DISADVANTAGES: - New design and technology - Working hours (max 1300 of industrial prototype) - High circulation load - Limited ventilation in the mill - Limits in feed moisture - Difficulty to produce OPC cement with fineness > 4000 Blaine - Difficulty to produce slag cement with slag content > 40% Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

215

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS Mechanical problems: - Hydraulic apparatus ( cylinders and accumulators) - Roller and track lifetime, scrapers wear - Cracks in the mill shell - Mill shell sealing - Misalignment of mill shall (material inside the mill) - Torsional vibration on drive line - Lubrication oil cooling system and pollution Process problems: - Limits in fineness with OPC cement - Two separators in series utilised in Karsdorf for OPC 42.5 cement - Difficulty to produce slag cements (> 40% of slag content) - Start-up procedure Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

216

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS  TREND

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

217

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS  TREND

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

218

5- HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILLS COMPARISON BETWEEN HOROMILL AND CEMAX Manufacturer Spin velocity Type of circuit C,C. regulation Mill ventilation Drying capacity Inlet mill Maximum size Expected production Italcementi Group

HOROMILL Fives Cail Babcock 1.6 x critical speed mechanical inside the mill low limited single 4000 kW 220 t/h PIC Grinding September 2005

CEMAX F.L. Smidth 0.82 x critical Speed ventilated separator high good double 5500 kW 300 t/h 219

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER COMPARISON OF MAIN PARAMETERS Specific pressure (F/LxD) Pressure nip angle Compression in single pass Substitution ratio Drying capacity kWh/t mill motor (*) kWh/t total (*) Maximum Blaine OPC Investment cost References

Roller press 6.5 6 1 1.7 - 2.2 out of the press 60 70 3500 110 > 300

Vertical mill 1.5 12 2 1.5 - 2.2 in the mill 60 75 4300 110 35

Horomill 3.5 18 5 1.5 - 2.2 out of the mill 60 70 4100 110 15

* = referred to horizontal ball mill as 100% Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

220

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER CEMENT VERTICAL MILL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

221

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER CEMENT VERTICAL MILL

Loesche mill LM 32.5+2S

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

222

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER

MILL FRESH FEED

MILL RECIRCULATION FEED

MASTER ROLLER

THIRD GENERATION CLASSIFIER

CEMENT VERTICAL MILL SLAVE ROLLER

Loesche mill LM 32.5+2S

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

223

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  CKP GRINDING SYSTEM

 PRE-GRINDING 

Italcementi Group

SEMI-FINISH GRINDING

PIC Grinding September 2005

224

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

225

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER NEW DEVELOPMENT: CKP Process

Characteristics:  No integrated separator  External mechanical elevator  Material outlet design  Low air flow (dedusting function)  low drying capacity  Association with a finishing mill

Production improvements:

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

226

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  CIRCUIT BEFORE CKP INSTALLATION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

227

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  CKP PRE-GRINDING SYSTEM

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

228

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  CKP PRE-GRINDING SYSTEM

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

229

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  CKP PRE-GRINDING SYSTEM

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

230

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  CKP PRE-GRINDING SYSTEM MARRAKECH - CEMENT MILL n°2 + CKP - CPJ 35 Pos.

Cement type

CPJ 35

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Test number Additives Sent to CKP Sent to ball mill Test date Production Residue 0.040 mm Residue 0.063 mm Residue 0.080 mm Residue 0.090 mm Residue 0.200 mm Blaine Clinker Limestone Pozzuolana Gypsum

t/h % % % % % cm2/g % % % %

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Mill absorbed power CKP absorbed power Services absorbed power Total absorbed power Mill specific consumption CKP specific consumption Services spec. consumpt. Total specific consumption

kW kW kW kW kWh/t kWh/t kWh/t kWh/t

25 Mill max power required

Italcementi Group

Reference

Performance

before CKP

warranties

% -

kW

1 100 lim + 0 poz cli + lim to CKP gyps to mill 08-mar 136 33,44 10,40

5 50 lim + 50 poz cli + lim to CKP poz + gyp to mill 12-mar 144 35,96 12,92

7 50 lim + 50 poz cli+lim+poz to CKP gyps to mill 13-mar 157

75 20 0 5

3,68 0,08 3650 71 24 0 5

5,04 0,12 4100 71 12 12 5

5,00 0,10 4100 71 12 12 5

21,5

2057 763 403 3223 15,13 5,61 2,96 23,70

2060 770 405 3235 14,31 5,35 2,81 22,47

2060 797 410 3267 13,12 5,08 2,61 20,81

100 lim + 0 poz cli + lim to CKP gyps to mill 100

CTG test with CKP

165

13,00

4-6

3600 75 5 - 15 5 - 15 5 2100 800 2900 21,00 8,00 29,00

2200

PIC Grinding September 2005

231

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  CKP PRE-GRINDING SYSTEM MARRAKECH - COTTO 2 + CKP a CPJ 45 Pos.

Tipo cemento

CPJ 45

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Test number Additives Sent to CKP Sent to ball mill Test date Production Residue 0.040 mm Residue 0.063 mm Residue 0.080 mm Residue 0.090 mm Residue 0.200 mm Blaine Clinker Limestone Pozzuolana Gypsum

% t/h % % % % % cm2/g % % % %

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Mill absorbed power CKP absorbed power Services absorbed power Total absorbed power Mill specific consumption CKP specific consumption Services specific consumption Total specific consumption

kW kW kW kW kWh/t kWh/t kWh/t kWh/t

25 Mill max power required

Italcementi Group

Reference

Performance

CTG test

before CKP

warranties

86

145

with CKP 4 50 lim + 50 poz cli + lim to CKP poz + gyp to mill 11-mar 122 33,32 9,08

2-4

2-4

3600 - 3700 85 10 - 5 5 - 10 5

85 5 5 5

2150

2060 760 400 3220 16,89 6,23 3,28 26,39

602 2752 25,00 7,00 32,00

kW

2,76 0,08 3300 87 4 4 5

2200

PIC Grinding September 2005

232

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  CKP SEMI-FINISH GRINDING SYSTEM

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

233

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

234

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

235

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  HORIZONTAL ROLLER MILL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

236

6- SYSTEMS AND OTHER  HORIZONTAL ROLLER PRESS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

237

VI- SEPARATING PROCESS 1. Theory 2. Cyclone 3. Static Classifier 4. Dynamic Classifiers :  First Generation  Second Generation  Third Generation

5. Design

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

238

1- THEORY PERFORMANCES:

GOOD CLASSIFIER EFFICIENCY

GOOD WORKSHOP EFFICIENCY

LOWER ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

GLOBAL PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

239

1- THEORY • PURPOSE => SEPARATION PARTICLE SUITABLE FOR "FINISHED PRODUCT" CLASSIFIER FEED COARSE PARTICLES "OVERSIZED" TWO THINGS MUST BE ENSURED

Italcementi Group

=> NO OVERSIZED IN THE FINISH => NO FINISHED IN THE REJECTS

PIC Grinding September 2005

240

1- THEORY PRINCIPLE:

EACH PARTICLE IN AN AIR FLOW : CxSx(V2/2)xRo= Global air force = Fa

Air current

MxW2xR= Centrifugal force=Fc

MxG=Gravity force = Fg Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

241

1- THEORY

Fg=K1 x d3 Fc=K2 x d3 Fl=K3 x d(3/2) d: particle diameter

Fg # 1/10 Fc => insignificant Fc = Fl => d0 = cut size

d > d0 => particle thrown out the inner side => Tail d < d0 => particle thrown up => Fines

