10_steps_design_pt_floors_l70.pdf

  • Uploaded by: Daniel Yong
  • 0
  • 0
  • January 2021
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 10_steps_design_pt_floors_l70.pdf as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 3,185
  • Pages: 18
Loading documents preview...
10- Step Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

Dr Bijan O Aalami Professor Emeritus, San Francisco State University Principal, ADAPT Corporation; [email protected]

301 Mission Street San Francisco, California High Seismic Force Region

www.adaptsoft.com PTPT-Structures copyright 2015

Four Seasons Hotel; Florida High Wind Force Region

Residential/Office PostTensioned Building in Dubai

Multi-level parking structures Column supported multistory building

One-way beam and slab design

Two-way flat slab construction

Hybrid Construction Post-tensioned podium slab supporting light framed structure above Santana Row; San Jose, California

Post-Tensioned ground supported slab (SOG) is the largest application of posttensioning in USA

Fortaleza, Brazil

KSA

POST-TENSIONED MAT FOUNDATION USING UNBONDED TENDONS

POST-TENSIONED MAT FOUNDATION USING GROUTED TENDONS

Post-Tensioning Systems

12.7 mm (0.5"*)

Unbonded System

WIRE

CORROSION INHIBITING COATING

PLASTIC SHEATHING

NOTE: * NOMINAL DIAMETER

(a) STRAND

(b) TENDON

GREASE FILLED PLASTIC CAP SHEATH

TUBE

STRAND

(c) ANCHORAGE ASSEMBLY

Example of a Floor System using the Unbonded Post-tensioning System

Post-Tensioning Systems Grouted System

Example of a Floor System Reinforced with Grouted Post-Tensioning System An example of a grouted system hardware with flat duct

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

™ Dimensions (sizing)

¾ Optimum spans; optimum thickness

™ Structural system

¾ One-way/two-way; slab band

™ Boundary conditions; connections

¾ Service performance; strength condition

™ Design strips ™ Design sections; design values

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

‰ Dimensions (sizing)

¾ Optimum spans; optimum thickness

™ An optimum design is one in which the reinforcement determined for “service condition” is used in its entirety for “strength condition.”

™ PT amount in service condition is governed mostly by: ¾ Hypothetical tensile stresses ¾ Tendon spacing

™ Spans: between 7 m – 9 m ft ™ Span/thickness ratios

¾ 40 for interior ¾ 35 for exterior with no overhang

¾ Skeletal Systems share load ¾ Slab systems may not share load, depending on reinforcement layout

™ One-way and two-way systems ¾ Skeletal Systems share load ¾ Slab systems may not share load depending on reinforcement layout

F

A

(ii) A C

D

COLUMN

BEAM

C

B L

aP

(a) ONE-WAY BEAM SYSTEM F

P

L

(i)

B

LOAD

D 2

F

A

(P L/ 4)

™ One-way and two-way systems

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

(1 -a )P

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

C

B

D A,C

B (iii)

P

B,D PL/4

(b) BEAMS ON FOUR COLUMNS

(b) TWO-WAY BEAM SYSTEM

Skeletal System

Capacity required for 100% of load in each direction, if reinforcement is placed along AD, and AC

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

™Structural system

¾ One-way/two-way; slab band

h b

h < 2t

b > 3h

SLAB BAND Slab band is treated as part of a two-way system. One-way shear design provisions meant for beams do not apply to slab bands

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

™ Boundary conditions; connections ¾ Service performance ¾ Strength performance

Detailing for service performance, such as the one shown below is to mitigate cracking from shortening of slab

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors ™ Selection of load path for two-way systems – Design Strips

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors Assumption of releases at connections, or reduced stiffness for selected members is made prior to analysis to achieve a more economical design. In the following, the assignment of reduced stiffness for the uppermost columns, or hinge assumption at connection is not uncommon

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors ™ Subdivide the floor along support lines in design strips 2

1

3

A B

C

D

Subdivide the structure into design strips in two orthogonal directions (Nahid slab)

E F Y X

G

4

5

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors Subdivide slab along support lines in design strips in the orthogonal direction 2

1

3

4

5

A

Preliminary Considerations Design of Post-Tensioned Floors

™ Design sections

¾ Design sections extend over the entire

design strip and are considered at critical locations, such as face of support and mid-span

B C

D

E F Y X

An important aspect of load path selection in a two-way system is that every point of the slab should be assigned to a specific design strip. No portion of the slab should be left unassigned.

