Ldm 2 For Teachers - Module 5 Lesson 2.pptx
This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA
Overview
Download & View Ldm 2 For Teachers - Module 5 Lesson 2.pptx as PDF for free.
More details
- Words: 925
- Pages: 14
Loading documents preview...
Lesson 2: EVALUATION RUBRIC
This section will present the criteria and the indicators for evaluating your PORTFOLIO. By the end of this lesson, you should be able to 1. explain the criteria and its specific indicators found in the Evaluation Rubric 2. list down your steps and plan of action to make your portfolio responsive to the rubric. Key Topics/Concepts evaluation rubric; LDM implementation; portfolio Resources Required - Evaluation Rubric - Study Notebook
CRITERIA AND INDICATORS IN EVALUATING PORTFOLIO
CRITE RIA
Demonstration of Professional Standards 20%
CRITE RIA
Language and Overall Presentation of the Outputs 15%
CRITERIA CRITERIA
CRITE Organization of Portfolio RIA 5%
CRITE Timeliness 5% RIA
CRITE RIA
Demonstration of Progress of the LDM Implementation 30%
CRITE Quality of Reflection RIA 25%
NO. 1 DEMONSTRATION OF PROGRESS OF PROVISION OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE LDM IMPLEMENTATION (30%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
SATISFACTORY (3)
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The outputs clearly and adequately captured the progress of the provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads, showing innovations that contribute to effective facilitation of learning
The outputs adequately captured the progress of the provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads
The outputs reflect to a big extent the progress of the provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads
The outputs reflect to a limited extent the progress of the provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads
The outputs do not show the progress of provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads
N0. 2 QUALITY OF REFLECTION (25%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
SATISFACTORY (3)
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
Reflection describes the experience in the provision of technical assistance/ coaching, shows in-depth analysis and synthesis, and excellently relates it to the professional standards and to professional and personal development goals
Reflection describes the experience in the provision of technical assistance, shows some analysis, and relates it to the professional standards and to professional and personal development goals
Reflection describes the experience in the provision of technical assistance and relates them to the professional standards and personal development goals
Reflection describes the experience in the provision of technical assistance with limited attempt to relate it to the professional standards and personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in the provision of technical assistance with no attempt to relate it to the professional standards and personal development goals
NO. 3 DEMONSTRATION OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS (20%) EXCELLENT (5)
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 or more indicators of relevant strands in professional standards
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 indicators of relevant strands in professional standards
SATISFACTORY (3)
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 indicators of relevant strands in professional standards
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The outputs clearly demonstrate the 2 indicators of relevant strands in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate any indicator in the professional standards
NO. 4 LANGUAGE AND OVERALL PRESENTATION OF THE OUTPUT (15%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
SATISFACTORY (3)
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The ideas are expressed in clear, coherent, and appropriatelyworded language with no errors in structure and/or writing conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear language with very minimal errors in structure and/or writing conventions
The ideas are expressed well but with incoherence in some areas and few errors in structure and/or writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using very basic words and structure with incoherence in many areas and several errors in structure and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult to understand; errors in structure and writing conventions are found almost everywhere in the output
NO. 5 ORGANIZATION OF PORTFOLIO (5%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
The portfolio The portfolio is logically is logically organized, is organized insightful and offers new perspective and insights
SATISFACTORY (3)
The portfolio is generally wellorganized with 1-2 items not well placed in the overall organization
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The portfolio The portfolio has 3-4 does not follow items not a logical order well placed in the overall organization
NO. 6 TIMELINESS (5%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
The output/s is/are submitted more than 3 days ahead of the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted 12 days before the deadline
SATISFACTORY (3)
The output/s is/are submitted on the day of the deadline
MARGINAL (2)
The output/s is/are submitted 1-3 days after the deadline
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The output/s is/are submitted more than 3 days after the deadline
Study the criteria and the indicators found in the LDM2 Coaches Evaluation Rubric. What steps will you take to ensure that you are able to hit the criteria in the rubric? Write your answers and other insights about the rubric in your Study Notebook.
Discuss and share your thoughts on the rubric in your next LAC session. Present your steps to make your outputs and Portfolio responsive to the evaluation criteria and indicators. Take note of useful insights and comments from your colleagues.
As a final reminder, make sure that you properly document evidence of your LDM TA provision to teachers and school leaders in relation to effective facilitation of learning in the new delivery modalities. At the end of the year, you will submit your Portfolio to your LAC Leader, who will announce the specific date and manner of submission. Congratulations! You have completed the LDM 2 Course. Good luck on your LDM implementation, Coach!