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

242

1- THEORY A CIRCULATING LOAD: A = R + F (t / h) or A / F (ratio)

R

FRESH FEED

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

F

243

1- THEORY DIFFERENT KINDS OF CLASSIFIERS  CYCLONE  STATIC  DYNAMIC TO DUST COLLECTOR

FINE MATERIAL TO DUST COLLECTOR

GAS WITH MATERIAL

GAS WITH FINES

MATERIAL

GAS REJECT PRODUCT

Italcementi Group

GAS FROM MILL

REJECT

PIC Grinding September 2005

244

2- CYCLONE FINENESS ADJUSTMENT BY : AIR FLOW REGULATION

Captation efficiency ANDERSON, ROSIN RAMMLER law



D min i 

K. . n l . s.Vt

K  Cst

 : duct . width. ( m) l: gas. trajectory . ( m) Vt : tan gential . speed . ( m / s )

h: Gas. dynamic. vis cos ity . ( Poiseuille ) S: Material . volumic. mass. ( kg / m3)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

245

3- STATIC SEPARATOR REGULATION OF THE CUT SIZE WITH: • GUIDE VANES INCLINATION (wheel) • OUTLET DUCT LENGTH (R) • AIR FLOW

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

246

3- STATIC SEPARATOR To mill dust collector

Fines

Adjustable guide vanes

Reject Mill vent air Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

247

3- STATIC SEPARATOR TWO TYPES OF STATIC SEPARATORS

FINES

FINES

TAILS

TAILS

AIR FLOW + FEED Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

AIR FLOW + FEED 248

3- STATIC SEPARATOR  ADVANTAGES : • EASY TO USE • CHEAP • HIGH AIR FLOW • LOW ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION • ALLOW TO SEND FILTER MILL PRODUCT TO FINAL PRODUCT

 DISADVANTAGES : • MEDIUM PRECISION OF SIEVING • CONVEYING FUNCTION (AIRSWEPT) AND SEPARATING FUNCTION LINKED TOGETHER • FINENESS LIMITED Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

249

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR

• FIRST GENERATION

• SECOND GENERATION • THIRD GENERATION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

250

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  FIRST GENERATION CLASSIFIER

STURTEVANT

Italcementi Group

Characteristics: • Single drive •Selection device (distribution plate) •Main fan 3 Functions with the same motor Fineness regulation by: •Selection blade number •Selection and fan blade size •Diaphragm valve small fineness range PIC Grinding September 2005

251

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  FIRST GENERATION (STURTEVANT)

Fineness adjustment by diaphragm position

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

252

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  FIRST GENERATION CLASSIFIER

POLYSIUS

Characteristics: • Double drive • Distribution plate & selection device mounted on the same shaft • Main fan • Selection device speed control

3 functions with two motors. Fineness regulation by: • Plate distribution speed • Selection blade number • Selection blade size Larger fineness range Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

253

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  FIRST GENERATION (POLYSIUS)

Double drive: variable speed and fixed speed

Fan (fixed speed)

feed

Selection blades

Feed distribution plate

Fineness adjustment by variable speed reject fines Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

254

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  FIRST GENERATION CLASSIFIER

RAYMOND

Characteristics : •Single drive with fix speed •Selection device (distribution plate) single or double •Main fan 3 functions with one motor Fineness regulation : •Selecting blades number •Internal deflectors position Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

255

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  FIRST GENERATION CLASSIFIER

DISADVANTAGES : Inner side effect (wall effect) Fines in tails

Italcementi Group

ALL FUNCTIONS (SELECTION -VENTILATION- CAPTATION) DISPLAYED INTO ONE MACHINE BIG CYCLONE • Bad selection efficiency (feeding under selecting zone + wide selecting area) •Limited cooling function •High by-passing level (fines in tails) •Fineness limited •No air flow regulation •Bad efficiency of the main fan PIC Grinding September 2005

256

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  SECOND GENERATION CLASSIFIER

Main description : •Central body • Satellite cyclones • High efficiency main fan Characteristics : • Fine particle captation made by small cyclones • Regulated air flow (recirculation air flow) Fineness regulation by : • Distribution plate speed • Recirculation air flow • Selection blades number & size Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

257

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  SECOND GENERATION (WEDAG)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

258

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  SECOND GENERATION (WEDAG)

Variable speed drive

fan

feed

selection

distribution Italcementi Group

fines PIC Grinding September 2005

rejects 259

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  SECOND GENERATION CLASSIFIER

ADVANTAGES:  FINENESS REGULATION EASY FROM THE CONTROL ROOM  COOLING CAPACITY (by regulating fresh air flow)  DRYING CAPACITY  SEPARATION OF DIFFERENT FUNCTIONS (Separation, Ventilation, Captation ...)  HIGH EFFICIENCY VENTILATOR  LARGE FINENESS RANGE

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

260

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  SECOND GENERATION CLASSIFIER

DISADVANTAGES:  CLASSIFIER SIZE  STILL HIGH BY- PASSING LEVEL (fines in tails)  FEEDING UNDER SELECTING ZONE AND WIDE SELECTION AREA

THIRD SEPARATION CLASSIFIER

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

261

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  THIRD GENERATION CLASSIFIER

CLASSIFYING PRINCIPLE:

Narrow classifying area for third generation classifier (versus first generation) Consistent centrifugal force

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

262

1_ csV12 2

1_ csV22 2

m2 R1

m2 R2

 mg

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR

mg

 THIRD GENERATION CLASSIFIER

THEORY 1_ csV 2 2



m2 R

mg 1_ csV 2 2

m2 R

mg

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

263

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  THIRD GENERATION CLASSIFIER

O-SEPA (Onoda, Japan)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

TSV (FCB, France)

264

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  THIRD GENERATION (STURTEVANT)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

265

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  THIRD GENERATION (O-SEPA)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

266

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  THIRD GENERATION (O-SEPA)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

267

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  THIRD GENERATION (FCB)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

268

4- DYNAMIC SEPARATOR  THIRD GENERATION (POLYSIUS)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

269

5- DESIGN  DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR A THIRD GENERATION CLASSIFIER

Ratio separator feeding / air throughput 1.75 kg/actual m3 (max : 2 kg/m3) Ratio fines/cage total surface max : 10 t/m² Ratio fines / air throughput max : 1 kg/actual m3 Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

270

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR LOAD RATIO

CEMENT: Separator feed rate/separation air => 1.8 kg/m3 Separator product/ separation air  3000 cm2 /g acc. to Blaine => 0.75 - 0.8 kg/m3  4000 cm2 /g acc. to Blaine => 0.55 - 0.6 kg/m3  5000 cm2 /g acc. to Blaine => < 0.55 kg/m3 RAW MATERIAL: Separator feed rate/ separation air => 2.2 kg/m3 Raw meal 12 - 14% residue 90 mm => 0.55 kg/m3 Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

271

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR COMPARISON

First generation: • all functions (selection, ventilation, product collection) in the same machine • wide separation area Second generation: • functions divided in different components • wide separation area Third generation: • high efficiency due to narrow separation area and controlled ventilation Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

272

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR DATA SHEET

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

273

5- DESIGN

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

274

5- DESIGN

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

275

5- DESIGN  DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR A THIRD GENERATION CLASSIFIER