10- Steps Design of Post Tensioned Floors

™ Design values

¾ Actions, such as moments at each design section are reduced to a “single” representative value to be used for design

559 k-ft is the area (total) of bending moment at face of support

1. Geometry and Structural System 2. Material Properties 3. Loads 4. Design Parameters 5. Actions due to Dead and Live Loads 6. Post-Tensioning 7. Code Check for Serviceability 8. Code Check for Strength 9. Check for Transfer of Prestressing 10. Detailing

Step 1 Geometry and Structural System

™ Select design strip and Idealize

¾ Extract; straighten the support line; square the boundary

Step 1 Geometry and Structural System

™ Select design strip and Idealize

¾ Extract; straighten the support line;

square the boundary ¾ Model the slab frame with a row of supports above and below. This represents an upper level of multi-story concrete frame. ƒ Assume rotational fixity at the far ends; ƒ Assume roller support at the far ends

View of idealized slab-frame

Step 2 Material Properties

Step 3 Dead and Live Loads

™ Concrete

¾ Weight 24 kN/m3 ¾ 28 day cylinder 40 MPa ¾ Elastic modulus 29,725 MPa ¾ Long-term deflection factor 2

™ Non-Prestressed reinforcement ¾ fy 460 MPa ¾ Elastic modulus 200,000 MPa

¾ Based on member volume

™ Superimposed dead load ¾ Min (partitions)

13 mm 99 mm2 1,860 MPa 1,200 MPa 200,000 MPa

2.00 kN/m2

™ Live load

¾ Residential

™ Prestressing

¾ Strand diameter ¾ Strand area ¾ Ultimate strength ¾ Effective stress ¾ Elastic modulus

™ Selfweight

3.00 kN/m2

Step 4 Design Parameters

‰ Applicable code

¾ ACI 318-14 ¾ IBC 2012 ? ¾ Local codes, such as California Building Code (CBC 2011) ?

‰ Cover for protection against corrosion

™ Cover to rebar

¾ Not exposed to weather ¾ Exposed to weather

Step 4 Design Parameters

‰ Cover for fire resistivity

™ Identify “restrained” and “unrestrained panels.”

Restrained or Unrestrained

Unrestrained

20 mm 50 mm

Restrained

Cover Thickness, mm for Fire Endurance

Aggregate Type 1 hr

1.5 hr

2 hr

3 hr

Carbonate Siliceous Lightweight

-

-

38 38 38

51 51 51

Carbonate Siliceous Lightweight

-

-

19 19 19

25 25 25

™ Cover to tendon

¾ Not exposed to weather 20 mm ¾ Exposed to weather 25 mm

Step 4 Design Parameters

‰ Cover for fire resistivity

™ Identify “restrained” and “unrestrained panels.”

™ For 2-hour fire resistivity ¾ Restrained ¾ Unrestrained

20 mm 38 mm

Step 4 Design Parameters

‰ Select post-tensioning system

¾ For corrosive environment use “encapsulated system.”

¾ For non-corrosive environment, regular hardware may be used

4 hr -

32 32 32

Step 4 Design Parameters

Step 4 Design Parameters

‰ Allowable deflections (ACI 318 .5)

‰ Allowable stresses for two-way systems

™ For

™ Service condition ¾ Total (frequent) load case ' ƒ Tension ---------------------------0.5 f c '

ƒ Compression -------------------- 0.6 f c

¾ Sustained (quasi permanent) load case ƒ Tension -------------------------- 0.5 f c' '

ƒ Compression ------------------ 0.45 fc

™ Initial condition

visual impact use total deflection ¾ Span/240 ¾ Use camber, if necessary

™ Total deflection subsequent to installation of members that are likely to be damaged ¾ Span/360

™ Immediate deflection due to live load ¾Span/480 ™ Long-term deflection magnifier 2. This brings the total long-term deflection to 3,

ƒ Tension ------------------------ 0.25 f c' ƒ Compression --------------- 0.6 f c'

Step 5 Actions due to Dead and Live Loads

‰ Analyze the design strip as a single

level frame structure with one row of supports above and below, using

Step 5 Actions due to Dead and Live Loads

‰ Analyze the design strip as a single level frame structure with one row of supports above and below.

