Top Civil Engineering Firms
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Top Civil Engineering Firms as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 2,542
- Pages: 6
Loading documents preview...
APRIL 23, 2012
m
enr.com
THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK
THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., ranked first in transportation overall, sees an uptick in business due to more use of alternative approaches.
#01
Power comprises thermal and hydroelectric powerplants, waste-to-energy plants, transmission lines, substations, cogeneration plants, etc.
Water Supply includes dams, reservoirs, transmission pipelines, distribution mains, irrigation canals, desalination and potability treatment plants, pumping stations, etc.
TE ECO
M
WA S OUS ARD
LEU
O RT ATIO N
TRO / PE
6,875.2
3,027.0
36
0
7
7
8
0
31
12
0
2 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif. †
EAC
5,334.0
1,353.9
12
3
6
7
5
19
30
16
0
3
3 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif.
AEC
5,222.7
2,434.2
10
10
6
1
1
53
14
3
1
4
5 FLUOR CORP., Irving, Texas †
EC
4,029.4
3,462.7
0
0
3
0
0
91
0
5
0
5
4 CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo. †
EAC
3,903.0
1,563.6
5
4
8
14
15
19
22
13
0
TEL
EA
2
HAZ
1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. †
TRA
SEW
NSP
TE
WAT
1
IND
POW
US.
UPP
WA S
LY
RIN
G
ILDIN L BU
MAN
2011 REVENUE $ MIL. TOTAL INT’L
GEN
FIRM TYPE
ER /
RANK 2012 2011 FIRM
G
The Top 500 Design Firms
M
Transportation includes airports, bridges, roads, canals, locks, dredging, marine facilities, piers, railroads, tunnels, etc.
ER
Hazardous Waste includes chemical and nuclear waste treatment,
Petroleum includes refineries, petrochemical plants, offshore facilities, pipelines, etc.
CTU
General Building as a category includes commercial buildings, offices, stores, educational facilities, government buildings, hospitals, medical facilities, hotels, apartments, housing, etc.
Telecommunications comprises transmission lines and cabling, towers and antennae, data centers, etc.
Manufacturing includes auto, electronic assembly, textile plants, etc.
UFA
Companies are ranked according to revenue for design services performed in 2011 in $ millions (*). Those with subsidiaries are indicated by (†). For information on subsidiaries and where each firm worked
outside of the U.S., see www.ENR.com. **Firms not ranked last year. Some markets may not add up to 100% due to omission of “other” miscellaneous market category and rounding. NA=Not available.
Sewerage / Solid Waste includes sanitary and storm sewers, treatment plants, pumping plants, incinerators, industrial waste facilities, etc.
Industrial Process comprises pulp and paper mills, steel mills, non-ferrous metal refineries, pharmaceutical plants, chemical plants, food and other processing plants, etc.
ERA
KEY TO TYPE OF FIRM A architect, E engineer, EC engineercontractor, AE architect-engineer, EA engineer-architect, ENV environmental, GE geotechnical engineer, L landscape architect, P planner and O other. Other combinations are possible. Firms classified themselves.
asbestos and lead abatement, etc.
ER S
How to Read the Tables
The Top Design Firms in Transportation TRANSPORTATION RANK FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
HIGHWAYS RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2,102.9
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
803.5
2
URS CORP.
1,596.1
2
URS CORP.
601.7
3
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
1,042.9
3
HNTB COS.
474.7
4
CH2M HILL
852.4
4
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
420.1
5
HNTB COS.
813.9
5
CH2M HILL
398.8
MASS TRANSIT AND RAIL RANK
FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
AIRPORTS RANK
FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
585.4
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
284.1
2
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
497.0
2
URS CORP.
248.3
3
URS CORP.
330.4
3
HNTB COS.
67.1
4
JACOBS
320.8
4
JACOBS
64.2
5
STV GROUP INC.
196.1
5
BECHTEL
64.0
MARINE AND PORT FACILITIES RANK
FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2
CH2M HILL
$ MIL. REVENUE
BRIDGES RANK
FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
158.8
1
URS CORP.
365.6
86.8
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
271.2
3
MOFFATT & NICHOL
71.4
3
HNTB COS.
120.6
4
LOUIS BERGER GROUP
55.7
4
CH2M HILL
112.6
5
URS CORP.
50.1
5
MICHAEL BAKER CORP.