Max tangential speed (peripheral speed) : Vt = 35 m/s Radial speed (air speed through the cage) : Vr = 4.5 m/s if product fineness <3200 Blaine Vr if > 4500 Blaine 4.5 m/s for small separator 3.5 - 4 m/s for big one Vr = 5 - 5.2 m/s for raw material Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

276

5- DESIGN  THIRD GENERATION CLASSIFIER

ADVANTAGES:  CLASSIFIER SIZE  HIGH SIEVING ACCURACY  COOLING CAPACITY  EASY TO CONTROL (in the control room)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

277

5- DESIGN  THIRD GENERATION CLASSIFIER

DISADVANTAGES:  FILTER SIZE  FINAL PRODUCT QUALITY

nRRS

=

• Workability • One and two days strength

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

278

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

279

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

280

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

281

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

282

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

283

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

284

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

285

5- DESIGN NEW

OLD

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

286

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

287

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

288

5- DESIGN

MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

289

5- DESIGN MODIFIED BY C.T.G.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

290

5- DESIGN  TROMP CURVE CALCULATION A (a)

G (g)

F (f) M

Vf =

Vg =

 Sa -  Sg  Sf -  Sg

 Sf -  Sa  Sf -  Sg

x 100 (%)

x 100 (%)

Italcementi Group

A = Separator feed (t/h) F = Separator fines (t/h) G = Separator reject (t/h) Ma= Fresh mill feed (t/h) Da = Granulometric size weight of separator feed (%) Df = Granulometric size weight of separator fines (%) Dg = Granulometric size weight of separator reject (%) Sa = Granulometric size passing of separator feed (%) Df = Granulometric size passing of separator fines (%) Dg = Granulometric size passing of separator reject (%) Vf = Separator fines weight (%) Vg = Separator reject weight (%) T = Separation coefficient (%)

In general: T = f (granulometric size)

Dg - Vg

T=

x 100 (%)

Dg x Vg + Df x Vf

PIC Grinding September 2005

291

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR RELATION BETWEEN SEPARATOR EFFICIENCY AND MATERIAL FLOWS A = F = G = a = f = g = h = UF =

Separator feed (t/h) Separator fines (t/h) Separator reject (t/h) Granulometric size passing of separator feed (%) Granulometric size passing of separator fines (%) Granulometric size passing of separator reject (%) Separator efficiency Circulation load A

fxF

h=

UF = F

a xA

h=

f a

Italcementi Group

a-g x

f =

f-g

f-g = a-g

1 x

a

PIC Grinding September 2005

UF

292

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR

TROMP CURVE CALCULATION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

293

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR

TROMP CURVE CALCULATION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

294

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR

TROMP CURVE Selectivity (%)

Tails in fines

Global by-pass (Stg)

P(t) 50 % Imperfection= (d75 - d25) / 2d50 By-pass slope (Pts) Fines in tails Particle size (μm)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

Minimum by-pass (St) Log 295

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

296

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

297

5- DESIGN  THIRD GENERATION CLASSIFIER

Selectivity (%)

FIRST GENERATION SECOND GENERATION THIRD GENERATION

Characteristics:  Squirrel cage to make separation Fineness regulation:  Rotor speed  Air flow regulation  Static blades inclination

Particle size (μm)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

298

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

299

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

300

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR

Cement type IA-52.5

Mill TOSI 9’ x 14’ with Sturtevant 16’ separator Mill SMIDTH 3.2 X 9.3 With O-SEPA N 1000 separator Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

301

5- DESIGN  SEPARATOR

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

302

VII - GRINDING CIRCUITS

Dry Process 1. Open Circuit 2. Closed Circuit 3. Raw Material Circuit 4. Swept Circuit 5. Coal Circuit 6. Cement Circuit

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

303

1- OPEN CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

304

1- OPEN CIRCUIT ADVANTAGES :

 LOW INVESTMENT COST  SIMPLE LAY-OUT

 SPECIFIC POWER CONSUPTION ACCEPTABLE FOR COARSE CEMENT (maximum 3000 Blaine OPC)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

305

1- OPEN CIRCUIT DISADVANTAGES :  RISK TO FIND COARSE PARTICLE IN CEMENT  NO ACCURATE REGULATION POSSIBILITY FOR DIFFERENT KINDS OF CEMENT  FINE CEMENT PRODUCTION EXPENSIVE  LOW VENTILATION  NO DRYING CAPACITY

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

306

1- OPEN CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

307

1- OPEN CIRCUIT  PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

308

2- CLOSED CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

309

2- CLOSED CIRCUIT

ADVANTAGES :     

GOOD EFFICIENCY (kWh/t) LARGE FINENESS RANGE HIGH RRS SLOPE DRYING & COOLING CAPACITY CIRCUIT REGULATION POSSIBILITIES

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

310

2- CLOSED CIRCUIT

DISADVANTAGES :  HIGH INVESTMENT COST  MORE MAINTENANCE COST => NUMBER OF MACHINES (vs opened circuit)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

311

3- RAW MATERIAL CIRCUITS RAW GRINDING

WET PROCESS

DRY PROCESS

Disagglomerator Horizontal mill Closed circuit

Horizontal mill Airswept circuit

Opened circuit

Italcementi Group

Mechanical circuit

Central Discharge

PIC Grinding September 2005

Vertical mill

Standard 312

3- RAW MATERIAL CIRCUITS



DRY PROCESS

 WET PROCESS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

313

3- RAW MATERIAL CIRCUITS  DRY PROCESS (VERTICAL ROLLER MILL)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

314

3- RAW MATERIAL CIRCUITS  DRY PROCESS (STANDARD CIRCUIT)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

315

3- RAW MATERIAL CIRCUITS  DRY PROCESS (DOUBLE ROTATOR)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

316

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  DRY PROCESS (AIR SWEPT)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

317

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  DRY PROCESS (AIR SWEPT)

AIR SWEPT CIRCUIT WITH RICICLE FAN

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

318

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  WET PROCESS

• NOT MORE UTILIZED FOR NEW PLANTS • SUITABLE FOR RAW MATERIALS VERY WET, HARD OR WITH HIGH LEVEL OF PLASTICITY

• REQUIRES FUELS AT VERY LOW COST

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

319

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  WET PROCESS ADVANTAGES: • LOWER ENERGY SPECIFIC CONSUMPTION (30-50% less than dry process) • LOWER INVESTMENT COST • NO AIR POLLUTION • EASY SLURRY TRANSPORT • EASY SLURRY HOMOGENISATION • WET KILN LESS AFFECTED BY PRESENCE OF CHLORIDES, ALKALIES OR SULFATES IN RAW MATERIALS • ABILITY TO USE HIGH SULFUR FUELS AND WASTE FUELS Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

320

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  WET PROCESS DISADVANTAGES: • HIGH SLURRY MOISTURE CONTENT (30 - 40 %) • HIGH THERMIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION • DIFFICULTY IN GRINDING MATERIALS WITH DIFFERENT GRINDABILITY • HIGH WEAR COSTS • CLAY INCREASES SLURRY WATER CONTENT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

321

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  WET PROCESS OPEN CIRCUIT • ROTARY DISAGGREGATORS (for soft materials) • HORIZONTALS BALLS MILL with 2-3 compartments ( cylpebs in 3^ compartment, rubber liner and diaphragms in 2^ and 3^ compartment) Advantages: • simple installation and control

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

322

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  WET PROCESS

CLOSED CIRCUIT • HORIZONTALS BALLS MILL with 1-2 compartments • SLURRY CLASSIFIER: - curved 270° screens (DSM) - FLS centrifugal screens - Hydrocyclones - MOGENSEN

