Corrective Action Report March 2013

  • Uploaded by: Jameelaa Salim
  • 0
  • 0
  • February 2021
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Corrective Action Report March 2013 as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 1,865
  • Pages: 14
Loading documents preview...
CAR Report Number:

Classification A

Corrective Action Report (CAR)

B

C

Date Opened:

Corrective Action Type: Internal - Continual Improvement

Customer Concern / Complaint

Nonconforming Product or Service Delivery or Logistics Concern Other: RMA#: CSI Containment Required:

Customer Name:

Quality Maintenance / Plant Engineering Process / ManufacturingMaterials / Delivery Tooling / Design / Product Engineering

Location: Report #: Example: PR&R, DMR, SMR, QN, SMRR, etc. Date Reported:

CSII

Health & Safety Ergonomics Environmental

Reported By:

Chemical Release Report No.:

Repeat Nonconformance

Medical Aids Report No.:

Supplier Concern / Complaint

Lost Time Report No.:

Nonconforming Product or Service Delivery or Logistics Concern Other: CSI Containment Required: Repeat Nonconformance

Preventive Action

Supplier Name: Location:

Other:

PCN Number:

CSII

Audit Concern

TS-16949 ISO-14001 HS&E Materials Human Resources

External Opportunity for Improvement Internal Associated Clause or Element Number: Minor Nonconformance Major Nonconformance Auditor(s): Repeat Nonconformance Auditee(s): Target Closure Date: Other:

(Insert photo or sketch here)

Problem or Concern Reported:

Plant / Location:

Group:

Part Number(s):

Vehicle Program:

CAR Champion:

Champion's Title:

Process Owner:

Process Owner's Title:

A CAR Project Location: Date CAR Initiated:

0

Initial CAR Project Response Date:

Business Unit PPS:

CAR Project Team Members: Establish a small group of people (5-6 maximum) with the process/product knowledge, allocate time, authority, and skill in the required disciplines to solve the concern or problem and implement corrective actions.

Name:

Title:

1 2 3 4 5 6

External Contacts: 1. Name:

Title:

Tel.:

Email:

Fax.:

2. Name:

Title:

Company:

Tel.:

Email:

Fax.:

WGW-QUA-F-002 3/20/13

Company:

Page #1

Corrective Action Report

CAR Report No.:

Interim Containment Action Plan

#REF!

*WGW-QUA-F-050 Action Plan may be used as an alternative tool

Interim Containment Action(s):*

Owner:

Description of Communication Plan

Date Implemented

Verified By

Owner

Date Implemented

Description of Exit Criteria:

Review of PFMEA

Review of Inspection Procedure

Review of Control Plan

Review of Error Proofing

Define and implement containment and/or short term corrective actions to isolate the effect of the concern or problem from the Customer until permanent resolution and long term actions have been implemented. Verify the effectiveness of the containment actions. Initial response to the Customer must occur within 24 hours

Page #2 #REF!

Note: "Why Shipped?" Cause & Effect Diagram below -- scroll down

CAUSE & EFFECT DIAGRAM

CAR No.

#REF!

HIGHLIGHT PRINCIPLE CAUSES TO BE ADDRESSED

WHY PRODUCED/WHY DID IT OCCUR? Potential Root Cause(s) that Created Problem MACHINE

METHOD

MATERIAL

PROBLEM STATEMENT (Effect)

CAUSE & EFFECT DIAGRAM

CAR No.

#REF!

HIGHLIGHT PRINCIPLE CAUSES TO BE ADDRESSED

PEOPLE

MEASUREMENT

ENVIRONMENT

CAUSE & EFFECT DIAGRAM

CAR No.

#REF!

HIGHLIGHT PRINCIPLE CAUSES TO BE ADDRESSED

WHY SHIPPED? Potential Cause(s) that Allowed the Problem to Escape MACHINE

METHOD

MATERIAL

PROBLEM STATEMENT (Effect)

0

CAUSE & EFFECT DIAGRAM

CAR No.

#REF!

HIGHLIGHT PRINCIPLE CAUSES TO BE ADDRESSED PEOPLE #REF!

MEASUREMENT

ENVIRONMENT

Page #3

Corrective Action Report Drill Deep - 5 Why Root Cause

CAR Report No.:

#REF!

Problem or Concern Statement: 0

Why did the planning process not predict the severity correctly?

P1 Why?

P2 Why?

P3 Why?

P4 Why?

Prc: Severity Root Cause M1 Why did the manufacturing process not prevent the occurrence?

Why?

M2 Why?

M3 Why?

M4 Why?

Mrc: Occurrence Root Cause Q1 Why did the Quality process not detect the defect to protect the Customer?

Why?

Q2 Why?

Q3 Why?

Q4 Why?

Qrc: Detection Root Cause Page #4 #REF!

Corrective Action Report Drill Deep Worksheet

CAR Report No.:

#REF!