107.4
*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM TRANSPORTATION SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENR’S LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
2
$ MIL. REVENUE
n
ENR SOURCEBOOK
n
July 2, 2012 enr.com
The Top Design Firms in Environment SITE ASSESSMENT AND COMPLIANCE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
431.8
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
186.1
2
CH2M HILL
401.6
2
URS CORP.
111.6
3
ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE
270.0
3
TETRA TECH INC.
89.0
4
URS CORP.
235.8
4
MWH GLOBAL
83.0
5
TETRA TECH INC.
157.0
5
CDM SMITH
81.4
SEWERAGE AND SOLID WASTE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
CH2M HILL
597.8
1
CH2M HILL
486.8
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
536.2
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
350.1
3
MWH GLOBAL
399.0
3
MWH GLOBAL
307.0
4
CDM SMITH
264.3
4
CDM SMITH
152.5
5
URS CORP.
260.4
5
ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE
141.0
TRANSMISSION LINES AND AQUEDUCTS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
HAZARDOUS WASTE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
TETRA TECH INC.
187.0
1
URS CORP.
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
184.6
2
ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE
827.0
3
MWH GLOBAL
154.0
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
801.9
4
URS CORP.
56.6
4
CH2M HILL
489.7
5
HDR
51.7
5
TETRA TECH INC.
394.0
WATER SUPPLY
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
860.6
CHEMICAL AND SOIL REMEDIATION
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
TETRA TECH INC.
800.0
1
URS CORP.
2
CH2M HILL
542.4
2
ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE
469.0
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
468.6
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
322.9
4
MWH GLOBAL
466.0
4
TETRA TECH INC.
140.0
5
URS CORP.
353.6
5
PARSONS
114.4
WATER TREAT. AND DESALINATION PLANTS RANK FIRM
568.9
$ MIL. REVENUE
1
CH2M HILL
542.4
2
TETRA TECH INC.
462.0
3
MWH GLOBAL
278.0
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
157.0
5
CDM SMITH
139.7
*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM ENVIRONMENTAL SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENR’S LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 25 U.S. ARCHITECTURE FIRMS OF 2012 Companies are ranked by revenue (in millions of dollars) for architectural services performed in 2011. This data also appears in Engineering News-Record’s Top 500 Design Firms list, which, unlike our ranking, also includes engineering-exclusive firms.
RANK 2012
2011
FIRM, U.S. HEADQUARTERS
TYPE OF FIRM
1
2
Gensler, San Francisco
A
2
1
TOTAL ARCHITECTURAL REVENUE
764.08
AECOM, Los Angeles
EA
445.40 365.40
3
3
Perkins+Will, Chicago
A
4
84
CH2M HILL, Englewood, CO
EAC
365.10
5
4
HDR Architecture, Omaha
EA
364.10
Key to firm types A
Architect
AE
Architect Engineer
AP
Architect Planner
EAL Engineer Architect Landscape AEC Architect Engineer Contractor (not all combinations listed)
See the entire Top 250 Architecture Firms list at architecturalrecord.com/practice.
enr.com July 2, 2012
n
ENR SOURCEBOOK
n
3
The Top Design Firms in General Building GENERAL BUILDING
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
COMMERCIAL OFFICES
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2,484.8
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
654.2
2
GENSLER
708.3
2
GENSLER
402.2
3
URS CORP.
646.9
3
HOK
131.9
4
JACOBS
543.5
4
JACOBS
102.7
5
HOK
386.7
5
CH2M HILL
GOVERNMENT OFFICES
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
97.8
HEALTH CARE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
637.2
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
314.3
2
JACOBS
248.1
2
HDR
205.2
3
URS CORP.
169.6
3
PERKINS+WILL
162.4
4
AMEC
144.3
4
CANNON DESIGN
146.6
5
TETRA TECH INC.
106.5
5
HKS INC.
124.7
HOTELS, MOTELS & CONVENTION CENTERS RANK FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
SPORTS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
296.4
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2
GENSLER
51.5
2
POPULOUS
75.9
3
HKS INC.
32.2
3
HNTB COS.
21.9
4
HOK
17.2
4
URS CORP.
20.8
5
URS CORP.
14.8
5
HKS INC.
16.4
RETAIL
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
217.2
CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
136.0
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
88.8
2
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC.
98.8
2
HDR
39.2
3
GENSLER
84.7
3
HOK
27.4
4
TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC.
70.7
4
URS CORP.
25.1
5
HENDERSON ENGINEERS INC.
44.8
5
STV GROUP INC.
20.8
MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
EDUCATION
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
36.1
1
PARSONS
2
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
32.6
2
URS CORP.
113.3 106.8
3
URS CORP.