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

323

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  WET PROCESS CLOSED CIRCUIT - SLURRY CLASSIFIERS CURVED SCREEN (DSM) • most frequently used • lifetime of screen elements acceptable • low specific investment cost • spare part low cost • high throughput (200 t/h)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

324

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  WET PROCESS CLOSED CIRCUIT - SLURRY CLASSIFIERS FLS CENTRIFUGAL SCREEN • movable parts • high wear costs • investment specific cost high (4 times DSM) • kWh/t higher than DSM • throughput limited (100 t/h)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

325

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  WET PROCESS CLOSED CIRCUIT - SLURRY CLASSIFIERS HYDROCYCLONS • simple machines • require small volume • efficiency affected by slurry characteristics MOGENSEN • high specific investment cost • good efficiency • good lifetime • max throughput 120 t/h

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

326

4- SWEPT CIRCUIT  WET PROCESS

CLOSED CIRCUIT Advantages: • • • •

less wear inside the mill less electric power consumption more constant product quality less problems to grind raw materials with different grindability

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

327

5- COAL CIRCUIT



DIRECT FIRING



SEMI DIRECT FIRING

 INDIRECT FIRING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

328

5- COAL CIRCUIT DIRECT FIRING : the ground coal is sent directly to the rotary kiln without storage and mill outlet production must be adjusted to the kiln consumption.

1: Raw coal silo 2: Air heater 3: Coal mill

4: Primary air fan 5: Rotary kiln

Italcementi Group

Disadvantage: Kiln performances depend on mill performances PIC Grinding September 2005

329

5- COAL CIRCUIT SEMI DIRECT FIRING : a feed hopper with a few hours storage capacity allows the process to be more elastic 1: Raw coal silo 2: Air heater 3: Coal mill 4: Cyclone 5: Feed hopper

6: Circulating air fan 7: Primary air fan 8: Circulating air 9: Rotary kiln

Disadvantage: Kiln performances depend on mill performances Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

330

5- COAL CIRCUIT INDIRECT FIRING: Grinding and burning process not linked 1: Raw coal silo 2: Air heater 3: Coal mill 4: Cyclone 5: Coal dust silo 6: Circulating air fan 7: Filter 8: Exhaust fan 9: Circulating air 10: Primary air fan 11: Rotary kiln

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

331

6- CEMENT CIRCUIT CEMENT GRINDING

BALL MILL

ROLLER PRESS

O.C.

Finish grinding

C.C.

Ball mill

VERTICAL MILL O. C.

Standard circuit

Italcementi Group

Double rotator

PIC Grinding September 2005

C.C. 332

6- CEMENT CIRCUIT

 ONE FILTER CEMENT CIRCUIT  ONE FILTER SERIAL CEMENT CIRCUIT

 TWO FILTER CEMENT CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

333

6- CEMENT CIRCUIT  ONE FILTER CEMENT CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

334

6- CEMENT CIRCUIT  ONE FILTER CEMENT CIRCUIT  ADVANTAGES : • LOW SPECIFIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION • LOW MAINTENANCE • CHEAPER INVESTMENT THAN TWO FILTER CIRCUIT

 DISADVANTAGES: • TUBE VENTILATION AND SEPARATOR DEDUSTING DIFFICULT TO ADJUST • LOWER DRYING AND COOLING CAPACITY THAN TWO FILTERS CIRCUIT • TWO SEPARATORS ==> TWO FINAL PRODUCTS Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

335

6- CEMENT CIRCUIT  ONE FILTER SERIAL CEMENT CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

336

6- CEMENT CIRCUIT  ONE FILTER SERIAL CEMENT CIRCUIT  ADVANTAGES : • ONLY ONE FINENESS CHECK POINT • LOW MAINTENANCE • CHEAPER INVESTMENT THAN TWO FILTER CIRCUIT • LOWEST POWER CONSUMPTION

 DISADVANTAGES: • LIMITED COOLING CAPACITY IN THE SEPARATOR • HIGH NEGATIVE PRESSURE IN THE CIRCUIT => RISK OF FALSE AIR

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

337

6- CEMENT CIRCUIT  TWO FILTER CEMENT CIRCUIT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

338

6- CEMENT CIRCUIT  TWO FILTER CEMENT CIRCUIT  ADVANTAGES : • HIGH COOLING CAPACITY • HIGH DRYING CAPACITY • CLASSIFYING AND TUBE VENTILATION FUNCTIONS NOT LINKED

 DISADVANTAGES: • HIGHER INVESTMENT COST (TWO FILTERS) • TWO FINENESS CHECK POINTS • HIGHER MAINTENANCE COST • HIGHER ENERGY CONSUMPTION IF COOLING IS NOT NECESSARY

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

339

VIII - CIRCUIT PROCESS CONTROL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

340

VIII- CIRCUIT PROCESS CONTROL CLOSED CIRCUIT Mill feed •

MILL FEED

BY

ELEVATOR MOTOR POWER

( affected by mechanical problems of bucket elevator ) or •

MILL FEED

BY

SEPARATOR REJECT WEIGTH

( impact weight feeder requires frequent calibration and proper installation) and •

MILL FEED

BY

MILL FIRST COMPARTMENT NOISE

( electronic ear needs proper installation and its signal is affected by surrounding noises) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

341

VIII- CIRCUIT PROCESS CONTROL CLOSED CIRCUIT Mill outlet or product temperature Cooling: • MILL OUTLET TEMPERATURE BY WATER SPRYING IN

• •

- 1st compartment (from mill inlet) with hot clinker - 2nd compartment (from intermediate or outlet diaphragm) ( only for temperature > 100°C ) MILL OUTLET TEMPERATURE BY KEEPING MILL VENTILATION AT MAXIMUM LEVEL FINISH PRODUCT TEMPERATURE BY SEPARATOR FRESH AIR INTAKE ( suitable for 2nd and 3rd generation dynamic separators ) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

342

VIII- CIRCUIT PROCESS CONTROL CLOSED CIRCUIT Mill outlet or product temperature Heating and drying •





MILL OUTLET TEMPERATURE BY BURNER’S FUEL => risk of cement quality by unburned => maximum mill inlet temperature for cement grinding 350 °C or MILL OUTLET TEMPERATURE BY FRESH AIR DUMPER ON HOT GASES DUCT FROM HEATING SOURCE

PRODUCT TEMPERATURE BY RECIRCULATION DUMPER AND/OR FRESH AIR DUMPER IN SEPARATOR’S AIR RECIRCULATION SYSTEM => 2nd and 3rd generation dynamic separators Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

343

VIII- CIRCUIT PROCESS CONTROL CLOSED CIRCUIT DOUBLE ROTATOR MILL

IN ADDITION TO THE CONTROL AS FOR STANDARD CIRCUIT • MATERIAL FILLING DEGREE OF MILL’S COMPARTMENTS ( electronic ear for each compartment ) BY DISTRIBUTION OF SEPARATOR REJECT FLOW BETWEEN GRINDING AND FINISHING COMPARTMENTS • AIR FLOW ( fresh or hot ) IN FINISHING COMPARTMENT MANUALLY ADJUSTED FOR PROPER MILL VENTILATION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

344

VIII- CIRCUIT PROCESS CONTROL AIR SWEPT MILL CIRCUIT

• VENTILATION THROUGH THE MILL CONSTANT ( measured by Venturi before mill fan) BY DUMPER OF MILL FAN • MILL FEED BY DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE THROUGH THE MILL or • MILL FEED BY MILL NOISE (ELECTRONIC EAR) • DRYING CAPACITY BY GAS RECIRCULATION Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

345

VIII- CIRCUIT PROCESS CONTROL VERTICAL MILL CIRCUIT FOR RAW MATERIALS • VENTILATION THROUGHT THE MILL CONSTANT BY MILL EXHAUST FAN

• MILL FEED BY MILL DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE • MILL INLET DEPRESSURE BY FRESH AIR DUMPER AT THE MILL INLET

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

346

VIII- CIRCUIT PROCESS CONTROL VERTICAL MILL CIRCUIT FOR RAW MATERIALS • MILL OUTLET GAS TEMPERATURE BY MILL INLET GAS TEMPERATURE ( kiln spray tower or furnace ) or / and • MILL OUTLET GAS TEMPERATURE BY WATER SPRAY INSIDE THE MILL The mill outlet temperature affects a lot the steady running of the mill ( good control of vibrations ) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

347

IX - INFLUENT PARAMETERS ON kWh/T 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8.