Plant:

0

Group:

0

Customer:

0

Location:

0

Part No.:

0

Program:

0

Implementation of Corrective Action

5 Whys

Corrective Action

Owner

Due Date

PREDICT THE SEVERITY P1

0

P2

0

Predict

P3

0

Planning process informational content in FMEAs and CPs

P4

0

P-RC

0

M1

0

M2

0

M3

0

M4

0

M-RC

0

Q1

0

Q2

0

Protect

Q3

0

Quality process detection & responsiveness

Q4

0

Q-RC

0

Why did the planning process not PREDICT the defect or concern?

Why did the manufacturing process not PREVENT the defect or concern?

Prevent Manufacturing process standardized work and error proofing

Why did the quality process not PROTECT the Customer?

K1 K2 Key findings from this 5-Why analysis?

K3 K4

RC = Root Cause

K5

Page #5

Action Plan For: CAR No.:

#REF!

Revision Date:

Revised By:

Date Reviewed: Date Reviewed: Date Reviewed:

Date Reviewed: Date Reviewed: Date Reviewed:

Issue Identified 25% Action Plan Identified 50% Actions Implemented 75% Success Confirmed 100%

Ongoing Closed Action Needs attention before it becomes critical Overdue/Critical

Current Condition and Expected Outcome: Seq. #

TRACKING OR WHAT IS AFFECTED? REFERENCE NUMBER (see pop up comment)

DATE ISSUED

NONCONFORMANCE

RESPONSIBLE OWNER

ACTION(S) TO BE TAKEN

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 #REF!

TARGET COMPLETION DATE

ACTUAL COMPLETION DATE

COMMENTS

STATUS COMPLETED (%)

Corrective Action Closing CAR Project Verification

#REF!

CAR Report No.:

Documents Updated: PFMEA

Control Plan

Process Flow

N/A

Procedure(s): Work Instruction(s): Form(s): Other: Error Proofing Implemented?

Yes

No

N/A

Is Corrective Action Effective?

Yes

No

N/A

Is Further Action Required?

Yes

No

Been addressed as Lessons Learned?

Yes

No

N/A

Verified By: Title: Date: Verification Steps/Comments:

CAR Project Completion Date: Closed By: MR / Auditor Approval (optional):

Date:

CARs for External Submission CAR sent to Customer Representative:

0

Date completed CAR sent to Customer: CAR Delivered via:

Congratulate the TEAM

Recognize the collective efforts of the team. Page #7 #REF!

8D Response Report Customer/Company:

Woodbridge 8D No.:

Cust/Ext Assigned#:

8D Initiator:

Cust/Comp Location:

Date Open:

Cust/Comp Part #:

Initial Response Date: Target Close Date:

Vehicle / Program:

INTERNAL

or

D1 TEAM MEMBER NAMES/TITLES: Champion:

EXTERNAL

Actual Close Date:

Team Leader: Team Members: D2 PROBLEM STATEMENT/DESCRIPTION (quantify, one defect per 8D)

D3 CHOOSE AND VERIFY INTERIM CONTAINMENT ACTION(S) (ICA):

% Effective

(Consider: customer site/warehouse, in transit, WFC warehouse/on line/lab/hold, etc. Note how product and/or packaging will show containment activity has been completed.)

D4 DEFINE AND VERIFY ROOT CAUSE(S):

Date Implemented

Verified By

% Contribution

EXPOSURE / IMPACT ANALYSIS, ARE SIMILAR PRODUCTS / PROCESSES EXPOSED TO THIS FAILURE MODE OR IMPACTED BY THIS ROOT CAUSE?

Yes:

No:

IF YES, AFFECTED TEAM NOTIFIED:

D5 CHOOSE AND VERIFY PERMANENT CORRECTIVE ACTION(S) (PCA):

% Effective

HAS ERROR PROOFING BEEN IMPLEMENTED THROUGH THESE CAs?

Yes:

No:

IF NO, EXPLANATION OF ERROR PROOFING CONSIDERATION:

D6 IMPLEMENT AND VALIDATE PERMANENT CORRECTIVE ACTION(S) (PCA):

D7 SYSTEM PREVENTION ACTIONS TO PREVENT RECURRENCE: How are you going to ensure it can't happen again?

Mistake Proofing:

Target Date

Actual Date

Target Date

Actual Date

HAS CORRECTIVE ACTION/IMPLEMENTATION BEEN REVIEWED AGAINST DOCUMENTS / PROCESSES?: Check boxes that apply:

Control Plan FMEA Process Flow Map/Proc./Work Instr./Form Preventive/Predictive Maintenance Other: Set-Up Process/Instructions Add to Internal Audit Calibration Tooling/Gaging

D8 TEAM AND INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION: Recognize the collective efforts of the team.

Internal Auditor's comments to validate this CAR:

Name/Sign: ______________________________________________

Date: ___________________

All initial 8D's and revisions must be sent to appropriate personnel for review prior to sending to the internal/external customer within required timing. WGW-QUA-F-002 3/20/13

#REF!

Note: This PDCA Worksheet may be used in place of and to combine the Interim Containment Actions, Drill Deep Form and Permanent Corrective Actions together. Initiatives (Corrective Actions) for the individual 5 Whys determined for the "P's" (Planning), "M's" (Manufacturing) and "Q's" (Quality) are to be listed on this form as they would have been in the Drill Deep form.