18.7
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
104.7
4
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC.
17.4
4
JACOBS
96.3
5
WSP USA
17.3
5
PERKINS+WILL
76.5
*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM GENERAL BUILDING SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENR’S LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
The Top 50 Program Management Firms
Construction Management-for-Fee/PM Firms 2011 REVENUE IN $ MIL.
2011 REVENUE IN $ MIL.
RANK 2012
DOMESTIC REVENUE
TOTAL REVENUE
RANK 2012 2011
FIRM TYPE
TOTAL REVENUE
INT'L REVENUE
1 CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo.
1,982.8
217.5
2,200.3
1
1
BECHTEL, San Francisco, Calif.
EC
3,979.0
428.0
2 BECHTEL, San Francisco, Calif.
1,433.0
4.0
1,437.0
2
2
CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo.
EAC
2,200.3
217.5 212.3
3 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif.
1,323.5
0.0
1,323.5
3
3
JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif.
AEC
1,788.9
4 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif.
1,126.4
46.5
1,172.9
4
4
URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif.
EAC
1,553.4
46.5
651.7
512.1
1,163.8
5
5
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif.
EA
1,163.8
512.1
5 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif.
4
INT'L REVENUE
n
ENR SOURCEBOOK
n
July 2, 2012 enr.com
The Top Design Firms in Power HYDROPLANTS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
COGENERATION
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
182.7
1
JACOBS
83.6
2
TETRA TECH INC.
70.0
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
43.3
3
MWH GLOBAL
68.0
3
ZACHRY HOLDINGS INC.
41.4
4
HDR
48.5
4
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
36.6
5
AMEC
33.1
5
THE BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
28.3
TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION PLANTS RANK FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
WIND POWER
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
BURNS & MCDONNELL
205.1
1
TETRA TECH INC.
2
POWER ENGINEERS INC.
166.2
2
STANTEC INC.
25.2
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
158.7
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
14.4
4
BLACK & VEATCH
146.4
4
ELECTRICAL CONSULTANTS INC.
11.0
5
TRC COS. INC.
99.8
5
SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
11.0
POWER
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
110.0
SOLAR POWER
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
THE SHAW GROUP INC.
707.1
1
BECHTEL
38.0
2
BLACK & VEATCH
591.2
2
FLUOR CORP.
35.3
3
SARGENT & LUNDY LLC
510.4
3
ZACHRY HOLDINGS INC.
26.9
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
480.8
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
24.0
5
BECHTEL
444.0
5
CH2M HILL
21.8
*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM POWER SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENR’S LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
. KTS
BUI
LDI
NGS
T/C
ENT
OTH
OTH
ER
MEN
DEN
E RT AIN
ESI MU
1
1 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif.
645
611.40
11
8
11
14
6
0
3
1
11
48
2
2 GENSLER, San Francisco, Calif.
1117
390.37
51
69
4
4
1
4
0
10
4
3
3
3 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif.
914
236.41
3
48
24
10
11
7
0
0
0
0
4
5 HOK, St. Louis, Mo.
865
164.71
37
26
15
9
31
2
1
1
13
1
5
8 HDR, Omaha, Neb.
784
137.22
9
0
66
2
16
0
0
0
16
0
RANK 2012 2011
ACC. STAFF
IN $ MIL.
COMMERCIAL OFFICES RANK FIRM
% OF TOTAL REVENUE
EL HOT
LTIR
ARE LTH C HEA
ER M
L TIA
FICE ION
T OF CAT
MEN
FICE
EDU
ERN GOV
/ OF RET AIL
2011 GREEN REVENUE
IVIC
Top 5 Green Design Firms by Sector
RETAIL $ MIL. REVENUE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
GENSLER
244.1
1
GENSLER
26.7
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
89.8
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
23.6
3
HOK
42.0
3
URS CORP.
16.9
4
URS CORP.
32.4
4
STANTEC INC.
8.5
5
TETRA TECH INC.
31.5
5
RNL
4.7
GOVERNMENT OFFICES RANK FIRM
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES $ MIL. REVENUE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
HDR
90.9
1
URS CORP.
83.5
2
TETRA TECH INC.
74.5
2
PERKINS+WILL
41.9
3
URS CORP.
65.8
3
LPA INC.
27.1
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
56.7
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
23.6
5
JACOBS
48.2
5
EYP ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING
23.3
enr.com July 2, 2012
n
ENR SOURCEBOOK
n
5
TE
IND
TRA
HAZ
TEL
ECO
SEW
NSP
ARD
M
OUS
WA S
O RT ATIO N
TRO / PE
WAT
US.