Mill Speed Ball-Material Filling Degree Ball Charge Liners and Diaphragms (Circulating Load) Ventilation and Air Velocities False Air Mill Feed Moisture Product Fineness

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

348

1- MILL SPEED

42.3

Critical speed =

= g/I’ Useful D (m) 76.6

Critical speed =

= g/I’ Useful D (feet)

Rotation speed = 70  77% critical speed

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

349

2- BALL-MATERIAL FILLING DEGREE % of critical speed

Ball volume in % of global volume

0

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

350

2- BALL-MATERIAL FILLING DEGREE

INFLUENCE OF MATERIAL FILLING DEGREE AND CIRCULATING LOAD ON MILL PERFORMANCES EXAMPLE OF SPEED PLANT CEMENT (95% CK + 5% G) MILL SEPARATOR THROUGHPUT t/h MILL POWER kW MILL CONSUMPTION kW/t CIRCULATING LOAD t/h BLAINE cm²/g

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

SPEED TYPE 1 FLS 13 * 43 OSEPA N1500 68.9 73.5 2900 2900 42.1 39.5 226.7 283.0 3600 3580

351

2- BALL-MATERIAL FILLING DEGREE

t/h kWh/t

% volume load

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

352

2- BALL-MATERIAL FILLING DEGREE  BALL/MATERIAL VOLUME LOAD First chamber

Second chamber

Second chamber

First chamber

Mill material level

HOW TO CHECK CORRECT MATERIAL FILLING: • CIRCULATING LOAD • MILL INSPECTION AFTER CRUSH STOP • MILL NOISE Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

353

3- BALL CHARGE

PLANT MILL SEPARATOR WORKSHOP PRODUCT FINENESS THROUGHPUT MILL POWER MILL CONSUMPTION FIRST CHAMBER SECOND CHAMBER FIRST CHAMBER SECOND CHAMBER

Italcementi Group

t/h kW kWh/t t t m²/t m²/t

CRUAS FCB 2.2*13.0 Polysius TSU-DSE Cement 2 CPJ (white cement) Blaine=4230 cm²/g 14.2 15.3 560 529 39.5 34.6 13.8 13.9 47.2 43.7 10.8 10.6 26.7 31.8

PIC Grinding September 2005

TRIESTE TOSI 10' * 22' Stutevant 16' Raw 2 Raw product R90=6.0 to 6.6% 29.5 34.9 754 762 31.1 21.8 18.7 18.0 37.5 35.6 9.5 9.2 19.4 14.2

354

4- LINERS AND DIAPHRAGMS  CIRCULATING LOAD

Circulating load Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

355

5- VENTILATION AND AIR VELOCITIES  VENTILATION IN THE MILL

• Goal:

=> Decreases the cement temperature (finished mill) => Dries the raw material in raw mills (hot gas) => Helps the ultra-fines to escape from the mill (improve the by-pass of fines and avoid overgrinding and coating)

• Characteristics: => Ventilation in the mill (closed circuit): 1 to 2 m/s (*) => Ventilation in the mill (closed circuit + drying chamber mill): 4 to 7 m/s (*) => Mill design (type of command, bearing & diaphragm) (*) referred to free volume inside the mill and outlet mill air flow Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

356

5- VENTILATION AND AIR VELOCITIES  MILL VENTILATION AND AIR VELOCITIES

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

357

6- FALSE AIR Point to care after for checking false air in the mill circuit

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

358

6- FALSE AIR



kWh/t



Mill ventilation



Mill efficiency



Drying capacity

How to fight false air: * Control air tightness into the circuit * Temperature through the circuit * Gas analysis (only with furnace or kiln gas) Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

359

7- MILL FEED MOISTURE

 MAXIMUM DRYING CAPACITY OF HORIZONTAL MILLS WITHOUT DRYING CHAMBER: => 1.5% OF WATER IN FRESH FEED MATERIAL

 FURTHER THIS PERCENTAGE THE ENERGY MAY BE BROUGHT BY EXTERNAL HEAT SOURCE (care about quality !!!)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

360

7- MILL FEED MOISTURE

PLANT CEMENT MILL SEPARATOR MATERIAL INLET MOISTURE BLAINE cm²/g THROUGHPUT t/h CONSUMPTION kWh/t R90 µm % CLINKER °C HOT GAS °C

Italcementi Group

HALYPS II35 (16.5% pozzolane) KHD 3*8.2 O & K 5000 2.7 TO 2.8% 3500 27.3 29.1 33.5 32.9 30.1 26.1 4.6 4.4 COLD 125 125 No No 160

PIC Grinding September 2005

361

8- PRODUCT FINENESS  PRODUCTION INCREASE THEORETICAL FOR CEMENT MILL WITH PREGRINDING

Production increase theoretical for cement mill with pregrinding, calculation according to BOND (with correction factors), reduction of mill fresh feed P80 from 15 mm down to x mm

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

362

8- PRODUCT FINENESS FRESH FEED GRANULOMETRY: 0  30 mm 0  120 mm

Horizontal mills Vertical mills

P80 = 20 mm P80 = 80 mm (depending on rollers size)

FINISH PRODUCT FINENESS: Raw meal

residue 90 mm 5  15 % residue 200 mm 0  1.5 %

(depending on kiln type)

Coal

residue 90 mm 5  18 % residue 200 mm 0  2 %

(depending on coal type)

OPCement 32.5 OPCement 42.5 OPCement 52.5

Blaine 2800  3300 cm2/g Blaine 3300  3800 cm2/g Blaine 3800  5000 cm2/g

(depending on clinker reactivity)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

363

X - MILL CHECK UP 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

Timing before Check-Up To do before Crash-stop Mill Visit Circulating Load Measurement Data Evaluation

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

364

1- TIMING BEFORE CHECK-UP  Mill and circuit evaluation, from control room and on the field, during steady and current mill running conditions.  If necessary, adjust the running conditions in order to optimize the mill operation.  Try to get a good knowledge of the problems affecting the installation. In the case of production of two different products, a check-up has to be foreseen for each quality. If not possible, choose the product with lower fineness (higher mill capacity).