™ In-house simple frame program ™ ™

(Simple Frame Method; SFM); or in-house Equivalent Frame Program (EFM); Specialty commercial software

™ All the three options yield safe designs.

But, each will give a different amount of reinforcement. ™ The EFM is suggested by ACI-318. To some extent, it accounts for biaxial action of the prototype structure in the frame model. ™ 3D FEM software can improve optimization

Moments due to DL (k-ft)

Moments due to LL (k-ft)

Step 6 Post-Tensioning

™ Selection of design parameters ™ Selection of PT force and profile

Step 6 Post-Tensioning ™ Selection of PT force and profile

¾ Two entry value selections must be made to initiate the computations. Select precompression and % of DL to balance

™ Effective force vs tendon selection option ¾ Force selection option

™ Calculation of balanced loads;

adjustments for percentage of load balanced

™ Calculation of actions due to balanced loads

Step 6 Post-Tensioning

™ Selection of design parameters

¾ Select average precompression 1 MPa ¾ Target to balance 60% of DL

™ Selection of PT force and profile

¾ Assume simple parabola mapped within the bounds of top and bottom covers Force diagram of simple parabola

Step 6 Post-Tensioning ¾ Assume simple parabola for hand calculation

STEP 6 Post-Tensioning

STEP 6 Post-Tensioning ™ Calculation of balanced loads;

™ Calculation of balanced loads; adjustment for % of DL balanced

adjustment of % of DL balanced F121_ACI_PT_2_way_082012

F121_ACI_2-way_PT_force_082012

Assume P/A =150psi[1MPa] 1

Select max drape using tendons from critical span

Select critical span 2

Select max drape

Calculate %of DL balanced (%DL)

Calculate %of DL balanced (%DL)

Yes

No

%DL < 50%?

No

Yes %DL > 80%?

No

P /A<300ps i [2MP a]?

%DL > 80%?

No

Yes

Yes

Increase P/A

Is it practical to reduce P/A or tendons?

P/A>125psi [0.8MPa]? Yes

No Reduce drape

No

Yes

Reduce P/A

Rais e tendon to reach %DL ~ 60%

Reduce P/A or tendons to %DL balanced ~ 60% ; P/A >= 125 psi [0.8 MPa]

Go to next span

Move to next span

Exit after last span

Member with widely different spans

STEP 6 Post-Tensioning ™ Calculation of balanced loads ¾ Lateral forced from continuous tendons ¾ Lateral force from terminated tendons ¾ Moments from change in centroid of member

STEP 6 Post-Tensioning ™ Calculation of balanced loads ¾ Lateral forced from continuous tendons ¾ Lateral force from terminated tendons ¾ Moments from change in centroid of member ‰

‰

Example of force from terminated tendon

Example of force from continuous tendon

P = 500 k a = 93 mm; b = 186 mm ; L = 9.0 m ; c = {[93/186]0.5/[1 + (93/186)0.5]} * 9.00 = 3.73 m wb = 2 P*a/c2 = (2*193*93/1000)/3.732 = 1.59 kN/m per tendon

L = 10 m ; a = 93 mm; P = 119 kN/tendon c = 0.20*10 = 2.00 m Wb = (2*119*93/1000) / 22 = 5.53 kN/tendon ↓ Concentrated force at dead end= 2*119*93/2000 = 11.06 k/tendon



STEP 6 Post-Tensioning ™ Calculation of balanced loads ¾ Lateral forced from continuous tendons ¾ Lateral force from terminated tendons ¾ Moments from change in centroid of member

STEP 6 Post-Tensioning ™ Calculation of actions due to balanced loads ¾ Check balanced loads for static equilibrium ¾ ¾

‰

Determine moments/shears from balanced loads applied to the frame model that was used for dead and live loads Note down reactions from balanced loads