ER S
POW
ER
ER /
UPP
WA S
LY
TE
G RIN CTU UFA MAN
2011 REVENUE TOTAL INT’L $ MIL. $ MIL.
GEN
FIRM TYPE
ERA
RANK 2012 2011 FIRM
L BU
ILDIN
THE TOP 150 GLOBAL DESIGN FIRMS
LEU
G
M
International Design 1
1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif., U.S.A.
EA
6,875.2
3,027.0
36
0
7
7
8
0
31
12
0
2
2 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif., U.S.A. †
EAC
5,334.0
1,353.9
12
3
6
7
5
19
30
16
0
3
3 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.
AEC
5,222.7
2,434.2
10
10
6
1
1
53
14
3
1
4
4 WORLEYPARSONS LTD., North Sydney, NSW, Australia †
EC
4,459.1
3,413.8
0
0
11
1
0
69
4
0
0
5
7 FLUOR CORP., Irving, Texas, U.S.A. †
EC
4,029.4
3,462.7
0
0
3
0
0
91
0
5
0
The Top 10 by Market SEWER / WASTE
7 RANK 2012 2011
Top 10 Revenue: $1,323.8 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $2,351.8 Mil.
TRANSPORTATION
2 RANK 2012 2011
Top 10 Revenue: $4,848.3 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $10,649.7 Mil.
BUILDING
3 RANK 2012 2011
HAZARDOUS WASTE
8
Top 10 Revenue: $4,576.3 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $9,384.9 Mil.
RANK 2012 2011
Top 10 Revenue: $2,045.8 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $2,211.9 Mil.
WATER
6 RANK 2012 2011
Top 10 Revenue: $1,742.8 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $3,367.8 Mil.
1
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
1
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
1
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
1
1
ARCADIS NV
1
1
ARCADIS NV
2
2
MWH GLOBAL
2
8
ATKINS
2
1
DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS
2
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
3
3
CH2M HILL
3
4
DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS
3
3
ARUP GROUP LTD.
3
3
URS CORP.
3
2
GRONTMIJ NV
4
5
GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP.
4
5
EGIS
4
5
ARCADIS NV
4
4
STANTEC INC.
4
3
MWH GLOBAL
5
**
URS CORP.
5
7
MOTT MACDONALD GROUP LTD.
5
4
WSP GROUP PLC
5
6
TETRA TECH INC.
5
**
CH2M HILL
6
4
MOTT MACDONALD GROUP LTD.
6
6
ARUP GROUP LTD.
6
8
RAMBOLL GROUP A/S
6
5
CH2M HILL
6
10
TETRA TECH INC.
7
8
GHD PTY LTD.
7
**
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
7
6
FUGRO NV
7
9
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOC.
7
6
MOTT MACDONALD GROUP LTD.
8
**
POYRY
8
**
URS CORP.
8
9
GRONTMIJ NV
8
8
AMEC PLC
8
**
ATKINS
9
**
DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS
9
**
CH2M HILL
9
7
ATKINS
9
10
ATKINS
9
**
SMEC
10
9
BLACK & VEATCH
10
9
COWI
10
**
SWECO
10
**
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
10
**
BLACK & VEATCH
Excerpted and posted from Engineering News-Record and Architectural Record, April 23, June 11, July 2 and July 23, 2012, copyright by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. with all rights reserved. This reprint implies no endorsement, either tacit or expressed, of any company, product, service or investment opportunity. #C12021 Managed by The YGS Group, 800.290.5460. For more information visit www.theYGSgroup.com/content.
GREENEST BIG COMPANIES
BEST CORPORATE STEWARD AWARD FINALIST
ENGINEERS
WITHOUT BORDERS www.aecom.com
m
enr.com
THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK
THE TOP 500 DESIGN FIRMS
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., ranked first in transportation overall, sees an uptick in business due to more use of alternative approaches.
#01
Power comprises thermal and hydroelectric powerplants, waste-to-energy plants, transmission lines, substations, cogeneration plants, etc.
Water Supply includes dams, reservoirs, transmission pipelines, distribution mains, irrigation canals, desalination and potability treatment plants, pumping stations, etc.
TE ECO
M
WA S OUS ARD
LEU
O RT ATIO N
TRO / PE
6,875.2
3,027.0
36
0
7
7
8
0
31
12
0
2 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif. †
EAC
5,334.0
1,353.9
12
3
6
7
5
19
30
16
0
3
3 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif.