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

365

1- TIMING BEFORE CHECK-UP

TO BE PREPARED BY THE CEMENT PLANT :    

Workshop visit with somebody from manufacturing. Sampling points identification, accessibility and reliability. Process data of last months or weeks. Feeders and electrical energy meters reliability.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

366

2- TO DO BEFORE CRASH-STOP 



  

  

Workshop visit with somebody from manufacturing department (somebody used to run the mill). Take in control room the running mill parameters (screen printing and production report). Electrical energy meters state and values Feeders state and values. Take samples of material in the circuit (from feeders to finish product) for moisture content and size distribution analysis. Make flow, pressure and temperature measurements into the gas circuit. Take material temperatures into the circuit. Gas analysis, if possible (O2 mainly), in case of kiln gas or furnace gas use.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

367

2- TO DO BEFORE CRASH-STOP  FLOW SHEET

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

368

2- TO DO BEFORE CRASH-STOP  PLANT DATA

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

369

2- TO DO BEFORE CRASH-STOP  PLANT DATA

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

370

2- TO DO BEFORE CRASH-STOP  MEASURE POINTS

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

371

2- TO DO BEFORE CRASH-STOP  CYCLE SAMPLING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

372

2- TO DO BEFORE CRASH-STOP

S:duct section (m) Ps:static pressure (pa) T:temperature (°C) Patm:atmospheric pressure (Pa) Patm=101325Pa=14.7 PSI Pd:dynamic pressure (Pa) d:density (Kg/Nm3):dair=1.293 (See values on following page) Q:throughput (Nm3/h) k: for a Pitot => k=1 for a Beri =>0.7
( Patm  Ps).273 K'  Patm. (273  T )

Gas velocity V (m/s)

V  k.

2. Pd 2  k . Pd K '. d K '. d

Gas throughput (Nm3/h)

Q  S .V . K '.3600 Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

373

2- TO DO BEFORE CRASH-STOP Density values: %O2 in gas DRY PROCESS 2% 1% H2O in Raw 4% PF=35,06% 6% 500 ppm CO 8% 10% 12% SEMI-DRY PROCESS 2% 13% H2O Raw 4% PF=35.68% 6% 500 ppm CO 8% 10% 12% WET PROCESS 2% 35% H2O Raw 4% PF=35,41% 6% 500 ppm CO 8% 10% 12%

Italcementi Group

Coal 1.46 1.44 1.42 1.41 1.39 1.37 1.36 1.36 1.35 1.34 1.33 1.32 1.23 1.23 1.24 1.24 1.25 1.25

PIC Grinding September 2005

Fuel 1.39 1.38 1.37 1.36 1.35 1.34 1.34 1.34 1.33 1.33 1.32 1.32 1.20 1.21 1.22 1.22 1.23 1.24

Gas 1.35 1.35 1.34 1.33 1.33 1.32 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.29 1.17 1.18 1.19 1.20 1.21 1.22

374

2- TO DO BEFORE CRASH-STOP  CRASH STOP

Machines have to be stopped in emergency (all at the same time)

The plant has to prepare the visit inside the mill (doors opening, ladders, lights, plastic bags, spoons) taking care about

Safety procedures

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

375

3- MILL VISIT BALL CHARGE MATERIAL SAMPLING First chamber

Second chamber

Take samples (# 10 balls in first chamber and 15 to 20 in second chamber) every meter all along the mill. Material (0.5 kg) has to be taken at the same places. Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

Samples have to be taken on this side

376

3- MILL VISIT Why ? To calculate the ball charge filling ratio and check the mill power consumption according to CTG - CMM formula. To evaluate the material filling degree of each compartment. Why ? To evaluate material flow capacity and air speed through the diaphragm, the risk to have balls passing through the diaphragm, the maximum filling degree and forecast maintenance

slot plugging ratio thickness Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

377

3- MILL VISIT • Inlet and outlet mill heads: thickness Why? To check gas velocity, the maximum filling degree and forecast maintenance • * * Number of liner raws * Check liners thickness, wear, breakage and the eventual gaps between liners * Coating on balls and on liners Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

Why? Grinding efficiency Maintenance

378

3- MILL VISIT

Points to check: • • • • •

Italcementi Group

Material spread Maximum and minimum ball size Balls wear, breakage and deformation Balls charge spread Coating on balls, liners, diaphragms

PIC Grinding September 2005

379

3- MILL VISIT  MILL INTERNAL SITUATION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

380

3- MILL VISIT  CLASSIFIER INTERNAL CHARACTERISTICS N° of fan blades

N° of valves

Short Medium Long

Ring

Italcementi Group

N° of selector blades

PIC Grinding September 2005

381

4- CIRCULATING LOAD MEASUREMENT A CIRCULATING LOAD: A = R + F (t / h) or A / F (ratio)

R

FRESH FEED

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

F

382

4- CIRCULATING LOAD MEASUREMENT

Weight some (3 - 4) buckets of the mill discharge elevator to check the circulating load (calculated by size distribution curve analysis of separator). If an impact flow meter on the separator rejects has been installed, check the indication.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

383

4- CIRCULATING LOAD MEASUREMENT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

384

XI - DATA EVALUATION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

385

DATA EVALUATION            Italcementi Group

GRINDING EFFICIENCY SEPARATOR BALL CHARGE BALLS / MATERIAL BALLS CLASSIFICATION COATING LINERS AND DIAPHRAGMS VENTILATION AND FALSE AIR THERMAL BALANCE MATERIAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION MILL FEED MOISTURE PIC Grinding September 2005

386

XII - EFFICIENCY EVALUATION 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Grinding Efficiency Material Size Distribution Mill Separator Circuit Ventilation Review of parameters

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

387

1- GRINDING EFFICIENCY

ENERGY LOST: • Attrition / impact between balls and liners • Attrition / impact between balls • Strain elastic energy • Acoustic energy (noise) and vibration • Overgrinding and reagglomeration

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

388

1- GRINDING EFFICIENCY

=> Impact

=> => =>

Temperature Liner wear Ball wear

=> Attrition

=> => =>

Temperature Liner wear Ball wear

=> =>

Temperature Ball wear

=> Impact & Attrition Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

389

1- GRINDING EFFICIENCY ENERGY CONVERSION

310%

100%

9097% Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

390

1- GRINDING EFFICIENCY

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

391

1- GRINDING EFFICIENCY

CONCLUSION:

1 to 3 % OF THE GLOBAL GRINDING ENERGY IS USEFULL ENERGY FOR PARTICLE SIZE REDUCTION Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

392

1- GRINDING EFFICIENCY

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

393

1- GRINDING EFFICIENCY

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

394

1- GRINDING EFFICIENCY

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

395

1- GRINDING EFFICIENCY

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

396

2- MATERIAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Evaluate the influence of mill filter fineness on the final product quality (in some case, it can be opportune to recycle the filter product into circuit). Care: dedusting points can affect the final product fineness.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

397

2- MATERIAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

398

2- MATERIAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

399

2- MATERIAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

400

2- MATERIAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

401

3- MILL Material filling degree versus ball charge

Max filling ratio filling ratio

Actual

Mill installed power absorbed power

Mill

Possibility to increase production Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

402

3- MILL

% volume load

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

403

3- MILL Low filling material level in the mill First chamber

Second chamber

Mill material level

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

404

3- MILL High filling material level in the mill First chamber

Second chamber

Mill material level

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

405

3- MILL Correct filling material level in the mill First chamber

Second chamber

Mill material level

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

406

3- MILL  BALLS CLASSIFICATION INSIDE THE MILL

Average balls diameter Criteria : • Straight line in C1 • Decreasing line in C2 C.1.1

C.1. n

C.2.1

C.2.n

Ball classification affected by : • ball charge filling degree • material filling degree Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