Always remember the 5 Ps Prior Preparation Prevents Poor PERFORMANCE
This section will present the criteria and the indicators for evaluating your PORTFOLIO. By the end of this lesson, you should be able to 1. explain the criteria and its specific indicators found in the Evaluation Rubric 2. list down your steps and plan of action to make your portfolio responsive to the rubric. Key Topics/Concepts evaluation rubric; LDM implementation; portfolio Resources Required - Evaluation Rubric - Study Notebook
CRITERIA AND INDICATORS IN EVALUATING PORTFOLIO
CRITE RIA
Demonstration of Professional Standards 20%
CRITE RIA
Language and Overall Presentation of the Outputs 15%
CRITERIA CRITERIA
CRITE Organization of Portfolio RIA 5%
CRITE Timeliness 5% RIA
CRITE RIA
Demonstration of Progress of the LDM Implementation 30%
CRITE Quality of Reflection RIA 25%
NO. 1 DEMONSTRATION OF PROGRESS OF PROVISION OF TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE LDM IMPLEMENTATION (30%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
SATISFACTORY (3)
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The outputs clearly and adequately captured the progress of the provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads, showing innovations that contribute to effective facilitation of learning
The outputs adequately captured the progress of the provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads
The outputs reflect to a big extent the progress of the provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads
The outputs reflect to a limited extent the progress of the provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads
The outputs do not show the progress of provision of technical assistance on instruction in the modalities provided to teachers and school heads
N0. 2 QUALITY OF REFLECTION (25%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
SATISFACTORY (3)
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
Reflection describes the experience in the provision of technical assistance/ coaching, shows in-depth analysis and synthesis, and excellently relates it to the professional standards and to professional and personal development goals
Reflection describes the experience in the provision of technical assistance, shows some analysis, and relates it to the professional standards and to professional and personal development goals
Reflection describes the experience in the provision of technical assistance and relates them to the professional standards and personal development goals
Reflection describes the experience in the provision of technical assistance with limited attempt to relate it to the professional standards and personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in the provision of technical assistance with no attempt to relate it to the professional standards and personal development goals
NO. 3 DEMONSTRATION OF PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS (20%) EXCELLENT (5)
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 or more indicators of relevant strands in professional standards
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 indicators of relevant strands in professional standards
SATISFACTORY (3)
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 indicators of relevant strands in professional standards
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The outputs clearly demonstrate the 2 indicators of relevant strands in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate any indicator in the professional standards
NO. 4 LANGUAGE AND OVERALL PRESENTATION OF THE OUTPUT (15%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
SATISFACTORY (3)
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The ideas are expressed in clear, coherent, and appropriatelyworded language with no errors in structure and/or writing conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear language with very minimal errors in structure and/or writing conventions
The ideas are expressed well but with incoherence in some areas and few errors in structure and/or writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using very basic words and structure with incoherence in many areas and several errors in structure and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult to understand; errors in structure and writing conventions are found almost everywhere in the output
NO. 5 ORGANIZATION OF PORTFOLIO (5%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
The portfolio The portfolio is logically is logically organized, is organized insightful and offers new perspective and insights
SATISFACTORY (3)
The portfolio is generally wellorganized with 1-2 items not well placed in the overall organization
MARGINAL (2)
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The portfolio The portfolio has 3-4 does not follow items not a logical order well placed in the overall organization
NO. 6 TIMELINESS (5%) EXCELLENT (5)
VERY SATISFACTORY (4)
The output/s is/are submitted more than 3 days ahead of the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted 12 days before the deadline
SATISFACTORY (3)
The output/s is/are submitted on the day of the deadline
MARGINAL (2)
The output/s is/are submitted 1-3 days after the deadline
UNSATISFACTORY (1)
The output/s is/are submitted more than 3 days after the deadline
Study the criteria and the indicators found in the LDM2 Coaches Evaluation Rubric. What steps will you take to ensure that you are able to hit the criteria in the rubric? Write your answers and other insights about the rubric in your Study Notebook.
Discuss and share your thoughts on the rubric in your next LAC session. Present your steps to make your outputs and Portfolio responsive to the evaluation criteria and indicators. Take note of useful insights and comments from your colleagues.
As a final reminder, make sure that you properly document evidence of your LDM TA provision to teachers and school leaders in relation to effective facilitation of learning in the new delivery modalities. At the end of the year, you will submit your Portfolio to your LAC Leader, who will announce the specific date and manner of submission. Congratulations! You have completed the LDM 2 Course. Good luck on your LDM implementation, Coach!
Always remember the 5 Ps Prior Preparation Prevents Poor PERFORMANCE
Related Documents
Ldm 2 For Teachers - Module 5 Lesson 2.pptx
February 2021 0
Module-3-lesson-2
February 2021 2
Lesson 2 Chapter 5-2
March 2021 0
Eapp-quarter-2-module-5
February 2021 1
169758984-cecil-module-2-lesson-17.pdf
January 2021 1More Documents from "bulentbulut"