Example of force from shift in member centroidal axis

Example of Balanced Load Assembly

Moment at face of drop = M M = P * shift in centroid = P * (Yt-Left – Yt-Right) P = 119 k; Yt-Left = 120 mm; Yt-Right = 146 mm M = 119 (120 – 146)/1000 = - 3.09 kNm

STEP 6 Post-Tensioning ™ Calculation of actions due to balanced loads ¾ Obtain moments at face-of-supports and mid-spans ¾

STEP 7 Code Check for Serviceability ™ ACI 318-14 requirements for serviceability ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾

Note the reactions. The reactions are hyperstatic forces..

Comments: Moments will be used for serviceability check. Reactions will be used for Strength check.

™

Load combination ¾ Total load condition 1.00DL + 1.00LL + 1.00PT ¾

™

Load combinations Stress check Minimum reinforcement Deflection check.

Sustained load condition 1.00DL + 0.30LL + 1.00PT

Stress check

Using engineering judgment, select the locations that are likely to be critical. Typically, these are at the face of support and for hand calculation at mid-span At each section selected for check, use the design actions applicable to the entire design section and apply those to the entire cross-section of the design section to arrive at the hypothetical stresses used in code check.

σ = (MD + ML + MPT)/S + P/A S = I/Yc ; I = second moment of area; Yc = distance to farthest tension fiber

STEP 6 Post-Tensioning

STEP 6 Post-Tensioning

™ ACI 318-14 Minimum Reinforcement

™ ACI 318-14 Minimum Reinforcement F114_041112

ACI Minimum Rebar for two-way systems `

1

¾ Rebar over support is function of geometry of the design strip and the strip in the orthogonal direction ¾ Rebar in span is a function of the magnitude of the hypothetical tensile stress

PT system? 2

9 Unbonded

At supports As = 0.0075Acf

3

Bonded

Calculate the cracking moment Mcr at supports and spans

`

In span calculate hypothetical tension stress ft

4

Does Mcr exceeed 1.2xmoment capacity? No

5

ft ? tension stress

8

11

Yes 12

No added rebar required

6 7

10

ft > 2 root 'c [ft > 0.17 root f'c ]

ft =< 2 root 'c [ ft =< 0.17 root f'c ]

Add rebar to resist force in tensile zone

No added rebar required

Add rebar to increase Moment capacity to 1.2 Mcr

As = 0.00075*Acf EXIT

STEP 6 Post-Tensioning ™ ACI 318-14 Minimum Reinforcement ¾ Rebar over support is function of geometry of the design strip and the strip in the orthogonal direction ¾ Rebar in span is a function of the magnitude of the hypothetical tensile stress

In span, provide rebar if the hypothetical tensile stress exceeds 0.16√f’c The amount of reinforcement As is given by: As = N / (0.5fy) where N is the tensile force in tension zone

As = Area of steel required Acf = Larger of cross-sectional area of the strip in direction of analysis and orthogonal to it.

STEP 7 Deflection Check ™ Read deflections from the frame analysis of the design strip for dead, live and PT; (ΔDL , ΔLL , and ΔPT ). ™. Make the following load combinations and check against the allowable values for each case ¾ Total Deflection (1 + 2)(ΔDL + ΔPT + 0.3 ΔLL ) + 0.7 ΔLL < span/240 This is on the premise of sustained load being 0.3 time the design live load. It is for visual effects; Provide camber to reduce value, where needed and practical ¾ Immediate deflection from live load Δimmediate = 1.00ΔL < span/480 This check is applicable, where non-structural members are likely to be damaged. Otherwise, span/240 applies ¾ Presence of members likely to be damaged from sustained deflection (1+ 2)(0.3 ΔLL ) + 0.7 ΔLL < span/360

h = member thickness; b = design section width

STEP 8 Strength Check ™ Steps in strength check ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾

Load combinations Determination of hyperstatic actions Calculation of design moments (Mu) Calculate capacity/rebar for design moment Mu Check for punching shear Check/detail for unbalanced moment at support

STEP 8 Strength Check ™ Determination of Hyperstatic actions ¾ Direct Method – based on reactions from balanced loads

