Social Desirables

  • Uploaded by: Ronix Ong
  • 0
  • 0
  • February 2021
  • PDF

This document was uploaded by user and they confirmed that they have the permission to share it. If you are author or own the copyright of this book, please report to us by using this DMCA report form. Report DMCA


Overview

Download & View Social Desirables as PDF for free.

More details

  • Words: 880
  • Pages: 13
Loading documents preview...
Social Desirables

The meaning and Characteristic of Social Desarible • Socail Desaribles Are factors that affect social stratification. A social hierarchy exists because of the unequal distribution of social desirables property, power , and prestige in a society where the larger population of financially challenged individuals have less social desirables than thae smaller group of rich people. • The following describes each social desirable: • Property income producing assets that people own. • Power the capacity to influence individuals or activities to achieve wealth and prestige. • Prestige an individuals status among his peers in society.

Social and Political Stratification • The dictionary defines stratification as something That has been arranged into categories. Social Stratification refers to the kind and degree of distribution of resources within a social system. Example: wealth, status, prestige, and previlege Political Stratification is best explained as the extent to which such inequalities are enclosed in , or influenced by, political structures and processes. Example: involving influence, authority, or power.

These three factors dictate one’s place in society. Ideally, the greater social desirable a person has donates a higher position in society. Because social desirables come hand in hand, more top class people become well-known and influecial in society and,as such, are treated with greater care and professionism. Examples: - Service quality in high-end restaurants significally differ from casual dining venues. - In significant societal functions, good seats are usually reserved for high ranking individuals. - People quickly follow trends set by powerful and

The Role of Social Desirables in a Functionist Perspective • In a functionist society, all social elements are seen as contributing factors in reaching social equllibruim and balance. • Social desirable serve as rewards for fulfilling certain social goals • Inequality is seen as universal and, therfore, allows unequal distribution of power,prestige,and property without disrupting the social structure. • The most important position in society are rewarded the most.

The Role of Social Desirables in a comflict Perspective • A comflict perspective views the attainment of social desirables as a constant competition for scarce resources. • Inequality greatly exists in a society that drives people to complete for resources, resulting to social change and continuous comflict. • People with social desirables are given more importance and priority than ordinary workers and imdividuals. • Social desirables dictate how one should be treated in a society of inequality.

Social Mobility and its System

• Social MobIlity is the movement of individuals or groups from one social status to another. A movement may be vertical going up or down the social hierarchy, or horizontal simply changing a social role within the same social class. Oftentimes,social status is seen as mainly dependent upon socioeconomic factors like power,prestige,and wealth. However, in some cases, status is determined by cultural or spiritual norms. These variations only specify that social mobility my also involve systems that of generational factors. • Social mobility may also be looked into in terms of generalazition factors. • An intragenerational mobility specifies the vertical or horizontal movement of one’s lifespan. A man who was poor as a child but became rich as an adult is an

• On the other hand, intergenerational mobility refers to the movement of social status across several generation. In this case, a man may be able to live a high status, lavish life because of the handwork of his poor grandparents a blue-collared workers and the perseverance of his middle-class parents to finish a college degree, eventually uplifting the financial status of their family and allowing their children to live better lives.

Meaning and types of Social Mobility System A social mobility system may be an open or closed system. As expected, an open system is less constrictive compared to a closed one. Below are their descriptions. Open System - this composed of achieved statuses where social status is gained trough merit or effort. - Its member have access to different resources depending upon their social status. - No formal restriction on marriage across classes is emphasized - Social mobility is impossible.

Example: class system

Close System - This is composed of ascribed statuses where societal membership is defined upon or proir to birth. - Its members strictly follow spiritual and cultural norms as a way of life. - Mobility from one group to another is not possible. - Decision making is also based on cultural and ispiritual norms. - At present, it is greatly implemented in some parts of india. Example: caste system

Social Mobility System: Functionalist and Conflict Perspective Social stratification involves various perspective such as the functionalist and conflict points of view. In a functionalist view of stratification, all factors involved within the social structure are seen as functional aspects that maintain social balance and equilibruim. Meanwhile, a conflict perspective of stratification implies that society in in constant conflict, especially with the distribution of resources, due to the existance of inequality where higher-ranking people are given proirity and importance than lower ones.

Social Inequality and the Social Mobility System Inequality between open and closed systems must be seen as different in terms of underlying factors. Inequalities in an open system would involve socioeconomic concerns. Meanwhile, Inequalities in a closed system may involve power and cultural relations. Responding to such inequalities in a closed system would be relatively.

Related Documents

Social Desirables
February 2021 0
Ligue Social
January 2021 1
Influencia Social
January 2021 1
Social Housing
January 2021 1

More Documents from "Jennalyn Casapao"

Social Desirables
February 2021 0
Chapter 12
January 2021 1
Vp44 Electronic Inj Pump2
January 2021 2
Onscreenb2p
January 2021 1
Solutions Of Tutorial 12
January 2021 0