Status / Legend R

- Late

Y G

- Maybe Late - Completed

ACTION PLAN:

Plant:

ROOT CAUSE STATEMENT:

Department:

IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITY:

Champion:

BIC INDICATOR AFFECTED:

Date Revised:

PLAN

DO

CHECK Schedule Task Timing

Status

#REF!

CAR #:

PDCA Worksheet

Item

Initiative

Task

Resp.

Date Opened

PDCA ITEMS

Target Date

Reviewed by: Close Date

Date

Base

Total Measured Improvement:

Open PDCA Tasks

Total

Comp.

Percent Completion

Red

Yellow

Green

Not Due

0

0

#DIV/0!

0

0

0

0

#REF!

Who

ACTIONS EFFECTIVE?

MEASUREMENT Projected

Actual

Yes/No

HS&E NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT (NCR) LOCATION:

NCR #

ELEMENT UNDER REVIEW:

Name of location being audited

RISK

AUDIT DATE

Indicate Audit Element under review REFERENCE: Identify Applicable Plant Procedure

MAJOR

MINOR

o

# of Audit subelement

Date Audit performed

AUDITOR:

Person performing audit of the element

AUDITEE:

Person responsible at Plant

NON-CONFORMANCE DESCRIPTION: Auditor to complete this section Identify the objective evidence the auditor observed

AUDIT ELEMENT REQUIREMENT: Auditor to complete this section Identify what is expected

Response due to Auditor by:

Date agreed to by the auditor & auditee to have decided what the corrective action is to be.

ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS:

To be completed by auditee. List the root causes that led to the Non-Conformance.

CORRECTIVE ACTION:

To be completed by auditee. What steps are to be taken to fix the problem.

Submission Date:

Submitted By:

When corrective action submitted to auditor

Who submitted corrctive action

Implementation Target Date. When corrective action is to be completed

CORRECTIVE ACTION COMPLETED AND IMPLEMENTED SATISFACTORILY Signed for Closure date comments Comments on completness or objective evidence of corrective action go here.

Site Manager: Signed by site manager when corrective action complete

Auditor: Signed by auditor when corrective action complete #REF!

Corrective Action Numbering System CAR Numbering System Requirments - External External Cars shall be numbered using "CAR" plus "Plant Code"-"Calendar Year"-"Sequential Report Number"

Example:

CAR CAR TRO 04 001

TRO - 04 - 001 - abbreviation for "Corrective Action Report" - Woodbridge Plant/Location Code - example "TRO" is Troy - Calendar Year - example 04 is 2004 - Sequential Report Number - example 001 is the first CAR issued in 2004 - 001, 002, 003…etc.

ALERT Numbering System Requirments Note:

Alert numbers shall use the CAR's location code, calendar year and sequential report number. The Alert for the CAR example above would be numbered: TRO-04-001

CAR Numbering System Requirments - Internal Internal CARs shall be numbered using the "Plant Code"-"Department Code"-"Calendar Year"-"Sequential Report Number" Example: TRO-QUA-04-001 Troy - Quality department - 2004 - first CAR report for calendar year.

Woodbridge Plant/Location Codes Plant / Location

Plant Code

Plant Code

Plant / Location

ADD ADL ATL AUB BDF BLN BRD BRP BTM CPV CHT CAM DLR ELP EXS FRL FRM GRA KNS KCS LEO MLB MNC MRV MSS MXC

Addison Adelaide Atlanta Auburn Hills Bedford Blenheim Brodhead Brampton Betim Cacapava Chattanooga Camacari Del Rio El Paso Enerflex Solutions Fairless Hills Fremont Grand Rapids Kansas City Kansas City Sequencing Leon Melbourne Manchester Morval/Kitchener Mississauga Mexico City

PIL RML SBC SLT SLL SPL SAR STP TLB TEX TRO WHB WHM CQL WBN KPL KPS WBS KP3 KP5 KP6

Pilar Romulus Sao Bernardo Saltillo Molded Saltillo Lamination Sao Paulo Sarnia/Corunna St. Peters Tilbury Molded Tilbury Enerflex Troy Whitby Whitmore Lake Woodbridge Corporate Lab Woodbridge North (Kipling) Kipling - Lamination Kipling - Slab Woodbridge South (Kipling) Kipling 093 Kipling 095 Kipling 096

Department or Function Codes Assembly & Sequencing Corporate Lab Corporate R&D Data Management Design Engineering Development Matrix Engineering Finance Human Resources Health, Safety and Environmental Information Technology Plant Lab Legal Logistics Maintenance

ASQ CQL CRD DAT DES DVM ENG FIN HRS HSE ITS LAB LGL LOG MNT

Management Marketing Materials Office Services PECT Process Product Development Production Purchasing Purchasing Engineering Quality Sales/ Account Administration Technical Services Group Tooling

#REF!

MGT MKT MTL OSV PCT PRO PDV PRD PUR PEN QUA SAL TSG TLG

Related Documents


More Documents from "Aldrin Paguirigan"