™ Load combinations U1 = 1.2DL + 1.6LL + 1.0HYP U2 = 1.4DL + 1.0HYP where, HYP is moment due to hyperstatic actions from prestressing ™ Determination of Hyperstatic actions ¾ Direct Method – based on reactions from balanced loads ¾ Indirect Method – Using primary and post-tensioning moments

STEP 8 Strength Check ™ A comment on capacity versus demand ¾ Post-tensioned members possess both a positive and negative moment capacity along the member length ¾ Rebar needs to be added, where capacity falls short of demand ¾ First, find the capacity and compare it with demand

STEP 8 Strength Check ¾ The figure below shows the forces on a PT member. In calculating the force from PT tendons, use either the ACI 318 or the following simplified procedure, based on parametric study of common building structures can be used for slabs

¾ f’c ≥ 28 MPa; P/A ≤ 1.7 MPa ¾ c/dt ≤ 0.375 ; dt is distance from compression fiber to farthest tension rebar ¾ Tendon Length ≤ 38 m for single end stressing; if length ≤ 76 m double end stressing ¾ fps is conservatively 1480 MPa if span is less than 10 m ¾ fps is conservatively 1340 MPa if span is greater than 10 m

STEP 8 Strength Check

STEP 8 Strength Check

™ Verify adequacy (detail) of the design for

™ Check for adequate ductility ¾ Ductility is deemed adequate, if c/dt <= 0.345 dt This condition guarantees that steel will yield, before concrete in compression crushes.

transfer of unbalanced moment at supports ¾ Unbalanced moment (Mc)is defined as the difference between the design moments on the opposite sides of a column support. This is the moment that is resisted by the support. ¾ The reinforcement associated with the transfer of unbalanced moment must be placed over a narrow band at the support (next slide) ¾ In most cases, this provision leads to a “detailing” requirement, as opposed to added rebar, since the reinforcement for slab design is in excess of that needed for transfer of unbalanced moment. MOMENTS Mc

COLUMN LINE

SLAB/BEAM CENTER- LINE

STEP 8 Strength Check

Punching Shear Design

™ Transfer of unbalanced moment

PUNCHED OUT COLUMN REGION

SHEAR STRESS DUE TO kM u

Mu

D108/SLIDES/060591

SHEAR STRESS DUE TO Vu

Vu

CRITICAL SURFACE

TWO-WAY SLAB

ILLUSTRATION OF CRITICAL SURFACE

Place the reinforcement within the narrow band identified as rebar strip

FOR THE EVALUATION OF PUNCHING SHEAR STRESSES

Definition based on ACI 318

STEP 9 Check for Transfer of Prestressing

STEP 9 Check for Transfer of Prestressing

At stressing: ‰ Tendon has its maximum force; ‰ Concrete is at its weakest strength; and ‰ Live load to counteract prestressing is absent

At stressing check extreme fiber stresses ¾ Add rebar when “representative”

(hypothetical) tension stresses exceed a threshold

Hence the member is likely to experience stresses more severe than when in service

¾ Do not exceed “representative”

hypothetical compressive stresses. Wait until concrete gains adequate strength

Local failure at stressing

STEP 10 Detailing

STEP 9 Check for Transfer of Prestressing ™ Load combination ¾

™

U = 1.00*Selfweight + 1.15*PT

SUPPORT

™ Allowable stresses Tension 0.25√f’ci

¾

Compression 0.60f’ci

¾ If tension exceeds, provide rebar in tensile zone to resist N

EQ. EQ.

MID-SPAN SEE PLAN EQ. EQ.

SUPPORT EQ. EQ.

STAGGER

STAGGER

¾

Position of rebar

TOP REBAR AT SUPPORT TYP. WALL

DROP CAP COLUMN

BOTTOM

PLAN

As = N / (0.5 fy)

9 If compression exceeds, wait until concrete

Lc/6

gains adequate strength

Lc/6 POST-TENSIONED SLAB

* DROP COLUMN

Lc/3 Lc SUPPORT LINE

ELEVATION

Ld

Thank you for listening.

www.adaptsoft.com [email protected]

More Documents from "Daniel Yong"