407

3- MILL  BALLS CLASSIFICATION INSIDE THE MILL

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

408

3- MILL  BALLS CLASSIFICATION INSIDE THE MILL

BAD CLASSIFICATION Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

409

3- MILL  BALLS CLASSIFICATION INSIDE THE MILL

GOOD CLASSIFICATION Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

410

3- MILL  BALLS CLASSIFICATION INSIDE THE MILL

BAD CLASSIFICATION Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

411

3- MILL

85-95 75-85 65-75 First chamber length

Italcementi Group

Second chamber: Correct Charge classification inversion Ball percentage

Ball percentage

First chamber: No classification for a correct efficiency

"V" classification

22-27

Second chamber length

PIC Grinding September 2005

412

3- MILL

Results of ball charge sampling using the average balls diameter Mono-chamber mill (diameter 10' x 22'). MONOPOLI plant (Italy)

100 80 60 40 20 0

84

69

60

er s

Average ball diameter 29

6

m et

er s

m et

er s 5

m et

er s 4

m et

er s 3

m et

er

40

2

m et 1 Italcementi Group

74

PIC Grinding September 2005

413

3- MILL  BALLS CHARGE BULK DENSITY

lbs/ft3

mt/m3

Compartment 1

280.91

4.50

Compartment 2

290.27

4.65

Mono chamber

284.03

4.55

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

414

3- MILL  METER SAMPLING AND CHARGE MOVEMENT

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

415

3- MILL  CUMULATED SIZE DISTRIBUTION CURVE Criteria :

% retained

•end of C1 : max 5% > 2.5 mm

 µ

•end of C2 : 10 - 20% < 90 µm for closed circuit •decreasing line in C1 & C2

C1.1

C1.n

C2.1

C2.n

Sieving : 20 mm, 10 mm, 5 mm, 2.5 mm; 1.5 mm, 630 µm, 320 µm, 160 µm, 80 µm, 40 µm. Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

416

3- MILL  MILL INTERNAL SAMPLING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

417

3- MILL  MILL INTERNAL SAMPLING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

418

3- MILL  MILL INTERNAL SAMPLING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

419

3- MILL  MILL INTERNAL SAMPLING

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

420

29/04/2002

C.T.G. - Italcementi Group - Comminution Department Company Plant Department Circuit type New charge date Mill speed Critical speed

g/1' g/1'

Critical speed 1st chamber

Characteristics Type of liner Diaphragm slots Measured free height Ratio steel / cement Useful diameter Useful lenght Useful lenght Total volume compart. Ball charge density Charge volume Filling degree Calculated free height Ball charge to add for each cm of free height Ball charge D = 100 mm D = 90 mm D = 80 mm D = 70 mm D = 60 mm D = 50 mm D = 40 mm D = 30 mm D = 25 mm D = 20 mm D = 17 mm Cil 25x25 mm Cil 22x22 mm Cil 19x19 mm Cil 16x16 mm

18,63 Installed power 27,8 Absorbed power 67,1% Ratio L/Ø

Av. size ball

mm

kW kW

mm m % m m % m³ t/m³ m³ % m

°C

Inlet 5,32

1st compartment

2nd compartment

6,0

6,0

Free area for gases Outlet m² m² 3rd compartment

2,320 3,200 25,9 13,5 4,49 4,0 29,9 1,53

mm m % m m % m³ t/m³ m³ % m

2,320 9,150 74,1 38,7 4,79 11,6 30,1 1,53

mm m % m m % m³ t/m³ m³ % m

t

0,32

t

0,97

t

t

%

t

%

6,42 3,75 3,75 4,28

18,2 Total compartement Mill total t 74,0 Ball S.S. Surface m² 1.711 Surface Av, weight ball g

3- MILL

Mill Feed point Hot gases Hot gas temperature Separator

35,3 20,6 20,6 23,5

24,6 m²/t m²

150 Av, weight ball g 33 Av. size ball mm

Italcementi Group

m

2

m

2

t

%

m

 MILL BALL CHARGE

2

54 36 41 54

4,22 8,45 3,56

7,6 15,1 6,4

65 161 91

39,60

70,9

1209

185 55,8 10,2 Ball S.S. 185 Surface

75,4 m²/t m²

1598 Av, weight ball g 73 Av. size ball mm

1525

27,3 Ball S.S. 1.525 Surface

m²/t m²

116 Av, weight ball g 30 Av. size ball mm

PIC Grinding September 2005

421

3- MILL

COATING

30% of grinding efficiency can be lost

Reasons:  Important retention time into the mill  High temperature in second chamber ( >110° C at mill discharge)  Raw material moisture + low temperature in first chamber  Low filling degree of material versus balls in the compartments  Grinding of cement types with high limestone content

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

422

3- MILL COATING Remedies :  Appropriate ventilation in the mill  Add water (calculated by thermal balance) in order to maintain a correct temperature at the mill outlet (< 105 °C)  Use grinding aid  If possible, use 2-3 % of abrasive material (slag, sand, ...)  Concerning a possible coating in first chamber due to moisture, the remedy is to increase t° ( tails, clinker t°, hot gas into mill).

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

423

3- MILL Diaphragm slots dimensions

– outlet diaphragm slots dimension > intermediate diaphragm slots dimension – slots clogging affect material retention time and mill ventilation (clogging degrees < 40% of free area) Liners wear

– affect the reliability of liners

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

424

3- MILL

Circulating load Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

425

4- SEPARATOR

Tromp (%) curve

Separator efficiency

Selectivity = f (securing) Material sampling evaluation Feeding (A)

Tails (T)

Fines (F)

Italcementi Group

Laser & Alpine Results

Selectivity

What percentage of a given particle size in the classifier feed is discharged in the tailing.

PIC Grinding September 2005

426

4- SEPARATOR KNOW HOW !!!

Italcementi Group

SELECTIVITY

PIC Grinding September 2005

427

4- SEPARATOR Monselice plant - Finish mill #4 Separator UM 6700

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

428

4- SEPARATOR TROMP CURVE Selectivity (%)

Tails in fines

Global by-pass (Stg)

P(t) 50 % Imperfection= (d75 - d25) / 2d50 By-pass slope (Pts) Fines in tails Particle size (μm)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

Minimum by-pass (St) Log 429

4- SEPARATOR

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

430

4- SEPARATOR

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

431

5- CIRCUIT VENTILATION • Goal: => Decreases the cement temperature (finished mill) => Dries the raw material in raw mills (hot gas) => Helps the ultra-fines to escape from the mill (improve the by- pass of fines and avoid overgrinding and coating) • Characteristics: => Ventilation in the mill (closed circuit): 1 to 2 m/s (*) => Ventilation in the mill (closed circuit + drying chamber mill): 4 to 7 m/s (*) => Mill design (type of command, bearing & diaphragm) (*) referred to free volume inside the mill and outlet mill air flow Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

432

5- CIRCUIT VENTILATION We must have a good idea of the ventilation through the mill. A particular attention has to be taken to the false air entrances in the circuit. Tube ventilation: Open circuit: 250-350 Nm3/mt of finished product 0.5-0.8 m/s (gas net speed inside mill) Closed circuit: 300-600 Nm3/mt of finished product 0.7-2. m/s (gas net speed inside mill) Mill inlet / outlet head ventilation: Maximum of 35 m/s False air : to be kept to the minimum normal range: 20 - 40% of the inlet gas flow Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

433

5- CIRCUIT VENTILATION False air affects a lot the mill ventilation and energy power consumption False air can provide from:  Mill tube: inlet joints outlet joints material feed  Mill discharge  Dedusting  Bag filter jet pulsing  Flaps airtightness  high negative pressure ducts and machines  ... Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

434

5- CIRCUIT VENTILATION Point to care after for checking false air in the mill circuit

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

435

5- CIRCUIT VENTILATION THE PLANT ENERGY CONSUPTION DEPENDS ON THE PRESSURE DROPS IN FILTER, MILL, ...