AEC
5,222.7
2,434.2
10
10
6
1
1
53
14
3
1
4
5 FLUOR CORP., Irving, Texas †
EC
4,029.4
3,462.7
0
0
3
0
0
91
0
5
0
5
4 CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo. †
EAC
3,903.0
1,563.6
5
4
8
14
15
19
22
13
0
TEL
EA
2
HAZ
1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif. †
TRA
SEW
NSP
TE
WAT
1
IND
POW
US.
UPP
WA S
LY
RIN
G
ILDIN L BU
MAN
2011 REVENUE $ MIL. TOTAL INT’L
GEN
FIRM TYPE
ER /
RANK 2012 2011 FIRM
G
The Top 500 Design Firms
M
Transportation includes airports, bridges, roads, canals, locks, dredging, marine facilities, piers, railroads, tunnels, etc.
ER
Hazardous Waste includes chemical and nuclear waste treatment,
Petroleum includes refineries, petrochemical plants, offshore facilities, pipelines, etc.
CTU
General Building as a category includes commercial buildings, offices, stores, educational facilities, government buildings, hospitals, medical facilities, hotels, apartments, housing, etc.
Telecommunications comprises transmission lines and cabling, towers and antennae, data centers, etc.
Manufacturing includes auto, electronic assembly, textile plants, etc.
UFA
Companies are ranked according to revenue for design services performed in 2011 in $ millions (*). Those with subsidiaries are indicated by (†). For information on subsidiaries and where each firm worked
outside of the U.S., see www.ENR.com. **Firms not ranked last year. Some markets may not add up to 100% due to omission of “other” miscellaneous market category and rounding. NA=Not available.
Sewerage / Solid Waste includes sanitary and storm sewers, treatment plants, pumping plants, incinerators, industrial waste facilities, etc.
Industrial Process comprises pulp and paper mills, steel mills, non-ferrous metal refineries, pharmaceutical plants, chemical plants, food and other processing plants, etc.
ERA
KEY TO TYPE OF FIRM A architect, E engineer, EC engineercontractor, AE architect-engineer, EA engineer-architect, ENV environmental, GE geotechnical engineer, L landscape architect, P planner and O other. Other combinations are possible. Firms classified themselves.
asbestos and lead abatement, etc.
ER S
How to Read the Tables
The Top Design Firms in Transportation TRANSPORTATION RANK FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
HIGHWAYS RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2,102.9
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
803.5
2
URS CORP.
1,596.1
2
URS CORP.
601.7
3
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
1,042.9
3
HNTB COS.
474.7
4
CH2M HILL
852.4
4
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
420.1
5
HNTB COS.
813.9
5
CH2M HILL
398.8
MASS TRANSIT AND RAIL RANK
FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
AIRPORTS RANK
FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
585.4
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
284.1
2
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
497.0
2
URS CORP.
248.3
3
URS CORP.
330.4
3
HNTB COS.
67.1
4
JACOBS
320.8
4
JACOBS
64.2
5
STV GROUP INC.
196.1
5
BECHTEL
64.0
MARINE AND PORT FACILITIES RANK
FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2
CH2M HILL
$ MIL. REVENUE
BRIDGES RANK
FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
158.8
1
URS CORP.
365.6
86.8
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
271.2
3
MOFFATT & NICHOL
71.4
3
HNTB COS.
120.6
4
LOUIS BERGER GROUP
55.7
4
CH2M HILL
112.6
5
URS CORP.
50.1
5
MICHAEL BAKER CORP.
107.4
*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM TRANSPORTATION SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENR’S LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
2
$ MIL. REVENUE
n
ENR SOURCEBOOK
n
July 2, 2012 enr.com
The Top Design Firms in Environment SITE ASSESSMENT AND COMPLIANCE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
431.8
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
186.1
2
CH2M HILL
401.6
2
URS CORP.
111.6
3
ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE
270.0
3
TETRA TECH INC.
89.0
4
URS CORP.
235.8
4
MWH GLOBAL
83.0
5
TETRA TECH INC.
157.0
5
CDM SMITH
81.4
SEWERAGE AND SOLID WASTE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANTS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
CH2M HILL
597.8
1
CH2M HILL
486.8
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
536.2
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
350.1
3
MWH GLOBAL
399.0
3
MWH GLOBAL
307.0
4
CDM SMITH
264.3
4
CDM SMITH
152.5
5
URS CORP.
260.4
5
ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE
141.0
TRANSMISSION LINES AND AQUEDUCTS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
HAZARDOUS WASTE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
TETRA TECH INC.
