2-constituent-structure.pdf

  • Uploaded by: emman leonardo
  • 0
  • 0
  • February 2021
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View 2-constituent-structure.pdf as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 661
  • Pages: 32
Loading documents preview...
CONSTITUENT - is a word or a group of words that functions as a single unit within hierarchical structure. - a group of words that forms a phrase in a sentence.

CONSTITUENT STRUCTURE OF A SENTENCE IS….

- a particular grouping of word - identified using TESTS OF CONSTITUENT

CONSTITUENT TESTS Structural Ambiguity Example:

Rolan saw old men and women. Rolan saw [old men and women] Rolan saw [old men] and women.

old

men

and

women

old

men

and

women

TYPES OF CONSTITUENT TESTS: 1. Non-syntactic Test 2. Distributional Test 3. Other (syntactic) Tests

1. NON-SYNTACTIC TEST [number, gender, case] Det

N

[number] [gender] [case]

[PL]

Det.

N

these

friends

[Det. PL.]

[N. PL.]

2. DISTRIBUTIONAL TEST 1. Pre-posing 2. Post-posing 3. Sentence Fragments

PRE POSING -moving items to the front

[....]

[ . . . . _____ . . . . ]

The mouse ran up the drainpipe •Up the drainpipe, the mouse ran.

POST POSING -moving items to the back

[ . . . . _____ . . . . ]

[....]

He explained his problems to her. •He explained to her, his problems.

SENTENCE FRAGMENTS - A string of words that can be a sentence fragment must be a constituent. - isolate parts of sentence and test where they can stand alone

[ . . . . _____ . . . . ]

[....]

• In conversation, short forms of replies are made. •The replies are also refers to sentence fragments. Question: Who don’t you like? Answer: Your new neighbor! new neighbor!

OTHER (SYNTACTIC) TESTS 1. Coordination 2. Pro-forms 3. Ellipsis

COORDINATION -Sequences of words which are constituents can be coordinated (or ‘conjoined’) with one another, provided that they are of the same syntactic category. -Test constituent identity

[x] & [x] [x] & [y]

cute cats and funny dogs slowly but surely go to the movies or stay at home

Speaker A: What did the mouse do? Speaker B: It ran up the drainpipe and up the roof.

BUT NOT: Speaker A: What did Angel do? Speaker B: *He ran up the bill and up a huge credit card debt.

prep

art

N

It ran up the drainpipe and up the roof. prep

art

N

prep

art

adj

He ran up the bill and up a huge adj

adj

N

credit card debt.

PRO-FORMS -Any string of words that can be replaced by an appropriate pro-form must be a constituent. -test on the basis of the replacement test that replaces constituents by appropriate pro-forms. - Elements that refer to another item (pronouns).

PRO-FORMS [xyz]

[xw] (= y z )

Pro

Pro- NP

Pro

Joyce fetched her friend in the school. She fetched her in the school. She fetched her She fetched her

PP

in the school. there. Pro- PP

Pro- VP

Joyce fetched her friend in the school. Yes, she did.

ELLIPSIS or ANSWER FRAGMENT - Tests the possibility of the omitted constituents - Predominantly applied to predicates

[x y z]

[ x y ___ ]

Rahul went to the market. Where did Rahul go? Answer: to the market.

He ate two red apples. What did he eat? Answer: two red apples.

LABELED TREE DIAGRAMS AND RELATIONSHIPS WITHIN THE TREE • It is more common to use labeled brackets or labeled tree diagrams. [PP [P down] [NP this road] ]

[PP [P down] [NP This road] ] • It is more common to use labeled brackets or labeled tree diagrams. • [PP [P down] [NP this road] ] PP P down

PP NP

P

this road down

NP D

N

this

road

– Branches – Category labels

– Node Phrasal nodes Lexical nodes

Words – – – – –

Immediately dominates Mother Daughters Dominates A set of elements forms a constituent in a tree diagram if and only if there is a single node that dominates just these elements, and no other items.

A

B d e

C F | g

H i

j

SOURCES: http://languagelinguistics.com/2014/10/10/constituency-tests-in-syntax-linguistics/ http://www.sfu.ca/~hedberg/222_Ch_5_07-3.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF0RgB1dZTU

More Documents from "emman leonardo"