People Vs Rodriguez (135 Scra 485) Digest

  • Uploaded by: Mhay Khaeyl Badajos AndohuYhan
  • 0
  • 0
  • March 2021
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View People Vs Rodriguez (135 Scra 485) Digest as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 376
  • Pages: 1
Loading documents preview...
Alvin V. Fuerte LLB-1 5A Criminal Law II PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES vs JAIME RODRIGUEZ (135 SCRA 485) Facts: The Appellants Jaime Rodriguez alias Jimmy alias Wilfred de Lara y Medrano, Rico Lopez, Davao Reyes alias Dario Dece Raymundo y Elausa and Peter Ponce y Bulaybulay alias Peter Power were crew members of the vessel M/V Noria 767, a barter trade vessel of Philippine Registry. On August 30, 1981, the accused-appellants armed with bladed weapons and high caliber firearms, forcibly steal and carried away the properties, equipments and personal belongings of the passengers and crew members of the vessel M/V Noria 767 in total amount of P3,687,300.00. The said act of piracy of the accused-appellants caused the death and injuries of the passengers and crew members of the said vessel. They were arrested by Malaysian Authorities and were turned over to the Philippine Authorities where they were charged of the crime of piracy before the then Court of First Instance of Sulu and Tawi-Tawi. The accused-appellants were all found guilty by the trial court and were sentenced each "to suffer the extreme penalty of death." Issue: Whether or not the trial court erred in imposing the death penalty? Held: No. The trial court is correct when it imposed death penalty to the accused-appellants. Presidential Decree No. 532, otherwise known as the Anti-Piracy Law, which took effect on August 8, 1974, provides: SEC. 3. Penalties.—Any person who commits piracy or highway robbery/brigandage as herein defined, shall, upon conviction by competent court be punished by: a) Piracy.—The penalty of reclusion temporal in its medium and maximum periods shall be imposed. If physical injuries or other crimes are committed as a result or on the occasion thereof, the penalty of reclusion perpetua shall be imposed. If rape, murder or no homocide is committed as a result or on the occasion of piracy, or when the offenders abandoned the victims without means of saving themselves, or when the seizure is accomplished by firing upon or boarding a vessel, the mandatory penalty of death shall be imposed. (Emphasis supplied) Clearly, the penalty imposable upon persons found guilty of the crime of piracy where rape, murder or homicide is committed is mandatory death penalty. The decision of the trial court was affirmed.

Related Documents


More Documents from "Jaece"