187.0
1
URS CORP.
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
184.6
2
ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE
827.0
3
MWH GLOBAL
154.0
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
801.9
4
URS CORP.
56.6
4
CH2M HILL
489.7
5
HDR
51.7
5
TETRA TECH INC.
394.0
WATER SUPPLY
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
860.6
CHEMICAL AND SOIL REMEDIATION
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
TETRA TECH INC.
800.0
1
URS CORP.
2
CH2M HILL
542.4
2
ARCADIS U.S./RTKL/RISE
469.0
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
468.6
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
322.9
4
MWH GLOBAL
466.0
4
TETRA TECH INC.
140.0
5
URS CORP.
353.6
5
PARSONS
114.4
WATER TREAT. AND DESALINATION PLANTS RANK FIRM
568.9
$ MIL. REVENUE
1
CH2M HILL
542.4
2
TETRA TECH INC.
462.0
3
MWH GLOBAL
278.0
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
157.0
5
CDM SMITH
139.7
*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM ENVIRONMENTAL SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENR’S LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
TOP 25 U.S. ARCHITECTURE FIRMS OF 2012 Companies are ranked by revenue (in millions of dollars) for architectural services performed in 2011. This data also appears in Engineering News-Record’s Top 500 Design Firms list, which, unlike our ranking, also includes engineering-exclusive firms.
RANK 2012
2011
FIRM, U.S. HEADQUARTERS
TYPE OF FIRM
1
2
Gensler, San Francisco
A
2
1
TOTAL ARCHITECTURAL REVENUE
764.08
AECOM, Los Angeles
EA
445.40 365.40
3
3
Perkins+Will, Chicago
A
4
84
CH2M HILL, Englewood, CO
EAC
365.10
5
4
HDR Architecture, Omaha
EA
364.10
Key to firm types A
Architect
AE
Architect Engineer
AP
Architect Planner
EAL Engineer Architect Landscape AEC Architect Engineer Contractor (not all combinations listed)
See the entire Top 250 Architecture Firms list at architecturalrecord.com/practice.
enr.com July 2, 2012
n
ENR SOURCEBOOK
n
3
The Top Design Firms in General Building GENERAL BUILDING
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
COMMERCIAL OFFICES
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2,484.8
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
654.2
2
GENSLER
708.3
2
GENSLER
402.2
3
URS CORP.
646.9
3
HOK
131.9
4
JACOBS
543.5
4
JACOBS
102.7
5
HOK
386.7
5
CH2M HILL
GOVERNMENT OFFICES
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
97.8
HEALTH CARE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
637.2
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
314.3
2
JACOBS
248.1
2
HDR
205.2
3
URS CORP.
169.6
3
PERKINS+WILL
162.4
4
AMEC
144.3
4
CANNON DESIGN
146.6
5
TETRA TECH INC.
106.5
5
HKS INC.
124.7
HOTELS, MOTELS & CONVENTION CENTERS RANK FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
SPORTS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
296.4
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2
GENSLER
51.5
2
POPULOUS
75.9
3
HKS INC.
32.2
3
HNTB COS.
21.9
4
HOK
17.2
4
URS CORP.
20.8
5
URS CORP.
14.8
5
HKS INC.
16.4
RETAIL
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
217.2
CORRECTIONAL FACILITIES
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
136.0
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
88.8
2
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC.
98.8
2
HDR
39.2
3
GENSLER
84.7
3
HOK
27.4
4
TERRACON CONSULTANTS INC.
70.7
4
URS CORP.
25.1
5
HENDERSON ENGINEERS INC.
44.8
5
STV GROUP INC.
20.8
MULTI-UNIT RESIDENTIAL
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
EDUCATION
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
36.1
1
PARSONS
2
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
32.6
2
URS CORP.
113.3 106.8
3
URS CORP.
18.7
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
104.7
4
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC.
17.4
4
JACOBS
96.3
5
WSP USA
17.3
5
PERKINS+WILL
76.5
*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM GENERAL BUILDING SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENR’S LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
The Top 50 Program Management Firms
Construction Management-for-Fee/PM Firms 2011 REVENUE IN $ MIL.
2011 REVENUE IN $ MIL.
RANK 2012
DOMESTIC REVENUE
TOTAL REVENUE
RANK 2012 2011
FIRM TYPE
TOTAL REVENUE
INT'L REVENUE
1 CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo.
1,982.8
217.5
2,200.3
1
1
BECHTEL, San Francisco, Calif.
