Cyanamid Philippines Vs. Ca

  • Uploaded by: j guevarra
  • 0
  • 0
  • February 2021
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Cyanamid Philippines Vs. Ca as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 332
  • Pages: 2
Loading documents preview...
Cyanamid Philippines, Inc. vs. CA Facts: Cyanamid Philippines, Inc. is a corporation organized under the Philippine laws, a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Cyanamid Co. based in Maine, USA. It is engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products and chemicals, wholesaler of imported finished goods and an importer/ indentor. On Feb. 7, 1985, the Commissioner of Internal revenue demanded to the petitioner the payment of deficiency income tax of P119,817 for 1981. Petitioner protested the assessment. On Oct. 20, 1987, CIR refused to allow the cancellation of assessment notices. Petitioner claimed that CIR assessment representing 25% surtax on its accumulated earnings for 1981 had no legal basis because (a) petitioner accumulated its earnings and profits for reasonable business requirements to meet working capital needs; (b) being a subsidiary of American Cyanamid Company whose share of stocks are listed and traded in New York Stocks Exchange.No individual shareholder of petitioner could have evaded or prevented the imposition of individual income taxes by petitioners accumulation of earnings and profits. Court of Tax Appeals denied the petition. It said the law permits a stock corporation to set aside a portion of its retained earnings for specified purposes. In the case at bar, petitioner's purpose for accumulating its earnings does not fall within the ambit of these specified purposes. The Court ordered that Cyanamid pay the CIR representing 25% surtax on improper accumulation of profits for 1981, plus 10% surcharge and 20% annual interest from January 30, 1985 to January 30, 1987.

Issue: Whether or not petitioner is liable for the accumulated earning tax for the year 1981? Held: Sec. 25 of the old National Internal Revenue Code of 1977 discouraged tax avoidance through corporate surplus accumulation, when corporations do

not declare dividends, income taxes are not paid on the undeclared dividends received by the shareholders. The tax on improper accumulation of surplus is essentially a penalty tax designed to compel corporation to distribute earnings so that the said earnings by shareholders could, in turn, be taxed.

Related Documents

Cyanamid Philippines Vs. Ca
February 2021 0
Cang-vs-ca
January 2021 1
Zulueta Vs Ca
February 2021 0
Bernardo Vs Ca
February 2021 0
Natcher Vs Ca
March 2021 0

More Documents from "SophiaFrancescaEspinosa"