Thw Ban The Use Of Religion In Prison Rehabilitation Programmes

THW ban the use of religion in prison rehabilitation programmes.

Def: The use of religion: spreading the concept of divinity (spreading the value of punishment and reward given by God in hereafter) in rehabilitating a criminal in prison. Better to use counsellor / consultant. The concept is more concerning on human general values.

THW ban the use of religion in prison rehabilitation programmes.

Justification 1.

Religion closes the retional capacity The concept of God forces human to accept all sudden all decisions given by God, for example you cannot take people’s property because you will go to hell. This process doesn’t give rational and logical explanation to human brain, Religion influence their followers just to accept all the God’s concept without giving them chance to clarify, ask and analys the gospel. The wrong doer also may not regret to any mistakes they had done in the past due to the concept of religion told them that their mistakes and sins were forgiven by Chirist in Christianity and Allah in Islam. 2. The prisoners behaviour changing cannot be analysed and checked. How can you check people ‘s behaviour positive changing based on religion influences. This is hard to oversee the prisoners behaviour if it’s attached to divinity. 3. Religion rehabilitation exploite the prisoner. Some prisoners may don’t believe any God, this program forces the prisoners to listen and follow the teaching of the religion. Even some prisoners also believe to any God, but the ideas spread in religon rehabilitation might be a concept of dogma which may be contrast to individual’s understanding on religion, even worse by going to extremism due to the dogma that the preacher give.

1. Concept of religion is always equal to the concept of general human values. Religion ban its believers to do harms to other people even to any creatures. It bans people to do cheating, killing, smuggling, saying untruth and soon. But religion also inspires people to do good deeds in life, help others, love others etc. This value is coming from the greatest guy (God). 2. Prisoners should have the rehabilation program options. The options includes providing them general values programs and religion programs. Every individual has their own ways to relieve and forgive themselves. Religion is very intrinsic and personal to individual. They assume that religion rehabilitation is the only way they can pass the hard moment in their lives. They believe God the only one can sit beside them and listen to them. No forcing here, this is about a choice that people should have. People in SQ are able to chose what religion rehabilitation they want to attend, and if they dont agree or like the rehabilitation concept, they may out of the program. This shows us the option based on rational capacity is guaranteed. 3. In SQ, religion is legitimated to be beared. Religion in real life teaches its followers to do good deeds, no one want to do harms if they really understand the concept of religion. Even if some believers did wrong, a. this cannot be generalized to all cases, it can be done by a particular person, but B, religion teaching in homes and schools are still allowed given to our kids and students.

THW ban the use of religion in prison rehabilitation programmes.

Practical Arguments 1.

General moral values must be prioritised in rehabilation programs. It conceded about human relationship to other humans, harmony life, respect, love and caring, sympathy and so on. 2. The prisoners may not understand what they did in the past was wrong. No room for them to critize and ask further about the concept of religion. After they released, they can lose their believe to religion and back to the wrong ways.

1.

Religion allows its believers to ask, clarify and discuss things. The idea to influence religion followers should be supported by giving the chance to the prospect followers to ask things in their mind until they get the answers to satisfy them. But second, some religon also move forwad or in proggressive ways to adjust to human values. For example, some christians in liberal countries acknowledge the right of gays and accept them into their community even more become their prists in their churce. This occured because religion institution gives them the platform to express their ideas and ask the religion institution points.