THE CONTROL OF PRESSURE IN DIFFERENT POINTS OF THE CIRCUIT IN THE GRINDING PLANT IS CRUCIAL TO MINIMIZE THE GRINDING ENERGY CONSUMPTION CHECK THE PROCESS FAN EFFICIENCY AND THE DAMPER OPENING: THIS POINTS COULD COST A LOT OF ENERGY Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

436

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  THERMAL BALANCE - DEW POINT

Due to the material moisture, the dew point has to prevent bag filter from clogging. =>  (bag filter gas temperature - dew point temperature) > 30°C P in Kg/cm2 Vaporisation pressure: Pv  Pgs.(1  %H 2 O) 1 with P: absolute pressure in Pgh .%H 2 O Kg/cm2 (mbars*0.00102) P = Patm.-chimney depressure Pgs = Volumic mass of dry gas Pgh = Volumic mass of wet gas

Italcementi Group

Temperature of condensation: Tc 

5168  273,16 in °C 13,89  ln( Pv)

PIC Grinding September 2005

437

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  MATERIAL SIZE DISTRIBUTION

Evaluate the influence of mill filter fineness on the final product quality (in some case, it can be opportune to recycle the filter product into circuit). Care: dedusting points can affect the final product fineness.

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

438

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  BALL - MATERIAL FILLING

INFLUENCE OF MATERIAL FILLING DEGREE AND CIRCULATING LOAD ON MILL PERFORMANCES EXAMPLE OF SPEED PLANT CEMENT (95% CK + 5% G) MILL SEPARATOR THROUGHPUT t/h MILL POWER kW MILL CONSUMPTION kW/t CIRCULATING LOAD t/h BLAINE cm²/g

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

SPEED TYPE 1 FLS 13 * 43 OSEPA N1500 68.9 73.5 2900 2900 42.1 39.5 226.7 283.0 3600 3580

439

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  BALL CHARGE PLANT MILL SEPARATOR WORKSHOP PRODUCT FINENESS THROUGHPUT MILL POWER MILL CONSUMPTION FIRST CHAMBER SECOND CHAMBER FIRST CHAMBER SECOND CHAMBER

Italcementi Group

t/h kW kWh/t t t m²/t m²/t

CRUAS FCB 2.2*13.0 Polysius TSU-DSE Cement 2 CPJ (white cement) Blaine=4230 cm²/g 14.2 15.3 560 529 39.5 34.6 13.8 13.9 47.2 43.7 10.8 10.6 26.7 31.8

PIC Grinding September 2005

TRIESTE TOSI 10' * 22' Stutevant 16' Raw 2 Raw product R90=6.0 to 6.6% 29.5 34.9 754 762 31.1 21.8 18.7 18.0 37.5 35.6 9.5 9.2 19.4 14.2

440

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  MILL FEED MOISTURE

 MAXIMUM DRYING CAPACITY OF HORIZONTAL MILLS WITHOUT DRYING CHAMBER: => 1.5% OF WATER IN FRESH FEED MATERIAL

 FURTHER THIS PERCENTAGE THE ENERGY MAY BE BROUGHT BY EXTERNAL HEAT SOURCE (care about quality !!!)

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

441

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  MILL VENTILATION

CASE OF WET MATERIAL PLANT MILL SEPARATOR CEMENT THROUGHPUT MILL POWER MILL CONSUMPTION AUXILIARY POWER AUXILIARY CONSUMPTION GLOBAL POWER GLOBAL CONSUMPTION MILL VENTILATION DAMPER SEPARATOR VENTILATION DAMPER ELEVATOR ABSORPTION PRESEPARATOR EXIT DEPRESSION

ventilation => Italcementi Group

3400 cm²/g t/h wet kW kWh/t kW kWh/t kW kWh/t % % A mmCA

throughput & PIC Grinding September 2005

ANKARA FLS 4*11.5 FLS Sepax KC32.5 (16% pozzolane) 96.75 103.95 2672 2639 27.62 25.39 395 458 4.08 4.41 3067 3097 31.70 29.79 35 MAX 80 42 MAX 50 64 70 148 223.0

kWh/t 442

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS MILL FEED MOISTURE PLANT CEMENT MILL SEPARATOR MATERIAL INLET MOISTURE BLAINE cm²/g THROUGHPUT t/h CONSUMPTION kWh/t R90 µm % CLINKER °C HOT GAS °C

Italcementi Group

HALYPS II35 (16.5% pozzolane) KHD 3*8.2 O & K 5000 2.7 TO 2.8% 3500 27.3 29.1 33.5 32.9 30.1 26.1 4.6 4.4 COLD 125 125 No No 160

PIC Grinding September 2005

443

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  BALL MILL EFFICIENCY

 Independent of material grindability  Lied to plant efficiency  Usually equal to:  0.85 for open circuit  0.87 for closed circuit with first generation separator  0.95 to 1 for closed circuit with 2nd and 3rd generation separator

 Limit: air swept mills Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

444

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  BALL MILL EFFICIENCY

LABORATORY TEST => specific energy at given Blaine fineness [Elab.mech. x (kWh/t at given fineness)] INDUSTRIAL DATA => Eindustrial electr (kWh/t at given fineness) Elab.mech / drive eff. = Elab.electr. ball mill efficiency = Elab.electr. / Eindustrial electr. With drive efficiency = 0.91 for pinion and girth drive = 0.92 for central drive Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

445

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  BALL MILL EFFICIENCY CALCULATION

ALSING TEST => Alsing specific energy for a given Blaine fineness [E mecha. (kWh/t / given fineness)] INDUSTRIAL DATA => E industrial elec. (kWh/t / given fineness) EAl sin g . elec . hBall . mill  Eindustrial . elec

Emecha .  EAl sin g . elec . hmecha .

with hmecha . = 0.91 for pinion and gearless drive = 0.92 for central drive Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

446

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  BALL MILL EFFICIENCY CALCULATION

Characteristics of hBall . mill :

• Independent of material grindability • Lied to plant efficiency • Usually equal to: * 0.85 for opened circuit * 0.87 for closed circuit with first generation separator * 0.95 to 1 for closed circuit with 2nd and 3rd generation separator

• Limit: airswept mills Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

447

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  PLANT MILL EFFICIENCY CALCULATION 

PGrinding . plant  ESpecific. CA  ESpecific. roller . press  ESpecific. ball . mill Pr oduction

EAl sin g . CA  PLANT . EFFICIENCY  hBall . mill  hRoller. . press C ESpecific . A Why? Because the Alsing test is considered like a standard test and so hBall . mill = 100% for an optimized ball charge and a third generation classifier Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

448

6- REVIEW OF PARAMETERS  PLANT MILL EFFICIENCY CALCULATION

Example: CCB-DR8 (Belgium):

EAl sin g . CA  PLANT . EFFICIENCY  hBall . mill  hRoller. . press C ESpecific . A Plant efficiency = 13.9/(10.6+4.1) = 94.5%

Italcementi Group

PIC Grinding September 2005

449

Related Documents


More Documents from "Keshav Chhawchharia"

January 2021 2