Loading documents preview...
www.steel-sci.com
SCI WEBINARS
“Serving engineers, specifiers, manufacturers and designers in every aspect of steel design since 1988”
For further details contact
+44 (0)1344 636500
@SCIsteel steel-construction-institute
SCI Course List
www.steel-sci.com/courses
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Lateral Torsional Buckling
Why free webinars? Strange times But perhaps you would consider joining the SCI…..
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
1
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
LTB A reminder of the structural mechanics • The buckling curves
A reminder of the codified verification process Use of software for Mcr Some unorthodox situations
Lateral torsional buckling
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
2
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Lateral torsional buckling
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
3
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Web stiffeners – and LTB No stiffener lateral
Web stiffeners – and LTB No stiffeners lateral
With stiffeners (no change)
AISC: “transverse stiffeners are simply along for the ride”
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
4
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Bending resistance Cross section: Mc,Rd = LTB: 𝑀
,
𝜒
𝛾 𝛾 1.0 and 𝜒 1.0 So LTB resistance is always less than cross sectional resistance
Buckling curves Cross sectional resistance
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
5
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Buckling curves Plateau (no LTB: short lengths)
LTB methods overview Three methods in BS EN 1993-1-1: Buckling curves, 6.3.2.2 & 3 • General case • Rolled sections & “Equivalent welded sections” • Simplified assessment methods, 6.3.2.4 • General method, 6.3.4
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
6
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Mcr Elastic Critical Bending Moment Required for the calculation of the nondimensional slenderness 𝜆̅
For rolled sections: 6.3.2.3
= 0.75 for rolled sections 𝜆̅ , = 0.4
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
confirmed in UK NA
7
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Calculate LT User-defined function in Excel Look-up tables in P362
Calculate LT? User-defined function in Excel Look-up tables in P362 Figure in P362
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
8
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
UK NA
Selection of curves For the special case only: Curves to be selected from Table 6.5 • But Table 6.5 is modified in the UK NA
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
9
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
UK NA
For the special case only: More resistance (optional) Modification of LT:
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
10
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
More resistance kc from Table 6.6 (or the UK NA)
Precisely the same for the standard cases
How to calculate Mcr? Spreadsheet • Download the data tables • Use “vlookup” to return section properties
M cr C1
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
π 2 EI z L2
I w L2GI T I z π 2 EI z
11
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
C1 some classic shapes
C1 for linear BMD
𝜓
smaller moment larger moment
respect the sign!
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
12
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
C1 for linear BMD C1 = 1.77 – 0.88 + 0.11 2 𝜓
May be negative if moments reverse – respect the sign!
(from New Steel Construction, Nov/Dec 2013)
C1 for varying BMD
From New Steel Construction, Dec 2013
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
13
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
C1 (if you ever need it)
How to calculate Mcr? Use software • LTBeam from CTICM • Mcr tool from steelconstruction.info
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
14
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
LTBeam
Note the uniform BMD (not UDL)
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
15
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Mcr = 111 kNm
Central point load
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
16
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Mcr = 151.4 kNm
C1
𝐶
.
1.36
“near enough!”
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
17
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Mb = 128 kNm
Blue Book
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
18
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Some observations C1 = 1 is the most conservative, and always safe The Blue Book uses the special case and uses the benefit of the f factor • The benefit of f increases as C1 increases
Some classic questions What is the effective length? The Eurocode leaves that to the designer, describing “the buckling length” BS 5950 had good advice in Table 13
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
19
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Some classic questions What are the end conditions? So-called “fork supports”
Some classic questions What about cantilevers? The Eurocode leaves that to the designer, describing “the buckling length” BS 5950 had good advice in Table 14 But why not use LTBeam?
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
20
SCI Education
Lateral Torsional Buckling
15th May 2020
But what are the conditions at the tip?
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
21
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Mcr = 190.9 kNm
Triangular BMD, C1= 1.77
Mb = 158 kNm
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
22
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
LTB Checked between restrained positions Low values of C1 are critical
C1 = 1.35 Buckling length = L
L
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
23
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
C1 = 1.77 Buckling length = 0.5L
* * 0.5L
0.33L
0.5L
*
*
*
* 0.33L
C1 = 1.0 Buckling length = 0.33L
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
0.33L C1 = 1.77 Buckling length = 0.33L
24
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Destabilising loads Usual assumption (neutral)
Destabilising load (load moves with flange)
Neutral
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
25
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Destabilising
Stabilising
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
26
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Effect of destabilising load 356 × 127 × 33, S355 5 m long, UDL (C1 = 1.13) Bottom flange, stabilising, Shear centre, neutral, Top flange, destabilising,
Mb = 77 kNm Mb = 60 kNm Mb = 46 kNm
From look-up tables 60.1 kNm – Tables assume neutral
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
27
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Destabilising loads BS 5950 increased the buckling length by a factor of 1.2 (when the compression flange is restrained) So 5 m becomes 1.2 × 5 = 6 m
From look-up tables 48.5 kNm at 1.2 × L
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
28
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Effect of destabilising load 356 × 127 × 33, S355 5 m long, UDL (C1 = 1.13)
Bottom flange, stabilising, Shear centre, neutral, Top flange, destabilising, Destabilising, BS 5950, 6m
Mb = 77 kNm Mb = 60 kNm Mb = 46 kNm Mb = 48 kNm
Beams on Padstones or similar
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
29
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Beams on Padstones or similar With some fixity at the ends (built in) BS 5950 said: • Le = 1.0L + 2D when loads are not destabilising • Le = 1.2L + 2D when loads are destabilising
356 × 171 × 45, 6 m long, UDL
Mb = 109 kNm
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
30
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
356 × 171 × 45, 6 m long, UDL On Padstones and a destabilising load Le = 1.2 × 6 + 2 × 0.35 = 7.9
Mb = 80 kNm
Eurocode calculation
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
31
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Mcr = 89.9 kNm
Mb = 85 kNm
Approximate answer was 80 kNm
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
32
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Restraints to the tension flange lateral
lateral
Less minor axis buckling of flange
Tension flange restraint
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
33
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Tension flange restraint
Tension flange restraint Mb with tension flange restraints = 110 kNm (no significant change, was 109 kNm)
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
34
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
One compression flange restraint
One compression flange restraint
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
35
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
One compression flange restraint Mb with one compression flange restraint = 223 kNm (significant change, was 109 kNm)
Really complicated? Use LTBeamN
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
36
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
LTBeamN Buckled form Ncr and Mcr
Resources Member buckling with tension flange restraint (July 2011) Getting the best out of LTBeam (May 2009) Use of LTBeamN (January 2015) LTB – additional Eurocode provisions (September 2016) A brief history of LTB (Feb & March 2016) Buckling resistance of uniform members in bending (July 2018)
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
37
Lateral Torsional Buckling
SCI Education
15th May 2020
Conclusions In LTB the shape of the BMD is important C1 = 1 is the most conservative (but can be very conservative) Beware destabilising loads Beware beams that sit on pads (and are not built in)
Next events Brittle Fracture 19 May (SCI Members) Execution to EN 1090 27 May (All)
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
38
SCI Education
Lateral Torsional Buckling
15th May 2020
SCI is the leading, independent provider of technical expertise and disseminator of best practice to the steel construction sector. We work in partnership with clients, members and industry peers to help build businesses and provide competitive advantage through the commercial application of our knowledge. We are committed to offering and promoting sustainable and environmentally responsible solutions.
©TheSteelConstructionInstitute
39