EC
3,979.0
428.0
2 BECHTEL, San Francisco, Calif.
1,433.0
4.0
1,437.0
2
2
CH2M HILL, Englewood, Colo.
EAC
2,200.3
217.5 212.3
3 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif.
1,323.5
0.0
1,323.5
3
3
JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif.
AEC
1,788.9
4 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif.
1,126.4
46.5
1,172.9
4
4
URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif.
EAC
1,553.4
46.5
651.7
512.1
1,163.8
5
5
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif.
EA
1,163.8
512.1
5 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif.
4
INT'L REVENUE
n
ENR SOURCEBOOK
n
July 2, 2012 enr.com
The Top Design Firms in Power HYDROPLANTS
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
COGENERATION
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
182.7
1
JACOBS
83.6
2
TETRA TECH INC.
70.0
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
43.3
3
MWH GLOBAL
68.0
3
ZACHRY HOLDINGS INC.
41.4
4
HDR
48.5
4
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
36.6
5
AMEC
33.1
5
THE BABCOCK & WILCOX CO.
28.3
TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION PLANTS RANK FIRM
$ MIL. REVENUE
WIND POWER
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
BURNS & MCDONNELL
205.1
1
TETRA TECH INC.
2
POWER ENGINEERS INC.
166.2
2
STANTEC INC.
25.2
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
158.7
3
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
14.4
4
BLACK & VEATCH
146.4
4
ELECTRICAL CONSULTANTS INC.
11.0
5
TRC COS. INC.
99.8
5
SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS
11.0
POWER
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
110.0
SOLAR POWER
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
THE SHAW GROUP INC.
707.1
1
BECHTEL
38.0
2
BLACK & VEATCH
591.2
2
FLUOR CORP.
35.3
3
SARGENT & LUNDY LLC
510.4
3
ZACHRY HOLDINGS INC.
26.9
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
480.8
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
24.0
5
BECHTEL
444.0
5
CH2M HILL
21.8
*BASED ON 2011 DESIGN REVENUE FROM POWER SECTORS AS REPORTED IN ENR’S LEADING CONTRACTORS AND DESIGN FIRMS SOURCEBOOK SURVEY. SEE ENR.COM FOR EXPANDED LISTINGS.
. KTS
BUI
LDI
NGS
T/C
ENT
OTH
OTH
ER
MEN
DEN
E RT AIN
ESI MU
1
1 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif.
645
611.40
11
8
11
14
6
0
3
1
11
48
2
2 GENSLER, San Francisco, Calif.
1117
390.37
51
69
4
4
1
4
0
10
4
3
3
3 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif.
914
236.41
3
48
24
10
11
7
0
0
0
0
4
5 HOK, St. Louis, Mo.
865
164.71
37
26
15
9
31
2
1
1
13
1
5
8 HDR, Omaha, Neb.
784
137.22
9
0
66
2
16
0
0
0
16
0
RANK 2012 2011
ACC. STAFF
IN $ MIL.
COMMERCIAL OFFICES RANK FIRM
% OF TOTAL REVENUE
EL HOT
LTIR
ARE LTH C HEA
ER M
L TIA
FICE ION
T OF CAT
MEN
FICE
EDU
ERN GOV
/ OF RET AIL
2011 GREEN REVENUE
IVIC
Top 5 Green Design Firms by Sector
RETAIL $ MIL. REVENUE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
GENSLER
244.1
1
GENSLER
26.7
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
89.8
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
23.6
3
HOK
42.0
3
URS CORP.
16.9
4
URS CORP.
32.4
4
STANTEC INC.
8.5
5
TETRA TECH INC.
31.5
5
RNL
4.7
GOVERNMENT OFFICES RANK FIRM
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES $ MIL. REVENUE
$ MIL. REVENUE
RANK FIRM
1
HDR
90.9
1
URS CORP.
83.5
2
TETRA TECH INC.
74.5
2
PERKINS+WILL
41.9
3
URS CORP.
65.8
3
LPA INC.
27.1
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
56.7
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
23.6
5
JACOBS
48.2
5
EYP ARCHITECTURE & ENGINEERING
23.3
enr.com July 2, 2012
n
ENR SOURCEBOOK
n
5
TE
IND
TRA
HAZ
TEL
ECO
SEW
NSP
ARD
M
OUS
WA S
O RT ATIO N
TRO / PE
WAT
US.
ER S
POW
ER
ER /
UPP
WA S
LY
TE
G RIN CTU UFA MAN
2011 REVENUE TOTAL INT’L $ MIL. $ MIL.
GEN
FIRM TYPE
ERA
RANK 2012 2011 FIRM
L BU
ILDIN
THE TOP 150 GLOBAL DESIGN FIRMS
LEU
G
M
International Design 1
1 AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP., Los Angeles, Calif., U.S.A.
EA
6,875.2
3,027.0
36
0
7
7
8
0
31
12
0
2
2 URS CORP., San Francisco, Calif., U.S.A. †
EAC
5,334.0
1,353.9
12
3
6
7
5
19
30
16
0
3
3 JACOBS, Pasadena, Calif., U.S.A.
AEC
5,222.7
2,434.2
10
10
6
1
1
53
14
3
1
4
4 WORLEYPARSONS LTD., North Sydney, NSW, Australia †
EC
4,459.1
3,413.8
0
0
11
1
0
69
4
0
0
5
7 FLUOR CORP., Irving, Texas, U.S.A. †
EC
4,029.4
3,462.7
0
0
3
0
0
91
0
5
0
The Top 10 by Market SEWER / WASTE
7 RANK 2012 2011
Top 10 Revenue: $1,323.8 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $2,351.8 Mil.
TRANSPORTATION
2 RANK 2012 2011
Top 10 Revenue: $4,848.3 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $10,649.7 Mil.
BUILDING
3 RANK 2012 2011
HAZARDOUS WASTE
8
Top 10 Revenue: $4,576.3 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $9,384.9 Mil.
RANK 2012 2011
Top 10 Revenue: $2,045.8 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $2,211.9 Mil.
WATER
6 RANK 2012 2011
Top 10 Revenue: $1,742.8 Mil. Sector’s Revenue: $3,367.8 Mil.
1
1
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
1
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
1
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
1
1
ARCADIS NV
1
1
ARCADIS NV
2
2
MWH GLOBAL
2
8
ATKINS
2
1
DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS
2
2
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
2
4
AECOM TECHNOLOGY CORP.
3
3
CH2M HILL
3
4
DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS
3
3
ARUP GROUP LTD.
3
3
URS CORP.
3
2
GRONTMIJ NV
4
5
GOLDER ASSOCIATES CORP.
4
5
EGIS
4
5
ARCADIS NV
4
4
STANTEC INC.
4
3
MWH GLOBAL
5
**
URS CORP.
5
7
MOTT MACDONALD GROUP LTD.
5
4
WSP GROUP PLC
5
6
TETRA TECH INC.
5
**
CH2M HILL
6
4
MOTT MACDONALD GROUP LTD.
6
6
ARUP GROUP LTD.
6
8
RAMBOLL GROUP A/S
6
5
CH2M HILL
6
10
TETRA TECH INC.
7
8
GHD PTY LTD.
7
**
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF
7
6
FUGRO NV
7
9
CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOC.
7
6
MOTT MACDONALD GROUP LTD.
8
**
POYRY
8
**
URS CORP.
8
9
GRONTMIJ NV
8
8
AMEC PLC
8
**
ATKINS
9
**
DAR AL-HANDASAH CONSULTANTS
9
**
CH2M HILL
9
7
ATKINS
9
10
ATKINS
9
**
SMEC
10
9
BLACK & VEATCH
10
9
COWI
10
**
SWECO
10
**
GEOSYNTEC CONSULTANTS
10
**
BLACK & VEATCH
Excerpted and posted from Engineering News-Record and Architectural Record, April 23, June 11, July 2 and July 23, 2012, copyright by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. with all rights reserved. This reprint implies no endorsement, either tacit or expressed, of any company, product, service or investment opportunity. #C12021 Managed by The YGS Group, 800.290.5460. For more information visit www.theYGSgroup.com/content.
GREENEST BIG COMPANIES
BEST CORPORATE STEWARD AWARD FINALIST
ENGINEERS
WITHOUT BORDERS www.aecom.com
Related Documents
Top Civil Engineering Firms
January 2021 0
2011-top Design Build Firms
January 2021 0
Civil Engineering
February 2021 0
Firms
January 2021 6
2015 Enr Top 500 Design Firms
January 2021 0
2014 Enr Top 500 Design Firms
January 2021 0More Documents from "kpglemon"
Top Civil Engineering Firms
January 2021 0
Gujarati General Knowledge 1500 Qua & Ans
January 2021 1
180 Days Ias Prelims Study Plan For 2017 Prelims.pdf
January 2021 0
Personal-growth-toolkit
February 2021 0
